Sep 14, 2015

Why Wasn't This Depicted in "Fraiser"?: Black People Kill One Another in Seattle with a Ferocity Usually Reserved for Majority Black Cities

via Stuff Black People Don't Like

Where I grew up in the 1990s, we played kick-the-can and Capture the Flag through entire neighborhoods late, late into the summer night. Trick-or-treating would be an all-night affair, with walkies-talkies utilized to locate the houses where homeowners had left out a "please take one" sign and a seemingly limitless supply of candy in a cauldron: like army ants we'd seize upon the unsuspecting house and quickly scavenge all unattended candy without a moments hesitation.

Such was the joy of life growing up in a city resembling exactly what the USA could have been.  What it once was... the only crimes were taking one to many pieces of candy from the "please take one" displays left out by homeowners far too lazy to stay in for the night on Halloween.

Back in those halcyon days, my parents inadvertently rented Sleepless in Seattle for me and some friends for a sleepover.

Big mistake for a bunch of 11-year-old kids to be watching such a silly movie, hopped up on Coca Cola and Pizza Hut...

Well, let's just say nothing like the type of animalistic behavior found in current Seattle ever occurred...[Seattle’s black community reels from killings of young men, Seattle Times, 9-13-15]:
The first killing that touched Leoma James happened in March.
Robert Robinson Jr. was the little brother of a close friend. He was 17, a Cleveland High senior, and gunned down in the middle of the afternoon on Beacon Hill. James, 20, drove back from Pullman, where she attends Washington State University, to be at the funeral.

In July, Reese Ali, 21, who had gone to school with James at St. Therese Catholic Academy, was found dead in an idling car in Renton. His death laid her low. “I couldn’t even go to the funeral,” she said.

A month later, a friend, 24-year-old Antonio Lamarr Jones, was fatally shot while walking his grandmother’s dog in the Central Area.
“Honestly, the thing that bothers me the most is that nobody has really had the opportunity to heal,” James said. “It’s been one death right after another.”
The Seattle Police Department confirms 2015 has been marked by an eruption of gunfire. By mid-August, the department had recorded 252 shots fired — a 30 percent increase over the same period last year. As of Friday, 11 people have died in Seattle, with more killed in surrounding areas, such as Renton, Kent and Skyway.
Most have been young black men. And so the trauma has hit especially hard among African Americans, some of whom, like James, are personally connected to several victims. They are caught in a state of perpetual grief and fear, wondering who will be next and, in turn, making adjustments, big and small, to their lives.
James, for instance, stayed in Pullman for the summer at the urging of her father, who felt it was unsafe for her to come back to Seattle. His point was made when James came home for the July Fourth holiday and went to a party on Westlake Avenue North that was punctuated by a shooting. Among a crowd of some 100 people, including a number of WSU students, “everyone hit the ground,” she said, and stayed there until police arrived.
On Aug. 25, police unveiled a strategy to deal with the violence, including daily internal briefings and weekly meetings with federal agencies and police departments in neighboring areas. But some of those most affected believe, as James put it: “We need to take it into our own hands to save our community.”

First, people have to acknowledge the carnage.
That was the point the college student’s father, a longtime activist named Charlie James, was making as he stood outside City Hall one recent Thursday with a “Black Lives Matter” banner. He began to affixpictures he had accumulated of local black men killed in the last two years. When he was done, 10 young men appeared on the banner — some mugging for the camera, some serious, some in T-shirts, one in a coat and tie. Robinson, the Cleveland student, wore a hoodie and smiled widely; behind him was the telltale blue background of a school photo.

On a piece of paper, Charlie James had written the names of 13 other young men whose photos he still hoped to get.

Only a handful of people turned up for what the activist, best known for his role in creating Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Park, hoped would be a show of support for stopping the violence and an idea he was trumpeting to form a regional organization devoted to helping black youth. Among those who came, though, were people searching just as fervently for answers.
 If Seattle didn't have any blacks, would the city have any homicides or nonfatal shootings? At only 8 percent black, the city of Seattle has a problem with black homicides precisely because the urban chaos of killings in the city is committed by black people.

This wasn't something shown in Sleepless in Seattle, nor was the threat of black people something my parents warned my friends or myself about as we went out trick-or-treating or playing capture the flag late at night when I grew up.n the matter of People v. Demarryous Johnson on the charges of murder, the jury could not reach a verdict. I declare a mistrial.”
>Prosecutor squints but knows another trial will loom<
>Victim’s family is in tears, “But they had video showing him shooting my brother!”<
>Outside courtroom #BlackLivesMatter protesters cheer and hug just one black juror<
>Media, and nation, goes nuts<
How long is it until #BlackLivesMatter finds its way into jury boxes? This is not a question of if, but of when. It’s all fun and games for Boomer whites, progressives, and politically-oriented secular Jews to look at #BlackLivesMatter and think of MLK, the Civil Rights crusade, Freedom Riders, and Selma. This is why the chants for dead cops, chants for dead non-blacks, and explicitly anti-white imagery and statements are glossed over by progressive whites. Do not show the monster Soros and social justice academics created. It will all end okay.
Take #BlackLivesMatter (BLM) to its logical conclusion. They do not want police in their neighborhoods. The supposed system oppresses blacks, not the actual, progressive-controlled system that needs blacks for justification of their rule and therefore gives them benefits and perks in the legal code. These invisible grievances from a long gone system build up, forcing blacks to commit crime. Why, oh why, should the justice system send more black men (and women) to jail for killing, due to evil, white thoughts and microaggressions? It might not be outright nullifications, which would mean acquittals, but it may mean more hung juries. With municipal budgets tight, this might mean more deals between prosecutors and criminals. “Take the 25, you’ll be out in 18, it won’t be a life sentence.”
This would be a travesty and another mile marker on America’s path to dissolution. Will these instances be reported? If the media can suppress crime patterns now, a few of these stories would be easy. The fear is a higher profile case, not Zimmerman-Martin level, but at least high enough profile that a metro paper would cover it, and it could blow up. Another problem is as the media dies out and alternative media rises, keeping a lid on this will not be possible. A George Zimmerman is probably murdered in his jail cell if not for the alternative media from outlets like PJMedia and Takis to bodybuilding forums.
The real problem is political. The Left has no figure to stop this madness. Presidential candidates are apologizing for saying “White lives matter” and even “All lives matter”. Senator Bernie Sanders cowers and shrinks from BLM protesters at his own presidential campaign stops, even though he was an old Civil Rights veteran. Any type of leadership on the Left could snuff this out, and stop the lunacy while still keeping blacks engaged at the ballot box for the Left’s benefit. The problem is the broad Left is like a blob, in that is has no shape, no head, and no directive, except to consume and spread for more control. Stopping BLM would also crimp the social justice warrior racket that is a decent export, not just in actual warriors, but of fellow travelers that want to signal they are hip. The Left would then reveal the hollowness of people power, as the Left does not want pure people power, no matter how much they say they do.
If jury oddities start and cannot be avoided, then what comes next? A proper discussion would simply call for an end to the BLM movement and call for the rule of law. That would destroy the Left’s grievance industry and the ever increasing offenses that justify retribution and social justice. It will not happen unless the dead bodies are well-to-do white leftists, but even then, we cannot be sure. Physically removing populations and creating segregated autonomous political districts are nonstarters but a fix.
The false choice will be an option of the Russian roulette of keeping trial by jury, which will only become more of a farce as other ethnicities catch on to the BLM nullification game, or ending trial by jury. Ending trial by jury will be palatable because it would then be a judge or series of judges reviewing cases. They can invoke the traditions of the West, while saying they will weigh social justice concerns. This fits the progressive preference for credentialed, politically indoctrinated experts who will be unaccountable in determining important matters. These judges will all go through our legal education system, which the progressives control. If immigrants can get away with slaps on the wrist in Europe from judges for rape, robbery, and assault, imagine the oddities a judge could dole out with the social justice stamp of approval.
The media will spotlight horror stories of juries gone wild. The great informed middle will accept this removal of an institution as a protection for them. “Singapore does it and Singapore has low crime,” will be the Fox News pitch. The system will also have many more years in the rearview mirror of pushing the microaggression and group grievance tricks on ever more diverse Americans. America must progress! Institutions as historic in the Anglo-Saxon mold as the trial by jury that lasted for centuries and before that were celebrated in Greek plays like The Eumenides will be scrapped–all for the goal of forcing universal beliefs, equality, and social justice on a multicultural, polyglot society. Long gone will be a jury of your peers.
In their place will be the commissars, whom the media will say are experts and can be trusted. They will be trained in the finest law schools, all controlled by the Left. Trust them but beware. They might just sentence a criminal to time served and probation for killing your mom because she was a huge fan of Seinfeld… after he was deemed “problematic”.
- See more at: http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/09/13/where-does-blacklivesmatter-go/#sthash.wPY9UVEZ.dpu
“In the matter of People v. Demarryous Johnson on the charges of murder, the jury could not reach a verdict. I declare a mistrial.”
>Prosecutor squints but knows another trial will loom<
>Victim’s family is in tears, “But they had video showing him shooting my brother!”<
>Outside courtroom #BlackLivesMatter protesters cheer and hug just one black juror<
>Media, and nation, goes nuts<
How long is it until #BlackLivesMatter finds its way into jury boxes? This is not a question of if, but of when. It’s all fun and games for Boomer whites, progressives, and politically-oriented secular Jews to look at #BlackLivesMatter and think of MLK, the Civil Rights crusade, Freedom Riders, and Selma. This is why the chants for dead cops, chants for dead non-blacks, and explicitly anti-white imagery and statements are glossed over by progressive whites. Do not show the monster Soros and social justice academics created. It will all end okay.
Take #BlackLivesMatter (BLM) to its logical conclusion. They do not want police in their neighborhoods. The supposed system oppresses blacks, not the actual, progressive-controlled system that needs blacks for justification of their rule and therefore gives them benefits and perks in the legal code. These invisible grievances from a long gone system build up, forcing blacks to commit crime. Why, oh why, should the justice system send more black men (and women) to jail for killing, due to evil, white thoughts and microaggressions? It might not be outright nullifications, which would mean acquittals, but it may mean more hung juries. With municipal budgets tight, this might mean more deals between prosecutors and criminals. “Take the 25, you’ll be out in 18, it won’t be a life sentence.”
This would be a travesty and another mile marker on America’s path to dissolution. Will these instances be reported? If the media can suppress crime patterns now, a few of these stories would be easy. The fear is a higher profile case, not Zimmerman-Martin level, but at least high enough profile that a metro paper would cover it, and it could blow up. Another problem is as the media dies out and alternative media rises, keeping a lid on this will not be possible. A George Zimmerman is probably murdered in his jail cell if not for the alternative media from outlets like PJMedia and Takis to bodybuilding forums.
The real problem is political. The Left has no figure to stop this madness. Presidential candidates are apologizing for saying “White lives matter” and even “All lives matter”. Senator Bernie Sanders cowers and shrinks from BLM protesters at his own presidential campaign stops, even though he was an old Civil Rights veteran. Any type of leadership on the Left could snuff this out, and stop the lunacy while still keeping blacks engaged at the ballot box for the Left’s benefit. The problem is the broad Left is like a blob, in that is has no shape, no head, and no directive, except to consume and spread for more control. Stopping BLM would also crimp the social justice warrior racket that is a decent export, not just in actual warriors, but of fellow travelers that want to signal they are hip. The Left would then reveal the hollowness of people power, as the Left does not want pure people power, no matter how much they say they do.
If jury oddities start and cannot be avoided, then what comes next? A proper discussion would simply call for an end to the BLM movement and call for the rule of law. That would destroy the Left’s grievance industry and the ever increasing offenses that justify retribution and social justice. It will not happen unless the dead bodies are well-to-do white leftists, but even then, we cannot be sure. Physically removing populations and creating segregated autonomous political districts are nonstarters but a fix.
The false choice will be an option of the Russian roulette of keeping trial by jury, which will only become more of a farce as other ethnicities catch on to the BLM nullification game, or ending trial by jury. Ending trial by jury will be palatable because it would then be a judge or series of judges reviewing cases. They can invoke the traditions of the West, while saying they will weigh social justice concerns. This fits the progressive preference for credentialed, politically indoctrinated experts who will be unaccountable in determining important matters. These judges will all go through our legal education system, which the progressives control. If immigrants can get away with slaps on the wrist in Europe from judges for rape, robbery, and assault, imagine the oddities a judge could dole out with the social justice stamp of approval.
The media will spotlight horror stories of juries gone wild. The great informed middle will accept this removal of an institution as a protection for them. “Singapore does it and Singapore has low crime,” will be the Fox News pitch. The system will also have many more years in the rearview mirror of pushing the microaggression and group grievance tricks on ever more diverse Americans. America must progress! Institutions as historic in the Anglo-Saxon mold as the trial by jury that lasted for centuries and before that were celebrated in Greek plays like The Eumenides will be scrapped–all for the goal of forcing universal beliefs, equality, and social justice on a multicultural, polyglot society. Long gone will be a jury of your peers.
In their place will be the commissars, whom the media will say are experts and can be trusted. They will be trained in the finest law schools, all controlled by the Left. Trust them but beware. They might just sentence a criminal to time served and probation for killing your mom because she was a huge fan of Seinfeld… after he was deemed “problematic”.
- See more at: http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/09/13/where-does-blacklivesmatter-go/#sthash.wPY9UVEZ.dpuf
“In the matter of People v. Demarryous Johnson on the charges of murder, the jury could not reach a verdict. I declare a mistrial.”
>Prosecutor squints but knows another trial will loom<
>Victim’s family is in tears, “But they had video showing him shooting my brother!”<
>Outside courtroom #BlackLivesMatter protesters cheer and hug just one black juror<
>Media, and nation, goes nuts<
How long is it until #BlackLivesMatter finds its way into jury boxes? This is not a question of if, but of when. It’s all fun and games for Boomer whites, progressives, and politically-oriented secular Jews to look at #BlackLivesMatter and think of MLK, the Civil Rights crusade, Freedom Riders, and Selma. This is why the chants for dead cops, chants for dead non-blacks, and explicitly anti-white imagery and statements are glossed over by progressive whites. Do not show the monster Soros and social justice academics created. It will all end okay.
Take #BlackLivesMatter (BLM) to its logical conclusion. They do not want police in their neighborhoods. The supposed system oppresses blacks, not the actual, progressive-controlled system that needs blacks for justification of their rule and therefore gives them benefits and perks in the legal code. These invisible grievances from a long gone system build up, forcing blacks to commit crime. Why, oh why, should the justice system send more black men (and women) to jail for killing, due to evil, white thoughts and microaggressions? It might not be outright nullifications, which would mean acquittals, but it may mean more hung juries. With municipal budgets tight, this might mean more deals between prosecutors and criminals. “Take the 25, you’ll be out in 18, it won’t be a life sentence.”
This would be a travesty and another mile marker on America’s path to dissolution. Will these instances be reported? If the media can suppress crime patterns now, a few of these stories would be easy. The fear is a higher profile case, not Zimmerman-Martin level, but at least high enough profile that a metro paper would cover it, and it could blow up. Another problem is as the media dies out and alternative media rises, keeping a lid on this will not be possible. A George Zimmerman is probably murdered in his jail cell if not for the alternative media from outlets like PJMedia and Takis to bodybuilding forums.
The real problem is political. The Left has no figure to stop this madness. Presidential candidates are apologizing for saying “White lives matter” and even “All lives matter”. Senator Bernie Sanders cowers and shrinks from BLM protesters at his own presidential campaign stops, even though he was an old Civil Rights veteran. Any type of leadership on the Left could snuff this out, and stop the lunacy while still keeping blacks engaged at the ballot box for the Left’s benefit. The problem is the broad Left is like a blob, in that is has no shape, no head, and no directive, except to consume and spread for more control. Stopping BLM would also crimp the social justice warrior racket that is a decent export, not just in actual warriors, but of fellow travelers that want to signal they are hip. The Left would then reveal the hollowness of people power, as the Left does not want pure people power, no matter how much they say they do.
If jury oddities start and cannot be avoided, then what comes next? A proper discussion would simply call for an end to the BLM movement and call for the rule of law. That would destroy the Left’s grievance industry and the ever increasing offenses that justify retribution and social justice. It will not happen unless the dead bodies are well-to-do white leftists, but even then, we cannot be sure. Physically removing populations and creating segregated autonomous political districts are nonstarters but a fix.
The false choice will be an option of the Russian roulette of keeping trial by jury, which will only become more of a farce as other ethnicities catch on to the BLM nullification game, or ending trial by jury. Ending trial by jury will be palatable because it would then be a judge or series of judges reviewing cases. They can invoke the traditions of the West, while saying they will weigh social justice concerns. This fits the progressive preference for credentialed, politically indoctrinated experts who will be unaccountable in determining important matters. These judges will all go through our legal education system, which the progressives control. If immigrants can get away with slaps on the wrist in Europe from judges for rape, robbery, and assault, imagine the oddities a judge could dole out with the social justice stamp of approval.
The media will spotlight horror stories of juries gone wild. The great informed middle will accept this removal of an institution as a protection for them. “Singapore does it and Singapore has low crime,” will be the Fox News pitch. The system will also have many more years in the rearview mirror of pushing the microaggression and group grievance tricks on ever more diverse Americans. America must progress! Institutions as historic in the Anglo-Saxon mold as the trial by jury that lasted for centuries and before that were celebrated in Greek plays like The Eumenides will be scrapped–all for the goal of forcing universal beliefs, equality, and social justice on a multicultural, polyglot society. Long gone will be a jury of your peers.
In their place will be the commissars, whom the media will say are experts and can be trusted. They will be trained in the finest law schools, all controlled by the Left. Trust them but beware. They might just sentence a criminal to time served and probation for killing your mom because she was a huge fan of Seinfeld… after he was deemed “problematic”.
- See more at: http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/09/13/where-does-blacklivesmatter-go/#sthash.wPY9UVEZ.dpuf

No comments:

Post a Comment