When the charming Nadiya Hussein won the Great British Bake Off in September this year, Britain’s liberals were beside themselves with joy. Okay, Muslim rape-gangs are operating throughout the country, the security services are constantly battling Muslim terror-plots and corruption flourishes in every Muslim “community” — but look, a Muslim has won a baking competition. Take that, you haters, racists and xenophobes!
“When You Whisk Upon a Star…”The Guardian proclaimed that “Nadiya has managed to defuse the negative, politicised and stereotypical discourse surrounding Muslims in one beat of a whisk.” She had shown that “the vast majority of people in Britain embrace diversity and inclusivity” and that “Britain is not limited by homogeneity but strengthened by diversity.” The implications are obvious: beleaguered France must hasten to acquire a Nadiya of its own. Then the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists will rise from the dead and the Paris attacks will turn out to have involved water-pistols and party-poppers.
Or so you might suppose. Yes, the reaction to Nadiya Hussein demonstrates the absurdity of liberalism and the irrational, superstitious psychology of liberals. Legend has it that Marie Antoinette was told that the peasants had no bread and replied: “Let them eat cake.” The phrase symbolizes indifference to the suffering of the masses. Liberals are certainly indifferent to the suffering of the White working-class, but their Nadiya-mania says “Let them eat cake!” in another sense too. Liberalism teaches that any amount of vice in a minority, no matter how vast, can be outweighed by any amount of virtue, no matter how small.
So Britain is supposed to forget Muslim rape-gangs, Muslim terrorism and Muslim corruption because one Muslim is good at baking cakes. François Hollande and David Cameron display more liberal superstition in their belief that dropping bombs in the Middle East will solve the problems posed by Muslims in Europe. Hollande has promised “solennellemente” to do everything to destroy “l’armée des fanatiques” who have stained Paris with blood for the second time in ten months.
The Army of FanaticsWill “everything” include ending Muslim immigration into France, let alone reversing it? No, of course not. France will continue to welcome Muslims in and to fund their high birth-rates. Their growing numbers will ensure that the fanatics are ever harder to track. The collaboration of “moderate” Muslims with the fanatics will be both active and passive. As a “Muslim FBI officer” put it in the Guardian after the Paris massacres: “how was a network able to operate in a tight-knit community and neighbourhood without any detection; why did the confidential informants, undercover agents, community leaders or citizens within the community not turn us on to this network … — why did they not say anything?”
He was talking about Belgium and the vibrant suburb of Molenbeek, a Muslim “no-go zone” within a few miles of NATO Headquarters. In other words, while France and NATO bomb Islamic State in Syria, Islamic Statelets are growing all over Europe, seething with crime, corruption and hatred of the White Christian nations that surround them and fund their expansion. And what has happened to those people, like Marine Le Pen and Brigitte Bardot, who have been warning for decades about the consequences of mass immigration from the Third World? Has France, land of Voltaire, cradle of liberty, disagreed with their opinions but resolutely defended their right to speak?
No, France has prosecuted them. In September this year, Marine Le Pen, leader of the Front National, went on trial under what the New York Times approvingly described as “France’s tough hate-speech laws.” She is accused of “inciting religious hatred against Muslims” in a speech she made in Lyon five years ago. The trial looked ridiculous when it began, a few months after the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris. It looks even more ridiculous now, after a new, improved massacre in the same city.
“A Very Umble Person”But who is busy advocating “France’s tough hate-speech laws”? Who has wanted to stifle free speech, prosecute dissidents and ensure that Muslim pathologies worsen with every passing day? (Hint: He’s the same person I wrote about in a column on the Stalinization of Europe.) François Hollande knows the answer, because he bestowed France’s greatest honour on a leading inquisitor in June this year:
Dr. Moshe Kantor, President of the European Jewish Congress (EJC), was awarded the Officier de la Légion d’Honneur (Officer of the Legion of Honour) by the President of France François Hollande. The award is the highest decoration in France, established by Napoleon Bonaparte. For two centuries, it has been presented on behalf of the Head of State to reward the most deserving citizens in all fields of activity.
The award was bestowed on Dr. Kantor at the Elysée Palace by President Hollande for leading the fight against Antisemitism, racism, intolerance and xenophobia, promoting interfaith relations and a more tolerant Europe in his roles at the European Jewish Congress, the democratically-elected umbrella organization representing European Jewry. President Hollande called Dr. Kantor “a man of peace, a man of culture, a friend, and a friend of France.”
“You are an inspiring person in the Jewish world, a great figure of the Jewish People in Europe, heading a major institution, the European Jewish Congress, which today represents 42 communities,” President Hollande said before bestowing the award. “You and the EJC are promoting Jewish culture, interfaith dialogue and tolerance, fighting Antisemitism and racism and preserving the memory of the Holocaust. Because all of these reasons, all of these values — your fight against Antisemitism and for peace, and for your love of France — we honor you here today.” (Dr. Moshe Kantor Awarded Legion of Honour by President Hollande, European Jewish Congress, 30th June 2015)
In other words, Kantor wants more thought-police, more laws against free speech and more surveillance of the goyim. François Hollande was right to speak of an “army of fanatics,” but wrong to restrict that army’s membership to Muslim terrorists. By any rational standard, he and Kantor are fanatics and extremists too, determined to impose a totalitarian ideology on the unwilling White nations of Europe. These two are just as guilty of “staining Paris with blood” as the Muslims who fired bullets and detonated suicide-belts.
Muslims and other non-Whites aren’t in Europe by the democratic will of the majority, but by the anti-democratic will of the liberal elite. This treachery has been openly admitted by another member of the army of fanatics. He’s a repulsive British politician called Roy Hattersley, once deputy leader of the Labour party and Member of Parliament for the Birmingham constituency of Sparkbrook:
How are politicians to behave when, having listened, they find themselves in fundamental disagreement with what they have heard? Should I, in 1964, have called for what a clear majority of my constituents, and most of the country, undoubtedly wanted — the repatriation of all Commonwealth immigrants? [His answer: “Not in a million years.”] (Politics should be guided by principles, not populism, The Guardian, 5th May 2013) … For most of my 33 years in Westminster, I was able to resist Sparkbrook’s demands about the great issues of national policy — otherwise, my first decade would have been spent opposing all Commonwealth immigration and my last calling for withdrawal from the European Union. (Ideology’s our life, Esther, The Guardian, 31st July 2013)
Pearlstine’s SwineThe Labour party knew very well that its White working-class supporters vehemently opposed mass immigration from the Third World. It ignored their wishes, just as it ignored the screams of White working-class girls raped by Muslims in Rotherham and other enriched towns and cities throughout the UK. Labour has betrayed the very people it was founded to protect. As I’ve pointed out before, the party is best described as a criminal conspiracy, not as a political organization.
Would Hattersley be a rich Lord with a Jewish wife if he had called in 1964 for what “most of the country undoubtedly wanted”: “the repatriation of all Commonwealth immigrants”? Would François Hollande be president of France if he were condemning Moshe Kantor rather than slobbering over him? Of course not. The war on Whites is massively incentivized. Traitors like Hattersley and Hollande are rewarded; patriots like Bardot and Le Pen are persecuted.
Malevolence and psychosisHollande was lying when he promised to destroy the “army of fanatics.” In fact, he, Kantor, Hattersley and the rest of Europe’s liberal elite are part of the army. Their extremist ideology is responsible for the insane course Europe has taken since the World War II. Mass immigration from the Third World into the West has been like tipping a bucket of hungry piranhas into a pool full of goldfish. Anyone who promises that such experiments will end well is either a malevolent liar or psychotically detached from reality. That front page from the Times isn’t ironic just because it juxtaposes the saintly Nadiya with the sinful Islamic State. Look at the colour of her headscarf. Like Europe’s future, it’s blood-red.
The traitors responsible for the coming horrors will not escape the judgment of history. Nor, if justice is served, will they escape prosecution and punishment for what are, by their own liberal ideology, unmistakable crimes against humanity. Decade after decade, the liberal elite have deliberately encouraged the murder, rape, impoverishment and ethnic cleansing of Europe’s indigenous White population. While they are up, Europe is down. As Europe rises, they will fall.