Jun 12, 2015

What are SJWs? And Why You Should Hate Them

via Amerika

While “social justice” may be a common topic on the internet, like the average person I never heard of them — until started working at an advertising agency. My job as a web programmer required me to integrate their ad control system with their many websites, adding extra functionality. This in turn required me to understand their marketing strategy, which specifically targeted Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) because they were a lucrative demographic.

SJWs are people for whom activism is an activity, like shopping, or being on a sports team. They bond with one another over having the right opinions. Cheap and easy, with no chance of criticism from others, social activism provides a hobby to talk about at the local bar after a long day of work. The vast majority of SJWs are liberal, middle-class, university educated white women and their low-status male admirers. These are the women who did not get married, but are living the single life, and the men who are of “low status” meaning they are not rich, famous, strong, or so intelligent that they are successful. They hang around middle-level jobs and follow around the women they think may grant them sexual access in exchange for “white knighting” or support in internet combat against the enemy.

Marketing to these people proves to be quite profitable. SJWs spend an absurd amount of money on cheap, mass-produced lifestyle products. They buy these things so they can post photos of themselves on Tumblr with the product, and a referral link to where they bought the item. These people are prolific consumers on par with the “bourgeois” they claim to resent. Where the bourgeois buy BMW and Prada, SJWs — being single, and unlikely to ever get married — spend their money on the same stuff time after time. They may own iPhones and cell phone plans, but the rest of their spending is on what are essentially novelty products. In this way, SJWs are a marketer’s dream because they have already established a sales pyramid among themselves and if a product becomes trendy it automatically scales that pyramid.

This makes it easy to sell them cheap products with expensive messages. There are considerably higher profit margins on “this is what a feminist looks like t-shirts” and a much lower investment is required to make them. There’s less of a barrier to entry. The same can be said for shit like “Depression Quest” or any other SJW fodder indy game. A game doesn’t have to look good or be fun if you can convince your audience to buy it because it addresses “issues.” If the product has the right message, they buy it with a blind impulse that is easily manipulated. They click ads and fall for fake marketeer profiles because they hear what they want to hear. They’re the left’s equivalent of people who’d buy anything with an American flag on for the years following 9/11.

Internet sites love these guys. Instead of surly 4chan types who never buy anything, they can easily attract people who will buy a t-shirt made in a Taiwanese sweatshop with a pro-feminist message on it (and 500% mark-up). How do you attract SJWs? You clear away threats to their ideology, which means anyone who might disagree. For them to see a virtual space as “safe,” it must be cleansed of the “undesirables” who are non-SJW. Luckily, these opposition types are bad consumers. Little money is made by pitching to ad-block, VPN, piratebay, google-fu experts who post things that makes the ladies want to faint. SJWs are a type of consumer that may be unique in its opinions, but it acts like every other type of consumer. If you pitch products to their self-image, they keep buying until they run out of credit.

You can see this same process of consumerization in music festivals. The festivals are made good by members of the counter-culture, but when the festivals start attracting big names, suddenly ticket prices climb, drugs are banned completely, nakedness, improptu perfomances, and general anarchy are stopped and it becomes some homogenised, middle-class-mother-friendly pop concert with Hummus everywhere and excellent baby-changing facilities. Why? Because dirty hippies don’t spend as much money as middle class moms and university-educated white girls. A dirty hippie is there to see the band, buy some beer and have a good time. An SJW is there to buy tickets, bumper stickers, mugs, pens and hats so that they can pose with them for a selfie and possibly win in the lottery of what is trending among other SJWs now. Even better, they are adamant about comfort, so you can sell them hotel rooms and rental cars too.

How do they afford this? Most of the famous SJWs are trust-fund babies. The working SJWs (and there are plenty) aren’t as loud and don’t spend so much time begging for you to supplement their trust fund or to fund their cutting edge game, made in game-maker, about being cat-called (games are art and therefore don’t have to be fun, shitlord). But they tend to follow the lead of the trust-fund SJWs because those have more time and as a result make up more of the cutting-edge trends. To post to Tumblr all day, someone else paying the bills or an easy perpetual entry-level job. SJWs will buy “male tears” mugs and “smash the patriarchy” t-shirts or a “die cis scum” quilt because they can do so from their desks every week instead of investing in homes, cars, kids and a future.

The SJW phenomenon causes a type of gentrification of high-traffic parts of the internet. When they start out, most sites are occupied by people who have goals other than pure consumption itself. They tend to buy less stuff and not buy compulsively. This group is worthless as a target demographic for advertising. They make very little money, buy few products, and hate advertising, so the more you advertise, the less likely they are to buy. Business likes a simple formula of audience x advertising = profits. You can only get that with people who buy compulsively, and since SJWs compulsively buy whatever is trendy at the time, it becomes easy to follow trends, put them on products, and reap the “fat tail” of all the SJWs trying to catch up with their leaders.

If you want to understand the mentality of the SJW, you need to see them as consumers in the classic model and not as radical activists. Where Bob Smith was “keeping up with the Joneses” to avoid looking poor in comparison, SJWs are keeping up with each other to avoid looking uninformed and un-hip. Remember, “social justice” activism is a mode of socialization and an activity for them. They are not engaging in this to change the world like a die-hard ideologue so much as to have fun and attract a social group. As single people without families or extraordinary success in their careers, they need some cause that makes it look like their lives are still important, and their dollars have funded a whole industry based on giving them what they want.

Is Universalism so Bad for Whites?

via The Occidental Observer

Our current disastrous situation is that the White race is rapidly declining in absolute numbers and the countries it built are being taken over by the Third World.

There are, clearly, two elements to this. The first is that Whites are disappearing of their own volition because they don’t reproduce.

The second element is unrestricted immigration and multiculturalism.
It’s my argument that universalism in general and Christianity in particular didn’t produce either (for simplicity I’m assuming that Christianity is universalist although there are exceptions). The distortions of the Left did.

The elephant in the room which nobody is too happy to mention is that the evident reason for the demographic suicide of White, Western peoples is that they have dissociated sex from reproduction, which Christianity teaches not to do. Here, far from Christianity being the cause of this White birth decrease, there is its opposite, the erosion and abandonment of Christianity, at the root of this trend.

There is a Jamie Kelso video in which he confronts young Whites about such an issue as well.

Whites have done this to themselves (I’m childless, so I’m not blaming others, just stating a fact). There is no amount of mass immigration, no number of people from alien races and foreign cultures that could have imposed sexual promiscuity, widespread use of contraception, abortion en masse and similar behaviour on our populations.

After Jesus, Judaism has taken, with the Talmud, a completely different path from its previous history and has become virulently anti-Christian — hence the deceitful ambiguity of the expressions “Judaeo-Christianity” and “Judaeo-Christian”.

For major Jewish movements and organisations in the Diaspora, the erosion of Christianity and traditional Christian sexual mores in Western societies has been a primary goal.

Christianity is what has made the West strong and united for a long time; Jews saw this as a threat.

But it’s up to Whites not to fall into this trap.

Having fun (sex without children or “strings attached”) and the ambition to make money and get influence (pursuing a career) have become more important than family. This is the Christian priority of values turned upside down.

We can forever speculate about why Whites — women in particular — decided to stop having children or greatly reduced their number, but that they did it is beyond dispute.

We have all the possible empirical evidence in the world to assert that wide use of contraceptives and abortion, starting from the mid-60s, the time when Jewish influence on the minds of the young reached its full maturity, resulted in declining Western birthrates and populations.

Patrick Buchanan, in his book The Death of the West (Amazon USA)  (Amazon UK) , is justifiably gloomy:
Only the mass reconversion of Western women to an idea that they seem to have given up – that the good life lies in bearing and raising children and sending them out into the world to continue the family and nation – can prevent the Death of the West.
Why are Western women having fewer children than their mothers or none at all? Why have so many enlisted in what Mother Theresa called “the war against the child”? Western women have long had access to the methods and means of birth control but chose not to use them to the extent they do today…
From studying the birth charts, we find that something happened in the mid-1960s, in the midst of the postwar prosperity, that changed the hearts and minds of Western women and killed in them the desire to live as their mothers had.
That something is the counter-cultural revolution of the 1960s when the movements of the left originated and dominated by ethnic outsiders achieved hegemony over the culture of the West. But there is no usefulness in always blaming someone else. We have to accept our responsibilities and change our views and behaviour.

We have been brainwashed, yes. The great battle over the last century has been a fight for the minds of the Western peoples, which was won by acquiring control over practically all of the mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media, and using that control to disseminate their message and the way they want us to think.

It has been a top-down revolution carried out originally at the highest levels of society by hostile elites motivated by hatred of and alienation from traditional Western societies. Although their rhetoric always promises a Utopian future free of sexual neurosis and ethnic strife, it is motivated first and foremost by hatred and desire for revenge against the traditional peoples and cultures of the West. It is, as Roger Scruton once noted, “a way of taking revenge on a social order from which they feel alienated.”

So the first thing is to fight the battle inside ourselves. We’ve got to stop thinking in a way that is still affected by Leftist influences, ways of thinking which we may have absorbed in our university years.

In the same way as the words ‘Nazi’ or ‘Hitler’ evoke in most people a classical, Pavlovian conditioned response of rejection of everything associated with them, developed through decades of careful conditioning, so that the conscious part of the brain is totally bypassed and — without the possibility of considering the merits of it — there is an automatic reaction, not dissimilar from a kneejerk, so words like “God”, “Christian doctrine” and “Catholic teaching” evoke conditioned negative responses, inculcated by the same sources, and similarly without the benefit of knowing or reflecting on what is being rejected.

We may have become thoroughly aware of the control of the education system and media and entertainment industries by anti-Christian elites, but are we just as thoroughly capable of neutralising and rejecting their effects on the less conscious parts of our brains?

How many of us have refused Christianity only on the basis of the scantest, most superficial knowledge, mostly coming from the distortions of the mainstream media in Christian-hating hands?

Universalism and Christianity don’t require suicide: this is an incorrect, deformed view of their meaning.

The idea that someone should suffer or die so that others can prosper has a long history.

First there are the animal and human sacrifices of some ancient — and contemporary — religions, including paganism. Animal experimentation which, although clothed in pseudoscientific garb, may be seen as a revisitation of the ritual animal sacrifices of primitive religions.

While animal and human sacrifices were immoral and just useless, animal experiments are worse: they are dangerous and harmful to the human beings whose health they are supposed to protect, due to the extreme unreliability of their outcome, on which treatments for humans are based.

But then scientific activity is much more dogmatic than people think, and wrong but well-established theories are hard to die.

The most recent incarnation of the belief in sacrifice is the problem we’re dealing with: the indigenous people of the West are supposed to sacrifice themselves, by allowing their countries to be flooded with populations from another day and age in the distant past (that’s what the Third World is), which will set the clock back for Westerners as well, in order to help these destitute, primitive populations. A modern version of the White Man’s Burden thing in which White people are implicitly seen as superior to the poor and downtrodden they are helping.

Like the other forms of sacrifice described above, it will not help the supposed beneficiaries.

For the result of this invasion of epic proportions will be the eventual destruction of Western civilisation.

Whites are declining fast and furiously in number; Arabs, Blacks and Browns are replacing them in White countries due to the rates of both their migration and their reproduction. What will happen is that the less advanced human elements with higher rates of reproduction enabled by the advanced welfare and medical care systems of the West will replace the traditional peoples of the West.

It’s easier for a more advanced state to revert to a previous one than the other way around. It may well be impossible for Third Worlders to adapt to a far more sophisticated society. But it will be relatively simple for them to destroy it from within, and that will become even more effortless as their numbers and percentage of the population increase.

There is a certain entropy in human affairs as well as in nature: disorder is easier than order, destruction is easier than construction, barbarism is easier than civilisation.
If we look long-term (rather than short), we see that the West, the civilisation created by Whites, will be no more as the same process will be repeated in every part of the West.

The image of a lifeboat that can only take a certain number of victims of a shipwreck springs to mind. It sinks when that number is exceeded so that everybody on it drowns and not even the original number can survive.

Is this a rational strategy to pursue?

Of course not. It’s not callousness, selfishness or particularism which make us realise that the West cannot take this unsustainable level of immigration and survive.

It’s realism and rationality.

From an ethical, universalist viewpoint, it’s essential, nay imperative, to preserve Western civilisation, which has established important moral principles to apply to humans and all other sentient beings. Without it, the world would — will? — be a much worse place. What other culture outlawed slavery for moral reasons? Without the West, the world descends into barbarism and  moral particularism.

Therefore, there is no contradiction between opposing mass immigration from the Third World and embracing universalism, no conflict between advocating a stop to this colonisation and believing in Christianity.

People quote Pope Francis and other representatives of the Church who say the opposite.

But we mustn’t forget that this is the post-Vatican-II Church, which is completely on board with the Third Worldization of the West and, not coincidentally, apologised to the Jews and totally changed its views on them.

The Church has for a long time been pressured by Jewish activists and infiltrated by crypto-Jews and Jewish converts. We can’t understand the contemporary Church without appreciating the impact of Jewish influence since Vatican II.

But it has not always been like this. In fact, it has been only in the last few decades of its two millennia of history. We have to understand what happened to the Church, not just with Vatican II, but during decades and centuries before.

To reject Christianity on the basis, as I have read sometimes, that it’s “not White”, it’s “Levantine” or of Jewish derivation is every bit as rational as if the Japanese, in an outburst of self-harming hypernationalism or racialism, had historically rejected Western technology because it hadn’t been created by Japanese or Orientals but Whites.

Finally, one has to ask oneself why, if Christianity were so bad for Whites as some people think, the media, entertainment industry and intellectuals are constantly bashing and deriding it. Is it atheism or Christianity that they fear?

They don’t attack and ridicule paganism or atheism. They actually promote and lionise atheism day in and day out. We don’t have Hollywood films making fun of atheism or criticising it.

This is a comment someone left to one of my posts on Facebook:
Christianity is a Roman reworking of some sand demon kult…
They [Christians] have no place being here in the heartlands of the Celto-Germanics/Nordics. The west died when Rome/Catholics tried to destroy our real heritage.
It could sound like a fairly common — if not typical — observation from a White advocate. Except, as I discuss, there were several telltale signs that he’s in fact Jewish. Not all those who trash Christianity are what they seem.

Esoteric Stoicism

via Gornahoor
Do not go outside, go back into yourself: the truth dwells in the inner man. ~ St. Augustine
Three factors go into creative misreading.
  1. Place it in a larger context
  2. Draw out its logical conclusions
  3. Extract a deeper meaning
In this post, we will see how the key concepts of Stoicism were reworked. Stoicism was an exoterism because it held that the representations in the mind were of objects in the material world. However, when the entire psychic contents become the data of analysis, these same concepts lead to an esoterism. We can see that the modern mind is more inclined to the Stoic understanding of the inner life, which reveals a reversion to paganism. The following phenomenological analysis of Stoicism and the Church Fathers will bring to light the workings of the mind.

Stoicism in the ancient world provided an appealing worldview based on living a rational and ethical life. Its weakness lay in its materialism and empiricism. The Stoics held that everything is corporeal so that immaterial or spiritual reality did not exist. The soul is constituted of finer matter while the body of God is the cosmos.

Nevertheless, the cosmos is animated by Logos which had the attributes of thought, consciousness, and providence. In this pantheistic system, everything is a part of God. Hence, God determines all that happens so that there is no distinction between Providence and Destiny. All is fated.

The concept of the Logos, therefore, was known before the Gospel of John, including its identification with God. With their deeper understanding of the Logos, the Church Fathers reworked certain key Stoic concepts into a larger framework. They did this by interiorizing the Stoic’s materialism.  In particular, the following seven concepts will illustrate how that process worked:
  1. The governing principle of the human soul
  2. Preconceptions
  3. Representations or Phantasies
  4. Assent
  5. Relation
  6. Ataraxy or Tranquility
  7. Apatheia or passionlessness

The Human Soul

For the Stoics, the idea of lower centers in the soul made no sense. If God is Logos or Reason, and the soul is part of God, there cannot be any irrational part of the soul. Rather they recognized a governing principle. Concepts reside in it and it is the faculty which exercises judgment and applies concepts to particular situations.

This is clearly the intellectual center of the soul, without making the distinction between intuitive and discursive reason. When this principle guides a person’s life, he is happy and free from passions. Whereas for the Stoic this highest state is natural, for the Fathers it is supernatural. The governing principle is the activity of inner attention, the power of discriminate between good and evil, and even sacred contemplation. Obviously, that is the activity of the higher intellectual center or nous.

Since the Fathers do not deny the irrational appetitive and emotional parts of the soul, they need to be transcended.


The Stoic concept of preconception is that they are innate principles common to all men. As such, they are not contradictory, but become contradictory when applied to concrete situations in different ways. The purpose of education is to learn how to apply these preconceptions to specific instances in conformity to nature. Epictetus provides some examples: knowing good from evil, beautiful and ugly, knowing what one ought to do and not to do. Other things, such as mathematics, are not innate and need to be acquired.

The Stoics and Fathers agreed that there is innate moral knowledge. However, the Christian understanding of conscience goes beyond that. Not only is it a moral guide, it is also the impartial moral judge. Without that judge, the Stoic follows his preconceptions.

However, for the Fathers, preconceptions also include negative elements: prepossession, prejudice, a predisposition to sin. These need to be opposed and eradicated. These days we hear that so and so has a “good heart”. This is more in tune with the Stoic ideal. However, preconceptions can prevent the right decision. Prejudice or the desire to please will cloud our judgment. Negative preconceptions need to be expunged before they become passions.


A phantasy in Stoicism is an impression made in the mind by an external object through the senses. As in the past, we will use the term “representation” instead of “phantasy” due to the unfortunate connotations of the latter term. The problem for the Stoics was to distinguish illusory representation from true ones, and they provided some criteria to do that. In that, they agreed with Socrates that the Stoic should not accept a representation as true without subjecting it to critical examination. Epictetus pointed out the need for inner attention to discriminate between acceptable and unacceptable representations. In this regard, the teaching is sound.

The Fathers then brought this idea into a wider context. Our inner attention and discrimination should not be limited just to the impressions of the external world, but should include all the contents of the soul: thoughts, concepts, memories, dispositions, and so on.

The Fathers realized that much of our inner life is demonic. The Stoic must deny that because in pantheism, everything is God, so there cannot be anything demonic. Once you get past the Hollywood style depiction of demons, this realization will make sense. Of course, the modern mind regards all inner soul contents as “natural”, not unlike the Stoics, so they are compelled by that logic to accept demonic influences as fully natural, with just the echo of moral preconceptions to restrain them.

Note how this coincides with our earlier discussions. First, representations are accepted uncritically as true or good: this is how it is for the bulk of people today. The philosopher, in the next stage, learns to question or judge the representation. In the third stage, the representations are seen for what they are.


Once representations are recognized as true or false, good or evil, then once must either assent to them or reject them. Otherwise, says Epictetus, “if we fail to do this, the impression will take possession of us and go off with us wherever it will.” There are many examples in the news illustrating how an initial impression, if left on its own, will lead to unnatural or even insane acts. The modern mind has been losing that faculty of discrimination.

The Fathers used this Stoic insight in their understanding of temptation, as shown in this analysis:
  • First a suggestion comes into our mind via a representation or thought
  • Then there is a mingling of the suggestion with our own thoughts
  • This is followed either by opposition or assent to the suggestion
  • If there is assent, then sin is the result
  • Assent then leads to enslavement, so that the same temptation is repeated with the same result
  • The refusal to assent results in spiritual combat which will lead to victory or defeat


An important philosophical category of being for the Stoics is relationship: to your body, to God, to those who live with you, and so on. The Fathers also adopted this notion in regard to our relation to God, our fellow men, material things, and secular values.

There is a binding character of psychical relations, which is on a scale. The human soul establishes relations between itself and various things such as money, possessions, glory, and people. Relations involve two things:
  1. An awareness of the existence of things or persons.
  2. An emotional or conative attitude towards them.
This attitude binds the soul to them in stages:
  1. First, there is an interest in a thing, a “feeling towards” it.
  2. When the interest gets stronger, an emotional response, called a “passion”, arises.
  3. Finally, the relation may become one of bondage or enslavement. E.g.:
    • Avarice: bondage to money
    • Greed: bondage to material possessions
    • Ambition: bondage to human glory
    • Lust: bondage to sex
To be free, a person needs to overcome such bondages. Obviously, it is easier to do this at stage (1) rather than (3), but it takes inner discipline to recognize something that subtle.


Ataraxy is the state of the soul which is peaceful, undisturbed by external events, thoughts, phantasies, desires, or emotions. For the Stoic, following the governing principle and living according to reason will lead the wise man to this state.

The Fathers recognized a similar state without, however, considering it the highest state. As such, ataraxy is a natural state. This state of inner quiet or tranquility is a preparatory stage for union with God, or theosis – or the Supreme Identity as some Traditional writers have phrased it.

The Stoics lived in cities, full of noise, turmoil, and distractions; they tried to reach the state of tranquility in the environment. The Fathers, however, held that outer tranquility was necessary for inner tranquility. Hence, they retired to the desert or the mountains or any quiet, solitary place.

In our time, however, we have to hark back to the Stoics and achieve Ataraxy in the midst of our everyday life. It is not outer things that ultimately perturb us, but rather our own cares, passions, temptations, etc.


Alongside ataraxy, apatheia, or passionlessness, constitute the highest Stoic ideal. The modern world has lost the understanding of that state, since “apathy” has taken on a negative connotation, not indicative of the highest state. A fortiori, the modern mind is instead impressed by passion or emotion. The intensity of feeling is the measure of truth. I don’t need to provide examples, since you can find them everywhere.

The Stoics unfortunately overdid it, regarding all emotions as sinful, irrational, or unnatural. They identified pleasure, grief, fear, and desire as the four chief emotions. This is an unsatisfactory position since it will lead to contradictions.

The Fathers, instead, equated “passions” to negative emotions. Hence, there are some distinctions to be made about what is properly a negative emotions:
  1. Those emotions bad in themselves: e.g., conceit, gluttony, lust, vanity, pride, greed, malice
  2. Those emotions are bad only when contrary to nature: e.g., anger, hatred, sorrow, fear. When these emotions are in conformity to our nature, they are not “negative emotions”. So, for example, misplaced anger is negative, but anger directed against an injustice is not. Try to note similar examples in your own inner life.
  3. Pleasures and desires: Once again, these depend on the object. For example, a normal desire for food, rest, or sex is not negative. Negative pleasures and desires are of two types:
    1. For example, when the desire for food becomes gluttony
    2. Disordered: For example, when the desire for food becomes coprophagia
Sorrow for sins, fear of God, fear of hell, are not passions, or negative emotions, in this sense. Rather, the impel us to reject temptations and regain the health of the soul.

Love becomes the highest goal, even higher than apatheia. Love, in this sense, is more than worldly friendship or family affection; it is a spiritual love. The overcoming of negative emotions, the state of apatheia, is preparation for this higher stage.

'Cuckoldry' and the Social Carcinogen Trying to Spread it

via TradYouth

Online discussion has been on fire regarding the children’s television show, Bella and the Bulldogs, which has been broadcasting on Jew Sumner Redstone’s Nickelodeon since January 2015. The well-worn hate memes of the puny and effeminate White male; the cool, smart, and dominant Black, the “with it” Jewish guy, and the ultra-feminist blonde girl as the object of all of their affection have become formulaic plot elements in our highly politicized “entertainment”.

But this time, however, people have noticed something that pushes even their boundaries: One of the black writer’s previous projects was a softcore interracial pornographic film titled The Cuckold (2009), and the very obvious translation of these themes into a show for kids has provoked outrage.

So far, attempts at examination have yielded an uneasy and disorganized stew of truth mixed with fiction, and this is a problem. Readers must realize that the system literally pays people, such as David Futrelle, to dedicate themselves to “debunking” very real observations of menacing and sometimes bizarre collective Jewish behavior. Commentators who bring numerology, occult, and “illuminati” talk and mix it into the greater critiques of real world Jewish cultural attacks on the West only open themselves up to mockery and discrediting.
David Futrelle
David Futrelle

Accusing “Bella and the Bulldogs” co-writer Gabriel Garza of being Jewish without hard evidence (while a plausible hypothesis) is doing a disservice to the whole cause, and that is precisely what losers like Futrelle–empowered by his Jewish check signers at the New York Times, Salon and Washington Post–have been capitalizing on.

That’s not to say Gabriel Garza isn’t Jewish, especially since he’s part of a culturally destructive media project, but there is also a remote chance he could be a non-Jewish Iberian or Mexican looking to take any gig that will take him up the ladder. This high standard for evidence is important to keep when it comes to the Jewish question, because the army of pundits beneath the dollar-wings of Adlers and Geiers (German words for predatory birds that also happen to be common Jewish names) will seize any small potential inconsistency in your story with as much legalistic pilpul as the rabbis in the Talmud debating whether an adult male  raping a three year old child specifically on the day of or after her birthday has ramifications beyond “sticking a finger into an eyeball” (Ketuvot11b).

The gut instincts of individuals commenting on the matter are right, just not well articulated. Some were accusing Anita Sarkeesian of being Jewish when they identified someone looking to invade and destroy the (sadly) last bastion where white men are free to congregate, video games. But this attention whore is actually just a goy looking to make money and kudos using Jewish infrastructure. The media platform that paid her to create “Tropes vs Women” in 2011, on the other hand, was Lisa “My Big Jew Nose” Jarvis and fellow tribeswomyn Andi Zeisler’s Bitch Magazine. Without  the Zionist New York Times and other controlled newspapers extending some of their Jewish privilege and promoting her, Anita would be just another anonymous Tumblr cultural Marxist mooching off her rich parents while getting her third Masters degree in Sociology.

But I digress…

Bella and the Bulldogs
Bella and the Bulldogs

Whenever you see an agenda you know offends the majority of the population, you should always assume Jew until proven goy; Bella and the Bulldogs is no exception.

Much attention has been alloted to the show’s two writers, Gabriel Garza and Jonathan C. Butler, and this is especially justified in the latter’s case. But one needs to question just how Butler–a no-name plumber from Buffalo with scant background in writing other than his pornographic film–managed to get his own prime time children’s sitcom. Who would be so tacky, so repulsive, and so unscrupulous to think that a pervert who fantasizes about sleeping with white women while humiliating their white husbands to the point of making a whole film about it, should write a TV show for a targeted demographic of children ages two through twelve?

The answer lies in  Bella and the Bulldogs overlooked executive producer: listed by IMDB as the Jew Jeffrey Bushell. This profane individual, who has made a prosperous career producing shows for your kids on the Disney Channel and Nickelodeon, makes no qualms about broadcasting his and his wife’s obsession with genitalia and sex they just can’t keep in their bedroom. The public announcement of Bushell’s inadequate genitalia by his wife reflect Jewish matriarchal household dynamics, which in the Middle Ages provoked curiosity and disgust in Europeans as they witnessed Yiddish women going out to work while their husbands stayed home to study the Talmud.

Naturally, this continues to exist in a water downed form today. There is a segment of Jewish men, more than in other populations, who enjoy being dominated and abused by their wives, and this leads to amusing scenarios such as Woody Allen’s “son” Ronan Farrow having Frank Sinatra’s trademark blue eyes.  It is likely that the heavily inbred Bushell, as a powerful force within the Nickelodeon and Viacom establishment, saw Butler’s film and felt it resonated with his shriveled up, microscopic…soul.  Thus, a new way to assault Western civilization was born.

Executive Producer Jeffrey Bushell
Executive Producer Jeffrey Bushell
As the show’s executive producer, Bushell supervises the “creative direction” that the writers take, to ensure that the white woman obsessed negro pervert Butler gets as many of his favorite themes into the show as humanly possible, while at the same time filling in any gaps.  Were it not for the Jewish money that funded films like The Cuckold, or Jewish executive producers granting him an outlet for the kid’s version, Butler would still be an unknown upstate New York plumber daydreaming about sleeping with 60 year old obese housewives every time he gets the call to fix a leak.

Bella and the Bulldog’s: Themes and Story Arc

The Jewish Brothers, Barney and Rafi Fine, might train and script children to say otherwise (with an unironic link to the Zionist Talmudic Nazi organization the Anti-Defamation League accompanying it), but children have ingrained preferences for their own race. Jewish children, in fact, have been found to show the most hatred towards ethnic out-groups of all.

For this reason, the first season of “Bella and the Bulldogs” is heavy on romantic tension between the black football player Troy and Bella, but nothing outright–as Judeo-Left critics of the “cuckold” controversy have painstakingly emphasized. But this is not the whole story. Troy is portrayed as being in love with the white girl, but it is superficially unrequited, with hints that it will one day come to be. What Bushell is going for is to attract a large enough audience, and then have Troy and Bella be together in an episode in the near future when there is a sufficient fanbase to survive a blow to ratings.

The Bella and the Bulldogs Wiki makes it clear they see the romantic pairing of Troy and Bella in the immediate future, with signs of her beginning to ‘submit’ to Troy’s solicitations already seen in episode 14 “Player Hater”.  This is interesting, as Bella is currently dating the white football star background character Kyle Webber, and it’s easy to predict that in the second season of the show they may have her “cheating” on Kyle with Troy.

On the theme of cuckoldry,  the “Player Hate” episode portrays a jealous Bella, as Troy begins to go out on dates with another white girl named Charlotte Newman. Charlotte Newman is using Troy to “get back” at Kyle Webber (who left her for Bella), much like the female character at the beginning of The Cuckold, upset at her husband’s infidelity. Miscegenation  and “cuckoldry” are both hinted at strongly, and  it’s safe to say that the second season will lay it on thick after these obvious setups.

Much has been made about symbolism, such as the “bull”, the weak and effeminate white male constantly being emasculated by the black character Troy (as portrayed in an episode where he intimidates the white into paying for everyone’s drinks) and virtually all the women on the show, and of course this disturbing and undeniable subliminal message:

Subliminal Messaging

All of this would arguably be circumstantial if we didn’t know the backgrounds and history of the writers and producers, but in this case it’s blatantly obvious.

After attracting 2.52 million viewers for its Series Premier in January 2015, its ratings have drastically declined since then. Despite heavy advertisement and a prime time time slot, its second-to-last episode managed to get barely over 1 million viewers. Regardless, the Nickelodeon Jews have renewed the show for more episodes, probably because the harder and more explicit political messages were initially planned for the second season.

The Authoritarian Personality
The Authoritarian Personality

Jews are the Sole Force Trying To Normalize Cuckoldry; and Why They Do It

In the year 1950, the American Jewish Committee sponsored a five volume socio-psychological study on effective ways to control Gentile political organizing and eradicate the anti-Semitic feelings provoked by Jewish behavior: Studies in Prejudice. One of the most well known parts of this research, conducted at Berkeley University, was called “The Authoritarian Personality”, whose authors were the Jews Theodore Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, and others, and built upon the work they were doing in 1920’s Germany prior to the national uprising of 1933.

The thesis put forth, which reflects the work of Adorno’s Frankfurt School in general, is that societies that encourage productivity, discipline, ethics, and collectivism are prone to become anti-Jewish. The Jews in 1920’s Germany were almost as powerful (and destructive) as the ones in 2015 America, yet the researchers were puzzled as to how a few Bavarian nobodies were able to engineer a plan to overthrow them just a decade later. The “pathology”, they found, was Western culture itself, and the solution to this naturally occurring barrier to Jewish abuses is to weaponize moral depravity, concoct, instill, and encourage unnatural sexual practices, and break all moral codes in Gentile host cultures.  The Jews were doing this in the infamous Weimar Republic beforehand, but Adorno’s research demanded things go into overdrive.

While originally preaching Marxism, post-war developments in the Soviet Union, where Jews had originally utilized outright barbaric violence to control the population, saw an internal coup by Joseph Stalin, who after 1948 decided he no longer wanted to share power with them. This began a campaign that decimated Soviet-Jewish intelligensia and isolated the agenda of Jewish Communist party members. By 1953, the strong man–who had reopened the Russian Orthodox Church, recriminalized homosexuality, encouraged marriage, and began preaching nationalism–created a commission that sought to deport all of Soviet Jewry, according to insider Nikolai Nikolayevich Polyakov.

While the Jews today claim Stalin’s investigation of a “Jewish doctor’s plot” in 1953–where he suspected they were trying to assassinate him–is a testament to his “baseless anti-Semitism”, the unearthing of long-hidden documents show that he indeed was probably poisoned. Nonetheless, the blow he dealt Soviet Jewry changed the political and cultural landscape in the USSR forever, and after this Stalinian shift, came both the Jewish-led “New Left” of the 1960’s and Neo-Conservative movement of the 80’s–with the Frankfurt school denouncing communism as being as bad as “Fascism” when it comes to the potential for anti-Jewish sentiment. Paul Gottfried’s “What Is a Conservative These Days” provides interesting insight on this dynamic–the Soviet-style communists were more conservative than the Western conservatives for most of the Cold War.

The evolution led to the conclusion of the “The Authoritarian Personality”, which is considered to be the foundation of all hitherto connected academic work, and is at least one of the major motives Jews have for disproportionately–and in many cases unilaterally–promoting practices and behaviors they know are immoral and harmful to Gentiles in order to control them. According to Christopher Lasch’s The True and Only Heaven: Progress and Its Critics:
“The purpose and design of Studies in Prejudice dictated the conclusion that prejudice, a psychological disorder rooted in the “authoritarian” personality structure, could be eradicated only by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective psychotherapy–by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum” (pg 453)
Most of the public has been scratching their heads while watching mass media talk about Bruce Jenner. Did he cure cancer? Did he invent something? No. He mutilated himself and now wears women’s clothing. The Jews Buzz Bissinger and Annie Leibowitz who used pretty adjectives and extensive photoshop to rationalize Jenner’s insanity on the cover of Vanity Fair can’t even convince 65 IQ Chris Brown that this is right–but it’s not for the majority.

The real target demographic are marginal cases like Jenner, who has struggled much of his life with substance abuse and mental health issues, and the goal is to exacerbate their condition for social engineering purposes. With the number of self-destructive lifestyles Jews promote with their monopoly on mass culture, they’re able to recruit 2% here, 3% there, 5% over there, and eventually this turns into a sizeable crowd in the anti-white and anti-normal popular front, all united against the “Authoritarian personalities” telling them it’s not ok to marry another man, …or his dog. The only reason Jews haven’t taken up the comparatively less degenerate cause of polygamy is because it’s historically associated with “authoritarian personalities” like Mormons and Muslims.

Cuckoldry: Only One Group Of People Trying To Make It Mainstream

The case of “cuckoldry” is no different. So far, this tentacle of the Jewish culture war is in its infancy, but expect it to get worse once they are able to consolidate their agenda of (or in other words, succeed in passing legislation to force everyone to accept it, and private means to intimidate those who dare speak up in response) men who mutilate their penises and shave down their adam’s apple.

Dan Savage, a Converso and racially Jewish fecophile “sex columnist”–as well as a “far Left liberal” war mongerer who supports American military  intervention against “Islamo-Fascism” and other enemies of Israel–has been very supportive of individuals who claim to have this sexual dysfunction. In fact, “cuckolds” seem to love writing Savage, much more than the other sex columnists I looked up, there’s a good chance that this is just someone trolling, or even Dan Savage forging the letters himself to keep things “interesting”. At the moment, “sex therapists” that encounter this rare “fetish”, as bad as they already are, at least tend to emphasize the inevitable relationship problems it brings, but Savage gives the green light without these qualifiers.

The closest thing to outright promotion in the mass media comes from the LA yentil Anneli Rufus. In a 2010 piece for the Daily Beast, called “The Intellectual Sex Fetish” and accompanied with an inflammatory picture of a black man with a white woman, the Jew Rufus is trying to sell “cuckoldry” specifically to the group she knows is susceptible: the trendy and bored bourgeoisie:
“Cuckolding is rapidly emerging as the alt-sex fetish of choice for American intellectuals. Just check out the online forums like OurHotWives.org/forum, where letter-perfect postings celebrate cuckoldry as a cerebral pursuit, transcending ordinary voyeurism and S&M as a dangerous game involving jealousy, misery, gratitude, shame, sharing, sublimation, lust, and trust.”
A real intellectual–unlike the cultural Marxist trust fund babies getting shoehorned into prestigious positions by Jews–would ask, where is the proof that this is a “rapidly emerging fetish of choice”? An internet forum full of anonymous people? Rufus tries to bolster her assertion with some anecdote about a New York City professional power couple that sometimes rent out a hotel room where the man watches his wife have sex with strangers. But that doesn’t mean this is happening on a wide scale, or that it is a “trend.” As usual, Jews want Goys to think something is more popular or acceptable than it actually is in order to strike some upper middle class WASPy “all the cool kids are doing it” chords.

Looking through the website Rufus cites, the posters are a small core of perverts, and a much larger group of men trying to sleep with their wives.

If OurHotWive’s 34,299 registered members (most being internet men looking for easy sex that don’t come back after a few posts) means that “cuckolding” is a “rapidly emerging” trend that Rufus believes needs more headlines, then the website where couples partake in literal bestiality, “Beast Forums”, must be happening on every block with its 1.4 million members.

And finally, the Jew Meredith Lindemon, makes similar claims as Rufus, except using nothing but dubious anecdotes.

On some parts of the internet, many people, including those who are apolitical, appear to believe that this “cuckold fetish” is more common than it actually is. This is due to the wave of Jewish-created amateur and professional pornography being disseminated with this theme. As outlined in my previous article, interracial pornography is not profitable, but done with subversive intentions. One outstandingly vicious and anti-white website, “Cum Eating Cuckolds”, which calls itself “The #1 Cuckold Site in the World”, is an asset of “Kick Ass Pictures, Inc”, whose president is the Jew Mark Kulkis.

Kulkis has also worked on behalf of the Republican Party, and his peddling of interracial pornography was heavily alluded to in an interview with Stephen Colbert:

Who Are The Cuckolds?

Are “cuckolds”, dysfunctional men who enjoy watching other men sleep with their wives, real? Yes, but they are a miniscule minority, on par with couples who molest children to add some Jewish-prescribed zest to their sex lives,  and probably dwarfed by those who practice any number of other strange perversions.

Cuckoldry is the end-product of feminism, and men who believe in feminism will be attracted to it. Men who are married to dominant women and refuse to put them in their place will in many cases turn a blind eye to female infidelity, but in rare cases like the elderly Canadian Jack King caught soliciting a stranger to bed his wife, the ball-busting lawyer Lori Douglas (who didn’t even take his name after marriage), the man will be an active participant.

What is the solution? Authoritarian personalities getting together to shame these failures, but also build up the men we break down–who really are just an extreme manifestation of the feelings of inadequacy aimed at people because they are male or of the Occidental race.  The Jews look to exploit the weak in our herd, and our solution ought to be a full-frontal counter-attack against these lying jackals. This is the only way to bring about the instauration of our race. But first we need to turn humble honkeys back into Aryan men.

Tell me to vote for the GOP one more time, and I’ll start thinking you’re a cuckold.

The Frankfurt School Meets Brave New World

via traditionalRight

Like the fog, Brave New world continues to creep in on little cat feet. I was unexpectedly enveloped in a bank of it while reading, of all things, the Science Times supplement in the June 2 New York Times. The piece, titled  “Study Suggests Sleeping One’s Way Past Bias”, begins,  “It may be possible to reduce biases regarding race and gender while a person sleeps. . . ”

These “biases” are actually the recognition of facts. The two facts which are to be removed from people’s brains while they sleep are, in this case, the fact that men and women are different and the fact that both races and ethnic groups within races, taken as wholes, have different characteristics. Thesa facts are, of course, Politically IncorrectTM.

The short Times piece goes on to describe the techniques of psychological conditioning that appear effective in obliterating  these facts.
Research had shown that biases could be reduced with a technique called counterstereotype training. . .
Study participants were shown images . . . of women  and African-American men. When participants were shown images of women alongside scientific words, and African-American men alongside pleasant words, they were asked to press a button labeled “Correct” (i.e., Politically Correct). A sound followed.
Then, while study participants napped, the sounds were played back to them, and after their naps the hapless saps so bombarded  “showed a reduction in bias,” i.e., a loss of ability to grasp reality.

This wonderful discovery comes straight out of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, where humans were reduced to mechanisms through a combination of genetic and psychological conditioning. The conditioning techniques are sufficiently effective that very few people escaped them. They were also all-pervasive.

But someone else was on to psychological conditioning in the 1930s, when Huxley wrote his book. Who? None other than the men of the Frankfurt School, those bright folks who gave us cultural Marxism, aka Political Correctness and multiculturalism. Realizing that their Marxist ideology had little future if it depended on reasoned argument, they decided that psychological conditioning would be their weapon of choice. Their disciples now practice endless conditioning techniques on us all, through the schools and universities, through the video screen media, and, it seems, through “scientific” experiments reported in the New York Times. Directors of North Korean prison camps, take note.

The cultural Marxists believe their ideology can, with enough conditioning behind it, overcome reality. It will not any more than other ideologies did. But the attempt has already done vast damage to Western societies, leaving them unmoored, forgetful of who they are and unable, on the moral level of war, to defend themselves. When reality returns, it will do so with a crash.

But what is repellant about the Times story is not just the ideological claptrap being shoved into the study’s subjects’ brains. What repels us, or should, is the whole idea of conditioning itself.

Conditioning is fundamentally dehumanizing. Man was created to be a reasoning creature. Reason may be the ability that makes men most like God. Conditioning cuts reason out  of the loop. Someone who has been sucessfully conditioned cannot reason about the content of his conditioning. His own mind prevents him. A powerful feeling of doing something wrong, something bad, rises if he begins to question what has been planted in his head–in the case of the experiment reported here, even while he slept.

We see again why conservatism is the negation of all ideologies, and with them the hideous methods adopted for their inculcation. Conservatives know that truth is attained only through a combination of faith and reason. We believe that schooling and culture should teach people how to reason, how to reach valid judgments based on facts. It should not surprise us that all ideologies suppress facts and forbid reason at least on certain matters. It should surprise us that the New York Times welcomes another step toward Brave New World.

Shanda fur die Goyim

via Age of Treason

Listen Now

We’re going to decode this term and a few others for the goyim.

It is a perfectly normal reaction for Whites to find Yiddish or Hebrew off-putting, alienating. It’s natural to interpret such words as, “not for me”, and get the urge to go read or listen to something else. The author or speaker who chooses such words, rather than plain English, is sending a signal, expressing their jewishness. And when you perceive jews as the enemy, the disgust and urge to ignore any thought or argument coming from a jewish point of view becomes even stronger.

Regardless of how you might perceive the jews, what I intend to do here is make the case that the jews see the non-jews around them as their enemies. Any form of codespeak would be an indication of this – but the term “shanda fur die goyim” really puts a point on it.

First, let’s review some of the superficial explanations that jews themselves provide.
Instant Yiddish:
Shame on you for not knowing what “shanda” means!
“shanda” is the Yiddish word for “shame, disgrace, disgusting”
. . .
And not knowing what “shanda” means is a double shanda!!
So shanda is a code word, in that most non-jews don’t know it, though it’s relatively well understood among jews. The scandal, for a jew, is in not knowing that code word.

I found these “Instant Yiddish” pages using a search engine. They’re buried on the personal web site of some jew named Joel Aronson, not linked from from the home page or site map. All you can gather from the surface is that Aronson is a photographer who graduated from James Madison High School in Brooklyn in 1955. But based on the names of his classmates, the school must have been full of jews.

The point is that Aronson doesn’t come right out and advertise himself as a jew – in fact, he likely hides the yiddish pages from sight exactly because it is such a definitive marker of jewishness. When I was growing up in New York I had a math teacher named Aronson – he was quirky, even spastic. It never occurred to me then that it was because he was a jew. I wonder now how many yiddish terms he sprinkled in his lessons, or conversations with other teachers, sending the signal, “I’m a jew”, mainly heard only by other jews.

I found another definition buried on the web site of the Santa Barbara Jewish Connection, Yiddish Phrases:
SHANDA: A shame, a scandal. The expression “a shanda fur die goy” means to do something embarrassing to Jews where non-Jews can observe it.
The subtitle of the page is: “The First Words You Learn”, with shanda being one of about 150 of the more common bits of jewish code. The scandal is not “for the goyim”, but for the jews in front of the goyim.

The usual jew cover story is that goy/goyim mean nation/nations. In practice, however, it means Them, the Other, and it has a distinct pejorative sense. Gentile is a synonym with a less disparaging, derogatory sense, but the point is that the very existence of these words indicates that jews see a clear distinction between themselves and Others, between jew and goy.

The classic example of the distinction is in the yiddish phrases yiddische kopf (jew head, smart) and goyische kopf (non-jew head, stupid).

Thought Catalog, which on the surface is not any more of a jewish site than say The New Republic or Slate, has a page titled 61 Hilarious Yiddish Insults You Need To Know:
51. Shanda: A scandal. … If you have a “shanda fur die goy,” that means that you fuck up in front of non-Jews, thus embarrassing your entire people. This is obviously not good.
Obviously not good for the jews.

Usually the term is only used by jews talking to other jews. Even when overheard it’s easy to misunderstand. You might take it to mean that jews feel bad about non-jews being harmed. That’s not it at all. It means they feel bad because they think it might cause jews harm, that whatever the scandal is might be bad for the jews.

A certain ambiguity is characteristic of yiddish. As programmers say: This is a feature, not a bug. It is a consequence of jewish crypsis, being furtive and secretive. Even when jews stop trying to hide their alien code and instead try to explain the significance of certain words, or the language itself, you must remain skeptical, cynical, and read between the lines.

A good example comes from The Daily Beast, a really jewy digital tabloid. Mazel Tov, Arvind! But Are You Sure It’s Not Kneydl?

The article highlights jewishness, their sense of Otherness, and how it is expressed via yiddish. The jew author absolutely revels in it. He recounts how an Indian kid won a spelling bee in the US by spelling this yiddish word kneydl. The joke is that yiddish is notorious for variations in spelling.

The jew provides the usual cover story. Jews just can’t agree, have no central authority – the old “two jews, three opinions” nonsense. That’s part of it, but it leaves out the most important facts.

The fact is that yiddish always has and continues to effectively serve as a code language. From a non-jew perspective the many variations in spelling make it harder to pin down, harder to search, though the internet makes it much easier than it ever would have been in the past.

Yiddish is so informal and quirky for the simple reason that it has almost entirely been passed down verbally, via jew to jew personal interaction. The jews did this on purpose, rather than writing books about it, though they very well could have, as they have done with every other imaginable subject.

As it turns out I did find a book specifically about yiddish. The exception proves the rule.

Dictionary of Yiddish Slang and Idioms, by Fred Kogos, published 1968 by Kensington Publishers:
When Hitler killed 6,000,000 Yiddish-speaking jews and when Israel proclaimed Hebrew was to be the official tongue of the nation, these actions spelled the death kneel [sic] of Yiddish.
Hebrew is spoken only by about 2,000,000 people in Israel, and a few abroad, while Yiddish is still spoken by, and known to, over 10,000,000 throughout the world! Yiddish is creeping into the English language more startlingly than is apparent, with even Webster’s Third International Dictionary containing over 500 Yiddish (and some Hebrew) words.
Kogos claims his book spells out Yiddish words for “the first time in Roman letters”, implying it had previously always been written in Hebrew characters – more evidence that it jews intended to keep it to themselves.

Kogos claims its beginnings go back to the 11th century, that the “principle parent” is Middle High German with some influence from English, Hebrew, Russian and Polish, and that there are 4 major dialects: “Lithuanian, Ukrainian (Galicia), Polish, and Western (German)”.

The bulk of the book is omitted from Google books, including the entry for shanda.

Regarding “Kensington Publishers”. It doesn’t look like it, but Kensington is another code word.

The original Kensington is an area of West London.

It is also “a small and easily overlooked neighborhood of Brooklyn” which “has long had a vibrant Jewish community”.

It might also refer to Kensington Market, a neighborhood in Toronto that became known as “the jewish market” after waves of jews colonized it in the early 20th century.

Since the 1970s, the city has been home to the largest Jewish population in Canada and become a centre of Jewish Canadian culture.” In other words, the largest colony of jews in Canada is in Toronto, and Kensington is the historic epicenter of the colony of jews in Toronto.

Kensington is an example of jews creating a ghetto and segregating themselves – counter to the usual jewish narrative that jews were forced to live in ghettos by others.
The Schmooze, by some old jewess, It’s a Shanda:
In Yiddish, “shanda”/”shande” means “shame.” And “shande far di kinder” means, literally, “a disgrace for the children.”
Arthur Naiman writes about the expression, “a shanda fur die goyim”: “To make a shanda fur die goyim is to do something embarrassing to Jews in a place where non-Jews can observe it. Understandably, this is looked on with much greater disfavor than to act like a jerk when only other Jews are around, since it makes things tougher on all of us–”Those damned Jews! See what they’re like.”
The old jewess provides examples, including “Madoff – the ‘ganef’”, “Jack Abramoff – convicted of mail fraud, conspiracy to bribe public officials, and tax evasion” and,
Selling organs is a “shande”
She cites some jew who suggested Anthony Weiner and Eliot Spitzer get out of politics in an article titled:
“The Shanda Factor: What makes Jewish sex scandals different?”
For much of his career, Spitzer was a source of pride to Jews, with some supporters referring to him as having the potential to become the first Jewish president. In the blogosphere ethnic pride, when the scandal broke, the Web site, Gawker, proclaimed it’s a “shanda fur die Goyim.
When the jewish university Brandeis granted Tony Kushner an honorary doctorate some outraged jew wrote:
Tony Kushner is an anti-Zionist self hating shatdlan who never had a moral compass even in his genes nor has he any sense of Yiddishkeit. Brandeis has committed a SHANDE.
Yiddishkeit means “jewishness”, “jewish way of life”, “jewish essence” – or yiddishness. It is typified by jews moaning about a shanda or oy veying about something or other.

We find more about the essence of jewishness at yiddishkayt means “the culture, language, art, and worldviews of Eastern European Jews”.

Shanda fur di Goyim! appeared in the e-newsletter ‘Keeping Our Families Jewish’, by Doron Kornbluth:
As if Bernie Madoff wasn’t enough. And as if Jack Abramowitz wasn’t enough. And as if riots in Jerusalem weren’t enough. Now we have a group of very religious looking Jews being handcuffed by the FBI in a massive fraud case that has brought down three mayors and scores of lawmakers and politicos in New Jersey.
The Yiddish phrase “Shanda fur di goyim” refers to (Jewish) embarrassment at a fellow Jew doing something Really Bad in front of non-Jews. In other words, don’t wash your dirty linen in public. Do we have problems? Of course. There have always been problems. But, the phrase suggests, be careful: the world tends to look at “the Jews” as one people and what one Jew does reflects well – or badly – on the rest of us. According to this idea, doing something bad is bad enough, but it becomes much worse when it reflects badly on the entire Jewish people.
How do you feel about this phrase? Does it still apply? Does the world still “clump us together”? I’ll leave it to you to decide.
In a sense, though, today the discussion may be academic. With modern technology, word gets out. Even if we wanted to wash our dirty linen in private – ie within the Jewish community – it isn’t really possible anymore anyway. The events mentioned above were on the news again, and again, and again. Specifically, the visuals of religious-looking Jews being violent or in custody are hard to avoid or forget.
Right. When the jews can’t hide what they’re doing, they switch to “explaining”.

Note the inversion. It is the jews who see themselves and act as one people more than anyone else. When jews fret about a “shanda fur die goyim” what they’re worrying about is that the goyim might catch on to their game and also see the jews as a group, maybe even punish them as a group, or organize their own groups.

Madoff and “Abramowitz” (Abramoff) loom large as recent examples of shanda fur die goyim. What triggered this article was the Bid Rig scandal, in 2009, when the FBI arrested a ring of orthodox jews in New York/New Jersey area.

Bid Rig also touched on the organ selling shanda the old jewess mentioned.

In Jews and Organ Transplants – Part 1 I discussed the minor “embarassment” that the orthodox jews take organs but don’t donate them. By Part 3 I described the deeper concern:
Shanda fur die goyim is misunderstood as embarassment. It is a reflection of jewish sensitivity to collective exposure/responsibility/vulnerability. It is an alarm, a call for the making of excuses and transferring of blame elsewhere. The most extreme and common example is how jews transfer blame to “anti-semitism”.
What’s going on it isn’t simply “organ trafficking”. There’s extortion of organs from misled and desperate victims, reselling them at enormous profit. And it’s all very jewy – jew patients, jew doctors, and jew brokers. It goes on, even though it’s illegal, because there are so many jews involved, because the jews won’t rat out each other, and because most of the time nobody else will dare prosecute any of them, even when they are caught red-handed. The cherry on top is that yet more jews are pushing to legalize the harvesting and selling of organs for profit.

Returning to Bernie Madoff – “the ganef”, also spelled gonef or gonif, which means thief, swindler, crook – an unscrupulous opportunist who stoops to sharp practice. It specifically means a jewish thief, or one who steals from jews. The use of the yiddish word implies “from a jewish point of view”, otherwise the English words would suffice.

An example of its use occurs in Michael Tomasky’s A Short Post About Jesse Jackson Jr at The Daily Beast:
I’m going to write this just so our conservative friends can’t say I brush these things under the rug. He’s clearly a troubled man, but he’s also a gonif and a loser, so good riddance to him. All right?
Tomasky is a “liberal” (somewhat ambiguous) jew sending a subtle signal here to “conservative” jews.

Bernie Madoff was a Wall Street insider:
a past chairman of the board of directors of the Nasdaq Stock Market as well as a member of the board of governors of the National Association of Securities Dealers and a member of numerous committees of the organization
Madoff was a money manager since 1960. For decades he ran a pyramid scheme informally known as The Jewish Bond. It was very exclusive, “invite only”, operated by and benefitting a tight circle of jewish family and friends, and servicing a clientele that was also glaringly jewish, many of whom assumed Madoff was cheating in some way, perhaps using his insider knowledge and access.

One of the main takeaways is that the scheme went on for nearly two decades before collapsing. It was not stopped by regulators or lawmen, despite suspicions and accusations expressed over the years. As with the organ “business”, the very obvious jewishness of the phenomenon seemed to create a protective bubble.

Another takeaway was the revelation of just how much jewish “philanthropy” money is sloshing around Wall Street, and how much of that “philanthropy” is actually dedicated to exclusively jewish causes.

When Madoff saw his pyramid scheme was collapsing he tried to take all the blame on himself, probably to protect his family and friends who were in the scheme up to their eyeballs. He turned himself in, called it “one big lie”, and claimed nobody else knew. There’s alot more to the story.

The collapse of this big jew’s jewish bond was an epic shanda fur die goyim. The jew cover story is that “Most of Madoff’s victims were charitable organizations, elderly people, and Jews.” – i.e. jews were victims, rather than perpetrators. This narrative traces back to a NYMag story that appeared only one week after Madoff’s arrest and prevails at Wikipedia and beyond to this day, despite the many revelations which contradict it. Jews got in on the ground floor of the scheme and in many cases pulled out far more than they put in. Their losses were largely imaginary. The biggest losers were the face non-jew corporations, municipalities, and feeder funds that got in late in the game.

There are lots of other examples of shanda for die goyim.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn , Jonathan Pollard (and other jewish spies), Greville Janner, Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, to name a few.

A comment on a jewsmedia article about Dershowitz notes, “If this isn’t an example of “shanda fur die goyim,” I don’t know what is!!”

In conclusion, keep in mind that the use of yiddish by jews is a clear expression not only of their Otherness, but their consciousness of that Otherness. It also indicates the asymmetry of this consciousness. Non-jews generally aren’t aware not only of the meaning of invididual words and phrases but are missing the larger picture – that the jews’ use yiddish as codespeak, to signal and communicate specifically jewish concerns to other jews.

In a “liberal” society, where we are all supposed to be one big US, the mere existence of the term “shanda for die goyim” is evidence of bad faith, evidence that the worldview of jews is actually in terms of US jews versus THEM goyim. They are fully conscious of this and that it would be bad for the jews if the goyim knew and acted on such a worldview as well.

There is no simple equivalent for the term in English. It is difficult to translate because jewish attitudes are so different.

Basically, it is yet another example of jews expressing their utmost concern for their own group. In this case the main concern is exposure, exposure of harm caused by jews, evidence of jewish parasitism, especially their manipulation or exploitation of non-jews.

The main desire of jews is not to stop the harm or even punish the jews who are most responsible, but to somehow stop the exposure, to stop any harm coming to jews. That’s what “shanda fur die goyim” means. It means, transfer the blame elsewhere. It means, bury it. It means, shut it down.

Why Re-Colonization?

via Alternative Right

Europeans brought order to Africa,
something that Africans can only get
now by coming to Europe
At independence, 50 years ago, optimism for the tropics was high. No one could have dreamed that half a century later, a massive movement for re-colonization would be afoot – led not by Africa's leaders but by her masses.

We have looked at some of the reasons that the global South wants into Teutonic countries. But the real appeal is broader. Globally, tropical peoples are trying to migrate to lands run by temperate peoples.

Like a baby trying to crawl back into the womb, the formerly colonized are coming back to their old foreign masters and begging (or demanding) to be ruled by them again.


We propose two major reasons: Future orientation and Commonweal orientation. These two qualities, we argue, are plentiful in the North but in short supply in the South, where their opposites (Short-Sightedness and Clannishness) can be found in abundance.

Today we shall focus on the former: Future orientation. We argue that the shortage of this trait in warmer climes has prevented these societies from developing the way they wish to. This is why, two generations after independence, millions are voting with their feet to place themselves back under Euro rule.

We also argue these traits follow tropical peoples long-term, which is why North America's centuries-old African population has never assimilated. This too, we shall show, should be a cautionary tale for European deciders on immigration.

So what is the evidence to back up our assertions?

I. Low future orientation: the micro

Future orientation, also referred to as low time preferencelow time discountingor delayed gratification, is simply the ability to plan ahead and delay present gratification for future rewards.

1) We think differently: Anecdotes

Anecdotes abound on our differences in time perception and abstract thinking ability. 

    a) Improvidence

The improvidence of tropical peoples, especially Africans, has been remarked upon since their first contact with Europeans:

Peter Kolb (1731) on the Cape's Khoikhoi
They are, without doubt, both in Body and Mind, the laziest People under the Sun. A Monstrous Indisposition to Thought and Action runs through all the Nations of ’em: And their whole earthly Happiness seems to lie in Indolence and Supinity.

John Matthews (1788) on Sierra Leone: 

The disposition of the natives is nearly the same every where, extremely indolent, unless excited by revenge.
Commissionner Charles Eliot (1905) on his British East Africa Protectorate charges:

They are dominated by the transient emotion or impulse of the moment, and neither remember what has preceded, nor look forward to what is likely to follow. On the whole, this is a happy and cheerful cast of mind; the African suffers little from the pangs of remorse or apprehension, and is always ready to be pleased by any agreeable trifle.

After decades in Africa, Nigerian colonial governor Sir Lugard (1924) opined: 

Perhaps the two traits which have impressed me as those most characteristic of the African native are his lack of apprehension and inability to visualise the future, and the steadfastness of his loyalty and affection. 
After being transplanted to North America?

John Commons, lamenting that U.S. Afros would soon be out-hustled by industrious south and east European immigrants (1907): 
The improvidence of the negro is notorious. His neglect of his horse, his mule, his machinery, his eagerness to spend his earnings on finery, his reckless purchase of watermelons, chickens, and garden stuff, when he might easily grow them on his own patch of ground, — these and many other incidents of improvidence explain the constant dependence of the negro upon his employer and his creditor. (1)

Dutch criminologist William Bonger, after an exhaustive survey of the literature on the Afro-American (1943):
If one would express the general impression of those who know the North American Negro, then one would say: He is childlike. He does not look very far ahead, he is not very accurate, he is fond of bright colors and finery, is easily distracted. These characteristics may, naturally, be inherent, but this is not necessarily so."  (2)

    b) Lateness 

A common refrain in black Africa is that 'nothing works.' But why? Nigerian blogger Kurtis Smith sums up:
Nothing is safe from African Time. I have been to weddings that started up to three hours later than the advertised time. ... With this tradition, everything in the continent is always running behind schedule.
For Africa to develop, our ideology on time has to change. ... this thinking keeps Africa as one of the world’s poorest regions.
Agyenim Boateng, Ghanian commenter on the BBC:
Yes, Africans are capable of keeping time. A "red hot stove" approach is needed to arrest this bad attitude. Africans in the Diaspora learn to keep the time. We show up at work or appointments on time, because there is a price to pay for tardiness. Africans have a saying, "Africans do not wait for time, rather, time waits for Africans". Time is money, and we are paying a heavy price for our tardiness.

On the other side of the Atlantic, a long-time U.S. lawyer with a majority-black clientele (not a public defender) has noticed a similar phenomenon:
Most of my clients who are not black either show up on time for appointments or call if they must reschedule. Amazing as this may seem, only about five percent of my black clients show up on time, and by that I mean within an hour of the appointed time. Only one in five shows up on the appointed day. A few trickle in a day or two later. Most just never show up. 
Missing an appointment never embarrasses black people. They call repeatedly for new appointments, making four, five or even six appointments and then miss them all. I had one client who called more than 50 times before he finally came to my office. ... They had many different excuses, but I never heard, “I forgot,” or “I’m sorry I didn’t make it.
Since appointments mean so little to my clients, I decide each day when I am available, and tell everyone to show up at the same time. On Saturday afternoons I can have as many as twenty appointments for the same time. Usually it is not a problem because few show up and even fewer show up on time. Only once in the last 20 years did everyone show up. (3)
    c) Abstraction

         c1) Primitive extremes

Sometimes looking at the extremes can help us better understand the middle.  For ground zero of ethnic groups who lack abstract reasoning, look no further than the tribes who can't count:

Among [Amazonian] Pirahã's many peculiarities is an almost complete lack of numeracy, an extremely rare linguistic trait ... The language contains no words at all for discrete numbers and only three that approximate some notion of quantity—hói, a "small size or amount," hoí, a "somewhat larger size or amount," and baágiso, which can mean either to "cause to come together" or "a bunch."
Despite missionaries' best efforts, the Hiaitiihi people simply couldn't grasp numbers:

Because of [fear of being cheated], the Hiaitiihi reported a genuine desire to learn how to count and do simple sums. They asked [missionaries] Everett and his wife to teach them these skills. The Everetts offered  regular classes each evening, for eight months in a row. The sessions were always initiated by the Hiaitiihi with much apparent enthusiasm. Still, after eight months of classes, not a single Hiaitiihi had learned to count from 1 to 10.  Not a single person had learned how to solve problems such as "3+1=x" or even "1+1=x."  Then, classes were discontinued.   (4)
Or who have no concept of time:

The Amondawa language has no word for "time", or indeed of time periods such as "month" or "year". The people do not refer to their ages, but rather assume different names in different stages of their lives or as they achieve different status within the community.
But perhaps most surprising is the team's suggestion that there is no "mapping" between concepts of time passage and movement through space. Ideas such as an event having "passed" or being "well ahead" of another are familiar from many languages, ... in Amondawan, no such constructs exist.
         c2) Civilized countries

Such primitive groups may represent ourselves millennia ago. But what about modern, civilized peoples who also seem to find it hard to reason abstractly? Values researcher Michael Minkov:

Consider the following problem given to 4th grade children in their native languages.  
"Al wanted to find how much his cat weighed. He weighed himself and noted that the scale read 57 kg.  He then stepped on the scale holding his cat and found that it read 62 kg.  What was the weight of the cat in kilograms?" 
How can we explain the fact that 95% of the students in Taiwan answered correctly, versus 12% in Kuwait and 9% in Qatar? ... What stops the fabulously rich countries in the Gulf from providing high-quality instruction to their children? (4)

Minkov had similar questions about Afghanis:

During a training session with Afghani high school graduates, I was asked to explain what an IQ test represents. I drew the following on the white board:

Then I invited the students to guess how the next arrow would be positioned. No matter how I paraphrased my question, the result was a row of blank faces. By that time, I had established a very good rapport with my students ... The blank faces could not be explained by shyness or a lack of interest.
I explained that the arrow had been turned (I avoided words like "rotated") always in the same direction and by the same angle, and used a whiteboard marker to illustrate the rotation. Then, once again, I asked how the next arrow would look. After a long pause, I had one volunteer.  He came to the blackboard and drew a circle. (4)

Gedeliah Braun, who taught philosophy in South Africa for years, came to a curious conclusion:
It was only after living amongst blacks for nearly twenty-five years that I discovered a most important fact. Put simply: blacks lack a full-blooded concept of time. It seems evident that if any African language contains a concept of time it will be in an extremely diminished form, and similarly with respect to the future.
People who have difficulty in thinking of things which do not exist, will ipso facto have difficulty thinking of the future. It appears that the Zulu [dictionary] entry for future – isikhati – is the same word as the word fortime, as well as the word for space. In other words, none of these concepts exist in Zulu thought, period. It also appears that there is no word for the past –  ... people who have difficulty in thinking of things which do not exist will have difficulty in thinking of the past as well as the future. (5)
2) We think differently: Studies

Having heard some anecdotes on the subject, let us turn to the numbers.

a) Gratification Delay: tests and studies 

In Richard Lynn's analysis of the question, he states:
The first study to demonstrate differences between blacks and whites in the delay of gratification was carried out by W. Mischel in Trinidad in the late 1950s. He offered black and white children the choice between a small candy bar now or a larger one in a week. He found black children were much more likely to ask for the small candy bar now.
These results were replicated in a multi-ethnic context:

Of course, time preference can be guessed at in many ways.  Studies have shown, for example, that Afro-Americans are less inclined than other ethnic groups to:

At the international level, in the only study of its kind, Wang et al. (2011) performed a gratification delay experiment on college students in 45 countries. Their results below (click to enlarge):

Thus we have some empirical clues on impulse control among ethnic groups.  But gratification delay is just one element of future orientation.

b) Mathematical Ability: tests and studies

Future orientation has been strongly linked to mathematical ability as well:  
  • Benjamin et al. (2006) showed a correlation between time preference and math ability in high schoolers.  
  • Frederick (2005) did the same, but in college students.  
  • Mischel et al. (1994) did a long-term follow-up on the 'marshmallow test kids' showing those who'd delayed gratification scored much higher on math SATs ten years later.

It would seem, then, that one way to possibly gauge future orientation is via standardized mathematics tests.

The OECD-sponsored PISA test, much reported on by Steve Sailer, gives us some data points (click to enlarge):

Within countries, we can guess at different ethnic groups' scores based on PISA's break-out of '2nd generation immigrant students' (data only available for global scores, not math alone):

Some multi-ethnic countries, such as Brazil, break out their scores by region:

For those unfamiliar with Brazil's ethnic geography, here is a comparison of PISA Math score and % white population of region (27 regions):

Within the multi-ethnic U.S., differences on PISA math scores have been broken out by ethnic group:

In the U.S., classic NAEP standardized math tests are also broken down by race/ethnicity:

If indeed future orientation is linked to both gratification delay and mathematical ability,  the data above seem to show that there could be marked differences between Southern and Northern peoples.

Thus both the figures and the anecdotes seem to tell the same story: Ethnic groups differ strongly on future orientation, and it is a trait that may follow them for generations or even centuries.  But this is all micro-level information. What does it mean when scaled up to the level of a society?
II. Low future orientation: the macro

So what effect does all this have on the level of a city, region, or country? 

1) Public infrastructure

When several million of the non-future-oriented get together and create a society, what does it look like?  We have some clues.

a) General infrastructure

Observers in all times and places have noted Afros' singular inability to organize and think ahead.  At the societal level, this can mean weaker than average infrastructure.

Sociologist Benjamin Kidd in 1898 wrote about Afro self-government in the Caribbean:
The descriptions we have had presented to us for many years past by writers and politicians of some of the West India [Caribbean] Islands read like accounts of a former civilization. Decaying harbours, once crowded with shipping; ruined wharves, once busy with commerce; roofless warehouses; stately buildings falling to ruins, deserted mines and advancing forests, ...  (6)
Hesketh Prichard, the first white man to travel all the way through Haiti since independence (1899):

At first sight Port-au-Prince looks fair enough to be worth travelling 5,000 miles to see; once enter it, and your next impulse is to travel 5,000 miles to get away again. The town possesses a peculiar picturesqueness of its own, unlike anything one sees in any other quarter of the globe.
But you walk through its cobbled streets with circumspection, for they are ankle-deep in refuse.  No smallest effort is made at sanitation; the street-drains with all their contaminations flow down and help to fill up the harbour. At times the rain flushes them, and this effort of Nature seems to be the sole force that tends to cleanliness. (7)
The end of colonialism in Africa has led to widespread degradation in the millions of dollars' worth of infrastructure the Europeans left behind.  The following NYT account came after 30 years of self-rule in resource-rich D.R. Congo (1990):

It is difficult to exaggerate the dizzying pace of decay in this city of nearly 400,000 people. ...  The main road to Kikwit [DR Congo] is now rutted and crumbled, ...  Elsewhere in town, squatters have moved into homes that once belonged to the Belgian colonials. Entire families now camp on sidewalks, in parks and even in cemeteries. Streets and backyards are littered with indescribable filth, and toward the edges of the city the roads crumble into dirty sand and then disappear altogether.
...   "Civilization is coming to an end here," said Rene Kinsweke, manager of Siefac, a chain of food stores, as he spoke of how Kikwit has become a dispiriting tableau of chaos and catastrophe. "We're back where we started.We're going back into the bush."

Maybe the most spectacular example has been South Africa, where Euros built a finished first-world nation on Sub-Saharan soil, the only one of its kind. Gedeliah Braun, who lived for years in Johannesburg, says:
White rule in South Africa ended in 1994. It was about ten years later that power outages began, which have now (2007) reached crisis proportions. Part of the problem is the government’s failure to build more power plants ... More generally, it is the breakdown of existing power plants due to lack of maintenance. (5)
South African writer Ilana Mercer on the effects of black rule:
Public healthcare, the railways, ports and road infrastructure bear testimony to the insidious effects of racial preference on South Africa. Refuse collection is erratic. The electrical grid has been degraded at every level:generation, transmission, and distribution. Since distribution is now entrusted to the local, increasingly inept, authorities, candles and paraffin lamps have made a come-back in my home town of Cape Town as well as in other cities.  (8)
Twenty years after handing over this jewel on the Cape to African rule, one has indeed seen the spectacular degradation of its schoolsfarmsmedical systemroadsrailwayselectricity, and water. One recent scandal from this year, among many:

The pictures, taken [in secret] at the coal-fired Lethabo power station, located in the northern Free State, showed that the interior of the plant had been consumed in mountains of ash. The ash deposits, located underneath the boilers in which the coal is burned, are supposed to be sucked out by hopper units and transported by conveyor belt to an ash stacker.
However, lack of maintenance caused the hoppers to become blocked. ...  Employees had “repeatedly warned of impending critical equipment failures. But the warnings appear to have been ignored,” sources said, adding that Eskom was “standing at the edge of the precipice” and that “if two power stations experienced breakdowns without warning, we would be in deep trouble."
(Americans, of course, will be familiar with the above phenomena in white-to-black cities such as Detroit.)

b) Medical infrastructure

A quarter of the funds for S.S. Africa's health system come from foreign donors.  And yet its quality is decried by watchdogs as among the worst in the world.

Keith Richburg, Afro-American journalist for the Washington Post, spent years zig-zagging the dark continent. He reports:
I walked through hospitals in almost every country I visited because I found them a fairly good gauge of how well a government invested in its own people.In almost every place, conditions were, to put it mildly, disgusting. Stiflingly hot, windowless rooms, with flies swarming through fetid air. Patients stacked up almost on top of one another in crowded wards. Blood everywhere.
Sick people, most likely with TB, coughing uncontrollably in the open wards. Family members lining the hallways and packing the courtyards, cooking meals for patients inside who might not otherwise eat.
Most African hospitals are desperately short of medicine. But on the streets outside, any type and variety of medicine is readily for sale, most of it pilfered from the hospital pharmacies or diverted before it even makes it that far. Those with money can afford to buy medicines privately; those without—and that means the vast majority of Africans—simply suffer until they die. (9)

Gedeliah Braun, ex-Johannesburg resident:

When I was in Johannesburg in January 1986, the mammoth Johannesburg General Hospital was for whites only. “Jo’burg Gen” was very impressive. ... It was clean and well-run. The previous white hospital, near the city center, served blacks.
What has happened under the “new dispensation?” Conditions have deteriorated dramatically. Patient infection rates have skyrocketed and theft of supplies is rampant. Discipline among the nearly all-black nursing and maintenance staff is virtually nonexistent — they simply will not work. Patients sometimes go without clean sheets. A rabbi friend, a chaplain at Jo’burg Gen, says it is not uncommon now for patients to die because of nurses’ incompetence and indifference. (5)
(Americans may be familiar with similar stories on their own turf.)

c) Infrastructure: Numbers

Lack of foresight, as we've seen, means lack of construction and maintenance.  Africa's handling of its colonial infrastructure legacy is visible in a variety of ways.

Today's electrification of the continent—whose population is greater than all of Europe's—visible in satellite photos:

Despite a wealth of natural resources which continues to make world powers drool, S.S. Africa's improvidence has led her to become ever more dependent on Western aid as colonialism recedes further into the past:

Despite these ever-growing aid dollars, here is a map of today's 'Least Developed Countries' according to the UN:

2) Public Health and Security

Low future orientation shows itself not only in a country's infrastructure, but in its public health and security.

a) Sexuality and health

Links have been made between Africans' lack of future orientation and their sexual habits.  This has contributed to public health disasters on both sides of the Atlantic. Michael Minkov:
A large-scale study in the 1990s focused on male sexuality and male sexual behavior outside marriage ... in southwest Nigeria.  The majority of the community believed that males are by nature sexually polygynous. Only half of the community believed that male sexuality can and should be confined to marriage.
In Nigeria, Caldwell and his African research associates concluded that only 40% of people's most recent sexual relationship had been between spouses (Caldwell 2002). Later, the researchers found similar patterns across sub-Saharan Africa and discovered that traditional society regarded female immorality as being constituted by sterility, not promiscuity.
Attitudes toward prostitution were also found to be somewhat permissive.... [In Nigeria] "most would have felt more degraded by taking up the traditional activities of rural women, trading and farming" (Caldwell 2002).  By the time they were 30, most of those women had returned to their villages, set up a small business, and married. "Unlike such women in earlier Europe or much of contemporary Asia, they did not thereafter spend their time feeling that they would be ruined if their past caught up with them".
... According to Caldwell, during the 1990s many African interviewees were knowledgeable about the cause of AIDS but did not consider the prospect of death a deterrant and did not intend to desist from their sexual networking practices. Many told the interviewers that they would probably be dead within 10 years even without AIDS, therefore the disease was not considered frightful.  (4)
Given such attitudes, global distribution of HIV may not come as a surprise:

And for U.S. Afros:

Keith Richburg, who spent years reporting in Africa, concurs:

One of the obvious reasons the [AIDS] pandemic has spread so far and so fast in Africa is the rampant prostitution and the Africans' free-and- easy attitude toward sex. Sex with prostitutes and sex with neighbors, co-workers, or almost anyone else is almost a way of life, especially in many of Africa's sprawling urban centers. African men come from a recent past where polygamy was the norm, and siring dozens of children was the only way of insuring that at least a few would survive past infancy. So today, monogamy still seems an alien concept. (9)

b) Crime

We need hardly belabor the statistics on Afro criminality, which have been covered  here extensively. A quick reminder of the situation in Afro-America (click to enlarge): 

Data on crime in Africa and among Afro populations around the world can be found here.

But what is the link with future orientation?  A U.S. public defender (and self-proclaimed 'liberal') who works with Afro-Americans speaks:
Most blacks are unable to speak English well. ... They often become hostile on the stand. Many, when they testify, show a complete lack of empathy and are unable to conceal a morality based on the satisfaction of immediate, base needs.
This is a disaster, especially in a jury trial. ...  It is my firm belief many blacks are unable to discuss the evidence against them rationally because they cannot view things from the perspective of others. They simply cannot understand how the facts in the case will appear to a jury.
One of my robbery clients is a good example. He and two co-defendants walked into a small store run by two young women. ... They drew handguns and ordered the women into a back room. One man beat a girl with his gun. ...  All of this was on video.
I asked [my client] how he thought a jury would react to the video. “They don’t care,” he said. I told him the jury would probably feel deeply sympathetic towards these two women ... I asked him whether he felt bad for the women he had beaten and terrorized. He told me what I suspected—what too many blacks say about the suffering of others“What do I care? She ain’t me. She ain’t kin. Don’t even know her.”  (3)
A different, non-public-defender lawyer dealing with middle-class Afro-American clients:
Many of my clients are unable to explain even the most basic facts. Often they must take the witness stand, and no matter how many times we have gone over the testimony in advance, I can be surprised by what they say. Some are simply lying and get tangled up in their lies, ... Often they seem to say the first thing that pops into their heads. When they are questioned further they cannot remember what they said previously. (3)
This inability to think about the future or to hypothesize someone else's pain has, as we've noted before, contributed to Afros' elevated criminality all over the globe.

Having seen the effects of low future orientation on a nation's public infrastructure, public health and security, let us now consider it in the context of a multicultural country's workplace.

3) The workplace: Quotas and their effects

Data sources: militaryteachersfirefighters

If in fact ethnic groups have widely different levels of future orientation, would quota policies shoehorning them together lead to dysfunction in the workplace? Witnesses in the U.S. have claimed exactly that.

a) Steelworking

NYC steelworker and union leader Tom Dilberger lived through the beginning of the quota era and saw the effects on his crews:

Some people will tell you blacks are lazy, but I think a better word for it is childlike. If a pusher gives them a task and leaves, they will sit down because they’re not being watched. It doesn’t seem to register with them that when the pusher comes back he will see that the work has not been done–until they see him coming. Then they will invent some silly excuse for why the work is not done.
...  Blacks have similar problems with rigging (the work of putting the right cables on the steel pieces and sending them up). Rigging is an integral part of getting the steel where it is has to go. Ironworkers must know all the different capacities of steel cable, ... For some reason, this is something blacks do not seem to pick up.
The same is true with knotcraft. All men in the trade must know certain knots and how to splice. I don’t know why, but blacks don’t seem to get the hang of it.Their abilities to see things before they happen don’t seem to be well developed, and don’t improve as they gain experience.
Finally, blacks do not read blueprints well. That is why there are so few black pushers even after all these years. It’s hard to cover for a guy who can’t read a blueprint. When I taught blueprint reading in the apprentice school, I was able to get it across to the white and [American] Indian guys but not to blacks. (3)

b) Military

The story of affirmative action in the U.S. military is fascinating and instructive.  Some background from psychometrician Linda Gottfredson:

IQ 85 is a second important minimum threshold because the U.S. military sets its minimum enlistment standards at about this level. Although the military is often viewed as the employer of last resort, this minimum standard rules out almost half of blacks (44%) and a third of Hispanics (34%), but far fewer whites (13%) and Asians (8%). The U.S. military has twice experimented with recruiting men of IQ 80-85 (the first time on purpose and the second time by accident), but both times it found that such men could not master soldiering well enough to justify their costs.
As simple de-segregation became hard-core promotion of minorities, career vets like Duncan Hengest watched in disbelief as the armed forces became unrecognizable:
Probably the greatest problem with blacks in the Army today is lack of ability...Blacks also fail the Army’s quite challenging field artillery training course at an appalling rate. At Fort Sill’s Officer Basic Course I was surprised that all of the blacks in my platoon who started with me flunked out or “recycled.” Likewise, all who graduated with me were “recycles” from earlier courses.
In Iraq, I was repeatedly stunned by the inability of many senior black officers to think through problems. In one case, I asked for increased close air support for an area commonly used by insurgents to fire mortars at American bases. A black officer refused air support, suggesting that we “put snipers in trees” to deal with the mortars. Iraq is a barren desert. The trees are mostly irrigated date palms and cannot support a sniper. That black officer worked hard and was certainly brave, but I am still amazed he came up with that foolishness... It took me hours to get fighter-bomber coverage. This was valuable time wasted, and lives were needlessly endangered.
... Once I saw a black major so befuddled by the unit’s vehicle bumper number standard that a five minute maintenance meeting turned into an afternoon marathon. What was the problem? Every combat vehicle in a unit gets a number.  For example, 1-300 IN K-6 would be the Kilo Company, First Battalion, 300th Infantry Commander’s Vehicle. Different units have slightly different numbering standards, but they are not hard to figure out–except for this black major, who was stumped.
He was the operations officer, and his failure to grasp the obvious spread out to more important areas. ... Eventually nothing worked right. When the head of a 500-man outfit does not have the brains to make common tasks routine or enough respect to make orders stick, things go wrong. ... Junior officers nicknamed the major “Abortion.” He was quietly replaced, but in a way that let him keep moving up.  (3)

c) Firefighting

Robert Charles, San Francisco firefighter, watched affirmative action cripple the capacities of his Department:

Standards of strength, size, and intelligence, have all been lowered in the name of diversity. The cost has been great.
Recently an Arson Investigator told me what he often sees when he arrives at fires still in progress: Inefficiency, hesitation, and confusion, mostly from non-white and female firefighters and officers, hired and promoted beyond their capabilities. His job in the Arson Bureau takes him all over town, and he confirmed that fires that would have been handled quickly and efficiently in the past now get out of hand and become greater alarms.
...  An inexperienced black lieutenant quota-hire lost his life because he didn’t recognize the signs of an impending back-draft (explosion). Eight other firefighters had thrown themselves to the floor to avoid the heat that was sure to come (later estimated at 2000 degrees), but the medical examiner’s report said the man had been standing, and had not properly used his protective clothing. Shouts from the firefighter bashing in the door to “hit the floor,” along with the eerie calm that precedes a back-draft were wasted on this unfortunate man, who was hired and promoted beyond his abilities.Affirmative action literally killed him. (3)
Having considered both the 'micro' and the 'macro' of the future orientation question, let us briefly examine the possible origins of this trait.
III. Low Future Orientation: The origins

While future-oriented societies are the preferred destination of the world's millions of would-be migrants, they paradoxically got that way by being not very desirable at all. If social science is to be believed, it was the harsh conditions of the northern climes that led its people to start planning ahead as a way of life. 

1) Ancestral environment

Did our ancestors' environments determine our propensity to plan ahead? (Image Sources)

Different theories on the question have been put forward by HBD thinkers. Most well-known is Richard Lynn's 'Cold Winters theory', which was taken up by Edward Miller as 'Parental Investment':
In cold climates males were selected for provisioning, rather than for mating success. In warm climates, where female gathering made male provisioning unessential, selection was for mating success. Male hunted meat was essential for female winter survival. Genes that encouraged mating success were selected for in warm climates.
Negroids (blacks) evolved in warm climates, while Caucasians (whites) and Mongoloids (Asians) evolved in colder climates. Mating is assisted by a strong sex drive, aggression, dominance, sociability, extraversion, impulsiveness, sensation seeking, and high testosterone. Provisioning is assisted by anxiety, altruism, empathy, behavioral restraint, gratification delay, and a long life span.
Intelligence research has led to the the R-k selection theory, originally used to talk about the animal kingdom, but appropriated by the  late J. Philippe Rushton to chart Asian-European-African biological differences:
According to Rushton’s theory, [...]  Blacks tend to be more ‘r’, having smaller brains and more offspring but investing less emotionally and otherwise in each of them while East Asians are more ‘K.'  They have larger brains and fewer children but invest more in them.  Whites come somewhere in between.  Such characteristics, and those associated with them such as intelligence, taken in the mass, have profound effects on the kinds of societies these racial groups produce.
Why did northern peoples become more 'K' ?
Thanks to the challenge of dealing with the colder winters and scarcer food supply of Europe and North East Asia, the Oriental and White races moved away from an r-strategy towards the K-strategy.  This means more parenting and social organisation which requires larger brain size and a higher IQ’ (‘Race, Evolution and Behaviour’ p 89).

It is of course all only speculation for now, but has the merit of posing a plausible-sounding hypothesis for the radical differences we see today.

2) Recent adaptations

Other, more recent eras that could have affected our time preference include the late Middle Ages, as described by Gregory Clark in A Farewell to Alms. As JayMan sums up:
[Clark] discovered that the well-to-do of this time had an enormous survival advantage compared to their poorer peers.  By examining wills from pre-industrial England, he found that the wealthy had far more surviving children than the poor. Similar patterns have been seen in continental Europe and probably also occurred in East Asia.'

'I suspect that was this case for most of the civilized world in the northern latitudes. This created a selective pressure that favored evolution of “bourgeois” traits in the population, as “people gradually developed the strange new behaviors required to make a modern economy work. The middle-class values of nonviolence, literacy, long working hours and a willingness to saveemerged.”'
(See also Ron Unz's ideas on a similar process in East Asia, via Peter Frost.)

3) Neurological evidence

As we have seen, future orientation and math ability may be correlated. So does the latter have any genetic basis?

Other interesting tidbits:

An active hippocampus helps:

A new study from the Stanford University School of Medicine says that the size and circuitry of certain parts of children's brains are excellent predictors of how well they'll respond to intensive math tutoring.
Menon's research team took MRI scans of 24 third-graders just before they underwent eight weeks of rigorous math tutoring. The kids who were tutored showed across-the-board gains in their arithmetic skills, with the levels of their improvement varying wildly — from 8 percent improvement up to 198 percent.
The researchers found that the kids who responded the best to tutoring tended to have a larger and more active hippocampus. ... Even more than its size, the hippocampus's ability to get along with other parts of the brain was the biggest predictor of math success.

The study looked at the professional success of people who, as 13-year-olds, had taken both the SAT, because they had been flagged as particularly gifted, as well as the Differential Aptitude Test. That exam measures spatial relations skills, the ability to visualize and manipulate two-and three-dimensional objects. While math and verbal scores proved to be an accurate predictor of the students’ later accomplishments, adding spatial ability scores significantly increased the accuracy.
The researchers, from Vanderbilt University in Nashville, said their findings make a strong case for rewriting standardized tests like the SAT and ACT tofocus more on spatial ability, to help identify children who excel in this area and foster their talents.
While a great deal of work is being done to understand how genetics could affect our math success (and thus, perhaps, our life success), as far as we know very little has been published on the racial aspects of the question.  We shall keep our ear to the ground.

*     *     *

Is it possible, then, that our ancestral environments left us with a legacy of different perceptions of the future? Of the ability to think abstractly?  Of the ability to think of things which are not?

W.H. Collins, in his 1918 tome about lynching in the South, said of the Afro:
He is the optimist of the human race, and lives in the eternal present. He has no sorrows from the past, and no care except for the immediate future.
From the data we have gathered, we dare to suggest that abstract thinking, mathematical ability, future planning, and gratification delay are all somehow linked.

At the micro level, these traits are found more often in members of groups that evolved in colder climates than in warmer ones.  At the macro level, the former and the latter create markedly different types of towns, states, nations, businesses, industries, and schools.

Paradoxically, it was the 'easy' climates which created the very people who, today, wish to migrate to states led by those who evolved in the 'hard' climates. But when a critical migrant mass is reached, the very traits that make cold-people countries such desirable destinations begin to chip away.

At the same time, in Euro countries with very old tropical populations, like the U.S. or South Africa, assimilation has still  not happened. The Sun-people-run parts of these countries function markedly less well than the Ice-people-run parts.

All of the above, we believe, form solid arguments for bringing immigration policy back in line with that of yesteryear. The 1924 U.S. Immigration Act or Australia's 'White Australia policy' openly promoted Teutonics. W. European countries would be wise to learn from others' mistakes and sharply limit future immigration from the global South.  

We finish with the late J. Philippe Rushton who, like many, puzzled over the different thinking patterns of Afros:
Still, the low African IQ of 70 remains hard for many to accept. One reason for the disbelief: Africans—and African Americans—display high levels of social competence. They are outgoing, talkative, sociable, warm, and friendly. Psychometrically speaking, they score high on the Extraversion personality dimension.
It is this “winning personality” among Blacks, I believe, that makes it hard for so many to accept the validity of their failing tests of abstract reasoning ability.  A typical academic story comes from professors who, on first exposure to African students, express their delight in the high levels of classroom performance. ... Only when the students took objectively measured essay or multiple-choice examinations did it become painfully obvious to even the most well-wishing faculty members that their grasp of abstract material failed to live up to their classroom rhetoric.
Future orientation is no joke. Along with commonweal orientation, it is the bedrock of the safe and prosperous societies we so enjoy today.  It is, we suspect, part of the genetic heritage of Northerners.

A mono-ethnic society has many benefits, but if we insist on bringing in large numbers of immigrants, we would do well to limit them to groups closely (and civilizationally) related to our own.  At this point, the very future of the West may depend on it.

Thank you for reading.


(1) Commons, J.R., Races and Immigrants in America. NY: MacMillan, 1907.
(2) Bonger, Willem Adriaan. Race and Crime. Trans. Margaret Mathews Hordyk. New York: Columbia U. Press, 1943.
(3) Taylor, Jared, ed.  Face to Face with Race. New Century Books, 2014.
(4) Minkov, Michael. Cultural Differences in a Globalizing World. Emerald Group, 2011.
(5) Braun, Gedaliah, Racism, Guilt, and Self-Deceit. Jan Lamprecht, 2007.
(6) Kidd, Benjamin. Control of the Tropics. London: MacMillan, 1898.
(7) Prichard, Hesketh. Where Black Rules White : A Journey Across and About Hayti. Westminster : A. Constable & Co., Ltd., 1900.
(8) Mercer, Ilana. Into the Cannibal's Pot. Bytech, 2011.
(9) Richburg, Keith B. Out of America: A Black Man Confronts Africa. 1st ed. New York: Basic Books, 1997.