Nov 25, 2015

Citizenship, Race, Nation

via Radix

In thinking about immigration and migration, I could not care less whether someone filled out the paperwork correctly or passed a civics exam. I oppose the immigration of an African who waits his turn and genuinely “wants to be an American”; conversely, I would gladly accept thousands of “Swedish boat people” who wash up on the shores. 

The question is really who someone is. It is not how someone is (whether he followed some arbitrary legal procedure).

But we still live in a liberal age based on liberal assumptions. And liberalism, among other things, values procedure as a chief source of legitimacy. A political decision is legitimate, for instance, if it is voted on correctly; an individual is a member of a nation if he happened to be born in its geographic territory or takes a test and is sanctioned by a lawyer or bureaucrat.

I have, no doubt, that the American governors who oppose the resettlement of Syrian migrants in their states (all but one of whom are Republican) have some traditionalist instincts buried beneath their PC talking points. After all, Salus populi suprema lex esto, and these governors are acting like true guardians of the people. But they also evince that Republican tendency of ultimately missing the point, and doing the right thing for the wrong reason.

The Muslims who attacked Paris last week were not (so far as we know) Syrian refugees; they were, in fact, French “citizens”. In other words, the issue is one of race (and all that this word implies) and civilization, and not legality or geographic location. In turn, in the age of mass migration, the threats to a nation are just as likely to be “citizens” as foreigners or invaders.

What we are witnessing is the passing of the concept of “the citizen”—“le citoyen” that was deified during the French Revolution. The politics of the future will be based on race and identity, and not the abstract, bankrupt notions of “citizenship” currently peddled by Western nation-states.

Rid of the Valkyries: Jewish Subversion of Nordic Traditions and Lore

via Aryan Skynet

Somewhere in America, a well-meaning mother is reading her daughter a bedtime story about a Valkyrie, perhaps thinking because it deals with Northern European mythology that it will foster in her child an intellectual curiosity about the old world, its folkways, its splendors, and its epic past. Unfortunately, the bedtime story is Edda: A Little Valkyrie’s First Day of School, and its author is a cultural Marxist Jew from Brooklyn named Adam Auerbach.
Published last year by Macmillan, the picture book tells the story of Edda, “the littlest Valkyrie”, who lives with her blond and red-haired folk in the magical land of Asgard. Poor little Edda feels unfulfilled and limited by continuing to live among her own kind, so her father, who is “very wise”, enrolls her in a public school where she can mingle with other races.

Adam Auerbach
Adam Auerbach
Auerbach depicts Edda walking into a classroom peopled with multicolored students. Propped up on a bookshelf to Edda’s left as she enters is a book with the title Myth, with a picture of Edda’s father on the cover. The meaning of this detail is that she has now been initiated into the real world, where citizens come in all shapes and shades, and everything is relative. The thanks the “very wise” patriarch receives for sending his daughter to this state indoctrination facility is that he will be represented to her as a false ideal.

Edda, who is shown misbehaving in class, throwing a book on the floor, knocking over her chair, and defiantly perching on top of her desk, must learn to be accommodating of those who are different. She must stand in line behind students of other races to get a drink at the water fountain or go for a ride on the playground slide. Eventually a juvenile romance buds between Edda and one of her Lahteeno classmates, guaranteeing that Edda’s “very wise” father has only succeeded in flushing his bloodline down the roach-infested commode of a system of multicultural myth1.

The author, according to the publisher’s website, “was inspired to create Edda while listening to Richard Wagner’s ‘Ring Cycle,’ a series of operas based on Norse mythology. Adam has always loved the stories of the rugged Norse gods and monsters.” His children’s book, however, merely conveys his thinly disguised hostility toward Europeans, whom he would clearly prefer to see dispersing themselves through dysgenic mating. In this way Auerbach expresses his Jewishness.

Leah Garrett
Leah Garrett
Jews have traditionally felt threatened by Germanic myths and legends and have done what they can to undermine the ethnic pride represented by these cultural forms. Leah Garrett, Loti Smorgon Research Professor of Contemporary Jewish Life and Culture at Monash University, addresses this in her essay “Sabotaging the Text: Tannhauser in the Works of Heine, Wagner, Herzl, and Peretz”, in which she writes that, “The line of cultural evolution of the Tannhauser myth is particularly interesting because […] it shows how even the work of an antisemite [sic] can become a tool for Jewish cultural cohesion.”2 Each phase of the development of the Tannhauser mythos as reiterated by Jews, she goes on,
reflects a moment in the transmission of ideas and shows how Jewish thinkers work with the products of the culture that surround them and adjust them to fit their needs. As they reintroduce the cultural product back into society, it moves to the next actor in the line of transmission. The Tannhauser text, as an expression of German folklore, is sabotaged and subverted by Heine, Herzl, and Peretz in such a way that Germanic elements are satirized, suppressed, or replaced with Judaic elements.3
Garrett notes how Heinrich Heine, a Jew, inserts toilet humor into the narrative of his 1836 poem “Der Tannhauser”:
Heinrich Heine
Heinrich Heine
The poem keeps intact much of the plot of the original medieval ballad while adding a humorous ending that transplants Tannhauser to contemporary Germany. Like many German romantics, the Tannhauser legend “cast a spell” on Heine, yet rather than using the myth to romanticize Germany, Heine subverted the original by having the poem shift in the latter half to a ribald and humorous account of Tannhauser’s travels through Europe:In Dresden I saw a poor old dog
Who’d made quite a stir in his youth;
But now he can only bark and piss,
Having lost his one last tooth.4

One can almost imagine such dreck being recited for comic relief in the conferences of the Allied war planners as they hatched their plans to really reduce Dresden to such a state. Heine, however, like Auerbach and so many others after him, was only doing what Jews have done to their hosts for centuries in realizing what Dr. Kevin MacDonald has termed the Culture of Critique. Yesterday it was toothless hounds urinating on German culture; today it is Marvel’s post-op “Thor” turning mudshark and smooching with “Captain America”. What so intimidates the Jews about pagan Germanic civilization that necessitates its subversion and degradation? Let readers find this out for themselves and restore the idols to their pedestals.

Rainer Chlodwig von Kook
  1. Auerbach, Adam. Edda: A Little Valkyrie’s First Day of School. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2014 [unpaginated].
  2. Garrett, Leah. “Sabotaging the Text: Tannhauser in the Works of Heine, Wagner, Herzl, and Peretz”. Jewish Social Studies 9, no. 1 (Fall 2002), p. 34.
  3. Ibid., p. 35.
  4. Ibid., pp. 35-36.

A Review of "The Good Religion: The Occidental Temple of the Wise Lord"

via Aryan Myth and Metahistory

I have just completed my reading of The Good Religion. The Occidental Temple of the Wise Lord by Darban-I-Den (Dr Stephen Edred Flowers/Edred Thorsson) and found it quite fascinating. This book may appear to signify a turning point for Edred as he is currently engaged in the formation of a Zoroastrian or Mazdan religious order in the West. This order is called The Occidental Temple of the Wise Lord, the Wise Lord being Ahura Mazda. This does not necessarily indicate to me that he is moving away from his Germanic and runic research. In the past he has produced for instance studies on the Celtic Ogham (The Book of Ogham, 1992), Hermetics and Alchemy (Hermetic Magic. The Postmodern Magical Papyrus of Abaris, 1995 and Carnal Alchemy, 1995) as well as forays into Freemasonry (Freemasonry and the Germanic Tradition, 2008) and his alleged involvement with the Temple of Set.

So this latest work follows a pattern of Edred examing and bringing to light Indo-European or Aryan sources of spirituality and making them accessible to a wider readership. In my opinion he is the ultimate modern day Germanic Faustian man and I commend him in his pioneering endeavours. My readers will be pleased to note that many of the now out of print Runa Raven titles are being republished by Lodestar. However a more mainstream publisher Inner Traditions Bear and Company is bringing out his Icelandic Magic: The Mystery and Power of the Galdrabok Grimoire in 2016. This may be a different work from his earlier Runa Raven book The Galdrabok. An Icelandic Book of Magic, 2011). This earlier work was originally published by Red Wheel/Weiser in 1990. Inner Traditions recently republished his groundbreaking and authorative Lords of the Left Hand Path: Forbidden Practices and Spiritual Heresies in 2012. In the same year Weiser published his ALU, An Advanced Guide to Operative Runology. See my review

In the book Edred sets out the history of Zoroastrianism and the life of the prophet Zarathustra and places this in an Indo-European context as he has done with his researches into the Celtic, Hermetic and Freemasonic paths. In this sense the book follows that pattern. Indeed there are three chapters on the Indo-Europeans, the Indo-Iranians and the Iranians in the Historical section of the book. After this section there follows an Ideological section with chapters on Theology, Demonology and Cosmology and finally a section on Ritual and Prayer. The first two sections of the book were the most interesting for me as I have no intention of becoming a Mazdan although Edred stresses that this religious path may run alongside any other that the individual is practicing. He demonstrates that this is an Indo-European religion built upon the tripartite system but nevertheless is intended to become a universal religion to counter the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. However the Mazdan path allows for people to continue also in their original religious path if they so wish. This shows remarkable tolerance which is a known trait of Indo-European systems of belief.

In his book Edred stresses the communal nature of this religion although most of it can be practiced alone as an individual. I think in this area he may struggle as I can see that isolated individuals may adopt this religion but to find small groups or individuals coming together in a wide geographical area will be difficult as those of us who follow a heathen path know only too well. To sum up this book is no doubt to be regarded as a foundation text of this new revival of an ancient religion and is specifically intended for the western man as western Mazdaism will inevitably have many differences to Iranian Zorastrianism. It will also be of interest to anyone who is drawn to Indo-European religion and spirituality regardless of what particular path you may follow.

Non-White Invasion Is the Biggest Threat to America

via American Freedom Party

‘Look what happened to Germany. Germany isn’t going to be Germany any more.’

Immigration is the biggest issue for the nation at the moment, contends Phyllis Schlafly, an icon of the conservative movement who has been active for half a century.

In a wide-ranging interview with WND she also urged Republicans in Congress to fight harder for conservative policies and discussed the possibility of a Trump presidency.

Schlafly said the Republican candidates need to be explaining to the American public their views on immigration.

“I think that’s the top grass-roots issue at the present time,” she told WND. “We want to vet the people who have gotten in here. … Our method of making people citizens is they have to agree to follow our laws, and they have to agree to never be a public charge.

“These coming in right now are going right on welfare,” she said. “That should not be allowed.”

She said the matter is simple: If they cannot make those promises, they don’t get in. If their nations don’t accept their return, the U.S. should cut off foreign aid to those governments, she said.

“There are so many ways the money could be used on behalf of America,” Schlafly said, “and not for the wrong purposes.”

Ann Coulter’s back, and she’s never been better than in “Adios, America!: The Left’s Plan to Turn our Country into a Third World Hellhole.”

“Teaching One-way Tolerance doesn’t work…”

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals just ruled that President Obama’s executive actions to change immigration law and allow millions of illegal aliens to remain in the United States are unconstitutional.

The Obama administration immediately said it would take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, but Obama might be out of office before the case is decided.

Obama’s own words likely would be used against him. He has stated several times that, as president, he does not have the authority to change the law.

Schlafly said the resettlement of refugees and newcomers to the nation is getting out of control.

“Look what happened to Germany,” she said. “Germany isn’t going to be Germany any more. It’s going to be Muslim. We shouldn’t allow that to happen.”

She said U.S immigration and naturalization laws “are really very good.”

“Now we need to obey them,” she said. “The idea of just letting anybody in who shows up on the seaboard is simply unacceptable.”

Regarding the case against Obama’s attempts to change immigration law, she noted the Constitution provides that Congress has the power over immigration.

“And Congress has fallen down on the job.”

What do YOU think? Should all illegal aliens in the U.S. be deported? Sound off in today’s WND poll.

Further, she said, Republican members of Congress need to give up the bipartisan talk.

“That’s not what politics is,” she said. “It’s a fight on all the time.”

On Trump, she recalled a similarly turbulent time for the GOP establishment when Ronald Reagan got the nomination.

“We survived that because Reagan was a real American and would stand up for America,” she said.

She said she believes that is Trump’s desire also.

Schlafly also noted the “kingmakers” in the party had difficulty then and likely will again when “they realize they can’t name the nominee and that Trump might be the nominee.”

But a key component of the presidency is love for America, she said.

“I don’t think Obama ever did. I think he wanted America to be like every other country. We don’t want to be like every other country. We’re better. We’re exceptional.”

The Obama-negotiated trade deals, especially the Trans Pacific Partnership, are bad, she said, because the U.S. “always gets the short end.”

“We are not in favor of treaties made in a closet where nobody else is around. And we think they ought to abide by the Constitution with the two-thirds requirement of the Senate,” she said.

A little more than a year ago, WND founder and CEO Joseph Farah wrote a column about Schlafly and her near single-handed defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment. He noted her new book “Who Killed the American Family?” and the republishing of her conservative classic, “A Choice Not an Echo.”

“I can’t even tell you how important Phyllis Schlafly was in helping me figure out what’s really happening in the world and in our country,” Farah said.

Introducing British Renaissance: British Nationalists Unite Against Islamism, Zionist Supremacism, and Mass Invasion

via The Occidental Observer

For several reasons, Britain has long been the “sick man” of European Nationalism. Aside from the British National Party’s string of local and European election victories prior to its spectacular electoral collapse of 2010, the story of British ethno-populism has, even in its earliest incarnations, largely been one of under-performance. Setting aside my own arguments and theories as to why this has been the case, one is astounded and horrified at the transformation that Britain is being subjected to. The Office for National Statistics has documented that between 2001 and 2009 the non-indigenous population of England and Wales increased by 37.4%. The mixed-race population increased in same period by nearly 50%. As of 2014, the non-indigenous population of Britain accounts for 80% of its population growth, with White births accounting for just 16.5% of the total in West Birmingham. White decline in Britain, as in much of the West, is not a putative future event — it is a contemporary crisis, an extinction in progress.

Despite media silence, Britain faces several existential threats. The character of the nation is currently under severe threat from Muslim immigration. The UK Muslim population is increasing rapidly and Britons are concerned. In 2003 a British Social Attitudes (BSA) survey highlighted that 48 per cent of the native British were concerned that an increase in the Muslim population would weaken Britain’s national identity. By 2013 that figure had risen to 62 per cent. Before and since the latest survey, the country has been rocked by the side effects of this population increase — Islamic terror, Muslim grooming gangs that have subjected thousands of indigenous British girls to rape and violence, the ‘Trojan Horse’ phenomenon where Muslim hardliners attempted to take over city schools, and the fact that a 2011 study showed that 21.3% of Muslims living in Britain have never worked. Muslims, together with Britain’s other ethnic minorities consume a disproportionate amount of welfare and tax credits, even relative to their swelling population.

The multi-cultural experiment has been an expensive one for the indigenous British public. The character of whole towns and cities has been altered wholesale. The elderly no longer recognize the land of their birth and childhood. Muslim-patrolled ‘No-Go’ areas have been established in British cities, as in much of Europe, where Whites are prevented from entering under threat of violence. Much the same situation prevails in those parts of the British urban landscape that Black gangs have rendered lawless. Millions in taxpayer cash has been wasted on failed ‘integration’ efforts, expensive social care for ‘problem’ minority families, special policing measures, and supporting minority cultural events. Britain’s socialist healthcare system, designed and implemented in an era when Britain was ethnically homogenous, has been stretched and tested to its limit; it’s future uncertain. Temporary migrants alone cost the National Health System around £2 billion a year, with the figure for settling immigrants rising to even more horrific levels.

These facts, and others pertaining to racial, religious and cultural differences, are not open for serious public discussion because of other existential threats to Britain — cultural Marxism and increasing restrictions on free speech. Cultural Marxism, and the many branches of related thought under its umbrella, have permeated British politics, British academia, the media, and large swathes of society. As a result, a perverse Lewis Carroll-like lexicon has developed around the discussion (or lack thereof) of race relations in Britain. Even though the 2011 Crime Census published by the Ministry of Justice showed that those of African and South East Asian ethnicity were substantially over-represented across all crimes, particularly so in violent crimes and robbery, Britain engages in perpetual witch-hunts against any dissent from the dogma that we are all the same. In one of the most apt recent illustrations of the madness that has taken root, the nation which obsesses over ‘hate crime’ has refused to punish Bahar Mustafa, a Goldsmith’s University ‘diversity officer,’ who tweeted the phrase “Kill All White Men.” Contrary to the utopian claims of the cultural Marxists, Mustafa represented a perfect truth: the agents of ‘diversity’ are not motivated by love, but by incredible hostility to White Britain.

To date, how has British Nationalism responded to these threats? Enoch Powell once remarked that “The life of nations … is lived largely in the imagination,” and, sadly, British Nationalism has failed to inspire the British imagination. This failure is not completely due to tactical errors, but in part to the context of the era. In this age of consumerist materialism and instant gratification it is more difficult than ever to lead someone by appealing to something other than what they may gain in the “here and now.” Of course, as I’ve outlined above, the native British would be substantially better off in a less ‘diverse’ nation. There would be little or no terrorism and no grooming gangs; there would be safe schools, safe and more familiar neighborhoods, more money to go around, and an infinitely greater legacy to be bestowed on the coming generation of British children.

London: Before and After the Racial Revolution was imposed from above
London: Before and After the Racial Revolution was imposed from above

But this future is too distant, and the path to it too obscure, for the great mass of the people. Their ‘imaginations,’ meanwhile, are occupied with baser interests — fashion, celebrities, social approval, the 9 to 5, and what to have for dinner. The great English pamphleteer William Cobbett (1763–1835), himself no friend of the Jews, once pointed out that “it is difficult to agitate a man with a full stomach.” A contemporary pamphleteer of sorts, I might say that it is difficult to agitate a man with satellite TV, an iPad, fast food and a luxury car that requires judicious polishing every Sunday afternoon. Appeals to heritage and posterity are, regardless of the merits of our cause, mainly lost on the acquisitive “me generation.” And as long as the pains of the demographic, cultural, and spiritual decline are dulled or masked by materialistic opiates, we will encounter difficulty. Nationalism, which in its purest form is anti-materialistic, will struggle to gain followers more than any other political ideology in this, the most materialistic age in the history of humanity.

But if the task wasn’t difficult enough, there have been enough problems within the fold to make success even more elusive. For a movement that originated the rallying cry “No More Brother Wars” we are proof positive that old habits die hard. Europeans are distinctive for their fierce individualism, and the traits of the warrior bands of centuries past are still alive and well. We are the first to pick fights with our brothers, and in this age of crisis this simply shouldn’t be the case. This is not to say that genuine disagreements don’t take place, or that cases of corruption are non-existent in our cause. Corruption and decay should be ruthlessly rooted out, but never at the expense of unity of purpose. The British people cannot be expected to unite with or behind a group that is itself languishing in disunity. Perhaps more than any other Nationalist movement, that of the British has been particularly fractious. Personality clashes, corruption, pessimism, unchecked ambition, incompetence, conceit, tactical errors, splits over ideological minutiae and, yes, government infiltration have all conspired to weaken and break apart the bonds that might have forged a movement capable of meeting the challenges of the era.

Organizational longevity hasn’t been scarce, but the focal point and effectiveness of the British movement has been shifting and unsettled. The British Brothers League (1902-1923), the British Union of Fascists (1932-1940), the British League of Ex-Servicemen and Women (1937-1948), the Union Movement (1948-1966), the National Front (1967 – present), and the British National Party (1982 – present) have all had their modest day in the sun only to subsequently fade into obscurity and inertia. Observing the poor fortunes of British Nationalism, at close hand and from afar, has been a tortuous and frustrating experience for me, as it has for many others.

But Jack Sen’s new project, the British Renaissance, brings some promise of change. For the first time in a decade, when I look at the stirrings now occurring in Britain, I feel optimistic about success there. I’ve followed the career of Jack Sen since his break with UKIP and subsequent interview for The Occidental Observer. Jack crossed a socio-political Rubicon in England by naming and shaming Jewish politicians like Luciana Berger for dual loyalties, something that hadn’t even been attempted by an English Parliamentary candidate since the early post-World War II period. What made the move all the more impressive was that Mr Sen, a husband and a father, was aware of the likely repercussions of this ‘outing’ of Jewish influence and, moreover, that he retained enough integrity to proceed despite having as much, if not more, to lose than many of us. Zionist-infiltrated UKIP wasted no time in exiling him from the party.


I wasn’t surprised when Jack moved to the British National Party, though I doubted the relationship would last long. I feel no great need here to dissect the current goings-on at the BNP (the internal workings of which I confess to knowing very little about) and I believe that Jack’s own report on his subsequent departure from that organization speaks volumes. Jack has informed me of a strong culture of fear and censorship at the BNP — an organization that seems to have lost its nerve and barely resembles the Nationalist party founded by the steely John Tyndall. Jack was castigated by BNP organizers for using the word ‘invader’ (the horror!) in a written piece on immigration, and was prevented from producing a documentary on the sexualization of children lest it offend homosexuals. Given the changes that have occurred in the BNP since the departure of Nick Griffin, and Jack’s unbending commitment to ‘calling a spade a spade,’ the eventual parting of ways was inevitable.

Whether or not one believes the current crop of financial allegations made against it by a female malcontent who took her story to the Antifa, the British National Party suffers from a crippling lack of trust as well as a current leadership that lacks the capacity to inspire the public. For all that may have been said against Nick Griffin, he was a media figure to an extent, and the British public at least knew who he was. Today, Jack Sen is more familiar to the British public than the current BNP chairman, a former teacher who is more likely to be remembered for his lifetime teaching ban after threatening a couple of his students and slashing the tyres of their bicycles. While the BNP chairman shrinks from the media, Jack has engaged the media energetically and continues to write, organize and speak prolifically. His ideas, and the narrative of his recent political history, are succinctly expressed in his new book, How to Get Suspended From UKIP and the BNP in 10 articles and 2 Tweets, which also features contributions from Andrew Anglin, Nick Griffin, Andrew Brons, and Jez Turner. Meanwhile the BNP is currently languishing in a state of inert terror, vanishing from electoral politics, producing the same tired literature, and shrinking from the media and any type of statement or action that might attract scorn. Along with its catastrophic decline in electoral clout and influence even within the wider movement, this renders the BNPs current de facto position as the focal point of English political nationalism barely tenable. It must give way, and there will be, in its wake, a position left vacant.

The British Renaissance project is more than just an attempt to fill this socio-political gap. The project marks a new departure in several respects. The faces, approaches and mostly importantly, the spirit of the venture, differ substantially from anything seen before on the British scene. I concur with Jack that the main difficulties facing British Nationalism are an apathetic public, an intolerant media, infiltration, and negative and selfish Nationalists. The central idea underpinning British Renaissance is that of unity, and ideological and structural purity. Jack is putting in place measures to screen out infiltrators and foster an atmosphere of co-operation and optimism. Already it is drawing on support from members of UKIP, the British Democrats under Andrew Brons, British Voice, and the BNP, as well as a number of smaller groups and previously unaffiliated members of the British public. If this continues to proceed on a larger scale, it will represent an unprecedented achievement for British Nationalism.

Perhaps just as crucially, the new venture has made it clear that the issue of Jewish influence will not be glossed over or made taboo, either internally or externally. The result will be an organization similar to AmRen or NPI, but with a more ‘aware’ message. In my own conversations with Jack, he has argued that concealing the issue “would be academically disingenuous and irresponsible.” Tackling this issue, especially in light of government-imposed restrictions on free speech, requires very careful treatment and subtlety. If it can be said that the silence on race has been harmful to the interests of White Britain, and damaging overall to race relations, in a truly free society we should be able to probe more deeply into the reasons for that silence. One of the reasons for the silence is of course the cumulative effect of successive waves of legislation targeting free speech. In Britain, the key figures in attempts to legislate against the discussion of race, and in race relations more generally, since the post-war period have been Harold Lever, Frank Soskice, Anthony Lester, Jim Rose, Harry Cohen, Malcolm Rifkind and, most importantly, Leon Brittan, architect of the racial clause of the 1986 Public Order Act. Taboo though it may be, it is an interesting fact that all of these individuals share Jewish roots, and this fact, along with any deeper implications, deserves to be discussed, analyzed and commented upon without intrusion by the State.

Unfortunately, Jewish groups in Britain jealously protect their interests in a manner that White Britons do not. In 2009 Channel 4 aired a documentary titled “The UK Israel Lobby,” which probed the manner in which pro-Israel Jewish organizations and individuals attempted to influence British political debate and public policy. The methods ascribed to these groups, and evidenced throughout the documentary, included: the formation of groups within groups (such as Conservative Friends of Israel); the use of media influence for the social ostracism of non-compliant politicians (such as an article berating William Hague appearing in The Spectator); the use of financial pressure (the withdrawal of CFI funds from Hague); and the lobbying of high level elites even on minutiae such as the use of descriptive language when describing Israeli military actions (specifically referencing a meeting between the CFI Director and Prime Minister, David Cameron). Predictably, Jewish organizations reacted quickly against the film-makers and Channel 4. The Board of Deputies of British Jews, along with the Jewish-operated Community Security Trust condemned the exposé as “anti-Semitic.” Following a slew of complaints to the media watchdog OfCom, the regulator issued a response adjudicating that:
Given the editorial content of this programme described above, and the way the programme sought to expose what it said was the way pro-Israel lobbyists use financial means to gain political influence, it is almost inevitable that many of the references to prominent figures and groups would be critical. However, such a critical analysis does not, in Ofcom’s view, constitute anti-Semitism. Importantly, Ofcom found that these references, and the programme overall were directed towards individuals or organisations because of their alleged actions and activities and not because of their religion.
British Renaissance will undoubtedly come under fire from Jewish organizations that will label it, and Jack Sen, ‘anti-Semitic.’ However, I believe that Mr Sen, Jez Turner, and the other leading figures of British Renaissance are capable and willing to execute the delicate but necessary task of focussing, in a manner similar to the Channel 4 documentary, on the actions and activities of individuals and organizations who are demonstrably bringing harm to Britain, its traditions, and its future. In doing so, they will avoid the legal traps put in place by Soskice, Brittan et al (and pioneered by the very same Board of Deputies) while simultaneously ending more than a decade of concessions to imagined ‘respectability’ which resulted more often in a loss of integrity. Jack has repeatedly refused to stay silent on the role of Jewish influence in our current problems, as evidenced in yet another badge of honor when he was removed as a PEGIDA UK admin after referencing Zionist influence on their Facebook page. Jack recognizes that we cannot compromise with the uncompromising enemies arrayed on the Left. With the emergence of British Renaissance, we witness a rekindling of the principle that the best form of defense is attack.

As well as representing a new departure in some respects, the British Renaissance will hold firm to more familiar patterns and approaches within the wider movement. It will reject the materialistic, functionalist view of society and, with it, the definition of the racial problem as one of integration and assimilation of minorities into the ‘mainstream.’ The organization will remain faithful to the stance that there are empirically observable psychological and behavioral differences between racial groups, and that in addition to sharp cultural dissonance these differences render integration, assimilation and ‘consensus’ within a given society to be utopian in theory and impossible to implement in reality. The British Renaissance rejects multiculturalism as a dangerous ideology that is playing a pivotal role in the decline of the White demographic throughout the West. Promoters of this ideology, whatever their racial or religious background, are enemies of the people.

Although the problems facing Britain are large in scale, British Renaissance acknowledges that electoral and cultural tactics must be local in practice. Local meetings in established ‘free speech zones’ under the BR umbrella are being organized across the country. In these locations Nationalists can meet in friendship and solidarity to exchange and promote ideas. It is hoped that these meetings can eventually grow into significant electoral and cultural forces. In the meantime, the task at hand must be modestly framed. The fractures must be healed and the movement must be strengthened. Optimism needs to be restored. Enemies and infiltrators need to be confronted and expelled. Loyalties should be redefined. A renaissance must occur.

Both organized Jewry and the State have already taken notice, and taken action. The movement is set to hold its first major meeting in Southport at the end of the month, and had invited as speaker Matthew-John Heimbach, the tireless young leader of the Traditional Worker’s Party. The Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Jewish Community Security Trust lobbied the government to ban Heimbach, who has no criminal or violent history, from being able to enter the UK. This was then dutifully imposed by Home Secretary Theresa May, and with no recourse to appeal, Heimbach is now banned from entering Britain until the case comes up for review a decade from now. Meanwhile the budding new UK movement is deprived of one of the world’s most promising and energetic young Nationalists, and with it, the opportunity to forge new bonds, and exchange ideas with, their American brothers.

If external enemies weren’t enough of a challenge, we can also be sure that fratricidal habits will rear their head once more. Thus far these seem confined to conspiracy theorists who see every new movement as a spy-ridden puppet of the State, and those who have taken issue with Jack Sen’s heritage (his paternal grandfather being a non-European immigrant). The former I simply won’t engage with, since paranoid delusions are largely untreatable and even more rarely open to reason. State monitoring of the ‘far-Right’ has always existed (even Hitler began his political career by spying on the German Worker’s Party), but becoming inert through fear or apathy is not an option. To the latter I simply point out that the floor has been open for anyone who considers themselves of pure heritage to do what Jack has done, and yet either the talent or the will has apparently been lacking. As Jack has expressed it to me: “If there were more 100% indigenous people willing to risk their careers, societal ostracism and financial hardship, then I might not have taken the lead. But I felt I had no other choice but to engage, in light of the dire direction my beloved Britain is headed.” The goal here is to rescue white Britain, not to argue over ideological niceties. We simply don’t have that luxury.

We can rest assured that our enemies, within and without, will ensure we have many more obstacles ahead. But I believe that Jack Sen and his colleagues at British Renaissance will stay the course. I have been impressed with the contact that I have had with Jack thus far, and I have adopted an advisory role within BR in which I hope to assist him as much as possible in achieving great things in a country that has for too long been subjected to the hate of our enemies. Britain can, and will, be restored to the green and pleasant land it once was. Islam will not reign supreme. British policy, both foreign and domestic, will no longer be swayed by the financial clout of elites with alien allegiances. These lands will remain ours. The BR leadership has integrity, determination and, perhaps most importantly, imagination. And in these dark and dying days of the West we should remember Powell’s observation: in imagination lies the life of nations.

Christianity Confused Identity & Allegiance

via Majority Rights

For his insolent defiance of Roger Waters plea that he not play Israel, he might have been singing “We don’t need no education” right along with Pink Floyd .....but actually, maybe Jesse Hughes, his friends and fans could use a little. Try a caveat on Abrahamic fellowship.
Jesse Hughes, commencing an Eagles of Death Metal concert, Tel Aviv, 12 July 2015:
Now I’m also going to tell you another true story before I bring the rest of the boys up here. We decided to end the tour in this fuckin’ city because we knew we couldn’t top it once we got here. That is 87 percent the absolute truth. But then we got this letter from this cocksucker named Roger Waters (jeers from crowd). Do you want to know what I wrote that cocksucker back? Two words: Fuck You!...Fuck You! Ain’t nobody goin’ to keep me from my people here in Tel Aviv! Ain’t Nobody!

Among other blundering statements, Hughes referred to Israelis as ‘his people.’ Unless there is something that we don’t know about him, they are not his people. The crowd at Bataclan, who should be referred to as “his people”, apparently did not know either that Israelis are not their people, or perhaps did not think attending a concert of someone who said that should, would, cost them their lives.
International Business Times, ‘Paris attacks: Eagles of Death Metal defied pro-Palestine boycott movement and Roger Waters to play Israel’, Nov 20, 2015:
A video has emerged of Eagles of Death Metal berating Pink Floyd founder and anti-Israel campaigner Roger Waters at a gig in Tel Aviv months before the Paris shooting at the Bataclan theatre.
The clip, from the band’s Tel Aviv concert in July, shows lead singer Jesse Hughes offering an expletive-laden riposte to a letter sent to the band by Waters urging them to shun Israel. It has been circulated in the wake of atrocities that claimed the lives of 132 people on 13 November.
In it Hughes tells the Tel Aviv crowd the band decided to end their tour in the city because they “could not top it”. The audience then boos mention of the Waters letter before Hughes shouts: “You want to know what I wrote that c********r back? Two words: f**k you!”
Waters, who has been accused of anti-Semitism, joined the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Movement - an anti-Israel pressure group - in 2012. Upon joining he called out to other musicians in an article he wrote for the Guardian: “[This is] a plea to my colleagues in the music industry, and also to artists in other disciplines, to join this cultural boycott.”
Roger Waters wrote to Eagles of Death Metal to urge them to boycott Israel.
The Paris attacks brought the video of Eagles of Death Metal back into focus because the formerly Jewish-owned Bataclan theatre which in the past has hosted pro-Israel Army events, and where the band were performing the night 89 people were killed, had supposedly been harassed by pro-Palestinian supporters in 2008.

Jesse Hughes is a “devout Christian.” That explains his confusion over who “his people are.”

He was interviewed before the Tel Aviv concert by “Consequence of Sound” -
CoS, ‘Fly Like an Eagle of Death Metal: An Interview with Jesse Hughes’, 1 Oct 2015:
At 43, Jesse Hughes hasn’t become an old man just yet. With the energy of a 16-year-old, he makes the most eccentric man in the world sound like a boozy liar.
The Eagles of Death Metal frontman has an opinion — often obscenity-filled — about everything. “But I’m not a bag of wind!” he insists. Around 30 minutes after our prearranged meeting time, before Eagles of Death Metal’s show in July, Hughes appears at his trendy hotel in the heart of Tel Aviv with two Israeli locals he just met at the falafel stand down the road. He’s dressed in typical Hughes attire: black-and-white-striped t-shirt with the sleeves cut off, suspenders, light jeans, and a neon green trucker cap with “Eagles of Death Metal” printed in Hebrew lettering.
A second after we meet, he’s chatting away on a tangent. Hughes is rarely off one. He sounds bluesy, even lusty when he talks, and when he gets especially riled up on a topic, he’ll bow his head, slap his knee, and speak like a southern debutant, referring to his fans as “the kids.” Hughes is as verbose as your archetypal reverend, hardly getting through his thoughts without breaching into song and then dissolving into giggles. Present him with a handshake or a voice recorder, and the truth serum starts to work.
Yeah, I’ve been shot before. Look. [shows scar on armpit] It made a canal through one of my muscles. I’ll tell you how it went down: I was going through a really ugly divorce, and I’m a devout Christian, so divorce isn’t a concept to me. I went through a very typical, clichéd “I served you my whole life, and this is what I get” anger. I weighed about 250 pounds, I was a big ol’ redneck boy. I was managing this privately owned chain of video stores and part-time freelancing for the Republican Party and speech writing and shit like that. The most awful thing I could think of immediately was to start taking speed. I lost 80 pounds, got really depressed. My mother called Joshua [Homme] because she felt he was one of the only dudes I listened to.
He dishes it out today. During our conversation, he gets into the full specifics of being saved from addiction by bandmate Joshua Homme, how he’s already written half of EODM’s next album, and how he’s struggling to convince everyone he’s a devout Christian who gets high and uses the phrase “titty-wobbling.” He talks about his face being a nipple on his album cover as seriously as his faith. “I know what you’re thinking — my life’s a contradiction,” he admits.
It’s dark stuff, but Jesse “The Devil” Hughes has a wicked sense of humor — crushing, hypnotic, and frequently laugh-out-loud ridiculous. “My way of thinking is,” he shrugs, “it’s gonna be harder in hell for me than for y’all. I’m just not going to be the fool that doesn’t know why he’s there.”
Christianity and its Enlightened step-child play a strong part in the confused identity and allegiance of welcomers as well.. ...and the upshot of that confusion…

The Lost Soul and the Crowned Christ

via Alternative Right

The alienated soul, of whom I have felt compelled to write of much lately, is one who recognizes the contemporary modern liberal Zeitgeist for the trussed-up sham that it is, yet at the same time can’t seem to will himself to believe in anything beyond this monstrous Moloch which looms so ubiquitously in his midst and bestrides him like a Colossus everywhere he goes.

That he despises this dreadful buggering beast is a given; he’ll be God-damned if he’ll ever be bullied into “loving Big Brother,” like that pussy Winston Smith in 1984 (or so he thinks to himself, bucking his spirit up temporarily with sheer self-generated buoyant bravado).

To be sure, he’d sooner die than turn his back on his loyal loathing or betray his hearty hatred. Yet no matter how diligently he strives and strains, he can’t manage to see anything beyond this terrible and obscene force which, animated with hideous strength and perverse will, goes about strangling all innocence, sucking every thing dry of its initial virtuous essence, leaving a crassly corrupt, counterfeit copy in its place.

This thing he hates, tragically enough, is also the only god he really knows: it is none other than the great juggernaut Nemesis, which seems determined to take him out, bit by bit, piece by piece. First his innocence, then his ideals, then his good will, and finally his sanity.


Yet the alienated soul wants to know an entirely different deity: namely, the redeeming, sanctifying, restorative divine Force spoken of by the prophets, the apostles, and the church fathers. To this end, he turns to the Catholic faith, which, for all of its flaws, at least possesses the virtue of  having weathered the various storms of history without being purged of its essential dogmas, truths, and sacramental traditions. The assaults of modernity have left the Church conspicuously limping, to be sure, but they have failed to empty it of that which sets it apart from the ravages of this evil age. It marches forward, weakened but unbowed.

So the alienated one becomes a faithful, loyal churchgoer. Yet though he takes part in the requisite activities of his faith, he still can’t quite get himself to believe that the Christ who he hears spoken of ultimately overcomes the bloody-fanged Nemesis-Moloch demonic demiurge he knows so keenly. Can this distant supposed Savior truly liberate him from the tormentor who bloodies his body and darkens his spirit daily? Most of the time, he remains unconvinced, particularly when he is forced to listen to another ghastly hippie-dippy hymn from the 70s (he refuses to add his own voice to such abominations), or hear yet another bland, insipid sermon from the “Church of Nice” contingent of the clergy.

Yet for all that, there are times when he does feel a faint stirring of something like peace of mind, as he reclines in his pew and gazes imploringly into the kind, luminous eyes of the Theotokos icon above the altar. And there are occasions when a similar something breaks through the Modernist miasma and the aesthetic piffle of the all-too-omnipresent, appallingly tackypost-Vatican II aggiornamento, striking his heart with surprising force.

One such occasion takes place today, the final Sunday in the Church calendar prior to the start of Advent and the start of new cycle. That day’s Mass celebrates the feast of Christ the King, which in itself cannot help but be a counter-cultural event in the midst of a furiously democratic, fanatically levelling, sentimental, dumbed-down and doped-up age.

The more devout Christians of our time tend to view their Lord with an altogether unbecoming informality. “Born-agains” commonly talk of Jesus as their “buddy,” somebody whom they would love to invite over for their backyard barbeque to hang out, swap stories, crack jokes, drink beer and altogether have a grand ol’ time. He’s “not here to judge us; he’s just here to love us,” etc.

This is millions of miles away from any traditional (and assuredly Biblical) notion of Christ as lordly royalty, to be revered and adored. The Christ of tradition stands at a distance from us; while he loves us, it is a patently hierarchical love, like the affection of a king for his subjects, or that of a patriarch for his children. This God-man is genial and compassionate, but can be quite stern, even fierce, on occasion; he is the sort of deity fittingly represented by author C.S. Lewis as a lion: a graceful, regal, warm-blooded being nevertheless capable of displaying terrifying wrath and roaring fury to his enemies.
Don't mess with Aslan
The Christ of scripture and tradition—the son of Mary who is also the son of God—is properly hymned in such stately, majestic songs as “All Glory, Laud and Honor,”“Crown Him With Many Crowns” and “All Hail the Power of Jesus’ Name,” each of which urges a fitting coronation for the uber-King of all creation:
"All hail the power of Jesus’ name; let angels prostrate fall Bring forth the royal diadem, and crown him Lord of all!" 
"Crown him the Lord of peace, whose power a scepter sways From pole to pole, that wars may cease, and all be prayer and praise. His reign shall know no end, and round his pierced feet Fair flowers of paradise extend, their fragrance ever sweet."
Such is the message of the Sunday of Christ the King, a feast day whose continued existence demonstrates the Church’s opposition to the mores of an aesthetically inelegant, morally degenerate, and spiritually bankrupt age, signaling the sending of a discordantly harmonious note into the cacophony of chaos that is modernity.

The alienated soul, who from his bitter core mourns his loss of connection and rootedness, feels himself briefly bathed in the warmth of a balmy blast of something which feels like blessed assurance: perhaps, after all, there is a King who must be served, and it could just be that in His service all things gone bad will again be made well.

Faustian Dreams

via Soul of the East

In its spiritual life, the human soul is confronted with two options, to seek the realization and actualization of its divine nature, or to be overwhelmed and rendered inert by the lower, transient things of the world. The 4th century Greek theologian St. Gregory of Nyssa once observed,
For those who look towards the true God receive within themselves the characteristics of the divine nature; so too, those who turn their minds to the vanity of idols are transformed into the objects which they look at, and become stones instead of men.
Saint Gregory never received the chance to witness the idols of modernity, which have far surpassed the the old stone and marble images of classical antiquity in their destructive transformational effects on the human spirit. Instead modern man has seized upon often-violent revolutionary ideologies and the sanctification of technology as the new idols he erected in the temple of his heart. In the last century, modern man found himself pursuing the ressentiment-driven mass violence of the Bolsheviks and methodical brutality of fascism. In our present era, meanwhile, he has settled razing entire countries to the ground in the name of freedom and democracy, and destroying ancient social traditions and institutions in the name of equality and social justice. The nihilistic revolutionary in this case does not become merely as stone, but something far worse, the “demons” described by the Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky.

St. Gregory of Nyssa
St. Gregory of Nyssa

Proud modern man pursues his Faustian deal with the technological Mephistopheles, hoping that he’ll be saved from death, or at the very least saved from the expansive boredom and emptiness of the modern world.  Enthusiastically he adapts himself to his electronic gods, not just in his social dealings, but spiritually as well, becoming the biological android so desired by transhumanist charlatans like Ray Kurzweil.

So in his technological and scientific progression, man is continuously becoming less of himself, or at least less of what he could potentially be were he to pursue his higher self. Indeed, similar to the companions of Odysseus who were transformed into swine by the witch Circe, modern men are reduced to a slothful and bestial state, the spell cast by their over-reliance on technology and an accompanying spirit of mindless consumerism.

The original scam artist at work.
The original scam artist at work

Such is the condition of modern man, who has cast God out from his heart and pressed forward his technocratic society. We must grapple with a condition in many ways far worse than anything endured by an ancient nature-worshiping pagan, who still had at least some vague awareness of transcendent reality. Yet Faust’s spiritual heirs, holding aloft their banner of sacred scientism, will tolerate no dissent even in their conscience; their souls are as dead as the matter that dominates their arbitrary empiricism.

Contemporary man can no longer face God, because, as the British author and theologian C.S. Lewis pointed out, he no longer has a face, merely a void-gazing simulacrum. And that is the crux of the matter. Until he finds his lost face, the divine image buried deep in his afflicted soul, he will forever be turning from one false idol, one false form to the next, never able to escape the cave in which he has imprisoned himself.

Why Did Turkey Shoot Down the Russian Plane?

via The Traitor Within

On 24 November 2015, Paul Watson said this at the Infowars site:
"Turkey shot down a Russian Su-24 fighter jet it claimed had violated Turkish airspace just days after threatening Moscow with 'serious consequences' if it continued bombing ISIS in Syria... The incident occurred just days after Turkish officials warned Russia to 'immediately end its operation' against ISIS after war planes bombed border regions... 
Shooting down the Russian jet may be a dangerous form of payback for Vladimir Putin’s two month bombardment of ISIS. Although a NATO member country, a deluge of evidence suggests that Turkey is in fact allied with ISIS and has helped the terror organization by providing safe passage and financing via black market oil sales. 
$800,000,000 worth of ISIS oil has been sold in Turkey, a supposed U.S. ally. ISIS trucks are routinely allowed to cross back and forth between the Islamic State stronghold of Raqqa and Turkey.  
As Nafeez Ahmed documents, a large cache of intelligence recovered from a raid on an ISIS safe house this summer confirms that 'direct dealings between Turkish officials and ranking ISIS members was now ‘undeniable'.' 
The senior western official who made this revelation also added that Turkey is allied with Ahrar al-Sham and Jabhat al-Nusra, two Al-Qaeda offshoots in Turkey who are fighting to topple Assad. A former ISIS communications technician also told Newsweek that part of his job was to, 'connect ISIS field captains and commanders from Syria with people in Turkey on innumerable occasions.' 'ISIS commanders told us to fear nothing at all because there was full cooperation with the Turks,' he said."

 It's not just Turkey backing ISIS. 

You must remember that Cameron and a variety of parliamentary warmongers were desperate to invade Syria back in 2013. If they had been allowed to do so, they would have been doing their best to topple Assad alongside ISIS and all the other Al-Qaeda-type jihadis.

And then there is a great deal of evidence and even more commentary and conjecture suggesting that the USA and Saudi Arabia funded ISIS into existence, again so that the West could be rid of Assad, just as the West rid itself of Saddam and Gadaffi.

If you're unaware of the real reasons we're almost on the verge of WW3, (Putin is rightly furious), the invasion of Iraq, which precipitated the horror (war, refugees, slaughter on the streets of Europe) was assured in the year 2000, when Saddam dispensed with the dollar and decided to sell Iraq's oil in exchange for Euros instead.

On 30 October 2000, CNN told us this: 
"A U.N. panel on Monday approved Iraq's plan to receive oil-export payments in Europe's single currency after Baghdad decided to move the start date back a week. Members of the Security Council's Iraqi sanctions committee said the panel's chairman, Dutch Ambassador Peter van Walsum, would inform U.N. officials on Tuesday of the decision to allow Iraq to receive payments in euros, rather than dollars... Iraq has called the dollar the currency of an 'enemy state'."
US Congressman, Ron Paul, said this in a 14 February 2006 speech before the House of Representatives:
"There was no public talk of removing Saddam Hussein because of his attack on the integrity of the dollar as a reserve currency by selling oil in Euros. Many believe this was the real reason for our obsession with Iraq. I doubt it was the only reason but it may well have played a significant role in our motivation to wage war. Within a very short period after the military victory, all Iraqi oil sales were carried out in dollars. The Euro was abandoned."
William Clark, Manager of performance improvement at Johns Hopkins University, said this in a 15 February 2003 article:
"Although completely unreported by the U.S. media and government, the answer to the Iraq enigma is simple yet shocking. It is in large part an oil currency war. One of the core reasons for this upcoming war is this administration's goal of preventing further Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) momentum towards the euro as an oil transaction currency standard. However, in order to pre-empt OPEC, they need to gain geo-strategic control of Iraq along with its second largest proven oil reserves."
Economist F. William Engdahl, author of 'A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order,' said this in a 31 October 2003 article:
"But November was when French and other Euroland members finally convinced Saddam Hussein to defy the United States by selling Iraq’s oil-for-food not in dollars, ‘the enemy currency’ as Iraq named it, but only in euros... This little-noted Iraq move to defy the dollar in favor of the euro, in itself, was insignificant. Yet, if it were to spread, especially at a point the dollar was already weakening, it could create a panic sell-off of dollars by foreign central banks and OPEC oil producers. 
In the months before the latest Iraq war, hints in this direction were heard from Russia, Iran, Indonesia and even Venezuela... All indications are that the Iraq war was seized on as the easiest way to deliver a deadly pre-emptive warning to OPEC and others, not to flirt with abandoning the Petro-dollar system in favor of one based on the euro. 
Iraq was not about ordinary chemical or even nuclear weapons of mass destruction. The ‘weapon of mass destruction’ was the threat that others would follow Iraq and shift to euros out of dollars, creating mass destruction of the United States’ hegemonic economic role in the world."
The identity of most of the leading Neocons, who had been clamouring for Gulf War 2 ever since the first one ended, illuminates the second reason Iraq was attacked.

The following commentators are Jewish:

The following whistle-blowers, who confirm the role played in the creation of ISIS by the USA et al, are also Jewish:
One high-ranking non-Jewish politician informed us of the role our own politicians had played in Syria's destabilisation:
In March 2007, the aforementioned General Wesley Clark had advised us of America's long-standing intent to 'take out seven countries in five years.'

I don't like bully boys, never have and I hate them when they do terrible things in my name.

If world war does come, America and Israel in particular and the West in general will have done much more to bring it about than the ISIS butcher, Bashar Assad and Vladimir Putin.

Just in case you're in any doubt, I was all for Putin sorting out the ISIS problem, particularly when the West was reluctant to do much more than pretend. If Cameron and co. were genuine about helping to remove ISIS from the picture, alongside Russia, the Syrian army and the Kurds, this time round I'd be up for our involvement.

I think the downing of the Russian plane has shown us where Turkey's loyalty really lies.

Turkey is a member of NATO. An undeniable ally of ISIS in Syria is a member of NATO. Not only that, Cameron, Merkel and Juncker want Turkey in the EU. Turkey, despite the ISIS connection, is best pals with the West. (As is Saudi Arabia - despite being the main monetary sponsor of ISIS)

If push comes to shove, our leaders will be on the side of the country that backs ISIS, as opposed to the country trying to defeat it. We are the bad guys, ladies and gentlemen. When we vote the moral leper into power, we should not be surprised when he does leprous things.

As you try to work out what our military and political leaders are up to in Syria after Cameron wins the forthcoming vote, check out Social Media for the real news, you won't get much of it from the BBC and the rest of the mainstream media, that's for sure.

On Mortality

via Counter-Currents

There will come a day when you will die.

The truck driving in the opposite lane will skid and crush the hood of your car, smashing you to a pulp.

The doctor will tell you that the funny feeling in the side of your belly was a developing malignant tumor which they can only try to remove. And you better sort out all important issues right now. 
A blood vessel in your brain will burst and the hemorrhage will burst the bubble of your illusory corporeal immortality.

The pain between your shoulder blades will announce cardiac arrest, and you will aimlessly flap your arms while you suffocate.

Or you will simply get old, weaker with every day, and once all the vital force has left you, you will be helplessly lying in your bed. Hopefully, someone you love will be holding your hand as you pass the gates of eternity into the great unknown.

If you are lucky, you will die a meaningful death, defending someone you love or something you cherish. A bullet will pierce your skull, and you will become one of the glorious dead. Or you will moan and tremble in the dirt, as you try to put your own entrails back into your ripped stomach: a painful and dirty death, but a hero’s death nevertheless.

Or at least you will die a beautiful death. Falling off a cliff of the eternally snow-covered mountain you were climbing; with your last gaze you will grasp the stunning view of the alpine majesty and then you will be squashed among the glaciers.

What are you going to regret in your last moments? Will you wish that you checked Facebook more often? Spent more time watching funny cat videos on YouTube? Slept longer? Immersed yourself in a Netflix binge? Pulled an all-nighter watching porn? Played more World of Warcraft? Unless you have a meaningful job (and the vast majority us don’t) you are not going to regret that you spent more time working.

You are probably going to regret you did not spend your time better. That you did not use your time to watch the sunrise or the full moon. That you did not spend more meaningful moments with your significant other. That you quarreled about all those petty issues. That you did not go out or have sex more often. That you did not visit one of those famous places, learn another language, read one of the timeless classics, climb this mountain, practice that sport, learn to play an instrument.

But after all is said and done, in that last moment of consciousness, you will wonder what will remain after you have passed. After all, every man must die, but not every man dies wholly.

There are only two real ways to save something and withstand death: through blood and spirit.

Death3There is only one way to survive through blood: to have children. This is the actual purpose of having a family. If you are picking the right woman think about her as your future wife and the mother of your children. This really changes the perspective. If you remember that your family, thanks to your children, is your key to dealing with your mortality, solving everyday problems becomes much easier. Also, this helps you keep your priorities straight. Going out with friends to the pub will not help you withstand death. The same applies to watching football or eating fancy snacks.

And while having no kids and having fun seems very satisfactory at first, once you reach your end, you experience disappointment and despair. With family it is the other way around. At first you lose all your free time, life becomes hard to bear, and you curse yourself for making this decision. But once you see your children grow up and accomplish more every day, you experience real happiness and true pride. If you know that your children will survive your death, and they will have children who will survive their deaths, and this relay of generations of our folk will go on, even once you are long gone – it is much easier to look in the face of death.

It is not enough to bring someone to life. You have to also help them find the meaning of life. You have to teach those you have sired. But you also need to love those you teach. So teach your children well the ways of our folk. And if you do it well, with love and care, they will reward you with twice as much love and care. They are your blood after all.

From the individual point of view all our life seems to have no greater sense. Everyone will die, and everything will die. It is easy to surrender to pessimism and proclaim that it is better never to be born. But you must not focus too much on the individual. From the perspective of one leaf, existence seems senseless. But from the perspective of the tree, existence has great and indisputable sense. The generations of men are like leaves, who wither and fall in winter. But in spring a new generation rises and the tree lives on.

This is withstanding death through blood. What about withstanding death through spirit?

Let us not discuss the matter of the individual soul, as this has already been done by greater men such as Plato or Aristotle. Instead, let us focus on the spirit of our folk. Where can you see this spirit? Probably you cannot see the spirit itself, but you can see its corporeal incarnation. You are the embodiment of that spirit: especially in your greatest moments. And people similar to you are also the incarnations of this spirit: especially those who are brave, creative, good, wise, intelligent, or beautiful. Thus, by preserving the blood you are also preserving the spirit.

But there is one more visible aspect of the spirit of our folk: great works. All great works of art, science, and technology created by people of our race are visible effects of our spirit. Every creative work of a member of our folk is an effect and a proof of the existence of this spirit. And you can become one of the creators. Start small with experiencing other people’s accomplishments. Try to find out what fascinates you. Then just give it a try – start creating. First steps are always difficult. Get in touch with others, who will help you judge and better your work. There is so much out there: music, literature, film, painting, drawing, sculpting, photography, home engineering, decoration, chemistry, craft food, brewing, sports, traveling, mountaineering, sailing. Just try something and stick with what you like and what you are good at.

And make sure that what you do matters to our race. If you are a musician, a poet, a visual artist – explore the variety of European traditions. If you are a photographer or a traveler – explore our land and our nature. Venerate our tradition by living it and sharing your experience with others, especially younger generations.

Withstanding death requires toil and sacrifice. Having a family (a real family: wife and children, not a girlfriend and a dog) requires losing most of your time and making your loved ones the number one priority. Most people make the mistake of using all the free time to relax after work and family obligations. Thus, they stop doing anything else which was meaningful in their life. Wrong. Do it the other way: sacrifice nights in a pub, net surfing, or other petty and pointless pleasures. Stick to stuff that matters: practice a sport, play an instrument, record an album, learn another language, write an essay or a story. If you cut out useless habits, procrastination, short-term pleasures, you will have enough time to secure your survival both by blood and by spirit.

If you don’t have the talent to do something creative yourself, support those that do. With your attention, praise, and your money. But don’t waste your money on major “best-selling” artistic products. These are big businesses who really don’t give a damn about you and your time. Once you die, they will find another consumer to pay their bills. Ignore Hollywood – let them starve. If you really need to watch a major picture or listen to a commercial album – just download it on torrent. If you really need to read a popular novel – get it from your library. They don’t care about you anyway, and they support a system aimed at destroying you and your family. So fuck them. There are hundreds of independent musicians, writers, film-makers, and artists. Many of them support the survival of our folk. Your praise makes a difference for them. Write them an e-mail or comment on their website; show your appreciation. Or better yet – approach them in person if you have the chance and thank them for what they’re doing. And support them with your wallet. If you pay them 10% of what you would pay for the official “entertainment” this will make a thousand times greater difference for our culture.

There are people working 24/7 to destroy our folk. To put it straightforwardly – there are people and institutions who are working every day and night to destroy everything you have ever created, in blood and spirit. Their aim is to annihilate all that may withstand your death. They want to take away all the sense and meaning of your life and your death. And they are making a profit on it. However, there are people and institutions — a few, but much more valuable, intelligent, and courageous than our enemies — who are working 24/7 to save our folk. They have sacrificed their free time and pleasure to advance our cause. They have also often sacrificed their personal, family and professional life to be on the front-line of the true culture war: the occult war. You have heard about some of them – otherwise you would not be browsing this website. Support them the same way – by praise and by money. The good guys are working to ensure that your achievements will remain and that you will withstand death. If you want them to keep on doing the right thing – help them pay their bills. If you want others to join their fight – donate more, so there can be more professional activists.

And if you are creative: get in touch and get involved. Some are more fit for street politics. Some for community organizing. Some for more solitary work: computer designing, writing essays, proofreading, translation. There is much work to be done. Our race is in an extreme situation: all hands are needed on board.

As Dominique Venner wrote in his final statement: “We should also remember, as brilliantly formulated by Heidegger in Being and Time, that the essence of man is in his existence and not in ‘another world.’ It is here and now that our destiny is played out until the last second. And this final second is as important as the rest of a lifetime. That is why you must be yourself until the last moment. It is by deciding, truly willing one’s destiny, that one conquers nothingness. And there is no escape from this requirement, because we only have this life, in which it is our duty to be fully ourselves — or to be nothing.”

Everyone dies and everything dies. But the fame of your deeds will not die. Your bloodline (which is the same as our common bloodline!) will not die. So get to work and start doing these deeds and start securing this bloodline.

You will die. This is inevitable. Men born on earth tread their own paths, but all of them lead them whither our ancestors have departed. There is no turning back and no other way.

You are mortal. Live and act accordingly. Spend your life and save your folk. Withstand death.

Credit for inspiration is due to Greg Johnson, Dominique Venner, Martin Heidegger, William Pierce, Rigveda, Iliad, Delphic Maxims, Poetic Edda, Tomislav Sunić, Friedrich Nietzsche, and German Black Metal.