Dec 14, 2015

White Genocide, a Jewish Plot?

via Muslim Ghettos

This post will present a huge amount of evidence to prove that Jews are working towards eradicating the white race, which is white genocide, via mass immigration and race mixing dysgenics.
‘Genocide involves the attempt to achieve the disappearance of a group by whatever means. It does not have to be violent, it could be a combination of policies that would lead to a certain group dying out.’ Malcolm Fraser (Prime Minister of Australia 1975-1983)


The screen grab above is of a tweet by Barbara Spectre, a Jew married to a Rabbi and working in Sweden for not only the destruction of Europe via multiculturalism (and other methods perhaps) but also the re-establishment of Jewishness in Europe. She heads Paideia, European Institute of Jewish Studies, which is funded in part by the Swedish government. The above screen grab is evidence of at least the crime of (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;. This covers the 'mental' element of genocide. Barbara Spectre also breaches the 'physical' element as she works towards making Europe multicultural (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;  . This article has been tweeted to almost every minister of the Swedish government, the Swedish police and many other prominent people in Sweden. If no action is taken against Barbara Spectre and all the people who have contributed to the genocide of the Swedish people (just one of the white Christian nations targeted) then we can be sure that our governments are also complicit in acts of genocide and also in denial of real acts of genocide, both of which are crimes in international and national law.

This is the text of the speech by Kamau Kambon, the man in the video which Barbara Spectre praised and cheered on with her genocidal comment:

"Now how do I know that the white people know that we are going to come up with a solution to the problem. I know it because they have retina scans, racial profiling, DNA banks, and they're monitoring our people to try to prevent the ONE person from coming up with the ONE idea. And the one idea is, how we are going to exterminate white people because that in my estimation is the only conclusion I have come to. We have to exterminate white people off the face of the planet to solve the problem. *tepid applause* Now I don't care whether you clap or not but I'm saying to you that we need to solve this problem because they are going to kill us. And I will leave on that. So we just have to set up our own system and stop playing and get very serious and not get diverted from coming up with a solution to the problem and the problem on the planet is white people."
The Swedish taxpayer is funding a woman who wishes to end the white race. . . . Read more

Frenchman, European, White Man: Dominique Venner and the Fate of Europe

via American Renaissance

On May 21, 2013, a Frenchman virtually unknown outside of Europe suddenly burst into the consciousness of racially aware Americans. That day, Dominique Venner walked into the Notre Dame cathedral in Paris and shot himself in the head. As he explained in his suicide note, he took his own life as an act of sovereignty–of control over his own destiny–and in protest against what his beloved France had become: a husk of a once-great nation, whose rulers submitted to American dominance, celebrated a decades-long invasion by unassimilable foreigners, and had legalized homosexual marriage.

Venner was a political activist and also a prominent historian. He was awarded the Broquette-Gonin Prize of the French Academy in 1981 for “philosophical, political, or literary achievement that inspires a love for the true, the good, and the beautiful.” Yet, until his death, none of his work had been translated into English. Thanks to the indispensible work of Arktos Media, this slim volume–composed for English-speakers–makes a few highlights of his thinking available to new audiences.


Venner had two great advantages as a historian: He did not just study history, he participated in it. He was also among the tiny handful of intellectuals who understood tribe, nation, and race, and who grasped the horror that Europe is inflicting on itself. Venner’s experience and insight shine through every page of The Shock of History.
Dominique Venner was born in 1935 and joined the French army the first day he became eligible: his 18th birthday. He served as a paratrooper, fighting the Algerian insurgency. In 1956, after three years of combat, he returned to France, where he was active in nationalist politics. That same year, he helped raid and ransack the headquarters of the French Communist Party to protest the Soviet suppression of the Hungarian uprising.

Later, Venner took part in the attempted coup against the French government when Charles de Gaulle–in Venner’s view–betrayed France by supporting independence for Algeria. Venner was imprisoned for 18 months as a “political undesirable,” but his experiences gave him rare insights. As he writes in this volume, “It is total immersion in action, with both its most sordid and noble aspects, that has forged me and given me the ability to understand history from the inside, as an initiate, and not as a scholar . . . or as a spectator.”

After his release in 1962, Venner began his career as an intellectual. He worked with the main figures of the French New Right until 1971, from which time he devoted himself to history. He wrote about the traditions of Europe, the French resistance during the occupation, the Russian civil war of 1918 to 1921, the Confederacy’s struggle for independence, and many other subjects. His French Academy prize was for History of the Red Army.

Dominique Venner
Dominique Venner

Venner also wrote handbooks about weapons, as well as a book on hunting called Dictionary for Those Who Love to Hunt. As he explains:
To my mind, hunting is not a sport. It is a necessary ritual in which every participant, predator and prey, plays the role imposed upon him by nature. Along with childbirth, death, and seed-sowing, I believe that hunting, if practiced according to the rules, is the last primordial rite to have partially escaped defacement and manipulation at the hands of rational, scientific modernity.

The fate of Europe

But history was Venner’s great passion. These are the first words of this volume: “The shock of history: we live it neither knowing it nor comprehending it.” And yet Venner devoted his life to trying to know and comprehend. “History is knowledge of the past,” he writes, “but this knowledge is not neutral. It incites reflection on events of the past in order to illuminate the present.” Venner writes that objective history is a European invention. Homer laid the foundation for what Herodotus and Thucydides were the first to practice.

Venner probed Europe’s past because he loved Europe and its people. He believed that no one could understand any people or culture unless he completely rejected universalism:
Men exist only by what distinguishes them: clan, lineage, history, culture, tradition. There are no universal answers to the questions of existence and behavior. Every civilization has its truths and its gods . . . . Every civilization creates its own answers, without which the individual, man or woman, lacking identity and archetypes, is thrown into a world of chaos. Like plants, men cannot exist without roots. Every individual must discover his own.
Universalism is a dangerous illusion because “it stunts our ability to comprehend that other men do not feel, think, or live the same way we do . . . .” He writes that “higher civilizations are not simply regions of the planet, they are different planets entirely.” He urges Europeans to search for their own, unique “spiritual morphology,” because “a human group is not a people unless it shares like origins, in a specific location, commanding a space, giving it direction and a border between the inside and the outside. This location, this space, is not only geographic but spiritual.”

A people’s spirit is embedded in tradition, which comes from the past, but gives life and meaning to the present: “If a tradition survives over time, it is because it rests upon the hereditary dispositions of related people.” Europeans must steep themselves in their traditions because they:
make us who we are, unlike any other. They constitute our perennial tradition, our unique way of being men and women in the face of life, death, love, history, and fate. Without them we are fated to become nothing; to disappear into the chaos of a world dominated by others.
Venner believed that Homer marks the beginning of what is truly European: “My holy texts are the Iliad and the Odyssey, the founding poems of the European soul.” Homer is the best teacher for those “looking for the decisive categories of the European soul, those of action, knowledge, beauty, excellence, and tragic wisdom.”

"Fury of Achilles" by Charles-Antoine Coypel, 1737.
“Fury of Achilles” by Charles-Antoine Coypel, 1737.

Venner also argues that the world itself is a standing refutation of universalism. Wherever we look, non-Europeans reject our ways and are incapable of adopting them. But the inability to reject universalism could prove fatal to Europe: “After having colonized other peoples in the name of universalism, Europeans are now in the process of being colonized in the name of the very same principle–against which they do not know how to defend themselves.” Because Europeans are unable to draw and defend spiritual and political boundaries, “Europe has been thrown, naked and defenseless, into a world aching to vengefully humiliate her.”

Why did Europe lose its nerve? Venner believes it was what he calls the repetition of the Thirty Years’ War, that took place between 1914 to 1945:
After the disaster caused by the two great wars, Europe entered into a state of ‘dormancy,’ crushed militarily, politically, and morally by her own mistakes, her quasi-suicide, and her terrifying and useless expense of energy and blood. Completely demoralized by the notion that European civilization could produce such horrors, the idea that it must be corrupt or cursed in some way began to creep into people’s hearts and minds.
Venner draws a parallel to the Opium War. Until then, China had never doubted itself nor its own civilization, but defeat shocked it into a headlong imitation of the West that led to the horrors of communism. In 1945, Europe had not only destroyed itself but was dominated by non-European powers: the Soviet Union and the United States. The result, writes Venner, is that “we have lost faith in our own values, which we no longer even know. We copy the American model, even as we criticize it, lacking the freedom to imagine a European future.”

Like so many European traditionalists, Venner is deeply suspicious of the United States. He mocks the idea of American exceptionalism, of “manifest destiny” and the “city on a hill.” He wonders how Emerson could have written that the United States is “the greatest favor God has ever granted to the world.” He continues: “These principles are never doubted by the American people. They are taught as dogma. Americans are told that they are representatives of the Empire of Good.”

Venner believed that America had degraded Europe with a rapacious form of capitalism that glorifies material possessions over everything else. Europeans have become Americans: “The zombie is happy. He is told he will find happiness in satisfying his desires, because his desires generate revenue.” Technological progress–America’s forte–is virtually all that remains of the European spirit.

But America’s greatest sin is to have promoted equality and to have built a nation that repudiated inequality and aristocracy.

The inevitability of inequality

Venner believed that healthy European societies need aristocrats who are conscious of their duties and prepared to sacrifice. He notes that before the First World War, with the exception of France, every major European power was a monarchy with an “active and modern nobility.” Nobility was not a matter only of birth but also of merit. It offered a higher ideal of duty, just as the Homeric heroes were models for the Greeks. The Prussian aristocracy, for example, believed that “freedom can only be conceived in relation to duty,” and that “solid education [was] passed down from one generation to the next, who would subconsciously interiorize the ethics of duty.”

Aristocrats understood that Europeans were all of the same blood and culture and that wars should be of limited duration and destructiveness. Venner writes that it was democratization and mass participation in politics that helped push Europeans towards national hatreds and unlimited war.

In this context, Venner writes admiringly of Clause von Stauffenberg and the other aristocratic leaders of the failed assassination plot against Adolf Hitler. “The only true German opposition to Hitler came from an aristocratic, Prussian military faction,” writes Venner, “composed partially of former National Socialists.”

Stauffenberg was inspired as a young man to join the army because of his fascination with Homer, the Greeks, the Romans, and the chivalric ideal. At first he supported Hitler, but was appalled by Hitler’s savage treatment of Russians and Ukrainians who could have been recruited to the German cause. He saw that Hitler was leading Germany to defeat and degradation, and he lead other aristocrats and traditionalists such as Erwin von Witzleben and General Ludwig Beck in an uprising he hoped would save Germany.

Shortly before the assassination attempt, Stauffenberg co-wrote a manifesto addressed to the leaders of the traditional Germany that he hoped would survive the war: “You seek a new nobility . . . You will recognize your brothers by the radiance in their eyes.” Venner argues that Stauffenberg knew his plan was likely to fail. He “knowingly acted in a self-sacrificial manner in order to prove that the ‘hidden and heroic Germany,’ of which he was the incarnation, morally condemned the blemishes of Hitler’s regime and called for a new Germany, wholly unrelated to the future Bundesrepublik imposed by the American victors.”

Venner adds that it was not a coincidence that one of the early acts of the American occupation was the obliteration of Prussia as a legal entity. Even in opposition to Hitler, the Prussian spirit of honor, commitment, valor, and personal responsibility was anathema to the conquering egalitarians.

Venner similarly admired Ernst Jünger, who wrote the great war novel Storm of Steel, and was one of the leaders of the Conservative Revolutionary movement in Germany after the First World War. Jünger, who also became hostile to Hitler, was a personal friend of Venner and died in 1998 at the age of 103. “His writings helped me to understand that the crisis facing the European people of today is not political,” Venner writes. “It is a spiritual and civilizational crisis that requires far more than just political solutions.” He adds that although aristocracy has disappeared as a social class, he found, in Jünger, that “the qualities of honor, self-sacrifice, and of noble conduct survive in those of elite character who, in decadent times, constitute a sort of hidden aristocracy.”

Ernst Jünger

Until the end of his life, Venner believed that aristocracy could be reestablished, even though it would be “an immense revolution of ideas and education.” For this great task, he again turns to Homer:
When we live in the company of people who walk with nobility, if we are not of low-born disposition, we feel an impulsion. It is thus that Homer has left us our life principles; nature as our basis, excellence as our goal, beauty as our horizon.
Hope for Europe
Venner writes that the two alien blocs that dominated Europe during the Cold War froze Europe into immobility for 45 years. With the fall of the Berlin wall, history began to move again, and Europe is slowly rising from its state of prostration. “There seems to have been a general weakening of American power,” Venner writes, “which should be exploited by Europeans in order to snap out of their dormancy.”

But in order to regain its spirit, Europe must rediscover itself. It was this in mind that Venner wrote History and Traditions of Europeans: 30,000 Years of Indentity: “My stated intention was to lay the groundwork for a reformation through the discovery of our origins.”

But one handicap for Europe is that it does not have an identitarian religion. Venner believed that Christianity was an alien, Middle Eastern faith that does not promote European identity. He writes that it was the perfect, universal religion for a Roman empire that wanted to spread its mores along with its power. But Venner is not hostile to Christianity, noting that “the cathedral of Chartres is as much a part of my universe as Stonehenge or the Parthenon. . . . Christianity, alien to Europe in its origins, was transformed from the inside by our ancestors: the Romans, the Gauls, and the Germans.”

Chartres Cathedral
Chartres Cathedral

In any case, Europeans are falling away from the Church, and must replace it with a deep cultural identity that unites them spiritually. An identitarian religion ensures survival and even justifies conquest:
In the same way that some consider themselves sons of Shiva, Muhammad, Abraham, or Buddha, it is important that Europeans see themselves as sons of Homer, Ulysses, and Penelope. . . . Whether one is Christian, free thinker, or whatever . . . we must rise above political and denominational variables and rediscover the permanence of tradition, which has permeated our founding poems for millennia.
"Odysseus and Penelope" by Johann H.W. Tischbein, 1802.
“Odysseus and Penelope” by Johann H.W. Tischbein, 1802.

Venner admires Hindu nationalism, for example, because it is such a powerful identitarian force that the political follows naturally from the spiritual. At one time, the Catholic Church had a similar political-spiritual power in Europe, and was led by hard-headed politicians who were also servants of God. Venner was not sure Europe could ever recreate anything similar but even if it did not, he believed Europe would find the courage to save itself.

This short book is mainly about history, but Venner touches on other important subjects, including the Western view of suicide. It is clear from The Shock of History that Venner had already made up his mind to kill himself. He writes approvingly of Publius Spendius who committed suicide at age 53 in 210 AD “because he refused to live in a degenerate society that negated the Rome of his soul.” He quotes Antoine de Saint-Exupery, author of The Little Prince, whom he believes deliberately flew his plane into the ocean: “I hate my era with every fibre of my being . . . Man is neutered, severed from his original resonances . . . The termite mound of the future horrifies me. I hate their [the Frenchmen of his day] robotic virtues.”

Venner also salutes Admiral von Friedeburg’s decision to end his life after signing the capitulation papers for the Kriegsmarine in 1945, and wonders how the disgraced commander of the French forces who surrendered at Dien Bien Phu in 1954 managed to live out the rest of his life. For Venner, suicide is the noble course if life is no longer worth living. It is the ultimate act of power and control. If it is an assertion of autonomy rather than a cry of despair, it is “a proclamation of sovereignty over one’s very self” and is a right that should be “limited only by the sadness we might cause to those close to us, or by obligations requiring us to stay alive.”

But more important, suicide was Venner’s final act of service to his beloved Europe. It was a proclamation that “the world is entering into a new phase of history in which the historically unexpected has become possible again.” His dramatic death was a rejection of the view that Europeans “will allow themselves to be displaced.”

To the end, Venner had faith:
We will be forced to rise up and face immense challenges and fearsome catastrophes even beyond those posed by immigration. These hardships will present the opportunity for both a rebirth and a rediscovery of ourselves. I believe in those qualities that are specific to the European people, qualities currently in a state of dormancy. I believe in our active individuality, our inventiveness, and in the awakening of our energy. The awakening will undoubtedly come. When? I do not know, but I am positive that it will take place.

Christmas in Our Anti-Christian Age

via The Political Cesspool

For two millennia, the birth of Christ has been seen as the greatest event in world history. The moment Jesus was born in a stable in Bethlehem, God became man, and eternal salvation became possible.

This date has been the separation point of mankind’s time on earth, with B.C. designating the era before Christ, and A.D., anno domino, in the Year of the Lord, the years after. And how stands Christianity today?

“Christianity is in danger off being wiped out in its biblical heartlands,” says the British think tank Civitas.

In Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Ethiopia and Nigeria, Christians face persecution and pogroms. In Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan, conversion is a capital offense. In a century, two-thirds of all the Christians have vanished from the Islamic world.

In China, Christianity is seen as a subversive ideology of the West to undermine the regime.

In Europe, a century ago, British and German soldiers came out of the trenches to meet in no-man’s land to sing Christmas carols and exchange gifts. It did not happen in 1915, or ever again.

In the century since, all the Western empires have vanished. All of their armies and navies have melted away. All have lost their Christian faith. All have seen their birthrates plummet. All their nations are aging, shrinking and dying, and all are witnessing invasions from formerly subject peoples and lands.

In America, too, the decline of Christianity proceeds.

While conservatives believe that culture determines politics, liberals understand politics can change culture.

The systematic purging of Christian teachings and symbols from our public schools and public square has produced a growing population — 20 percent of the nation, 30 percent of the young — who answer “none” when asked about their religious beliefs and affiliations.

In the lead essay in the Book Review of Sunday’s New York Times, Paul Elie writes of our “post-Christian” fiction, where writers with “Christian convictions” like Walker Percy and Flannery O’Connor are a lost tribe.

“Where has the novel of belief gone?” he asks.

Americans understand why Mao’s atheist heirs who have lost their Marxist-Leninist faith and militants Islamists fear and detest the rival belief system of Christianity. But do they understand the animus that lies behind the assault on their faith here at home?

Andrew Seddon (“The New Atheism: All the Rage”) describes a “Reason Rally” in Washington, D.C., a “coming out” event sponsored by atheist groups. Among the speakers was Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins, author of “The God Delusion,” who claims that “faith is an evil precisely because it requires no justification and brooks no argument.”

Christians have been infected by a “God virus,” says Dawkins. They are no longer rational beings. Atheists should treat them with derisory contempt. “Mock Them!” Dawkins shouted. “Ridicule them! In public!”

In “The End of Faith,” atheist Sam Harris wrote that “some propositions are so dangerous that it may even be ethical to kill people.”

“Since the New Atheists believe that religion is evil,” notes Seddon, “that it ‘poisons everything,’ in (Christopher) Hitchens’ words — it doesn’t take much effort to see that Harris is referring to religions and the people who follow them.”

Now since atheists are still badly outnumbered in America and less well-armed than the God-and-Country boys, and atheists believe this is the only life they have, atheist suggestions to “kill people” of Christian belief is probably a threat Christians need not take too seriously.

With reference to Dawkins’ view that the Christian faith “requires no justification and brooks no argument,” Seddon makes a salient point.

While undeniable that Christianity entails a belief in the supernatural, the miraculous – God became man that first Christmas, Christ raised people from the dead, rose himself on the first Easter Sunday and ascended into heaven 40 days later – consider what atheists believe.

They believe that something came out of nothing, that reason came from irrationality, that a complex universe and natural order came out of randomness and chaos, that consciousness came from non-consciousness and that life emerged from non-life.

This is a bridge too far for the Christian for whom faith and reason tell him that for all of this to have been created from nothing is absurd; it presupposes a Creator.

Atheists believe, Seddon writes, that “a multiverse (for which there is no experimental or observational evidence) containing an inconceivably large number of universes spontaneously created itself.”

Yet, Hitchens insists, “our belief is not a belief.”

Nonsense. Atheism requires a belief in the unbelievable.

Christians believe Christ could raise people from the dead because he is God. That is faith. Atheists believe life came out of non-life. That, too, is faith. They believe in what their god, science, cannot demonstrate, replicate or prove. They believe in miracles but cannot identify, produce or describe the miracle worker.

At Christmas, pray for Hitchens, Harris, Dawkins and the other lost souls at that Reason Rally.

The Jewish Conquest of America!: Christian Christmas Symbols Outlawed, Jewish Menorahs Erected


Nothing that better illustrates the Jewish extremist takeover of America than the triumphant Jewish War on Christmas!

Jewish organizations have been the leaders of the legal fight to ban Christian Christmas symbols from American public life. The largest Jewish organizations in America such as the American Jewish Committee, has financed and sponsored numerous lawsuits saying that Christian Manger scenes and Christian crosses cannot be erected on any public ground.

Even though such has been permitted during the entire history of the United States, they claimed these displays were harmful to Jews. They have also successfully banned Christmas Carols in schools and created the newspeak of “Winter Holidays” instead of “Christmas Holidays.”

With the media overwhelmingly owned and run by Jewish tribalists, and with the American political and judicial system thoroughly run by Jewish money and Jewish influence, they completely banned any Christian Christmas celebration from any public ground and in any public institution.

At the very same time they successfully banned Christian Christmas commemoration, Jewish extremist groups such as Chabad Lubavitch began to put up thousands of Jewish Menorahs up on public ground across America. Including a giant Menorah right across from the White House. It is proudly labelled in the Headlines of CNN and CBS as the National Menorah! Not only would a Christian manger scene or cross not be labelled the National Nativity Scene, such is outlawed in the United States!
What kind of Talmudic logic did our Jewish dominated political system use to justify the placing of Jewish Menorahs in thousands of public places?

They claimed it was simply a secular symbol and not a religious symbol. So, we are told that the oldest symbol of Judaism is not a religious symbol! All this while rabbis perform the traditional Jewish religious ritual of lighting the Menorah. Yet, not a single newspaper or media broadcast dares to point out the hypocrisy of banning Christian Christmas symbols but allowing Jewish religious Symbols and calling the Jewish Menorah the “National Menorah!”

The legal argument was “separation of church and state.” That even though the vast majority of Americans are Christian and even though Christian Christmas celebrations have been an intrinsic part of American and Western traditions and culture, they must be banned because no religious symbols can be allowed.

Yet, no one can seriously argue that the Menorah is not the oldest symbol of the religion of Judaism just as the cross is the oldest symbol of Christianity.

The lighting of the Jewish menorah on public ground across America is carried out  under strict Jewish law, just as it was yesterday in front of the White House on public ground. According to an article in CNN, the 30-foot menorah stands high enough to be seen from afar, and its height is regulated under Jewish law.

“It’s got to be visible, so it has to be at least two and a half feet off the ground minimum, and not higher than 30 feet, because the rabbinical authorities deem that to be the height at which a person has to crane their neck to see it,” a leading Jewish Supremacist religious leader said.

The whole idea of Hanukkah, he said, is visibility.  The Chabad group of Orthodox Jews who organize the event say that for the thousands of people who watch the broadcast of the illumination of the menorah, it is a signal that the 8-day religious holiday has begun.

Observation of the holiday begins at sunset, and this year’s event began at 4:00 p.m. ET to the sounds of the United States Navy Band.

Hanukkah is Symbol of Jewish Racism and Murder

Not only is the display of the Jewish Menorah illegal under the same laws that they ban Christian Christmas symbols, the celebration of Hanukkah is actually a celebration of Jewish racism, supremacism and ultimately even murder of Jewish enemies. It is the literal opposite of the Christian Christmas motif of “Peace on Earth and Goodwill toward Men!”

The celebration of Hanukkah, kicked off yesterday with the lighting of a huge menorah in front of the White House, is exactly that: a celebration of an event in Jewish history which was marks an armed uprising by Jewish extremists in which they murdered Gentiles and all Jews who dared to associate with them.

Imagine if a Christian or Muslim group had a celebration in the White House about preventing Jews from assimilating in Gentile society! The Jewish Lobby would be up in arms, screaming “hate” and “antisemitism.”

Hanukkah–and the menorah lighting–is a celebration of Jewish military victory and the maintenance of Jewish racial purity!

Perhaps nothing is more indicative of the double-standards that exist for Jews and Gentiles than to contrast the government and media treatment of Christmas and Hanukkah.

The American Jewish Committee, the ADL and many other groups have been at the forefront to ban any mention of Christmas from our public life. No groups have worked harder to take Christ out of Christmas and Christmas out of our national life.

The American Jewish Committee, the Jewish Council of Presidents, American Jewish Congress, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and hundreds of other Jewish organizations have been at the forefront of the effort to destroy American Christian traditions.


As a result of their litigation and bullying, the Christian part of Christmas has been stripped away from much of our national life. Not only are Christmas carols banned from public schools, but now even the mention of breaks such as the Christmas Holidays is being quietly phased out in favor of politically correct terms such as “winter holidays.”

The White House has for a long time not dared to display a cross or even a manger scene for fear of the Jewish powers.

A few years ago, major Jewish organizations got raging mad because the structure of the podium of the Republican national convention they say resembled a cross. Of course it is easy for just about anything to resemble the common shape of a basic cross. But just the slight resemblance drove them to rage.

When you have a persecution complex as many of them do, it is easy to believe you are being persecuted at every turn.

Where are the Jews who are so concerned about “separation of Church and State, now that there is a menorah lit every year in front of the White House?

And what exactly is the celebration of Hanukkah now celebrated at the White House?

Let me quote to you from a typical Jewish account of it. I take this quote from Zipple: the Jewish Supersite. Here are some excerpts:

Quote: That’s not to say that Chanukah isn’t important. After all, the eight-day holiday celebrates the Jewish military victory against the Syrians…, Underlying Chanukah is a theme just as central today as it was 2,000 years ago, the fight against assimilation. Today, just as then, Jews are well accepted; the Maccabees revolted not only against the ruling Syrians, but against the prevailing Jewish practice of Hellenization.

See, Jewish writers define the Hanukkah celebration as one to encourage resistance to assimilation among Gentiles, a battle as vital today as the one that went on 2000 years ago. The word Hellenization is just a substitute word for Americanization.

You see, everyone else in the world that comes to America is supposed to be quote, “Americanized, ” everyone of course except the Jews. For them we are supposed to say ‘isn’t it great that they want to maintain their separateness and not merge into the great melting of races and creeds in America!’

Any Gentile who would dare to say that Jews want to remain separate and not truly assimilate into American culture would be labeled an anti-Semite. If that’s true, I guess almost every Jewish organization is quote “anti-Semitic”, because all of them preach against intermarriage and assimilation.

The fact-of-the-matter is that Hanukkah is an extremely ethnocentric celebration of a Jewish military victory and massacre of the pro-Greek Syrians along with those Jews who appreciated the beauty and culture of Greek civilization.

While a billion Christians celebrate peace on earth and good will to men, the Hanukkah celebration celebrates annihilation of Jewish enemies.

Most of the Jewish holidays are celebrations of massacres of their enemies. Seems odd, doesn’t it, for a religion to revere military victories as their most sacred times.

In fact, the meaning given to Hanukkah by almost all Jewish leaders and scholars is, that Hanukkah symbolizes the resistance of the assimilation of the Jewish people, religion and culture. That in itself is not so bad; all people who want to maintain their traditions, culture and even the heritage of their children, should resist assimilation.

The popular terms today for assimilation of the European-American people with the Third World are multiculturalism and diversity. Somehow those terms are not supposed to apply to Jewish supremacists, for they need to keep themselves pure, and non-assimilated. We are supposed to have our people and culture be assimilated and subsumed, but they are supposed to resist assimilation at all costs.

Any resistance we have to losing our genetic and cultural heritage through assimilation is called chauvinism, intolerance, and ultimately racism, by the media. Jewish resistance to assimilation is called “heroic” and an absolute necessity.

Obama has repeatedly announced that he is committed to Israel as a Jewish state. Note, he did not say multicultural state, diverse state, but as a JEWISH state, which of course it is. With three million Palestinians living under an oppressive Israeli military occupation, some even still dare to call Israel the only democracy in the Mideast!

What is so incredibly hypocritical about the whole thing is that the same media that lauds assimilation and diversity for European Americans has no problem with Jews resisting assimilation in the countries in which they dwell.

Of course, that is because the media is dominated by the same group that celebrates Hanukkah. Most of the Jewish groups promoting Hanukkah use it as a lesson to vigorously condemn intermarriage between Jews and Gentiles.

Imagine for a moment if there was a White House ceremony that symbolized White rejection of assimilation and multiculturalism, and stridently opposed intermarriage of Whites and nonwhites.

Do you think the media would be silent?

Every major Jewish organization in the world has programs dedicated to preventing marriage of Jews and non-Jews.

How often are they compared to those organizations of Whites or any other race who opposes wholesale intermarriage?

How many times have you seen the Hollywood stereotype of the White Southerner opposed to race-mixing?

How many of you know that by law Israel does not legally recognize marriages between Jews and non-Jews?

How many times has the media dared to compare those Israeli laws to the old anti-intermarriage laws in most of the American states, or for that matter the Nuremberg Laws of Hitler’s Germany.?

How are these double standards maintained without any outcry?

In truth the double standards that we witness every day in our nation reveal the extent of Jewish power and influence over our media, government and culture.

The outlawing Christian Christmas Symbols and the promotion of Judaic Racist Symbols at this Christmastime can be a very powerful symbol in itself of the Jewish extremist tyranny over the American people.

The extremist Maccabees who massacred both Gentiles and Jews in event celebrated by Hanukkah prevailed led the Jewish establishment to its extremist, ultra-racist character that prevails even to this day.

Symbols are important. Look at the pictures of the giant “National Menorah” and you see the symbols of those who rule America.

Stand up for your freedom!

Stand up against the Jewish racist supremacists who are leading our nation and people to tyranny and ruin!

"Swastika:" Film Footage Showing What Germany Was Really Like under the Third Reich

via Ur-Fascist Analytics

This  footage is from a 1974 documentary titled 'Swastika'; it offers excellent footage of life in Greater Germany from from 1933 through 1939, in many different contexts.

Golden Dawn and the Traditionalist Worker Party: Nationalist Unity

via TradYouth

Meeting with Golden Dawn the previous year was transformative for me, underscoring much of what we were doing right and also what we need to improve. Jason Claar of the Identity Vanguard and I had another opportunity to meet with them this past month. Golden Dawn is one of the most successful nationalist movements in all of Europe and the aim of the Traditionalist Worker Party is to follow their examples and have positive relations between our two nationalist movements.

Golden Dawn is a Party that was founded in 1985 in an age when both the Left and the Right alike were living high on the hog on the backs of the Greek people. For years Golden Dawn remained a small Party because the Establishment was able to use huge amounts of money from the European Union to bribe the Greek people into staying silent. “Bright” people insisted that Golden Dawn shift from their consistently third positionist platform to something more mainstream in order to win popular support, but Nikolaos Michaloliakos and his comrades didn’t budge.

They had the foresight to know that the Greek people would eventually, after a gradual process of humiliation and betrayal by the political Establishment, come to embrace their complete vision.

Now that the disastrous economic policies of both the Establishment Left and Right have bankrupted the Greek people, the immigration policies have betrayed the Greek nation and the mainstream Parties spit upon the Greek Orthodox Faith and traditional Greek values, more and more Greeks are waking up to realize that Golden Dawn, and only Golden Dawn, is the Party that fights for the best interests of Greece and her people.

The Traditionalist Worker Party had the true honor of being able to be an official guest of Golden Dawn and was able to meet with the Golden Dawn MP’s and leadership inside the Greek Parliament. It was a busy day for Golden Dawn when we arrived because outside in Athens, Greek farmers from all over Greece were protesting the governments policies of high taxation, land foreclosure, and seizures of products that were bankrupting Greek farmers, their families and local communities. The European Union and her parliamentary puppets were fleecing the Greek people and Golden Dawn were the only party standing up for the Greek people.

I attended the farmers’ protest before entering the Greek Parliament and I saw that these are normal people who have been betrayed by their government. The current government, led by Syriza, or The Coalition of the Radical Left, gained power in recent elections promising relief for working and middle class Greeks. Of course Syriza had huge tax hikes that would take effect just after the most recent elections, so many normal Greeks listened to the lying vipers of Syriza and are now paying the price.

Greek farmers were discussing with one another and the public how they work now more than ever but their crops are bringing in less money and their taxes are going up. The Leftist government has abandoned these people in favor of serving the international elites, the opposite of what a legitimate government would do. I saw sadness and outrage in the faces of the Greek farmers because they have few options and many were discussing how Syriza that very day was proposing a bill that would allow the State and banks to evict people from homes their families had lived in for centuries.

I did see hope, though. Several of the farmers were holding Golden Dawn newspapers or were wearing buttons in support of the Party. While the radical Left and the Establishment Right have sold the people out, the people are realizing only nationalists will stand up for their best interests and the future for their nation.

A coalition of farmers’ organizations were preparing to enter the Greek Parliament to meet with Golden Dawn leaders to discuss how Golden Dawn could best serve the interests of rural Greeks. It was inspiring to see organizations that the Left has long controlled coming to the nationalist perspective and opening themselves up to sitting down with Golden Dawn.

Inside the Greek Parliament, I saw how the System habitually persecutes and marginalizes nationalists. Smaller Parties than Golden Dawn were given bigger office space and better accommodations while Golden Dawn was forced into back offices. I asked one of the members how they could go to work everyday and see the politicians who illegally threw Golden Dawn members in jail and who support movements that have bombed Golden Dawn offices and assassinated patriotic Greek members. With a smile and a shrug the member responded to me, “We focus our energy on serving the Greek people while these other groups focus on destroying the Greek people. This is not about Party versus Party. It is the survival of the Greek people against those who are working to destroy it.”

While Golden Dawn is now the third largest Party, Greek law has worked to enshrine the Establishment as being able to override elections. The largest Party in Greek election is given a bonus of representatives in the Greek Parliament. This law is specifically aimed at disenfranchising the will of the Greek voters to give the approved Parties a powerful head start on their agenda. Of the 300 parliamentary seats, 50 are bonus seats awarded to the establishment against the will of the people.

While the offices were cramped, they were joyous places of bustling activity. Members, secretaries and MP’s were coming in and out on business for bills in the Parliament, correspondence from members and citizens, working out details for upcoming food drives for needy Greeks, organizing meetings for local chapters, and a whole host of activities geared towards serving the constituents of the Party.

Each office also had in it Orthodox icons of Christ, the Theotokos, and various heroic Greek Saints, something that as an Orthodox Christian spoke to me deeply. The Party and national flags on flagpoles were topped with Crosses, a true symbol of Golden Dawn fighting for the Faith, family, and folk of Greece. While the Leftist government refused to be sworn in by the Greek Patriarch as is Greek custom and has even discussed removing the cross off of the Greek flag, Golden Dawn continues its staunch defense of Greek culture and the values of an Orthodox nation.


The highlight of the trip was being able to sit down with Christos Pappas, his wife Irene Pappas, and Party leader Nikolaos Michaloliakos in Mr. Michaloliakos’ office. In our nearly hourlong meeting I was able to discuss with the leadership of Golden Dawn the Traditionalist Worker Party, our ideology, our electoral and community organizing plans, and strategies and to discuss ways for our two Parties to coordinate with one another on shared issues.
Mrs. Pappas, who I had the honor of meeting on my last trip to Greece, is a heroic woman. She has been in the struggle for nationalism longer than I have been alive and has suffered alongside her husband and the comrades of Golden Dawn on both the streets and in her personal life. When I was in Greece last year her husband was in prison as a nationalist POW. Under Greek law, the government can hold you for 18 months without a hearing or evidence brought against you.

Of course the Leftist government kept the leaders of Golden Dawn under lock and key until the most recent elections until the law forced them to release our noble comrades after a year and a half behind bars. While her husband was in prison, Mrs. Pappas did not slacken at all in her fight for Greece and her sweetness and compassion for needy Greeks and working families is evident to anyone who speaks to her for even a moment.

As a mother and a leading Party member, Mrs. Pappas should serve as inspiration to all nationalist women around the world. One must not choose between family life or politics. She is a shining example of how women can be active members of nationalist movements and raise a healthy family.

The look of a man who will never be broken
The look of a man who will never be
broken by a corrupt and evil System
Christos Pappas is not only a dedicated husband and father, but a personal inspiration of mine. His writings on nationalism, tradition, and a whole host of subjects are some of the best that have come out in recent decades. The difference between nationalists and the System was made evident during his immoral arrest two years ago.
Shouting out “Golden Dawn will survive. Golden Dawn forever. Long live the country,” to reporters, Christos Pappas held his head up high, knowing that he was on the right side of history. The thugs of the Leftist Greek government covered their faces for fear and shame of what they were doing. Real men hold their heads up high, cowards hide their faces, and Christos Pappas certainly falls into the category of being a true European man.

Now that he is out of prison, Christos Pappas, his wife, and all of the comrades of Golden Dawn are carrying on their struggle to fight for Greece, the only Party to do so in Greece.

Meeting Nikolaos Michaloliakos was a true honor and privilege. His work as Party leader of Golden Dawn is something I can only hope to emulate in the struggle for my people here in the United States. Mr. Michaloliakos served his nation as a soldier, receiving praise and commendation for his dedication, his skills, and his willingness to do anything in his ability to secure the safety of the Greek people. His activist career stretches decades and is the tale of a man who truly loves his God and his people.

In our meeting, we discussed ways that the Traditionalist Worker Party could emulate Golden Dawn regarding strategy, propaganda techniques and community outreach. Many of these tactics will become the central tenets of our Party as we move forward into our first election season. The leadership of Golden Dawn has built a Party against persecution from the media and the State and all odds serves their folk better than any other Party or the government itself does and we in the Traditionalist Worker Party will do the same.

As our meeting in the Greek Parliament came to a close, I was able to gift Mr. Michaloliakos with a small token of appreciation, a Traditionalist Worker Party flag for his desk, and then go with several Golden Dawn members to a Party meeting being held at a nearby Athens office.

Inside the meeting, I once again saw how Golden Dawn speaks to all classes and all demographics of the Greek people. The media of course only shows stereotypes of tough young men as Party members but the meeting hall was filled with men, women, young, old, farmers, office workers, and all different parts of Greek society. Only a Party that speaks to the soul of a people can ever gather together all elements of that people under the same banner, and Golden Dawn has done that.

The meeting went very well and was standing room only. They discussed history, ideology, and practical ways to implement these ideas within Greek society. My thanks go out to my translator who kept me in the loop for what was being said at the meeting. Afterward, I was hosted at a local comrade’s home for traditional Greek food, which was of course delicious, and left feeling the true spirit of camaraderie and community that only nationalists can share.

Going to Greece was an invigorating trip and I have nothing but praise for the work of Golden Dawn. They are the spearpoint for European nationalism. We all could learn a lot from their decades of sacrifice and hard work to become leading voices for nationalism, Faith and Identity in the 21st century. I look forward to meeting with comrades in Greece again soon and finding new ways to learn from and support the Gold Dawn.

Now it is up to us in America to take the strategies I have learned and put them into effect for our first electoral season here at home. Our Party will follow our Greek comrades in battling for Faith, family and folk against all enemies both foreign and domestic. In the future, I pray the friendship between our two Parties will only grow, cementing the idea that nationalists around the world are fighting the same enemies on the same barricades. United, we will win.

Merry Christmas

via Cambria Will not Yield

And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night. And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid. And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.Luke 2: 8-14

Child Jesus
When the Christ-Child to this world came down,
He left for us His throne and crown.
He lay in a manger, all pure and fair,
Of straw and hay His bed so bare.
But high in heaven the star shone bright,
And the oxen watched by the Babe that night.
Hallelujah! Child Jesus!

Oh, come, ye sinful and ye who mourn,
Forgetting all your sin and sadness,
In the city of David a Child is born,
Who doth bring us heav’nly gladness.
Then let us to the manger go,
To seek the Christ who hath loved us so.
Hallelujah! Child Jesus!

–Hans Christian Andersen

I drove by a church the other day that had a big sign, which read, “Happy Holidays.” I’m so used to seeing Happy Holidays everywhere at this time of year that it really didn’t, at first glance, strike me as something odd. But then when I thought about it, it did strike me as rather cutting edge. Are the organized churches now going to make explicit what has been implicit for the last half century? “We believe what the liberal establishment tells us to believe.” And the liberal establishment does not believe in the founder of the Christmas feast. From that disbelief comes all the “we musts” of Liberaldom.

The liberals tell us we must be multicultural, we must let Moslems into the European nations, and we must let blacks into our neighborhoods, our schools, and our homes. We also must let Aztecs overwhelm North America. And we must keep abortion legal, because a woman must have a right to choose. But must we allow any of those evils? Have the European people flourished under all the “we musts”?

It is my contention that what men have wrought with the support of the devil can be unwrought by men who are inspired by Christ the Lord. A case in point – I came into the anti-abortion movement in my mid-twenties. There was already, at that time, an old guard that had been protesting outside the local abortuary for about six years. I asked one of the grizzled veterans if we might do the unborn babies more good if we burned down the clinic instead of just standing outside and protesting. The G. V. told me an interesting story. When the clinic first started he went door to door in his parish and lined up over a hundred men who were willing to “visit” the clinic at night and burn it down. Then his parish priest got wind of their plans and condemned them from the pulpit. Thus the crusade ended before it began. The pro-life movement in that area became a movement of little mite, and then it moved on to become a pro-abortion movement that condemned all violence against abortionists. But what if Christian men had taken the other path? What if professed Christians of every church and parish had really fought abortion? What was wrought would have been unwrought.

Unfortunately that one parish was a reflection of organized Christianity’s response to abortion. If you don’t fight an evil, you will become part of the evil. It is easy to condemn men like Paul Hill and Richard Dear for being violent and mentally unstable, but how is it possible to act alone, as such men do, and not be unstable? They need the support of those people who claim to be Christian in order to stay militant and sane. When your Christianity is bred in the bone because you live amongst blood Christians, there is no need for the agonized lonely search for the right and the wrong of violent action against the enemy, because you strike in union with ten thousand other men of your own blood and your own faith. But that is the cleverness of the devil; he convinced the Europeans that what was important was their intellectual sectarian defenses of the Christian furniture in their local churches, not the defense of our common hope and the ethos that flows from a belief in our common hope.

The first betrayal starts with the betrayal of our racial hearth fire. From that betrayal stems the denial of Christ’s birth at His divine hearth fire. Once the divinity of Christ’s birth is denied, the blasphemers then go on to deny the reality of His resurrection. All the liberals’ “we musts” have been set up to kill the Christ Child in His crib. To restore the Christ Child we must oppose the liberals’ “we musts.” We must not be multicultural, we must not integrate, and we must not murder the baby in the womb.

God bless all Christians of the old European stock, may you have a Merry Christmas, free from the stink of liberalism. Next week and the week after, I’ll run a Christmas story. I’ll resume the regular blog in January.

A Christmas Carol
In the bleak mid-winter
Frosty wind made moan,
Earth stood hard as iron,
Water like a stone;
Snow had fallen, snow on snow,
Snow on snow,
In the bleak mid-winter
Long ago.
Our God, Heaven cannot hold him
Nor earth sustain;
Heaven and earth shall flee away
When he comes to reign;
In the bleak mid-winter
A stable-place sufficed
The Lord God Almighty
Jesus Christ.
Angels and archangels
May have gathered there,
Cherubim and seraphim
Thronged the air;
But only His Mother
In her maiden bliss
Worshipped the Beloved
With a kiss.
What can I give Him,
Poor as I am?
If I were a shepherd
I would bring a lamb,
If I were a Wise Man
I would do my part –
Yet what I can I give Him,
Give my heart.
-Christina Rossetti

Anti-Zionist Jews?

via Radix

Many Jews support mass immigration and multiculturalism for the United States and Europe, while opposing such policies for Israel. Until about 10 years ago, this was the dominant position amongst neoconservatives and the liberal Jewish establishment, represented by the likes of Abe Foxman, Alan Dershowitz, Charles Krauthammer, Sheldon Adelson, Joe Lieberman, et al.

Pointing out such hypocrisy has two uses. It reveals the intellectual dishonesty (or, perhaps, self-deception) of many Jewish-founded multicultural movements. Secondly, it is rhetorically useful to ask, “If Israel can have a unique religious and ethnic identity, why can’t America and European countries?”

Over the past decade, however, this hypocritical consensus amongst Jews has broken down. First, many neoconservatives have vocally embraced immigration control. For instance, however repulsive we might find David Frum and Bill Kristol, they are better on the immigration than so many Gentile Republicans. In turn, a major force within the Jewish Left—for example, Max Blumenthal, Tim Wise, “Jon Stewart,” and George Soros—are hostile to Israel’s Likud government. Whatever this shift means, it is not a serious or effective argument to parrot some variation of “Why don’t you support open borders for Israel, too” to Jews who vocally criticize all varieties of nationalism, including Israeli.

Unfortunately, it seems many on the alt Right do not seem to recognize this new reality.

On Twitter, popular alt Right accounts have done the (Shit-) Lord’s work in trolling the establishment Left and Cuckservative Right. But a recent troll raid on Jewish leftist MJ Rosenberg shows how many do not understand, or are simply ignorant of, the new anti-White and anti-Zionist Left. Rosenberg undoubtedly holds hostility towards America’s White Majority, for a combination of racial and religious reasons; and like many on the Left, he has been tweeting hysterically about Donald Trump. As you can imagine, this led a few Right-wing Shitlords to respond with the Happy Merchant cartoon or put ((((())))) around his last name.

Rosenberg took the bait and tweeted,
Before getting to the response, let me briefly describe Rosenberg’s background.
MJ Rosenberg has been a long-time left-wing policy analyst. During the 1980s, he briefly worked for AIPAC, but has since become critical of the group. From 2009 to 2012, he worked for Media Matters, where he criticized neoconservatives and Christian Zionists with slurs like “Israeli Firsters.”

Christian Zionists, neoconservatives, and pro-Likud liberal groups all attacked Rosenberg. Eventually, a group founded by Bill Kristol and Gary Bauer, The Emergency Committee for Israel, ran a full page ad in the New York Times accusing Rosenberg of "throwing around the term ‘Israel Firster,’” which has “a nasty anti-Semitic pedigree.”

As the attacks intensified, Rosenberg resigned (likely under pressure), citing his desire to avoid dragging Media Matters into further controversy. Afterwards, the Jerusalem Post ran an article entitled "Jewish leaders welcome Rosenberg’s removal.” A few quotes from the article:
“I’m proud of whatever small role I played. . . It wouldn’t surprise me if there were some calls to Media Matters from the White House. . . It would have been a smart thing for somebody to have made it clear that the White House could not have any association to somebody who accuses [AIPAC] of not having loyalty to the US. That is such an off the chart accusation.”
—Alan Dershowitz
“For years, Media Matters has been spreading what the ADL, AJC, Simon Wiesenthal and others have all identified as anti-Semitic ideas and hate speech, and despite the departure of this person, this organization has yet to condemn or distance itself in any way from the vile things they have been advocating and paying him to say. The real unanswered question for Media Matters is who hired him in the first place? Clearly, though, they and others now understand that the Democratic party discourse has no room for that kind of anti-Israel and anti-Semitic rhetoric.”
—Josh Block, former AIPAC Spokesman who now heads The Israel Project
“‘Israel Firster’ is a term that demonizes Israel’s supporters and that has debased critical Middle East debates and deliberations—including a nuclearizing Iran. Media Matters’ removal of M.J. Rosenberg and his anti-Israel rants from White House access to the margins is appropriate and long overdue.”
—Rabbi Abraham Cooper, President of the Simon Wiesenthal Center
Even if one was too lazy to look up Rosenberg on Wikipedia, one could just read his Twitter bio: “Former AIPAC employee who learned first-hand that it should register as foreign lobby or shut down.”

The same day of his tweet about Nazis and Trump, he also tweeted:
Thus, whatever one wants to say about Rosenberg, he’s not a shill for AIPAC and the Israel Lobby. Nonetheless, most of the Shitlords responded as if he were.
Here are few of the many example:
There are literally hundreds more of these types of attacks. Rosenberg aptly responded,
I don’t want to overstate the importance of these twitter exchanges. Most of the Shitlords have moved on from Rosenberg and will, no doubt, engage in more successful troll raids. In turn, Rosenberg will continue to promote his anti-Likud and anti-White agenda with the renewed self-righteousness of being attacked by real anti-Semites and the smugness of thinking that they don’t even recognize what he believes. It’s all part of the circle of life.

Nonetheless, the exchange reflects the Right’s failure to understand the changes in the Jewish Left. Of course, I don’t expect grand meta-political analysis in 140 characters from self-proclaimed trolls. But it’s not too much to ask that they refrain from calling someone an Israeli shill whose entire political career is defined by attacking the Israel Lobby.

Put frankly, the alt Right should recognize, address, and seek to counter Jewish influence. But you cannot defeat what you do not understand.