Dec 17, 2015

With Eyes Seeking Prey

via Kevin Alfred Strom

Listen Now

Lloyd Blankfein, Jewish boss of Goldman Sachs
The writer David Sims put it beautifully when he said recently that “Every race has its peculiarities. Whites have moderately high IQs and their eyes tend to seek the horizon.” Jews, on the other hand, “have high IQs — and their eyes tend to seek out prey.”

Seeking the horizon — exploring the universe, from macro-worlds to micro-worlds — discovering and conquering new lands — pushing the boundaries of scientific knowledge ever farther toward infinity  — achieving the most sublime beauty and deepest meaning in art; these are the hallmarks of our Faustian race-soul.

Seeking prey — seeking other human beings to deceive, trick, use, abuse, and enslave — so you and your tribe can live off of them and get something for nothing; these are the hallmarks of the materialist and parasitic race-soul of the Jews.

The so-called “banking industry” and related financial and investment firms are one of the main means by which the Jews — who largely own and control these shady businesses — extract money from the Gentile population.

I’ve shown you in previous programs that the Jews are fantastically, almost unbelievably overrepresented in the finance sector: “Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Wall Street banks, trade exchanges, and regulatory agencies by a factor of 36 times (or 3,600 percent)” and “Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Wall Street mutual funds, private equity funds, hedge funds, and brokerages by a factor of 32.5 times (or 3,250 percent).”

I have shown that among hedge fund managers — who have in effect created an entirely new, private currency out of thin air, raking off trillions from the hard-earned wealth of the people — Jews are over-represented by a factor of 40 times, or 4,000 per cent.

And I have proven in earlier editions of this radio program that this banking system — the banking system we have lived under for 100 years in this country — is a system of privilege and power, giving the insiders at these banking institutions the ability to create money out of nothing and the “right” to be paid interest on the money they so create, and the tremendous power of placing every citizen in their debt, which they do by the simple expedient of getting their bought-and-paid-for legislators to enact laws making it so that every dollar spent by the government — actually, every dollar that exists — constitutes a “debt” owed to them. No king, no president-for-life, no dictator, no emir or warlord or discoverer of caves filled with acres of gold and diamonds ever held such power or possessed such wealth.

One wonders, after all of the evident outrage at the abuses of the financial sector — from the recent mortgage crisis to the sickening taxpayer “bailout” of the richest institutions (and richest ethnic group) known in all of human history — where are all of the regulations and regulators which are supposed to protect us from these predators?

Here’s the answer: Jews, as noted above, are as wildly over-represented in the regulatory agencies as they are in the financial industry itself. And, most significantly, they — using their ill-gotten wealth — have made their financial system, and the banks, funds, brokerages, holding companies, shell companies, and other corporations which embody it, so unbelievably complex that the regulators are hard-pressed even to catalogue it or understand it, much less keep it under control.

Let me give you an example. Many corporations have subsidiaries. If they are public corporations they are required to report all of the subsidiary companies that they control to the Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC). Industrial giant General Electric has 19 subsidiaries under its control. The Coca-Cola company reports that it owns and controls 104 subsidiaries. The largest automobile manufacturer in the world, General Motors, has an astounding 455 subsidiaries.

But all that is nothing, I repeat nothing, compared to what the largely-Jewish financial pirates have done. They have created a structure of interlocking companies and companies within companies so huge, so complex, that it rivals the complexity of the complete non-financial remainder of American society, or the governmental structure of the entire nation from the federal executive right down to the local level and everything in between.

According to a study by Swiss financial research firm Bureau van Dijk, Goldman Sachs — the “too big to fail” recipient of so much of your tax money — has 3,536 subsidiaries. Another megabank, J.P. Morgan, has 5,123 subsidiaries — more than half of them overseas. Wells Fargo has 3,675 subsidiaries.

Just the six largest banks in this country own and control a total of 22,621 subsidiaries.

Sen. Sherrod Brown states of these banks and their thousands of shell corporations: “They are not just too complex to manage, they are too complicated and too interconnected to regulate.” And that is precisely why they exist.

Does company A owe too many taxes? Why not switch some of its operations over to company B, which has a big loss for the year so far, so the whole operation can show a small loss instead of a taxable profit? It can all be done with the stroke of a pen in one minute.

Is company C liable to pay damages under a lawsuit? Why, after writing down a few numbers and words and signatures on a piece of paper, we can arrange things so that it no longer has any assets at all and so can pay little or nothing to the people it harmed.

Are you trying to figure out just what company D is doing and what its income and liabilities are? Good luck with that — half its shares are owned by shell company E that owns 14 other companies F through S, half of them also shell companies that partly own company D and significant parts of each other, including company A. By the time you’ve figured all that out, after maybe a year, you still don’t know where the money went or who made the profit — and it’s too late anyway, since in the meantime, company T just bought a majority stake in company E and the whole deal was financed by a loan from companies U and D, who share several directors in common but have separate bank accounts.

The Mafia used to do the same thing, but on a much smaller scale. It’s all quite impenetrable, and at some level you start to understand that it’s basically unreal. You have to realize that — whether you’re a consumer or a regulator — you have been cheated by experts, and good luck proving it. It’ll be you against the top law firms and accountants in the world, and I do mean the world of crime, and by that I do mean America.

Thomas Jefferson warned us against fractional reserve banking when he said in the early 19th century: “Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies” and “Bank-paper must be suppressed, and the circulating medium must be restored to the nation to whom it belongs.” That means we need an honest money system, a system which allocates the people’s credit to the people based on what is best for our race and nation; a system which has the strength and health of the nation in mind, not private profit for a few based on the “lending” of something which never belonged to those few to begin with. Never again should a privileged class be allowed to create money out of nothing, imposing chains of debt on all of us who are not among the “chosen” class of money-creators.

But to get to an honest financial system and an honest economy, and to end the impoverishment of our people, we have to get this entire Jewish system off our backs. As I’ve demonstrated in earlier broadcasts, if we don’t get this system off our backs, we aren’t even going to survive as a race. We won’t even survive as a slave race. We’ll be a dead race. We will be nothing. And the Universe which gave us birth will know us no more.

So it’s time now to begin planning for the fall of the current system, and the building of a whole new nation — a whole new world — a morally and racially clean world, a world of which we can be proud — a world fit for the next thousand generations of the race that seeks the infinite horizon. Join us. Join the National Alliance.

The Fraud of Sandy Hook

via The Thinking Housewife

JAMES TRACY, a professor of communications at South Florida University, writes at Fellowship of the Minds on the third anniversary of the Sandy Hook events:

Three years ago the public learned of the most significant mass shooting in recent US history involving the deaths of 20 young school children and seven adults. As a father of three I immediately empathized with the parents, reminding myself there was no real way to fathom the sense of loss such an experience must involve.

After several days of reflection, however, my instincts as a media analyst took charge. In reviewing news coverage of the Sandy Hook School massacre I began to recognize very unusual features in the alleged forensics, the emergency response and the overall way the event was being reported.

Commonplace emergency protocols were abandoned. There was no surge of EMTs into the building, no proper triage protocol employed or Med-Evac helicopters called. Parents were not even allowed to view and hold the bodies of their deceased children, and law enforcement oddly admonished those who questioned the official narrative online were subject to criminal prosecution.

The following day Connecticut’s state coroner amazingly bumbled and guffawed through a fifteen minute press conference where it was anticipated he would provide an expert overview of the postmortem. His responses to reporters’ questions were so bizarre and incompetent I was awaiting an avalanche of lawsuits from victims families to be brought against the school district and State of Connecticut. On December 28 one was filed, then quickly withdrawn. The following October the Sandy Hook School—among the greatest crime scenes in US history—was demolished. . . . [cont.]

Mike Judge, Idiocracy, and the Jewish Suppression of Eugenics

via The End of Zion

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert
Camacho. This is what the leader of the dysgenic
future of America will most likely look like
One of the rare examples of a Hollywood movie that is genuinely good and actually has a powerful, positive message that touches on an important social issue is the 2006 movie Idiocracy, written and directed by the brilliant satirist Mike Judge of Beavis and Butthead, Office Space, and King of the Hill fame.

The plot is that two people volunteer to be cryogenically frozen in a military hibernation experiment, and the experiment goes wrong, causing them to not be released until well into the future, in 2505. The future is populated by a coffee-colored mass of, well, idiots, due to hundreds of years of dysgenic down-breeding.

Below is the first two minutes of the movie, which shows a hilarious contrast between an intelligent couple that keeps putting off having children until it’s too late, and a White trash moron who impregnates women left and right and pops out dozens of them. It begins with the following voice-over narration:
As the twenty-first century began, human evolution was at a turning point. Natural selection, the process by which the strongest, the smartest, the fastest reproduced in greater numbers than the rest, a process which had once favored the noblest traits of man, now began to favor different traits.
Most science fiction of the day predicted a future that was more civilized and more intelligent. But as time went on, things seemed to be heading in the opposite direction — a dumbing down. How did this happen? Evolution does not necessarily reward intelligence. With no natural predators to thin the herd, it began to simply reward those who reproduced the most and left the intelligent to become an endangered species.

That is, basically, the traditional argument for eugenics, originally derived from Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection by Darwin’s cousin, Francis Galton. Whether Judge was versed in the theory of eugenics when he wrote the movie, or whether he had just happened to independently come to the same conclusion as the eugenicists through observing current trends in society, is hard to tell.

If he was aware of eugenics, and the content of the movie suggests that as a good possibility, he must’ve either not been aware of the stigma associated with eugenics, which has become a dirty word in our current world due to the association it has with the so-called Jewish Holocaust, or unaware of the extent of that stigma, or else he just didn’t care.

Eugenics is a dirty word because the Third Reich practiced eugenics, and it led to the mass extermination of millions of Jews and other “undesirables,” so the story goes. This association was cemented into the mind of the public following the highly organized Jewish campaign for promoting the Holocaust in 1967, primarily as a deterrent to anti-Jewish sentiment following the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. John Glad, in his book Jewish Eugenics, explains how
Subsequent to the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, the Holocaust Memorial Movement is launched, with eugenics targeted as the ideology of genocide. So effective is the campaign that polls show that many more Americans can identify the Holocaust than Pearl Harbor or the atomic bombing of Japan. Those who are familiar with the term “eugenics” begin to associate it with “Holocaust” and “racism.”
Glad could hardly be called an anti-Semite, as he is a Jew himself. Ideologically he is pro-eugenics and a universalist, rather than ethnocentric, and, in that eye-opening, thoroughly researched book of his he puts the blame for the suppression of eugenics – in great detail – squarely on his fellow Jews, who have themselves, he writes, “practiced eugenics for millennia.” This is a fact. Eugenics are actually embedded in Talmudic, Jewish religious law. (For more on this see A People That Shall Dwell Alone by Dr. Kevin MacDonald. Also see here and here)

So I guess it should come as no surprise to find out that the Jews in Hollywood did all they could to suppress Idiocracy, to the point where it almost didn’t even get released theatrically, and, when it did, there was virtually no promotion – no trailers, ads, etc. – and it was to a very limited amount of theaters.

Mike Judge spoke to VICE about this controversy in a video interview in 2013. Beginning at around 8:40 he says:
But Idiocracy though, that was, like, really ditching a movie, I mean they, I think it was like maybe 11 theaters they put it in. We locked, finished the movie, put it in the can and it was over a year after that that it came out, so I, by the time they got around to marketing, I was completely out of touch with them.

The Myth of Equality

Idiocracy also inherently challenges another sacred cow of Hollywood propaganda: the myth of equality. The movie puts a strong emphasis on the importance of IQ differences and their relation to biological inheritance. A taboo topic, to be sure. Because, as we know, everyone – Blacks and Whites, men and women, rich and poor – must always be considered exactly equal to everybody else, without exception. Any suggestion to the contrary, no matter how scientifically or logically sound, is simply unfit for polite society. Yet Judge courageously smashes through this silly myth by the deployment of unflinching satire – the most powerful weapon of all in combating the lies of the left – with devastating effectiveness.

If anyone hasn’t seen the movie, I recommend doing so. I can almost guarantee you will like it, as it is very witty and funny (though it may be a bit too silly and over-the-top for some, depending on your taste). The entire movie is on YouTube here.

Eugenics and Conspiracy Theories

Ironically, Judge was also interviewed by the pro-Jew, anti-eugenics conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, and they also touched on this topic.
Beginning at 27:40:

Conspiracy types use the word “eugenics” to refer to their theory of a secret plan by Satan-worshipping Nazis that want to depopulate 90% of the earth, using poisonous airplane exhaust and other super secret evil methods. This issue has been dealt with already, so I will not rehash the arguments against it, but needless to say it is utter nonsense.

Their conspiratorial version of eugenics is basically the same as the fantasy, mainstream Jewish version, where it’s claimed that the Nazis herded defectives into buses and gassed them with diesel fumes (an impossibility) and then conducted all kinds of evil and weird medical experiments, eventually killing 6 million Jews in gas chambers and turning their remains into lampshades, soap and fertilizer. The conspiracy movement is kosher to the core, and does nothing but serve Jewish interests by pushing stupid gibberish such as this. They claim to be against the system, yet at the same time push the exact same narrative as the mainstream, except taking it even farther by claiming that Nazis are somehow still running the show.

Why the Nazis would promote anti-Nazi propaganda 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, while they are running things behind the scenes, is never explained. Also, if there’s a Nazi conspiracy, why the New World Order powers coalesced during World War II to absolutely destroy Nazi Germany is also never explained.

Fortunately, not many who follow alternative media are still dumb enough to believe that our enemies are actually Nazis, rather than Jews.

Eugenics….Are They Really Bad?

Like many other topics in today’s world, one is left scratching their head while studying eugenics and seeing the disconnect between what we are told and what actually is.

Eugenics was designed as a system for the betterment of society, the minimizing of suffering, the lowering of crime, and the strengthening of living standards for future generations, and is based upon objective science. Yet what we are led to believe in our post-WWII society is that it is nothing but a slippery slope to evil and genocide, and those who advance and promote it are seen as hate-crazed racists at worst and misguided at best. Reality has been inverted.

This seeming anomaly makes much more sense once you add in the Jew factor though, as what strengthens the White race – and eugenics surely would – is bad for Jews, and what weakens the White race – as dysgenics surely does – is good for Jews. This is a fact that simply can’t be denied by anyone with any intelligence who takes an objective look at Jewish behavior and how the world really works.

As far as Hitler and the National Socialists, the Jews had already absolutely destroyed their country and taken over many of its top institutions before Hitler had come to power, so conflict between the two was inevitable, and it was initially instigated by the Jews.

In the years leading up to 1933 the Jews had been using their media influence to divide and poison the minds of the Germans with anti-German and Marxist propaganda; they had been leading the Communist party which was trying to incite a violent revolution paralleling the Jewish Bolsheviks who took over Russia in 1917 and then brutally tortured, murdered and starved millions of the elites in the name of “equalizing” the Russian people; it was Jews who had disseminated the demoralizing propaganda and led the workers’ strikes on munition factories that caused Germany to lose World War I – a war that Hitler fought valiantly in from start to finish – and it was Jewish bankers who had plundered the German economy, causing hyper-inflation that resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths of German civilians from starvation and suicide.

Hitler, like any honorable man, was wholeheartedly opposed to all of this, so he fought tooth and nail to defend his people and return his beloved nation to its former glory, free of the Jewish parasite that had proven itself to be hostile and disloyal to Germany and the German people.

Because of his open anti-Semitism, the Jews declared war on Germany as soon as Hitler took power, before any anti-Jewish policies had even been enacted. Hitler then began systematically passing laws to force the Jews out of positions of power and influence and he dismantled usurious Jewish banking houses such as the Rothschild dynasty and others. This obviously made the Jews feel very unwelcome – as it was meant to – and so they were leaving Germany in droves. Many went to America, and many went to Palestine and elsewhere.

Needless to say, this treatment was a great embarrassment for the Jews and caused them to develop a deep, burning hatred toward Germany and as a result they were – and still are – willing to make up any lie necessary to have the Third Reich, and its memory – and anyone else who would resist their tyranny – demonized and destroyed. The lies told about eugenics have little to nothing to do with the German-Jewish conflict of the 30s and 40s and, as we have seen, weren’t even invented until 20+ years after the end of the war. They are an outgrowth of the ongoing Jewish hatred of White gentiles, who they view as all potential Nazis that must be destroyed.

Historian and Eugenicist Lothrop Stoddard visited Hitler’s Germany in 1939 and reported on what he saw in the book Into the Darkness: Nazi Germany Today. In that book, he gives the reasons for Germany’s eugenics policies, and their aims, through firsthand knowledge:
When the Nazis came to power, Germany was biologically in a bad way. Much of her best stock had perished on the battlefields of the Great War. But those war losses were surpassed by others during the post-war period, due to the falling birth-rate. Economic depression, mass-unemployment, hopelessness for the future, had combined to produce a state of mind in which Germans were refusing to have children. The birth-rate dropped so fast that the nation was no longer reproducing itself. Furthermore, the lowest birth-rates were among those elements of highest social value. The learned and professional classes were having so few children that, at this rate, they would rapidly die out. At the other end of the scale, the opposite was true. Morons, criminals, and other anti-social elements were reproducing themselves at a rate nine times as great as that of the general population. And those lowest elements were favored in their breeding by the welfare measures of the Weimar regime. Statistics indicate that it cost far more to support Germany‟s defectives than it did to run the whole administrative side of Government—national, provincial, and local. As the Nazis saw it, they had a two-fold task: to increase both the size and the quality of the population. Indiscriminate incentives to big families would result largely in more criminals and morons. So they coupled their encouragements to sound citizens with a drastic curb on the defective elements.
To stand in opposition to the implementation of eugenics policies, such as those described above, is obviously insane, and literally suicidal for a nation. The only reason our society frowns upon eugenics is because our society is controlled by Jews, and as such the basis of our negative perception of the science is not driven by rationality – as most have no idea what it actually even is – it is driven by Jewish lies. Like everything that the Jews don’t like because it is good for Whites, they just claim it inevitably leads to lampshades and Holocausts, and is therefore off limits to even contemplate.

The main reason people don’t know what eugenics really is and are therefore unable to come to a rational opinion in regard to it, is because the other side of the debate over them is ruthlessly suppressed by the liberal Jew media, just as innumerable other big lies. Whatever is good for Whites and bad for Jews – from eugenics, all the way to the belief that White people should not be wiped off of the face of the planet – is simply shouted down as being “Nazi.”

Yes, if you simply care about the future of White children, you will be labeled a “Nazi.” You have to roll over and let your race perish to avoid that label. You have to let your race be degraded into a disgusting cesspool of fat Walmart shoppers that ride around in little carts so they don’t break their ankles trying to get at a tub of Ice Cream, and you must not object to having our borders wide open to hordes of violent subhumans who hate our guts and will slaughter every single one of us wholesale as soon as they’re given half a chance, if you want to avoid that label.

Therefore, unless you are on board with the White genocide program led by the Jews, being called a Nazi is clearly a compliment, and fighting to have every policy associated with Nazism implemented ASAP, virtually a sacred duty.


The logic in favor of eugenics requires only very basic, common sense. Not practicing it is insane and apocalyptic for any people, anywhere.

Are the Jews Right in Suppressing Eugenics?

Suppressing eugenics is clearly evil, but is this a logical strategy from the Jewish point of view?

It can be argued that it is. Eugenics is about rejuvenating the health of your nation, which can only be bad for Jews, since they function as parasites on the body of their host peoples.

Eugenics is rooted in science, and, excluding the leftist versions of it which ignore racial sub-groups and focus only on its IQ and hereditary disease aspects, it emphasizes the need to separate the races geographically due to their differing levels of achievement. The study of civilizations through a racial lens – a key factor in the foundation of racial eugenics – leads to the overwhelming historical evidence which shows that all great ones were built by White people, with the Nordic element at the forefront.

Madison Grant, the most famous early American anthropologist/eugenicist, in his highly influential 1916 book The Passing of the Great Race, characterized the Jew as one whose “dwarf stature, peculiar mentality, and ruthless concentration on self-interest are being engrafted upon the stock of the nation,” and warned against the dangers of race-mixing:
It must be borne in mind that the specializations which characterize the higher races are of relatively recent development, are highly unstable and when mixed with generalized or primitive characters, tend to disappear. Whether we like to admit it or not, the result of the mixture of two races, in the long run, gives us a race reverting to the more ancient, generalized and lower type. The cross between a white man and an Indian is an Indian; the cross between a white man and a negro is a negro; the cross between a white man and a Hindu is a Hindu; and the cross between any of the three European races and a Jew is a Jew.
Thus we see that physical anthropology and race science, of which eugenics grew out of, also leads to the recognition of the Jews as a distinctive and separate race (actually a mixed race), which leaves no room for their trick of blending in by pretending they are White when it suits them and pretending they are just a religion when that suits them. That trick has served them very well, and indeed serves them very well to this day, with most White people having no clue what a Jew actually is, to the detriment of us all.

So yes, eugenics for Whites is bad for Jews, necessarily. Therefore, keeping in mind that they are our deadly racial enemy with separate interests and an entirely different value system, and indeed live off of us as parasites, then it becomes obvious that discouraging us from practicing eugenics is the logical way for them to behave.

Equally obvious, with the simple facts above in mind, is that the logical way for us to behave is to be unashamedly and unapologetically anti-Semitic and pro-eugenics, without fear of the Jews genocidal smear terms, because it is the right thing to do from our perspective.


Why is eugenics evil again? Oh yeah, lampshades and soap. We must feel guilty and give all our wealth and power to Jews and just roll over, rot, and die as a race, right?

Deliberate Genocide

What the Jews are doing to us by suppressing eugenics is conscious, deliberate, premeditated genocide, provably. First off, they are highly conscious of the fact that race-mixing is genocide, and always have been. Secondly, they are also conscious that low birth-rates lead to genocide. Eugenics takes both of these problematic issues into account, and seeks to rectify them.

All leading Jewish groups actively work toward preventing Jews from marrying outside of their race. Alan Dershowitz, one of the top Jewish leaders in America, even wrote an entire book about this, The Vanishing of the American Jew. For Israel, they regard a low Jewish birth-rate vs. a high Palestinian birth-rate as tantamount to Jewish genocide – and rightly so – and thus they are alarmed by and fight against that trend. Israel is, for all intents and purposes, a national socialist, eugenics state.

Meanwhile, they promote the opposite for Whites in White countries: race-mixing, multiculturalism, open borders, and dysgenics; and they brainwash our people into believing that national socialism, White race consciousness and eugenics are the ultimate in evil.

They cannot fallback on the excuse that they are just true-believing “liberals,” because there is ample evidence – stretching back thousands of years – that they are aware that what they are promoting inevitably leads to race destruction.

Therefore, they are guilty of White genocide, with malice aforethought, and it could be proven in court.

Let that sink in for a moment.


Ad encouraging Jews not to intermarry or miscegenate.

Running Out of White People

The President of the future United States in Idiocracy is a hilarious, Black professional wrestler/porn star named Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho. A few years ago Mike Judge brought him back from the future for a series of webcasts, wherein he issued a dire warning in the form of the most politically incorrect statements I’ve ever seen coming from anyone who is anywhere near the mainstream.
Apparently, the future doesn’t run so smooth once White people have, for the most part, disappeared from the face of the earth, and this is a great concern for President Camacho.

Take heed, White man:
“Seeing as I’m from the future and I’ve seen it all, and I see how the shit came out. Listen. Y’all don’t need to worry about climate change. What you need to worry about is we running out of White people. We running out.
“Let me tell you something. In about 500 years. Y’all done went to bonkers. Y’all done got on planes, you flew to different places. The White Flight. There ain’t nowhere else to go! You done head out in the mountaintops, you done went underground. We, let me tell you something: there’s a White people shortage. That’s gonna happen.
“You White people been worrying so much about what’s in danger to spotted owls…the fucking…the fucking deer and the last bit of rabbit that’s running around, the jack rabbits. Can’t let us shoot the coyotes. And y’all didn’t realize yo ass was in danger. Check it out right now. Look, you used to be blonde, family was blonde, now you running around the family looking like…like…like Chico!
Let me tell you something. It’s all getting mixed together player. We all one family, come on out of hiding. Man, we got to save the White people, that’s why I have a 5% stake in the Washington Whiteskins. That’s right.”
“What I’m trying to say is: preserve yourself White people. You special. I’m getting choked up over this shit.”
“So, I came back, from the future, to let you know that this shit is happening. You’re running out of time.

A Tale of Two Petitions

via Alternative Right

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times... Actually scratch that first part, and underline the second.

As we see in France – and probably later in America – the will of the people is not something the establishment is happy acknowledging, even if it has made its way through the multiple obstacles of an artificial and phony egalitarian morality, a mass media that is all false narratives, and a skewed political system where the money flows the other way.

The most they are willing to allow the people are a few token expressions. In the UK, for instance, people have the incredible "freedom" to sign e-petitions and to even have them 'debated' (i.e. briefly mentioned and then ignored) in the House of Commons if they get past a rarely reached threshold of 100,000 names. Hail the Revolution! Muh democracy!

But it seems that even this tiny bone of direct participation, thrown to the unrepresented masses, is subject to all sorts of sinister interference.

Recently two Trump related petitions have been gathering signatures.

One is an expression of views in line with that of the British establishment:
Block Donald J Trump from UK entry.

The other is pro-Trump or simply pro-common-sense:
Don't ban Trump from the United Kingdom.

Of course, there is no real intention to block Trump from the UK for what was actually a rather mild statement, because then the British government might have to do a bit more explaining about all the terrorists, jihadists, and barbarians from the Gulf States it allows to freely cross its borders. But the petition is symbolic and sends out the message the establishment wants to send out, namely:
"Although we may run into problems actually banning a man who could become the next US President from entering the UK, his views on Muslims are simply not welcome here, and our people have been suitably brainwashed to love Muslims. So, don't worry, our Saudi friends; keep banking in the City, boosting our property market, buying our weapons, and using our prostitutes."
For this reason, Her Majesty's Government (sic) has a vested interest in one Trump petition doing rather better than the other. But they are not content to just cheer from the sidelines. Under cover of the fact that a lot of names on petitions turn out to be false, HMG has actually been involved in "trimming" the pro-Trump petition, while allowing every dubious name on the anti-Trump petition to go unchallenged.

There are currently 557,571 signatures on the anti-Trump petition, but a recent freedom of information request by a Eddy Butler, a prominent English nationalist, revealed that zero names had been deleted for suspicion of being fraudulent from this list.

Contrast this with the pro-Trump petition. There are currently 37,626 signatures on this petition, but a further 30,000 names have actually been deleted for being suspected of being "fraudulent." One reason for this rather churlish action is that HMG is keen to prevent the pro-Trump petition reaching the 100,000 threshold, because then the petition has to be officially considered for a debate in parliament.

Such gerrymandering of the political process of course marches lock-step with multiculturalism, reminding us once again that you can never have true democracy in the modern age without having secure nationalism first.

Caution: Jews at Work

via Koinen's Corner

It seems as though on any given day when you check the news you can always be sure that you will spot one or more stories about the anti-White and anti-Western Civilization activities of the Jews. This week has been no exception.

As happens every year about this time, we are treated to some 'tis the season' Jewish news that once again reminds us who is really calling the shots in America.

Here, a David Duke show (with guest) concerning this year's menorah display in front of the White House (and the contemporaneous banning of any Christian symbolism).

In this article Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer offers his always-enlightening perspective on the matter.

And lastly on this subject, here is yet another definitive article by David Duke.

How can this be?  Are we White Nationalists the only people in the country who are outraged by this Jewish chutzpah?

But of course, preempting our traditional Christmas displays at the White House isn't the only thing the Jews have been up to lately.

Here we have an article about Israeli Jews supporting the ISIS terrorists we are supposed to be fighting in order to put a stop to their savage territorial conquests in Iraq and Syria; their inhumane, murderous barbarities; and of course their terrorism which has now spread to Europe and America. And if buying their stolen oil were not enough, here we have a report of those same Israeli Jews rescuing ISIS fighters and providing medical care.  Once again -- doesn't anybody other than us White Nationalists wonder 'what in the hell is going on here?'

And because the Jews are so determined to weaken White nations and genocide White people, they are always at the forefront of efforts to bring alien immigrants into our countries.  Even those who have a much higher than normal potential for committing terrorism against our people (see previous blog post).  So I guess it's no surprise that they would be one of the groups most upset at presidential candidate Donald Trump's comments about keeping Muslims out of the United States.

Also unsurprisingly, there seems to always be some kind of news of the continuing pressure and support on the part of organized Jewry for more gun-control legislation and executive action .  And they don't let a little hypocrisy keep them from pushing that agenda.  Here, the Jewish ACLU favors using the Department of Homeland Security's 'no-fly' list to ban gun purchases even though they oppose that tool for improving air-travel security to the point of filing a lawsuit against it.

Oh, well, I suppose none of these Jewish shenanigans should surprise us.  It's all pretty much SOP (standard operating procedure) for the complicit and culpable Jews; just TJB (typical Jewish behavior).  After all, things have gotten so bad when it comes to our 'bending over' for Israel that one political analyst has suggested that because of our unconditional support for that 'Jewish state,' including our grossly excessive financial support, Tel Aviv has effectively replaced Washington D.C. as the U.S. capital (article here).

Damn, it gets tiresome.  We simply must find a way to make more of our people aware of Jewish efforts to destroy our culture, our Western Civilization, and the White race as a subspecies of mankind (see earlier post and links here).  And then, if we hope to survive, we have to find ways to control, and put a stop to, the kinds of Jewish malevolence and perfidy described in the articles linked above.

An Old Schoolteacher’s Reflections on the Failure of Modern Education

via Return of Kings

Several weeks ago I went home to visit my parents for a wedding – my cousin was getting married. Despite the lingering thoughts about how the couple would probably get divorced, and about how marriage is a horrible deal for a man, I still genuinely hoped that it would work out for them.

As the procession ended, my family and I funneled out through the narrow front doors of the church, and I was surprised to see my Kindergarten teacher standing there. “Jon!” she exclaimed.

I was always impressed at how she could remember every one of her students’ names, despite the number of years that had passed. She seemed like one of the few teachers who actually got into teaching for the sake of helping young children grow into responsible young adults.

Mrs. Clark, my Kindergarten teacher, stood at about 5’3” – she was a little old lady with blondish-greying hair, and she was dressed in attire that a woman should be dressed in (a dress that went down to her ankles, a nice sweater, a scarf, and some other female accessories). Despite how many might feel about running into an old teacher, I was actually glad – I remembered many of the lessons that she had taught me, and how they were applicable to real life.

After chatting with her for a while, I found out that she was still a Kindergarten teacher. I asked her how long she’d been teaching for, and she said almost 50 years, now. Curious as to what I could learn from her, I asked if she’d noticed any changes in the educational system over the last five decades (since 1965).

Immediately, her normally joyful, rosy-cheeked expression transformed into a grimace.

“It’s changed a lot, Jon – and not for the better. Things that used to be common sense are being thrown out the window,” she said. “It’s becoming more and more bureaucratic – we have to please the parents to a much greater extent than we ever had to when I first started teaching. It’s become more about politics than it has about actual teaching.”

We chatted for quite a while, and as she began to drop more and more gems of wisdom on me, I decided that it would be a good idea to ask her if I could record our conversation. I told her that more people needed to know the truth, and that I was a blogger who could give it to them. After asking me what in the hell a “blogger” was, she consented.

After a long discussion about the current state of the American educational system, I went home and sifted through my recordings. I have compiled here a list of the three core points which Mrs. Clark Made.

Masculinity is being weeded out of children at an alarming rate

“I don’t want to hear this feminist bullshit.”

As most ROK readers know, schools are now essentially nothing more than brainwashing, “grooming” grounds which exist to churn out droves of good little beta male citizens. From a young age, any time that a boy tries to express his masculinity, he is viciously reprimanded and made to feel guilty about his natural biological tendencies. Meanwhile, little girls are eagerly rewarded for every single thing that they do, thus inflating their already bloated egos.
I can’t even let boys roughhouse anymore, because it could mean a lawsuit for the school. I used to let the boys play with toy swords and shields, too. They would make up their own games and fight with each other – I thought it was good for them. It taught them to have courage, it exercised their creativity, it showed them the value of teamwork, and it gave them an outlet. All of that went away in the mid 90’s, Jon.
As most of us are aware, this is how it all started. At first, the liberals pressured schools to stop letting boys rough play, under the guise that it was dangerous and violent. The public ate it up. However, not satisfied with simply depriving young boys of their right to roughhouse, an activity that is crucial for a young boy’s development, they moved on to attack anything that was even remotely perceivable as being masculine.
As if it isn’t enough that they can’t roughhouse anymore, our principal banned toy soldiers from the school! They aren’t allowed to make the gun symbol with their fingers, they can’t read anything about soldiers, knights, or warriors…they can’t even say anything even slightly perceivable as being offensive.
The other day one of my boys got a detention, because he said he wanted to be a firefighter when he grew up. The VP [vice principal] was attending a special little presentation that our classroom had put on; each of the kids drew a picture of what they wanted to be when they grew up, and said a few words about why they chose that profession. One of my boys said that he wanted to be a firefighter, because that’s what his daddy does, and it’s a job for men. He said that he wanted to be a man like his daddy, and that being a firefighter would make him a stronger, braver man.

Uh oh. Brace yourself for the shit storm, kid.

“The VP became furious and told him that he had just earned himself a detention for being sexist. The kid just started to cry; he was so confused. It was heartbreaking,” said Mrs. Clark.

This level of hyper-speech control really struck a chord with me—I felt bad for the kid, because I could relate. I had a similar “speech-control” incident when I was in 7th grade. I was playing with a basketball during recess. The class bully came up, took it from me, kicked it as far as he could, and ran. I yelled after him: “You’re dead meat!”

Immediately following recess, I was brought into the Vice Principal’s office and questioned about a death threat. They told me that I had threatened to kill another student, and that they took matters like this very seriously.

I was completely dumb-founded; I never actually threatened to kill him, it’s just a figure of speech. Apparently they were too stupid to understand this, so I told them that I didn’t really mean it. They let me off with a warning, but told me that if I ever said anything like that again, I would probably be expelled.

Egalitarianism has infected our schools

George Orwell was startlingly accurate

Egalitarianism, as defined by the pussified, Orwellian newspeak-promoting Merriam Webster, means: “a belief in human equality especially with respect to social, political, and economic affairs.”

The ACTUAL, more realistic definition of egalitarianism, is something like: “The belief that all human beings should be treated equally, regardless of any differences, and that their beliefs should also be treated equally, regardless of their validity.” If you can’t see why this is clearly a bad thing, let’s allow Mrs. Clark to elaborate.
I used to teach my kids to color in the lines, because that’s the way it should be done. I taught them how to hold a pencil, and the proper way to write letters and numbers with it. I taught the girls how to sit when wearing a skirt, so that they didn’t expose themselves. I taught the boys to be gentle with the girls, because they were stronger, and it was their responsibility to protect them.
Now I’d probably get fired for teaching these things. We’ve abandoned teaching cursive, because nobody writes anymore, and I’m not allowed to correct kids either, because that means that their way of doing things isn’t good. The other day, I got in trouble for teaching a young boy to color in the lines; for teaching him to color in the lines! Nowadays, I can’t even say that ‘This is the right way to do it,’ because I’m supposed to value everyone’s opinions equally, no matter how wrong they are.
A decade ago I got in trouble for teaching a young boy how to use a folder. He had been stuffing worksheets into his backpack, leaving them all crumpled up and disorganized, so I bought him a little two pocket Spiderman folder and showed him how to use it.
The next day, his parents chewed me out. I told them that he was disorganized and lost everything. They told me that their son had ADHD, and that ‘His medical disorder causes him to do things differently sometimes. You’re being insensitive to his disability, and it’s barbaric; he has his own way of doing things, and it has its advantages and its disadvantages, and you need to accept that.’
Mrs. Clark was astonished at their grossly offensive idiocy and irresponsible parenting:
They were using his ADHD as an excuse to let him stay disorganized and cluttered. I couldn’t say anything though, because they were threatening to sue the school. Even though the kid would have been much better off organized, I was forced to tolerate his complete lack of organization, because ‘It’s just his way of doing things.’ Give me a break.
Still think that egalitarianism is a good thing?

We aren’t preparing kids for the real world

Most children grow up thinking this is what it’s like

I remember my class with Mrs. Clark – vaguely of course, but there’s definitely some things that stick out in my mind. Perhaps the clearest thing which I recall, is being bullied by a kid named Robbie. Every day, for no apparent reason, he would push me down onto the ground. I would get upset, run away, and then resume playing.

Mrs. Clark saw this several times, but didn’t intervene. She pulled me aside one day, and asked: “Why don’t you ever push him back?” My world was shattered. It had never even occurred to me that I could stand up for myself, thanks to years of Barney brainwashing and maternal coddling.

So, the next day, I pushed him back. He seemed shocked that I was standing up for myself. Mrs. Clark was watching; she came over and told Robbie that “If you push somebody, they might just push you back.” After that, Robbie never bothered me again.

This was probably one of the most valuable lessons that I’ve ever learned. It taught me to be brave, even when you’re scared. It taught me to stand up for myself. It taught me that sometimes a man has to solve his own problems.

Nowadays, this would probably be deemed as child abuse, according to Mrs. Clark:
If two boys in my class ever got in a fight nowadays, I would probably be fired. I’m supposed to helicopter parent them every second of every day, and it’s not preparing them for the real world. Kids can’t even stand up for themselves anymore – I remember two kids that got in a fight, I think about 8 years ago, maybe 9; Colby and Patrick.
One day, Colby decided it would be a good idea to slap Patrick in the face. Patrick told him to stop, but Colby just slapped him again. I was watching the whole thing, and didn’t get involved. I used to let kids work things out for themselves – it prepares them for the real world. Colby then picked up a handful of mulch and smeared it all over Patrick’s shirt…Patrick got really mad. He swung a mean right hook and knocked Colby onto the ground – he started crying and throwing a temper tantrum.
I pulled them aside and explained to Colby that if he’s going to provoke another student, he might just get what he’s asking for. I told Patrick that he did the right thing, and that he should always stand up for himself.
Within the next week, I was told by the principal that Colby’s parents were filing a class action lawsuit against the school, and had already reported Patrick’s…’assault,’ to the police. The principal told me that Patrick was being suspended for his actions.
“I couldn’t believe it!” exclaimed Mrs. Clark. “The little shit, pardon my language, had been harassing and humiliating Patrick, and when Patrick stands up for himself he gets in trouble? I tried to stand up for him, but the principal threatened to fire me. I almost lost my job that day, Jon, and it’s never been the same since.”

In Summary

The American educational system has deteriorated into a colossal lump of shit. 14 years of education, from preschool to graduating high school, and what are our children taught? Boys are taught to suppress their masculinity, and instilled with a deep-seeded victim complex. Girls are taught that they’re God’s gift to this earth, and that they deserve to be treated like princesses, regardless of their actions.

Both boys and girls are fed lie after lie, until they have no choice but to accept the false reality being forced upon them.

School doesn’t teach our children basic financial responsibility, how to socialize, how to change a tire, or any other basic life skills. What it does teach them, however, is that men are evil, women are goddesses, and that the world is a soft and cushy place that will cater to their needs.

So, if you have a kid, it’s best that you don’t raise him in America. If you don’t have a choice, send him to a private school, but do your research first, because some of them have been infected (Mrs. Clark taught at a Catholic school). If you can’t afford to give your kid a private education or to move out of the country, try to move to a more conservative area, where the schools haven’t been completely overrun by liberals.

At the very least, you should be teaching your child the truth from a young age, so that by the time that the school system tries to bullshit him, he’ll have a weak, but functioning, bullshit detector. Some other writers have already discussed how to instill your son with neomasculine values, such as here and here.

If you don’t have a son, then do your best to pass on red pill knowledge to young boys. Whenever I get together with my family for Thanksgiving or other holidays, I always play football with the young boys, and impart masculine wisdom onto them. One of my nephews, who I’ve been subtly implanting with red pill truths over the years, is now a total player in 8th grade; he has dozens of bitches chasing after him, but prefers to go deer hunting with his buddies.

We need more young boys like this in the world, and you, my friends, have the power to create them. We must combat the school system ourselves, because nobody else will. We have a responsibility to pass down our wisdom to the younger generation, so that we may have a hope of one day reclaiming the patriarchy of our ancestors.

Did Somebody Say "Structural Racism"?

via Radix

Richard Spencer discusses the Sam's Club/Rosalind Brewer controversy and the usefulness of the concept of "structural racism."

The Occult in Vatican's "climate change" Light Show

via Life Site

Despite the striking imagery of last week’s “climate change” light show at the Vatican – its beautiful landscapes, colorful animals, birds, insects, flowers, and sea creatures – many will remember it as an offensive moment when the Vatican partnered with her enemies to use one of its greatest churches, on one of the Church’s greatest feast days, to broadcast a deeply-controversial political statement.

Yet in addition to this basic issue, there are also grave concerns to consider about the nature of the show’s content, and in particular, its apparent use of New Age spirituality.

When LifeSiteNews raised these concerns in previous articles, many were critical, and one writer at the National Catholic Reporter even took it as an occasion to charge us with being “only marginally less deranged” than Planned Parenthood murderer Robert Dear.

Many Catholic observers have argued – speciously, we think – that the show used Christian symbolism. Some have called the show “awesome” and others believe it employed “sound theology.”

Yet those same symbols that could be taken as Christian also have New Age and even demonic significance. Given that the show’s creators have explicitly highlighted the New Age influence, we believe that interpretation for these symbols is vastly more plausible.

‘We have Gaia, and Aya, and Mother Earth appears’

When LifeSiteNews first reported about the Vatican show containing elements of “New Age symbolism associated with ancient pagan deities,” we did not pull this information out of a black hat, but sourced it from the creators of the show – the U.S.-based company Obscura Digital.

Obscura Digital first unveiled the show’s prototype in New York on August 1 when it was projected onto the iconic Empire State Building. The message in both the New York and Vatican shows was the same: man-made climate change is destroying the planet, and along with it numerous animal species. The show’s creators called the New York venue a “warm-up act” for the Vatican.

When Obscura Digital ran this “warm-up act” in New York, they included images of pagan goddesses alongside those focusing on the beauty of creation or the plight of endangered animals.

“We have Gaia, and Aya, and Mother Earth appears,” said Travis Threlkel, founder and creative director of Obscura, in an August interview about the New York version of the show. The greek pagan goddess Gaia is a Greek Mother Earth who has been appropriated by worshipers of nature. Aya is a Babylonian mother goddess associated with the rising sun and with sexual love.

The artist who created these goddess images, “Android” Andrew Jones, said at that time that he wanted to depict Mother Earth in her “fiercest form” to draw attention to what might happen if people ignored the implications of climate change. Jones explained in an interview last month that he uses “psychedelic substances” (mind altering drugs) to help him portray the occult deities accurately. He said the deities are “actively involved, enrolled, and contributing” in guiding his hand as he makes the work.

Among Jones’ creations for the New York show was an image of Kali, the Hindu goddess of death and destruction. Kali, who was depicted with a long blood red tongue and whose name means “the black one,” promises wealth to those who worship her by satiating her lust for blood by human sacrifice. Daily human sacrifices of young children were offered on her altars in India until 200 years ago. She has since been culturally appropriated by New Age spirituality as a kind of Mother Earth goddess.

‘A spirituality that supposedly will save the planet’

Obscura did not include any explicit images of pagan deities in the Vatican show, but observers with knowledge of New Age spirituality nevertheless detected its influence in the show’s images and sequences.

Canadian Catholic artist and novelist Michael O’Brien, for example, criticized the show for offering a spiritual vision devoid of Christianity.

“The underlying ethos was incomplete to say the least,” he told LifeSiteNews.

“The tableau was implicitly religious, offering a spirituality that supposedly will save the planet, as if to say that here is the ‘woman’ (mother earth, the goddess Gaia) to whom we owe reverence, if not worship. It is therefore particularly disturbing that the event was planned for the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, the Church's foremost feast of the true Woman, the Mother of all Peoples.”

O’Brien said that the show appears to indicate the “Church's solidarity with concerns over the environment and the condition of select portions of mankind, but criticized a form of “inculturation” where the evangelist “loses the vision of his identity and missionary purpose as a bearer of the one true Light that will save the world.”
“Wherever prudence and clarity are lacking, inculturation easily mutates into assimilation by paganism,” he said.

Prolific Catholic writer Fr. George Rutler has also expressed concern about such an event about science that may have “become a religion” being projected onto St. Peters on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception. Rutler writes in Crisis Magazine,
So it was perplexing, that on the recent Feast of the Immaculate Conception, the feast itself was upstaged by an unprecedented light show cast on the fa├žade of St. Peter’s Basilica, sponsored by the World Bank Group, an environmental foundation called Okeanos, and Vulcan, Inc., a Seattle-based private company dedicated to exposing “sins against the climate.” Sins? These interests may have good intentions, but the parameters of banking and business and academe do not include imputing sin. There may be offenses and even crimes against the balance of the ecosystem, but not sins, unless science really has become a religion. The irony is that many who impute sins to those who disrupt the balance of nature, also defend and promote unnatural acts among humans. Although the Immaculate Conception was neglected in the New Age light show with its flying birds and leaping porpoises, it is consoling to remember that the Virgin Mary was completely free of sins against the climate and left this world without leaving any carbon footprint.

‘New Age and occult’?

Cornelia Ferreira, who holds a Master of Science degree and is an internationally-known writer, lecturer, and author of books and articles exposing the New Age Movement, took her analysis one step further than O’Brien, saying that in her opinion, the show is “definitely New Age and occult.”

“It's what is often used in mind-control theatre, opening people to occult influences,” she told LifeSiteNews.

Ferreira said the show contains many “levels of meaning.”


Butterflies covered St. Peter's facade at numerous points in the show.
“There is the superficial level where one simply sees animals being projected onto a surface. But there is a deeper level when you look at who projected the show and what they used as their backdrop. And there is even a deeper level when you go into the strange symbolism and sequence of events that took place within the show.”

“Most people don’t go beyond the superficial level and are oblivious to the deeper meanings. But this does not mean that the deeper meanings do not influence them. Unfortunately, because of their open minds, they can be influenced all the more,” she said.

Some commentators such as Elizabeth Scalia, editor-in-chief of Aleteia’s English edition, have suggested that elements in the show lend themselves to a Christian interpretation. For example, she wrote, “The projection began with images of white doves, a traditional symbol for the Holy Spirit. The first image was a peacock, a Christ-symbol.”


The sun rising on St. Peter's near the beginning of the show.
But Ferreira said that it would be “naive” to ignore all of the occult signs and symbols that appear to have been deliberately inserted into the show by its creators.
“Right near the beginning of the show we see a huge sun rising over the entire front of St. Peter’s. This tells us who is in charge of the production, like credits rolling at the beginning of a film. In occult symbolism, the rising sun represents the ‘new day’ that is dawning upon the masses, a change of direction.”

After the rising sun, the opening sequence, she noted, portrayed a rising moon that was eclipsed, followed by clouds and sky, then by water covering the basilica, and ending with burning candles.

“They are showing the four elements that are worshipped by indigenous peoples [WARNING: occult material], namely earth — in this case the moon, another common element of pagan worship — air, as represented by the sky and clouds, then water, and finally fire.”

“It is a spirituality that has been taken over by the environmental movement, but which has its roots in indigenous and occult spirituality. These symbols are just another sign of who is running the show and what they truly worship,” she said.
Ferreira said that given the deeper significances of the show she was not surprised to see animals projected that are not endangered species.

“Some of the animals that were projected, such as the lion [WARNING: occult material] and the dolphin [WARNING: occult material] also have an occult significance in that they are commonly used as ‘spirit guides’ [WARNING: occult material] by occult practitioners. Bees [WARNING: occult material] are known to be very significant in occult thinking. Also butterflies [WARNING: occult material], which signify change, a powerful transformation. A swarm of bees was shown covering St. Peter’s, as well as hordes of butterflies covering the entire facade, at various points in the show.”
Ferreira also took notice of the soundtrack that accompanied the images.

“The sound effects were typically New Age, with metallic harsh sounds, the tinkling of crystals, heavy breathing, and the eerie chanting of a female singer. The ambiance was heavy and dark. There were nightmare sounds. There was almost nothing here what you would call harmonic or tonal.”


A swarm of bees covering St. Peter’s.
She suggested that the light show could be seen to be an attempt to influence people to worship the earth as god instead of God, the creator of heaven and earth. Such shows, she said, are “being projected on buildings all over the world, and its creators make it clear that their goal is to ‘change consciousness and thinking.’”

Ferreira said the artistic medium of light and sound is the perfect catalyst for manipulating people.

“The beautiful spectacle of lights and sound leads the viewers on a spiritual path that bypasses rational thinking and normal human judgment. Of course it’s all dressed up as ‘climate change,’ and ‘save the oceans,’ and ‘save the planet,’ and ‘save the animals,’ and that’s what’s so dangerous about it: People buy into it without realizing what they’re doing.”

‘Occult overtones’

Michael Hichborn of The Lepanto Institute, who has studied the occult for nearly 20 years, told LifeSiteNews that the show contained scenes and images that lend themselves to a occult interpretation, especially given the absence of the Christian cross — a key to Christian interpretation — in any part of the show.

“Here's the problem: occult symbolism is designed to be just that... occult (hidden/secret).  Those who have eyes to see will understand what is dancing around in plain view, but those who don't believe that there is an occult will scoff,” he said.
“Most people won't pick up on any occult symbolism regarding the presence of a butterfly. However, practitioners of occult mysticism know the meaning and place it among their artifacts with direct intent,” he said.

Hichborn said he noticed a few scenes in the Vatican light show that lend themselves to an occult interpretation, the most obvious being the scene where halves of people’s faces were shown, with a focus on one human eye.

“The Eye of Horus (All-Seeing Eye, Eye of Providence, etc) is the most prominent symbol of Freemasonry, the Illuminati, and black magic.  It all goes back to ancient Egyptian mythology regarding the Egyptian god Horus. Horus, according to myth, was the son of Osiris. Osiris was killed by Horus' brother Set, causing a long-standing war between the two. At one point, Set blinded Horus in one eye, but the eye was healed by Thoth. That eye then became a powerful magic symbol.”


The doves were flying backwards.
“There is no Christian significance to such images. On the contrary, this is a very distinct reference to pagan Illuminism,” he said.

In another scene involving large white doves, Hichborn noted how the birds weren’t flying forwards, but backwards.

“Now, normally, the Holy Spirit is represented by a dove. However, in this show, we hear a crackle of electricity just before we see a dove in flight, flying backwards. Furthermore, the light goes up from below, not coming down from above, to reveal the dove flying backwards.”


Distorted humanoid forms, like skeletons, appearing in the falling light.
Hichborn pointed out how the devil “likes to ape God,” but does so by “copying him in the reverse.” He noted how a Satanic mass is the reverse of a Catholic mass.

Faces, skeletons, strange symbols

There are instances where human-like forms, totem-pole-like faces, and glowing eyes appear at various points within the light show. A few of these instances among many are showcased in the “highlights” video. Their significance may never be known, but the question remains why they were put into a show allegedly about depicting the beauty of the earth.

Ferreira said there is so much happening in the show that it would take months to try to decode it all, and parts of it would still remain a mystery. Despite this, she said that God-fearing Christians do not need to know what all the signs and symbols mean to understand the larger picture of what is happening.

Some critics of the show have speculated that the Vatican organized it without the pope’s knowledge, but that was contested by one of the creators. Louie Psihoyos, who curated the projection alongside Threlkel, said the show was personally “green lit” by Pope Francis and that the pope watched it from his balcony overlooking the square. Additionally, Threlkel said that the Vatican had “surprisingly minimal” input into its creation and that he “[could not] believe how supportive they’ve been.”

E. Michael Jones: Protecting the Goy from Judaism, Inc.

via Darkmoon

Darkmoon Editor's Note: This article by the mysterious blogger known as ‘Video Rebel’ is a highly intelligent review of four stunning videos produced by Dr E. Michael Jones in which the great Catholic scholar takes a look at Jewish history in long perspective. It is best to read through the article first and then check out the four videos later. These are linked within the text. 
Dr E. Michael Jones, a Catholic academic who has written voluminously about the Jews and their ways, is the author of the magisterial The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (1200 pages). Another ground-breaking book of great interest—which has had an enormous influence on my own thinking—is EMJ’s book on sexual politics, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control (660 pages).

A renegade Roman Catholic like myself, unfairly stigmatized as an “antisemite”, Jones has always been an inspiration to me: a kind of ideological mentor or remote guru figure. And so I am all the more pleased that Video Rebel should bring the outstanding work of EMJ to our attention. (LD)


E Michael Jones is a Catholic writer and publisher  at Culture Wars magazine who does his best  to alert the world to the dangers Jewish thought processes and behavior pose to normal human beings. We cannot convert to his religion and go back to the Catholic church’s methods of protecting the faithful from exploitation by the Jewish minority. And  I doubt many inside the Church hierarchy today are capable of resisting the Evil that Judaism Incorporated poses.

I do not think of Jews either as a race or a religion. I think of Jews as people from many different races and lands whose ancestors converted to a religion that taught them it was permissible to exploit, to rob, to deceive, to betray and ultimately to even kill non-Jews. The Talmud taught the Jews that it was permissible to steal from the Gentiles as soon as they got control of their government. This explains the failure of the governments apart from China and Iceland to jail Bankers who stole money by the tens of trillions.

What I propose we do is to let E Michael Jones teach us the past so the Goy can survive the precarious future the Jews have created for us in the 21st century. The world has been in the grip of Judaism Incorporated since World War I though some in Great Britain would date that back either to the end of the Napoleonic Wars or earlier to the rise of Cromwell and the return of the Jews to England. Africans would date their Jewish problems back to the slave trade.

I will be commenting on four videos made by E Michael Jones.
In the first video (21 minutes) Jones outlined the plan the Catholic Church used to protect the Goy from the Jews. The church’s guiding principle was: Sicut Judaeis Non. No one has the right to harm the Jew. But on the other hand the Jew does not have the right to harm your culture.

The state of Israel has adopted the Samson option which in modern terms means they browbeat Germany into giving them submarines from which the Israelis can launch nuclear missiles if the world learns the truth about the Jew. Jews have not yet evolved far enough to learn that to be safe they must make their neighbors feel safe.

Jones says our greatest problem is that we cannot even name the Jews as the ones who create the most trouble for us whether it be in banking or in pornographic movies or wars for the Banks and Israel.

Jones says that the Jewish leadership must reject Truth (Logos) to survive. He sees the Jewish rabbi as the enemy of Jewish people. A converted Jew, Nicholas Donin, warned Pope Gregory the IX about the Talmud. The Pope examined the Talmud and waged war against it. Many of the Jews of Europe fled. Some stayed and became church leaders like Pope Alexander the VI who was born in Spain to a converted Jewish family. He was the father of Lucretia and Caesar Borgia.
In the second video (18 minutes) Jones said there was a clash between the Jewish culture of Usury and the Benedictines who thought that labor was the source of value. Savonarola was a popular preacher and reformer who made his stand against Usury. Pope Alexander VI was Jewish and sided with the Bankers against Savonarola. The Jewish pope allowed the man campaigning against Usury to be murdered. Calvin proclaimed that loans for productive purposes could be made with interest because the yield from the investment was sufficient to pay the interest.

The Quran had also banned Usury which makes for an interesting interpretation of the Battle of Armageddon. The Muslims call the anti-Christ Daijal. They say that the anti-Christ will be Jewish. Some modern Muslims interpret Daijal to be the Jewish financial system.

Jones traces the idea of Marx’s proletariat and the rise of Socialism to the abysmal conditions of the British working class. Hereditary rule and Finance Capitalism robbed working people of their wealth and denied them self-worth.

A quote worth noting: Israel Shamir said, ‘The Jewish people are the human shields of the Jewish leaders.’ I would add that Jewish leaders are self-appointed. Jewish people have never elected their leaders. The Jews have not evolved far enough to practice democracy. I sincerely believe that whoever launders the most illegal drugs and weapons money hires the most assassins and proclaims himself to be the Jewish leader.

Jones pointed out that President Obama said Israel should go back to its pre-1967 borders. Netanyahu responded by flying to America and addressing the US Congress. AIPAC told them to applaud and to give him standing ovations or never receive any Jewish donations ever again. The Democrats and the Republicans gave Netanyahu 29 standing ovations. The issue we face is that many of us are blind to the Jewish problem.


With Alexander VI (1492-1503), the Papacy hit a new low. He was the father of the infamous killer Cesare Borgia. With his toxic daughter, Lucrezia, he is said to have had an incestuous relationship and fathered a child on her. He threw large parties at the Vatican, amounting to orgies, in which pretty little boys would leap out of large cakes and dance on the table. (LD) 
In the third video (28 minutes) Jones says the slave trade was a mostly Jewish affair. They owned 90% of the slave ships. The Jews who resisted Catholic attempts to convert them migrated to Poland where they cruelly exploited the poor for 4 centuries until the revolt of 1648. Poland was wiped off the map by Russia, Prussia and Austria in the 18th century.
LD: Video Rebel is here referring to the Partition of Poland which, in the late 18th century, was broken up and shared between three great powers: Russia, Prussia, and Austria-Hungary. The bulk of Poland went to Russia, which inherited its huge Jewish population at this time. For centuries, Poland been the Jews’ last refuge and dumping ground—the country of last resort to which the Jews always fled when expelled from every other part of Europe.
Finding the Jews a thorn in the flesh, Russian empress Catherine the Great decided to confine them within a separate area of the Russian empire known as the Pale of Settlement. This was a vast region extending from the Black Sea in the south to the Baltic Sea in the north. Pre-1917 Russian Jews in Tsarist Russia, in other words, were forbidden to enter and settle in Old Russia. That didn’t stop them, however. Several hundred thousand highly qualified “privileged” Jews managed to get permits to live and work in Russia, and thousands more flooded in illegally and battened on the peasants, reducing them to poverty with usurious loans and demoralizing them by the sale of cheap alcohol in Jewish-owned taverns.
In 1917, after the Jewish-led Bolshevik Revolution, the Pale of Settlement was abolished and Jews emigrated in their millions to America, Canada and every other European country which had formerly tried their best to exclude them. The result we now see: a Europe and America under almost total Jewish control.  (LD)
Russia did not give the Jews a favored position as the Poles had. The Sephardic Jews and the Khazars joined forces to rebel against the Goyim of Russia. The Jews have successfully blocked the translation and publication of the book 200 Years Together by the Nobel prize winning author Solzhenitsyn. The Czar learned of starvation in the Ukraine. He wondered how this was possible. The Jews had loaned farmers money and collected all of the grain which they converted into alcohol so the poor had nothing to eat. The Jews have not yet evolved far enough to understand that simple human decency ought to place limits on our behavior. The Czar tried to turn Jews into farmers but that failed as Jews preferred trade to physical labor. The Jews assassinated Czar Alexander II in 1881. Things were to soon become infinitely and unimaginably worse for the Russians and for any other people from eastern Europe to Asia because they were doomed to suffer from unrestrained Jewish government.
In the fourth video (48 minutes) Jones, Kevin MacDonald and others examine the rise of Jewish cultural wars. This happened in part as a result of the failure of the Jewish revolts after World War I in Europe. The proletariat was willing to accept Socialism because they were starving. But leaders like Bela Kun were so insane and so vicious that they lost the support of the miners and other working people. The Jews fled to Frankfurt and to other cities in Europe and North America where they began a cultural war against the Goyim so the Gentiles would have no defenses against the coming Jewish revolution.

The Jews revolted against Christian values of the family and the soul. The Catholics had borrowed from Greek philosophy the concept of the soul. The Greeks and the church used the analogy of the rider and the horse. The rider was reason, the reins were the will and the horse was passion. Jewish anthropology came to the conclusion Christian values created stress and anxiety in teenagers. The Jewish solution to stress was to eliminate Christianity. The fourth video does have an intellectually interesting section on the authoritarian personality which is code for fascism and antisemitism. The Jews also denied racial differences. This means that your nation ought not have the right to sovereignty.
I call the European Union “Rothschild land”. I see this current massive immigration to Europe and the the US through “Amnesty for illegal aliens” as one coordinated giant Step towards a Jewish New World Order.
What this series of videos is missing is someone who understands economics. They leave out all mention of fractional reserve banking and non-interest bearing currencies. I define a Depression as a period in time when Unpayable Debts are cancelled en masse. The ancient Babylonians had a system to prevent Depressions and to protect the working class. The King of Babylon would cancels debts whenever the economy slowed down due to excessive indebtedness. There was a National Security issue involved here. The King wanted his poor to be free of debt so they were armed and willing to defend their property and their king.
In the modern world our governments and the Bankers want everyone to be indebted, unarmed and surveilled 24/7 so they feel helpless and are rendered incapable of resisting a Jewish New World Order.
To stop Usury and the transfer of wealth from the workers to the Bankers we need a non-interest bearing currency. New money needs to be spent into existence without charging interest. Government debt needs to be banned. Fractional reserve banking needs to be banned so a ten dollar deposit is not multiplied to become a $100 loan. That is how tens of trillions of dollars in Unpayable Debts are created.

Instead of attempting to reform the Catholic church and then converting everyone to anti-Usury Catholicism I would prefer to arrest the Bankers and to seize their assets including the Foundations. Use that money to fund Debt Cancellation and to restore pensions. Every adult citizen should receive $20,000 in credits towards debt reduction. Seizing control of the Foundations and the government would give us control of the universities and the right to establish a more sensible educational system.

The alternative is that we do nothing and by default allow the New World Order to shrink America’s population by 40 or 50 million due to starvation and a series of plagues because the Bankers had looted Gentile pension funds.

I think money and the desire to avoid starvation and nuclear war are better motivators to action than theology.

I would recommend you read Debt Cancellation Is The Best Way To Take Down Bilderberg

As I said, the Bankers stole our pensions and are in the process of repossessing our homes. Bankers want us to be reduced to Debt Slavery. Their solution to the missing trillions from our pensions is a Race War so Gentiles cannot unite against their oppressors. Please consider this: The Uber Rich Want Us To Have A Racial Civil War.