Jan 22, 2016

Craft for Breaking the Anti-White Siege

via NationalSalvation.net

Annihilation by Assimilation

Nobody is saying that Africa needs diversity.

Nobody is saying that Asia needs diversity.

They are already 100% diverse.

People are only telling white children in white countries that they need diversity.

White countries will be 100% diverse when there are no white people left.

Diversity is a code-word for the genocide of white people.


Every white country on earth is supposed to become multicultural and multiracial.
Every white country is expected to end its own race and end its own culture. No one asks that of ANY non-white country.
 
The Netherlands is as crowded as Japan, Belgium is as crowded as Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve the RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.
 
Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate with them.
 
Immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used against the white race.
 
All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.
 
Anti-white is called anti-racist, but it leads to the disappearance of one race and only one race, the white race. The real aim of anti-racism is to wipe out the white race or make it a minority anywhere it exists.
 
It is genocide.
 
Would a Black Line Go Unnoticed?
What if the same “anti-racist” policy that is at the heart of World Opinion today were applied to black countries?
 
Anti-whites insist on non-white immigration into white countries that have not adequately mixed to be called brown.
 
An example of the policy reversed would be if World Opinion split the island of Santo Domingo into two categories, the Dominican Republic, which is mixed race, and Haiti, which is black.
 
If the same policy currently applied to white countries were applied to Haiti, Haiti would be forced to be “ready for immigration,” as they are saying of Eastern Europe. The anti-white policy reversed would divide every island in the Caribbean into “black” and “mixed enough.”
 
The American Virgin Islands are definitely black enough to fall inside the Black Line and World Opinion would demand they bring in non-black immigrants AND assimilate with them. In contrast, Puerto Rico, if it were independent, would be considered “brown enough” to lie outside the Black Line and immigration would not be forced on the theory that it was mixed with enough light-skinned people to pass.
 
The Black Line would run between the coast of Africa and Madagascar and also be somewhere in the Sahara and about the top of Ethiopia. World Opinion would demand that all of the countries within the Black Line have non-black immigration forced upon them so that they were mixed with enough light-skinned people to be considered the “proper” shade of brown.
 
What are the chances that the Black Line would go unnoticed if every single strip of land inside it, as in the case of the divided island of Santo Domingo, were the focus of a world-wide “anti-racist” campaign?
 
What if the attitude of World Opinion would be instantly hostile toward any country considered “too black”?
 
What sane black man would not object to this on the grounds of the genocide of black people? 


Genocide is Worse than Discrimination‎


Doing away with whites is not idealistic; it is the sort of thing a lot of people got hanged for.

Certainly we cannot discuss future racial policy until a free discussion, and I mean totally free discussion, has been allowed on the present policy of demanding that All white countries and ONLY white countries be open to massive third-world immigration and forced into assimilation, with assimilation meaning intermarriage and an end of what THEY call the white race.

Until we get the basic message of white genocide across, we cannot go on to say that genocide is considered a far, far more serious crime than discrimination. The idea that a plan to completely get rid of a non-black race is worse than putting black people at the back of a bus would meet screams of resentment and bring out the Thought Police.


But we are faced with the utter destruction of what THEY call white people when there is immigration or punishment to be inflicted. THEY have set the precedents when it comes to discrimination.

If mere discrimination is cause for affirmative action, genocide is far more so. Which means that the program of doing away with all white people to the point where Europe and America are to be majority non-white this century requires a lot more than merely changing this policy. It calls for affirmative action at a far higher level to make up for this criminal behavior.

It will call for affirmative action so extreme that it is as alien to this genocidal age as the mention of hiring blacks over whites would have been when slavery was the issue.

And slavery is a lesser crime than genocide.


Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White Countries for Everyone

There will still be Africans in Africa. There will still be Asians in Asia. But my race is set to be blended out of existence through mass immigration and forced assimilation.

That's genocide. 

This is happening in ALL white countries and ONLY white countries. 

This is genocide through racial replacement. 

Wake up and fight the system! 


Robert Whitaker

There are two kinds of people, those with hearts and minds in alignment, and those who trade deference for pay, done solely for personal advantage.
 
However, do not be quick to praise those whose commitments and loyalties are genuine, for they may nevertheless serve resentments and objects that are unworthy, dangerous in their power to lead others astray.
 
But a small minority are different. Not only are their hearts and minds aligned, their loyalty is to the simple and obvious truth tragically unsaid: the greatest evils of any age are denied and unrecognized.
 
These are our real leaders. This is Robert Whitaker.

No comments:

Post a Comment