via Atlantic Centurion
For liberals in the United States, a mission statement is easily produced and promulgated. Formally, it is to promote equality and inclusion among Americans of all backgrounds.
In practice, it is building a coalition of ethnic minorities and
leftist Whites to outvote a former conservative White majority, but that
is beside the point. Today, some debate exists over the implementation of the liberal mission in the United States, but not the principles of the mission itself.
It is a debate over means, namely whether the vehicle of liberalism
will be a corporate-supported, bureaucratic enforcement of social
liberalism and ‘anti-racism’ via federal institutions, or a
European-style social democracy promoting those same policies via
left-wing populism, with which they can run through the minoritization of Anglo-Americans and the dispensing of more gibsmedats.
On the other hand, mainline conservatives have a much harder time
articulating their mission. In general, the formal mission probably
sounds like to support freedom and limited government. In
practice, we see something much more confused and convoluted, and which
relies on reaction rather than ambition. Freedom means anything and
therefore nothing; seldom can tangible results on freedom be delivered
by conservatives, with firearms ownership being the most notable
exception. Limited government
is a relative term and is just taken to mean that policy initiatives
championed by liberals should be opposed long enough that conservatives
can claim credit for opposing them. It is all a show, one in which
conservatives are roped to the back of their own stolen car and taken
for a ride down Cuckold Boulevard.
Another major problem for the mainline conservative mission is that
it isn’t really a competitor to the liberal one. No matter who wins in
the short-term, the country will move left in the long-term and become
browner. Just what are we conserving exactly? The conservative mission
is not an existential threat to the liberal one, but an annoyance.
Liberals will repudiate the conservative claims about ‘freedom’ and
limited government because those make it harder for the state to provide
equalizing services to target populations. And liberals are essentially
correct in saying that a smaller government respecting property rights
more literally would be bad, bad for the available pool of gibsmedats
necessary for liberals to be elected by their coalition. The liberal
response assumes there is bite to the conservative bark though; there is
hardly one since in practice most of their disagreements outside of
guns, abortion, and same-sex marriage are on paper only.
What do mainline conservatives have to say about the liberal mission
of equality and inclusion (which will lead to White minoritization)? Jack shit,
that’s what. This is not only a pity but treachery considering most
conservative voters are, have been, and will likely continue to be
White. Cuckservatives are shooting themselves in the foot by doing nothing to counter their opponents. They fear taking too extreme a position
relative to the liberal mission, either because they don’t want to be
challenged by their enemies or would genuinely side with them when it
comes down to the wire.
The common saying, “If you aren’t with us then you’re against us,”
decently describes the relationship between the liberal and conservative
missions. An impartial observer would conclude they are not that
different. A conservative mission that provides nothing to people beyond
the formula to stand for the current year minus one is a de facto subsidiary of the liberal mission, which is to make sure every White oppressor knows what year it is.
The key difference is that it is aimed at a different market, and with
less alienating rhetoric. Don’t worry about changing demographics; all
those brown people will become just like you, i.e. English-speaking taxpayers. Too bad you won’t be around to see it.
This is the true power of the hegemony afforded by our occupation:
the choice for the despised White man is fast-tracked destruction or a
slower progression. The mission of both parties has nothing to do with
the health and prosperity of the founding and majority stock of the
country. There is no choice C to slam the brakes and search the train
for your assailant. That mission is yet to be taken up.