Sep 12, 2014

The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and Russia's Early Soviet Regime

via Institute for Historical Review

In the night of July 16-17, 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police murdered Russia's last emperor, Tsar Nicholas II, along with his wife, Tsaritsa Alexandra, their 14-year-old son, Tsarevich Alexis, and their four daughters. They were cut down in a hail of gunfire in a half-cellar room of the house in Ekaterinburg, a city in the Ural mountain region, where they were being held prisoner. The daughters were finished off with bayonets. To prevent a cult for the dead Tsar, the bodies were carted away to the countryside and hastily buried in a secret grave.

Bolshevik authorities at first reported that the Romanov emperor had been shot after the discovery of a plot to liberate him. For some time the deaths of the Empress and the children were kept secret. Soviet historians claimed for many years that local Bolsheviks had acted on their own in carrying out the killings, and that Lenin, founder of the Soviet state, had nothing to do with the crime.

In 1990, Moscow playwright and historian Edvard Radzinsky announced the result of his detailed investigation into the murders. He unearthed the reminiscences of Lenin's bodyguard, Alexei Akimov, who recounted how he personally delivered Lenin's execution order to the telegraph office. The telegram was also signed by Soviet government chief Yakov Sverdlov. Akimov had saved the original telegraph tape as a record of the secret order.1

Radzinsky's research confirmed what earlier evidence had already indicated. Leon Trotsky -- one of Lenin's closest colleagues -- had revealed years earlier that Lenin and Sverdlov had together made the decision to put the Tsar and his family to death. Recalling a conversation in 1918, Trotsky wrote:2
My next visit to Moscow took place after the [temporary] fall of Ekaterinburg [to anti-Communist forces]. Speaking with Sverdlov, I asked in passing: "Oh yes, and where is the Tsar?"
"Finished," he replied. "He has been shot."
"And where is the family?"
"The family along with him."
"All of them?," I asked, apparently with a trace of surprise.
"All of them," replied Sverdlov. "What about it?" He was waiting to see my reaction. I made no reply.
"And who made the decision?," I asked.
"We decided it here. Ilyich [Lenin] believed that we shouldn't leave the Whites a live banner to rally around, especially under the present difficult circumstances."
I asked no further questions and considered the matter closed.
Recent research and investigation by Radzinsky and others also corroborates the account provided years earlier by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times in Russia for 17 years. His account, The Last Days of the Romanovs - originally published in 1920, and reissued in 1993 by the Institute for Historical Review -- is based in large part on the findings of a detailed investigation carried out in 1919 by Nikolai Sokolov under the authority of "White" (anti-Communist) leader Alexander Kolchak. Wilton's book remains one of the most accurate and complete accounts of the murder of Russia's imperial family.3

A solid understanding of history has long been the best guide to comprehending the present and anticipating the future. Accordingly, people are most interested in historical questions during times of crisis, when the future seems most uncertain. With the collapse of Communist rule in the Soviet Union, 1989-1991, and as Russians struggle to build a new order on the ruins of the old, historical issues have become very topical. For example, many ask: How did the Bolsheviks, a small movement guided by the teachings of German-Jewish social philosopher Karl Marx, succeed in taking control of Russia and imposing a cruel and despotic regime on its people?

In recent years, Jews around the world have been voicing anxious concern over the specter of anti-Semitism in the lands of the former Soviet Union. In this new and uncertain era, we are told, suppressed feelings of hatred and rage against Jews are once again being expressed. According to one public opinion survey conducted in 1991, for example, most Russians wanted all Jews to leave the country.4 But precisely why is anti-Jewish sentiment so widespread among the peoples of the former Soviet Union? Why do so many Russians, Ukrainians, Lithuanians and others blame "the Jews" for so much misfortune?

A Taboo Subject

Although officially Jews have never made up more than five percent of the country's total population,5 they played a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role in the infant Bolshevik regime, effectively dominating the Soviet government during its early years. Soviet historians, along with most of their colleagues in the West, for decades preferred to ignore this subject. The facts, though, cannot be denied.

With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews. Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party's executive secretary and -- as chairman of the Central Executive Committee -- head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Moisei Uritsky.6

Lenin himself was of mostly Russian and Kalmuck ancestry, but he was also one-quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather, Israel (Alexander) Blank, was a Ukrainian Jew who was later baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church.7

A thorough-going internationalist, Lenin viewed ethnic or cultural loyalties with contempt. He had little regard for his own countrymen. "An intelligent Russian," he once remarked, "is almost always a Jew or someone with Jewish blood in his veins."8

Critical Meetings

In the Communist seizure of power in Russia, the Jewish role was probably critical.

Two weeks prior to the Bolshevik "October Revolution" of 1917, Lenin convened a top secret meeting in St. Petersburg (Petrograd) at which the key leaders of the Bolshevik party's Central Committee made the fateful decision to seize power in a violent takeover. Of the twelve persons who took part in this decisive gathering, there were four Russians (including Lenin), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and six Jews.9

To direct the takeover, a seven-man "Political Bureau" was chosen. It consisted of two Russians (Lenin and Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), and four Jews (Trotsky, Sokolnikov, Zinoviev, and Kamenev).10 Meanwhile, the Petersburg (Petrograd) Soviet -- whose chairman was Trotsky -- established an 18-member "Military Revolutionary Committee" to actually carry out the seizure of power. It included eight (or nine) Russians, one Ukrainian, one Pole, one Caucasian, and six Jews.11 Finally, to supervise the organization of the uprising, the Bolshevik Central Committee established a five-man "Revolutionary Military Center" as the Party's operations command. It consisted of one Russian (Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and two Jews (Sverdlov and Uritsky).12

Contemporary Voices of Warning

Well-informed observers, both inside and outside of Russia, took note at the time of the crucial Jewish role in Bolshevism. Winston Churchill, for one, warned in an article published in the February 8, 1920, issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald that Bolshevism is a "worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality." The eminent British political leader and historian went on to write:13
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.
Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people.
David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington: "The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution."14

The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, made much the same point a few months later: "Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."15

"The Bolshevik Revolution," declared a leading American Jewish community paper in 1920, "was largely the product of Jewish thinking, Jewish discontent, Jewish effort to reconstruct."16

As an expression of its radically anti-nationalist character, the fledgling Soviet government issued a decree a few months after taking power that made anti-Semitism a crime in Russia. The new Communist regime thus became the first in the world to severely punish all expressions of anti-Jewish sentiment.17 Soviet officials apparently regarded such measures as indispensable. Based on careful observation during a lengthy stay in Russia, American-Jewish scholar Frank Golder reported in 1925 that "because so many of the Soviet leaders are Jews anti-Semitism is gaining [in Russia], particularly in the army [and] among the old and new intelligentsia who are being crowded for positions by the sons of Israel."18

Historians' Views

Summing up the situation at that time, Israeli historian Louis Rapoport writes:19
Immediately after the [Bolshevik] Revolution, many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the new government. Lenin's first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish origins.
Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution, including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists' vows to eradicate anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the Revolution -- partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Bolshevik secret police, the Cheka And many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.
The collective leadership that emerged in Lenin's dying days was headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, mean-spirited, curly-haired Adonis whose vanity knew no bounds.
"Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka," wrote Jewish historian Leonard Schapiro, "stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with, and possibly shot by, a Jewish investigator."20 In Ukraine, "Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the rank-and-file Cheka agents," reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an American professor of Russian history.21 (Beginning as the Cheka, or Vecheka) the Soviet secret police was later known as the GPU, OGPU, NKVD, MVD and KGB.)

In light of all this, it should not be surprising that Yakov M. Yurovksy, the leader of the Bolshevik squad that carried out the murder of the Tsar and his family, was Jewish, as was Sverdlov, the Soviet chief who co-signed Lenin's execution order.22

Igor Shafarevich, a Russian mathematician of world stature, has sharply criticized the Jewish role in bringing down the Romanov monarchy and establishing Communist rule in his country. Shafarevich was a leading dissident during the final decades of Soviet rule. A prominent human rights activist, he was a founding member of the Committee on the Defense of Human Rights in the USSR.

In Russophobia, a book written ten years before the collapse of Communist rule, he noted that Jews were "amazingly" numerous among the personnel of the Bolshevik secret police. The characteristic Jewishness of the Bolshevik executioners, Shafarevich went on, is most conspicuous in the execution of Nicholas II:23
This ritual action symbolized the end of centuries of Russian history, so that it can be compared only to the execution of Charles I in England or Louis XVI in France. It would seem that representatives of an insignificant ethnic minority should keep as far as possible from this painful action, which would reverberate in all history. Yet what names do we meet? The execution was personally overseen by Yakov Yurovsky who shot the Tsar; the president of the local Soviet was Beloborodov (Vaisbart); the person responsible for the general administration in Ekaterinburg was Shaya Goloshchekin. To round out the picture, on the wall of the room where the execution took place was a distich from a poem by Heine (written in German) about King Balthazar, who offended Jehovah and was killed for the offense.
In his 1920 book, British veteran journalist Robert Wilton offered a similarly harsh assessment:24
The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov (who came to Russia as a paid agent of Germany) and carried out by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yurovsky, is the act not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.
In the struggle for power that followed Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin emerged victorious over his rivals, eventually succeeding in putting to death nearly every one of the most prominent early Bolsheviks leaders - including Trotsky, Zinoviev, Radek, and Kamenev. With the passage of time, and particularly after 1928, the Jewish role in the top leadership of the Soviet state and its Communist party diminished markedly.

Put To Death Without Trial

For a few months after taking power, Bolshevik leaders considered bringing "Nicholas Romanov" before a "Revolutionary Tribunal" that would publicize his "crimes against the people" before sentencing him to death. Historical precedent existed for this. Two European monarchs had lost their lives as a consequence of revolutionary upheaval: England's Charles I was beheaded in 1649, and France's Louis XVI was guillotined in 1793.

In these cases, the king was put to death after a lengthy public trial, during which he was allowed to present arguments in his defense. Nicholas II, though, was neither charged nor tried. He was secretly put to death - along with his family and staff -- in the dead of night, in an act that resembled more a gangster-style massacre than a formal execution.

Why did Lenin and Sverdlov abandon plans for a show trial of the former Tsar? In Wilton's view, Nicholas and his family were murdered because the Bolshevik rulers knew quite well that they lacked genuine popular support, and rightly feared that the Russian people would never approve killing the Tsar, regardless of pretexts and legalistic formalities.

For his part, Trotsky defended the massacre as a useful and even necesssary measure. He wrote:25
The decision [to kill the imperial family] was not only expedient but necessary. The severity of this punishment showed everyone that we would continue to fight on mercilessly, stopping at nothing. The execution of the Tsar's family was needed not only in order to frighten, horrify, and instill a sense of hopelessness in the enemy but also to shake up our own ranks, to show that there was no turning back, that ahead lay either total victory or total doom. This Lenin sensed well.

Historical Context

In the years leading up to the 1917 revolution, Jews were disproportionately represented in all of Russia's subversive leftist parties.26 Jewish hatred of the Tsarist regime had a basis in objective conditions. Of the leading European powers of the day, imperial Russia was the most institutionally conservative and anti-Jewish. For example, Jews were normally not permitted to reside outside a large area in the west of the Empire known as the "Pale of Settlement."27

However understandable, and perhaps even defensible, Jewish hostility toward the imperial regime may have been, the remarkable Jewish role in the vastly more despotic Soviet regime is less easy to justify. In a recently published book about the Jews in Russia during the 20th century, Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting the Bolshevik regime the "historic sin of the Jews."28 She points, for example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps, and the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, "The Jews of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition." In light of this record, Margolina offers a grim prediction:
The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in the subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged Soviet power will be equated with Jewish power, and the furious hatred against the Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.
If the past is any indication, it is unlikely that many Russians will seek the revenge that Margolina prophecies. Anyway, to blame "the Jews" for the horrors of Communism seems no more justifiable than to blame "white people" for Negro slavery, or "the Germans" for the Second World War or "the Holocaust."

Words of Grim Portent

Nicholas and his family are only the best known of countless victims of a regime that openly proclaimed its ruthless purpose. A few weeks after the Ekaterinburg massacre, the newspaper of the fledgling Red Army declared:29
Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies by the scores of hundreds, let them be thousands, let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritskii let there be floods of blood of the bourgeoisie -- more blood, as much as possible.
Grigori Zinoviev, speaking at a meeting of Communists in September 1918, effectively pronounced a death sentence on ten million human beings: "We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia's inhabitants. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated."30

'The Twenty Million'

As it turned out, the Soviet toll in human lives and suffering proved to be much higher than Zinoviev's murderous rhetoric suggested. Rarely, if ever, has a regime taken the lives of so many of its own people.31

Citing newly-available Soviet KGB documents, historian Dmitri Volkogonov, head of a special Russian parliamentary commission, recently concluded that "from 1929 to 1952, 21.5 million [Soviet] people were repressed. Of these a third were shot, the rest sentenced to imprisonment, where many also died."32

Olga Shatunovskaya, a member of the Soviet Commission of Party Control, and head of a special commission during the 1960s appointed by premier Khrushchev, has similarly concluded: "From January 1, 1935 to June 22, 1941, 19,840,000 enemies of the people were arrested. Of these, seven million were shot in prison, and a majority of the others died in camp." These figures were also found in the papers of Politburo member Anastas Mikoyan.33

Robert Conquest, the distinguished specialist of Soviet history, recently summed up the grim record of Soviet "repression" of it own people:34
It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the post-1934 death toll was well over ten million. To this should be added the victims of the 1930-1933 famine, the kulak deportations, and other anti-peasant campaigns, amounting to another ten million plus. The total is thus in the range of what the Russians now refer to as 'The Twenty Million'."
A few other scholars have given significantly higher estimates.35

The Tsarist Era in Retrospect

With the dramatic collapse of Soviet rule, many Russians are taking a new and more respectful look at their country's pre-Communist history, including the era of the last Romanov emperor. While the Soviets -- along with many in the West -- have stereotypically portrayed this era as little more than an age of arbitrary despotism, cruel suppression and mass poverty, the reality is rather different. While it is true that the power of the Tsar was absolute, that only a small minority had any significant political voice, and that the mass of the empire's citizens were peasants, it is worth noting that Russians during the reign of Nicholas II had freedom of press, religion, assembly and association, protection of private property, and free labor unions. Sworn enemies of the regime, such as Lenin, were treated with remarkable leniency.36

During the decades prior to the outbreak of the First World War, the Russian economy was booming. In fact, between 1890 and 1913, it was the fastest growing in the world. New rail lines were opened at an annual rate double that of the Soviet years. Between 1900 and 1913, iron production increased by 58 percent, while coal production more than doubled.37 Exported Russian grain fed all of Europe. Finally, the last decades of Tsarist Russia witnessed a magnificent flowering of cultural life.

Everything changed with the First World War, a catastrophe not only for Russia, but for the entire West.

Monarchist Sentiment

In spite of (or perhaps because of) the relentless official campaign during the entire Soviet era to stamp out every uncritical memory of the Romanovs and imperial Russia, a virtual cult of popular veneration for Nicholas II has been sweeping Russia in recent years.

People have been eagerly paying the equivalent of several hours' wages to purchase portraits of Nicholas from street vendors in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other Russian cities. His portrait now hangs in countless Russian homes and apartments. In late 1990, all 200,000 copies of a first printing of a 30-page pamphlet on the Romanovs quickly sold out. Said one street vendor: "I personally sold four thousand copies in no time at all. It's like a nuclear explosion. People really want to know about their Tsar and his family." Grass roots pro-Tsarist and monarchist organizations have sprung up in many cities.

A public opinion poll conducted in 1990 found that three out of four Soviet citizens surveyed regard the killing of the Tsar and his family as a despicable crime.38 Many Russian Orthodox believers regard Nicholas as a martyr. The independent "Orthodox Church Abroad" canonized the imperial family in 1981, and the Moscow-based Russian Orthodox Church has been under popular pressure to take the same step, in spite of its long-standing reluctance to touch this official taboo. The Russian Orthodox Archbishop of Ekaterinburg announced plans in 1990 to build a grand church at the site of the killings. "The people loved Emperor Nicholas," he said. "His memory lives with the people, not as a saint but as someone executed without court verdict, unjustly, as a sufferer for his faith and for orthodoxy."39

On the 75th anniversary of the massacre (in July 1993), Russians recalled the life, death and legacy of their last Emperor. In Ekaterinburg, where a large white cross festooned with flowers now marks the spot where the family was killed, mourners wept as hymns were sung and prayers were said for the victims.40

Reflecting both popular sentiment and new social-political realities, the white, blue and red horizontal tricolor flag of Tsarist Russia was officially adopted in 1991, replacing the red Soviet banner. And in 1993, the imperial two-headed eagle was restored as the nation's official emblem, replacing the Soviet hammer and sickle. Cities that had been re-named to honor Communist figures -- such as Leningrad, Kuibyshev, Frunze, Kalinin, and Gorky -- have re-acquired their Tsarist-era names. Ekaterinburg, which had been named Sverdlovsk by the Soviets in 1924 in honor of the Soviet-Jewish chief, in September 1991 restored its pre-Communist name, which honors Empress Catherine I.

Symbolic Meaning

In view of the millions that would be put to death by the Soviet rulers in the years to follow, the murder of the Romanov family might not seem of extraordinary importance. And yet, the event has deep symbolic meaning. In the apt words of Harvard University historian Richard Pipes:41
The manner in which the massacre was prepared and carried out, at first denied and then justified, has something uniquely odious about it, something that radically distinguishes it from previous acts of regicide and brands it as a prelude to twentieth-century mass murder.
Another historian, Ivor Benson, characterized the killing of the Romanov family as symbolic of the tragic fate of Russia and, indeed, of the entire West, in this century of unprecedented agony and conflict.

The murder of the Tsar and his family is all the more deplorable because, whatever his failings as a monarch, Nicholas II was, by all accounts, a personally decent, generous, humane and honorable man.

The Massacre's Place in History

The mass slaughter and chaos of the First World War, and the revolutionary upheavals that swept Europe in 1917-1918, brought an end not only to the ancient Romanov dynasty in Russia, but to an entire continental social order. Swept away as well was the Hohenzollern dynasty in Germany, with its stable constitutional monarchy, and the ancient Habsburg dynasty of Austria-Hungary with its multinational central European empire. Europe's leading states shared not only the same Christian and Western cultural foundations, but most of the continent's reigning monarchs were related by blood. England's King George was, through his mother, a first cousin of Tsar Nicholas, and, through his father, a first cousin of Empress Alexandra. Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm was a first cousin of the German-born Alexandra, and a distant cousin of Nicholas.

More than was the case with the monarchies of western Europe, Russia's Tsar personally symbolized his land and nation. Thus, the murder of the last emperor of a dynasty that had ruled Russia for three centuries not only symbolically presaged the Communist mass slaughter that would claim so many Russian lives in the decades that followed, but was symbolic of the Communist effort to kill the soul and spirit of Russia itself.

Notes

     
  1. Edvard Radzinksy, The Last Tsar (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 327, 344-346.; Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.
  2. From an April 1935 entry in "Trotsky's Diary in Exile." Quoted in: Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1990), pp. 770, 787.; Robert K. Massie, Nicholas and Alexandra (New York: 1976), pp. 496-497.; E. Radzinksy, The Last Tsar (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 325-326.; Ronald W. Clark, Lenin (New York: 1988), pp. 349-350.
  3. On Wilton and his career in Russia, see: Phillip Knightley, The First Casualty (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1976), pp. 141-142, 144-146, 151-152, 159, 162, 169, and, Anthony Summers and Tom Mangold, The File on the Tsar (New York: Harper and Row, 1976), pp. 102-104, 176.
  4. AP dispatch from Moscow, Toronto Star, Sept. 26, 1991, p. A2.; Similarly, a 1992 survey found that one-fourth of people in the republics of Belarus (White Russia) and Uzbekistan favored deporting all Jews to a special Jewish region in Russian Siberia. "Survey Finds Anti-Semitism on Rise in Ex-Soviet Lands," Los Angeles Times, June 12, 1992, p. A4.
  5. At the turn of the century, Jews made up 4.2 percent of the population of the Russian Empire. Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1990), p. 55 (fn.).
    By comparison, in the United States today, Jews make up less than three percent of the total population (according to the most authoritative estimates).
  6. See individual entries in: H. Shukman, ed., The Blackwell Encyclopedia of the Russian Revolution (Oxford: 1988), and in: G. Wigoder, ed., Dictionary of Jewish Biography (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991).
    The prominent Jewish role in Russia's pre-1914 revolutionary underground, and in the early Soviet regime, is likewise confirmed in: Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter, Roots of Radicalism (New York: Oxford, 1982), pp. 92-94.
    In 1918, the Bolshevik Party's Central Committee had 15 members. German scholar Herman Fehst -- citing published Soviet records -- reported in his useful 1934 study that of six of these 15 were Jews. Herman Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum: Das jüdische Element in der Führerschaft des Bolschewismus (Berlin: 1934), pp. 68-72.; Robert Wilton, though, reported that in 1918 the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party had twelve members, of whom nine were of Jewish origin and three were of Russian ancestry. R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (IHR, 1993), p. 185.
  7. After years of official suppression, this fact was acknowledged in 1991 in the Moscow weekly Ogonyok. See: Jewish Chronicle (London), July 16, 1991.; See also: Letter by L. Horwitz in The New York Times, Aug. 5, 1992, which cites information from the Russian journal "Native Land Archives."; "Lenin's Lineage?"'Jewish,' Claims Moscow News," Forward (New York City), Feb. 28, 1992, pp. 1, 3.; M. Checinski, Jerusalem Post (weekly international edition), Jan. 26, 1991, p. 9.
  8. Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1990), p. 352.
  9. Harrison E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917 (Doubleday, 1978), p. 475.; William H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution (Princeton Univ. Press, 1987), vol. 1, pp. 291-292.; Herman Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum: Das jüdische Element in der Führerschaft des Bolschewismus (Berlin: 1934), pp. 42-43.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 318-319.
    This meeting was held on October 10 (old style, Julian calendar), and on October 23 (new style). The six Jews who took part were: Uritsky, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Sverdlov and Soklonikov.
    The Bolsheviks seized power in Petersburg on October 25 (old style) -- hence the reference to the "Great October Revolution" -- which is November 7 (new style).
  10. William H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution (1987), vol. 1, p. 292.; H. E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917 (1978), p. 475.
  11. W. H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, vol. 1, pp. 274, 299, 302, 306.; Alan Moorehead, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1965), pp. 235, 238, 242, 243, 245.; H. Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum (Berlin: 1934), pp. 44, 45.
  12. H. E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917 (1978), p. 479-480.; Dmitri Volkogonov, Stalin: Triumph and Tragedy (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1991), pp. 27-28, 32.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 319-320.
  13. "Zionism versus Bolshevism: A struggle for the soul of the Jewish people," Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920. Facsimile reprint in: William Grimstad, The Six Million Reconsidered (1979), p. 124. (At the time this essay was published, Churchill was serving as minister of war and air.)
  14. David R. Francis, Russia from the American Embassy (New York: 1921), p. 214.
  15. Foreign Relations of the United States -- 1918 -- Russia, Vol. 1 (Washington, DC: 1931), pp. 678-679.
  16. American Hebrew (New York), Sept. 1920. Quoted in: Nathan Glazer and Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Beyond the Melting Pot (Cambridge, Mass.: 1963), p. 268.
  17. C. Jacobson, "Jews in the USSR" in: American Review on the Soviet Union, August 1945, p. 52.; Avtandil Rukhadze, Jews in the USSR: Figures, Facts, Comment (Moscow: Novosti, 1978), pp. 10-11.
  18. T. Emmons and B. M. Patenaude, eds., War, Revolution and Peace in Russia: The Passages of Frank Golder, 1913-1927 (Stanford: Hoover Institution, 1992), pp. 320, 139, 317.
  19. Louis Rapoport, Stalin's War Against the Jews (New York: Free Press, 1990), pp. 30, 31, 37. See also pp. 43, 44, 45, 49, 50.
  20. Quoted in: Salo Baron, The Russian Jews Under Tsars and Soviets (New York: 1976), pp. 170, 392 (n. 4).
  21. The Atlantic, Sept. 1991, p. 14.;
    In 1919, three-quarters of the Cheka staff in Kiev were Jews, who were careful to spare fellow Jews. By order, the Cheka took few Jewish hostages. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 824.; Israeli historian Louis Rapoport also confirms the dominant role played by Jews in the Soviet secret police throughout the 1920s and 1930s. L. Rapoport, Stalin's War Against the Jews (New York: 1990), pp. 30-31, 43-45, 49-50.
  22. E. Radzinsky, The Last Tsar (1992), pp. 244, 303-304.; Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.; See also: W. H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, vol. 2, p. 90.
  23. Quoted in: The New Republic, Feb. 5, 1990, pp. 30 ff.; Because of the alleged anti-Semitism of Russophobia, in July 1992 Shafarevich was asked by the National Academy of Sciences (Washington, DC) to resign as an associate member of that prestigious body.
  24. R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (1993), p. 148.
  25. Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 787.; Robert K. Massie, Nicholas and Alexandra (New York: 1976), pp. 496-497.
  26. An article in a 1907 issue of the respected American journal National Geographic reported on the revolutionary situation brewing in Russia in the years before the First World War: " The revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race, and the most effective revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund " W. E. Curtis, "The Revolution in Russia," The National Geographic Magazine, May 1907, pp. 313-314.
    Piotr Stolypin, probably imperial Russia's greatest statesman, was murdered in 1911 by a Jewish assassin. In 1907, Jews made up about ten percent of Bolshevik party membership. In the Menshevik party, another faction of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party, the Jewish proportion was twice as high. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 365.; See also: R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (1993), pp. 185-186.
  27. Martin Gilbert, Atlas of Jewish History (1977), pp. 71, 74.; In spite of the restrictive "Pale" policy, in 1897 about 315,000 Jews were living outside the Pale, most of them illegally. In 1900 more than 20,000 were living in the capital of St. Petersburg, and another 9,000 in Moscow.
  28. Sonja Margolina, Das Ende der Lügen: Russland und die Juden im 20. Jahrhundert (Berlin: 1992). Quoted in: "Ein ganz heisses Eisen angefasst," Deutsche National-Zeitung (Munich), July 21, 1992, p. 12.
  29. Krasnaia Gazetta ("Red Gazette"), September 1, 1918. Quoted in: Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), pp. 820, 912 (n. 88).
  30. Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1990), p. 820.
  31. Contrary to what a number of western historians have for years suggested, Soviet terror and the Gulag camp system did not begin with Stalin. At the end of 1920, Soviet Russia already had 84 concentration camps with approximately 50,000 prisoners. By October 1923 the number had increased to 315 camps with 70,000 inmates. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 836.
  32. Cited by historian Robert Conquest in a review/ article in The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.
  33. The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.
  34. Review/article by Robert Conquest in The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.; In the "Great Terror" years of 1937-1938 alone, Conquest has calculated, approximately one million were shot by the Soviet secret police, and another two million perished in Soviet camps. R. Conquest, The Great Terror (New York: Oxford, 1990), pp. 485-486.;
    Conquest has estimated that 13.5 to 14 million people perished in the collectivization ("dekulakization") campaign and forced famine of 1929-1933. R. Conquest, The Harvest of Sorrow (New York: Oxford, 1986), pp. 301-307.
  35. Russian professor Igor Bestuzhev-Lada, writing in a 1988 issue of the Moscow weekly Nedelya, suggested that during the Stalin era alone (1935-1953), as many as 50 million people were killed, condemned to camps from which they never emerged, or lost their lives as a direct result of the brutal "dekulakization" campaign against the peasantry. "Soviets admit Stalin killed 50 million," The Sunday Times, London, April 17, 1988.;
    R. J. Rummel, a professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, has recently calculated that 61.9 million people were systematically killed by the Soviet Communist regime from 1917 to 1987. R. J. Rummel, Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917 (Transaction, 1990).
  36. Because of his revolutionary activities, Lenin was sentenced in 1897 to three years exile in Siberia. During this period of "punishment," he got married, wrote some 30 works, made extensive use of a well-stocked local library, subscribed to numerous foreign periodicals, kept up a voluminous correspondence with supporters across Europe, and enjoyed numerous sport hunting and ice skating excursions, while all the time receiving a state stipend. See: Ronald W. Clark, Lenin (New York: 1988), pp. 42-57.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 55-75.
  37. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), pp. 187-188.;
  38. The Nation, June 24, 1991, p. 838.
  39. Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.
  40. "Nostalgic for Nicholas, Russians Honor Their Last Czar," Los Angeles Times, July 18, 1993.; "Ceremony marks Russian czar's death," Orange County Register, July 17, 1993.
  41. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 787.

Khazar Theory: A Scapegoat for Jews?

via Fitzpatrick Informer

Regardless of if those who call themselves “Jews” today are indeed the descendants of Abraham, they are behaving in the spirit of the ancients who rejected Christ.

That is what matters most. People who obsess on the racial heritage of today’s Jews are missing the bigger picture. However, there is some value to the racial heritage question on a secular level. For example, if today’s Jews are not descendants of Abraham, how then can they justifiably claim a Biblical right to Palestine? But the focus of this article will be the Khazar theory as scapegoat for Jews and their anti-Christian behaviour.

Much of the confusion, present mainly in Protestant circles, is caused by a misunderstanding of Jesus words found in St. John’s Apocalypse, chapter 2, verse 9.
I know thy tribulation and thy poverty, but thou art rich: and thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
The confused are rendering this passage carnally, saying that Jesus was singling out only “fake Jews” as the synagogue of Satan but not the true descendants of Abraham. The root cause of this confusion stems from the heresy of dual covenant theology, which states that Jews are saved based on their race alone, not on their faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. The truth of the matter is that Jesus was speaking of the spiritual nature of the issue.

Khazars didn’t exist when Jesus spoke against the Synagogue of Satan


The Khazar Empire, a medieval power that lay just north of the theocratic Christian Byzantium Empire, is believed to have been established around the 7th century A.D., several hundred years after Christ walked the Earth. During the 8th century, many of its nobles converted to Judaism. It is believed that many or most of today’s European (Ashkenazi) Jews are descended from this Turkish Khazar tribe. How is it, then, that Jesus could have been referring to these supposed “fake” Khazar Jews in His admonishment of the Synagogue of Satan throughout the Gospels? Were the Jews to whom He spoke indeed the literal descendants of Abraham? The answer is unequivocally, yes. In almost all of Jesus’ discourse with the Zionist Jews of His time, he focused on their spiritual blindness, not on their supposed racial legitimacy. In the following passage, Jesus makes it clear that the faithful spirit that was present with Abraham, not ethnicity, is what counts. The following passage also proves that Jesus did not view the Synagogue of Satan as Khazar Jews.
I know that you are the children of Abraham: but you seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you. I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and you do the things that you have seen with your father. They answered, and said to him: Abraham is our father. Jesus saith to them: If you be the children of Abraham, do the works of Abraham. But now you seek to kill me, a man who have spoken the truth to you, which I have heard of God. This Abraham did not. You do the works of your father. They said therefore to him: We are not born of fornication: we have one Father, even God. Jesus therefore said to them: If God were your Father, you would indeed love me. For from God I proceeded, and came; for I came not of myself, but he sent me: Why do you not know my speech? Because you cannot hear my word. (John 8:37-43)
Jesus then exposes the true source of their spirit.
You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof. (John 8:44)
The consistent message in the New Testament is that one’s spirit towards Christ will determine his ultimate destiny, heaven or hell…to be reborn of the Spirit or to remain in the spirit of bondage to sin. There is no way of carnalizing the Gospels and making them about heritage or ethnicity.

The terms “Jew” and “Israel” were redefined by Christ’s coming

Adding to the confusion of the identity of the Synagogue of Satan is the definition of the term “Jew” in the Bible. In the New Testament, there are instances where Jew refers to a racial/national group and other instances where Jews are referred to as a spiritual group. Still yet, Jews are also referred to as an adversarial group, summed up in the term “Synagogue of Satan” and hinted at in passages like “they hid for fear of the Jews.” So how are we to determine what “Jew” means? Historian E. Michael Jones has a solid grasp of the variation in application of the term “Jew.”
When St. John uses the words “oi Ioudaioi,” he is referring to a group that has rejected Christ. The coming of Christ changed Jewish identity forever, something the Jews at His time comprehended only with difficulty. From then, the terms “Israelite” and “Jew” were no longer synonyms, because, Ferdinand Hahn points out in Caron’s book, “the true Israelites” from the Christian perspective “are precisely those who, like Nathaniel, recognize Jesus as the Messiah.
—E. Michael Jones, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History”, Fidelity Press, South Bend, Indiana, 2008, p. 33-34
Upon Christ’s arrival…the situation changes, for the Jews have to accept Christ to remain Israel…John uses the term “Jew” two ways. He begins by saying that “Salvation comes from the Jews,” and ends by saying those who call themselves “Jews” are not children of Abraham or Moses and, in fact, have Satan as their father.
From identifying the word Jew with “we,” as he does with the Samaritan woman, Jesus goes on to refer to what John calls “Jews” as “you,” which is to say, a group that does not include Jesus. Accepting or rejecting the Messiah becomes the principal way of defining what it means to be a Jew. (p. 36)
In other words, the true meaning of what it means to be a Jew has to do with the spirit that was present with Abraham. By rejecting Christ, the Jews also rejected Abraham, for the Spirit of Christ was with Abraham. However, now, the term “Jew” has been redefined as a rejecter of Christ, regardless of ethnicity; for the Jews, in their rejection of Christ, accepted Satan as their father.
There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:28)
One who distinguishes him or herself as Jewish is declaring their rejection of Christ and the spiritual redefinition of God’s people in the above passage from Galatians.

Scapegoating Jews

Those who continue to advance the lie that Jesus was referring to Khazar Jews when He admonished the Synagogue of Satan are not only guilty of falsifying history but also of excusing ethnic Jews of their rejection of Jesus the Messiah. There can be no excuse for a Jew, or anyone, who rejects Jesus. In a religious and spiritual context, the Khazar debate is irrelevant. There is no validity in the dichotomy of “fake Jews” vs. “real Jews” outside of St. John’s definition of “Jews”.  And Jewish behaviour today cannot be excused away as being the rotten fruits of Turkish impostors. Jewish behaviour today is no different than it was 2,000 years ago when the Jews cried for the release of the criminal Barabbas over Jesus and for Herod to crucify the Messiah. The likely reason why some push the Khazar theory is in an attempt to avoid being labelled a racist or anti-Semite while implicating “Khazars” in crimes and conspiracy.
Yet no man spoke openly of Him, for fear of the Jews. (John 7:13)

Mentally Challenged Black 'President' to Attack Syria and Arm More Muslim Rebels to Fight ISIS

via The Daily Stormer

The Negro commander of a declining America issued a new series of mission parameters for attacking the rising ISIS Caliphate, during a much heralded Wednesday night speech from the White House.

During the national address, which ran for just under fifteen minutes, the primitive incompetent highlighted a three stage plan for crushing the Islamic fundamentalists, consisting of new bombing missions into Syria, training the completely inept and corrupt Iraqi army with increased troop deployments, and arming a collection of “moderate” Muslim Arabs to counter the radicals in the region.

This third tactic flies in the face of all recent experience and common sense, instead relying on a course of action that is largely responsible for creating this crisis in the first place. The original strategy of forming a fanatical Jihad-oriented organization was intended to break the power of Syrian leader Bashar Assad, and is thought to have been a joint American-Israeli concoction.

However, like most undertakings of the Jew and traitorous underlings, it largely blew up in the faces of its creators, although this ISIS force, which began as promising and awe-inspiring, seems to have solidified into a motley band of low-intelligence savages, choosing to rape and pillage their own instead of attacking real enemies.

Fox News:
President Obama on Wednesday ordered a sharp escalation of the U.S. military campaign against the Islamic State, authorizing U.S. airstrikes in Syria along with expanded airstrikes in Iraq as he vowed to wipe out the group’s terrorists “wherever they exist.”
“Our objective is clear: we will degrade, and ultimately destroy, ISIL through a comprehensive and sustained counter-terrorism strategy,” Obama said during a prime-time address to the nation.
The president’s address, just 15 minutes long, effectively completed a dramatic turnaround from the administration’s approach to the Islamic State just a few months ago, when the president downplayed the group’s advances through northern Iraq.
Now, he is outlining a “comprehensive” strategy for targeting the organization in Iraq and Syria, including by potentially aiding moderate factions of the Syrian opposition.
Until now, U.S. airstrikes have been limited to specific missions in northern Iraq. But Obama said Wednesday he is expanding those efforts “beyond protecting our own people and humanitarian missions, so that we’re hitting ISIL targets as Iraqi forces go on offense.”
In a nod to his plans to go into Syria, Obama said: “I have made it clear that we will hunt down terrorists who threaten our country, wherever they are. That means I will not hesitate to take action against ISIL in Syria, as well as Iraq.”
Senior administration officials, on a conference call before the speech, said the president has authorized those airstrikes, and the military “will take action on the Syrian side” of the border.
The administration is not giving a timeframe for when the expanded airstrikes will begin. But senior administration officials said the militants operate freely across both sides of the Iraq-Syria border, and the U.S. cannot be restrained by that border in going after the organization.
More than likely, this new mode of engagement will only succeed in complicating the problem, as the odds run high that these new American-backed Muslims will merely take the money, training, and equipment provided, and run wild, possibly leading to a further strengthening of the Islamic State. In addition, any further attacks on Islamic areas can only lead to further hatred for the West, and the desire to seek blood to avenge their losses.

An actual idea capable of success would consist of expelling all non-Whites capable of sympathy with the terrorists, and a total blockade aimed at preventing future infiltration of the West.

Instead, we see something that borders on the fundamentally retarded, as the world begins to ignite into an inferno that threatens to envelop all stability and order. Perhaps we can rise from the chaotic flames, and assert our independence before the situation becomes too dire.

The Blur of Black-on-White Violence

via The Political Cesspool

Every so often I like to turn my attention to what I call the blur …

The Blur is the daily toll of real black-on-white violence in the United States. Some recent examples include the mob beating of Iraq War veteran Ralph Weems IV at the Huddle House in West Point, MS, the mob beating of the White couple outside a club in Springfield, MO, and the black gang “Fam Mob” that went on a rampage in a Kroger parking lot in Memphis, TN over the weekend.

It’s like being on a roller coaster that never stops … before you have digested one hideous black-on-white crime, there’s another, and another, and another, and so on. There’s only so much black-on-white violence that I can take before it becomes disorienting. It makes me sick and angry to dwell on it. Eventually, I find a reason to look away from the blur when I start to feel like I am becoming emotionally numb to it.

Who was Donald “Travis” Harper, Jr? He was a White man who was beaten and shot to death in his own neighborhood in South Carolina while defending his wife, daughter, and unborn child from two worthless black thugs. Because of this tragedy, Travis has two little girls who will never grow up to have their father walk them down the aisle.

You know what? We live in a world where that could be any of us. We live in a world where the Mainstream Media reserves its sympathy for worthless sacks of shit like Rodney King, Trayvon Martin, and Michael Brown. We live in a world where if any of us shot and killed Keylan McClintock and Sandino Jackson in self defense … they would lionized as the real “victims” by default, and we would be put on trial as a public enemy like George Zimmerman or Darren Wilson.

Take a look at what happened to Carter Strange and Beverly Hope Melton in South Carolina. Have you ever heard of those names? This will continue to happen over and over again to White people in Obama’s America.

Jews Claim Jew Jack the Ripper Only Killed Hookers Because of Antisemitism

via The Daily Stormer

Jews continually refuse to ever accept responsibility for anything, and continue to believe that if a single member of their evil tribal cult is accused of a crime, their entire criminal operation is being indicted.

The recent revelation that Jack the Ripper was indeed a Jew has put Jews in panic mode, trying to explain away why such a weird act as murdering and disembowelling hookers would be committed by a dirty Jew.

Haaretz has literally gone so far as to claim that Jew Jack only butchered these hookers because of Antisemitism – his feelings were so hurt by evil Whites that he could do nothing but go out and slaughter whores.

Haaretz:
In an in-depth follow-up on the revelation, the Daily Mail relates the details of Kosminski’s life before he came to Great Britain.
“He was born near the old Russian-Polish border in 1864 or 1865, when anti-Semitic laws were driving Jewish communities into ghettos – forbidden to grow food, use Hebrew or build synagogues, they were being starved out of existence.
Young Aaron was an unwanted child, born much later than his brothers and sisters, when his mother was 46. The family shared one mattress, and it is thought the boy was sexually abused, probably by his stepfather.
“Following the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881, waves of ‘pogromy’ — the Russian word for devastation – were unleashed. Just as in Nazi Germany 60 years later, the Jews were blamed for everything, and extremist mobs were sent by special trains to obliterate the ghettos, in what would today be termed ‘ethnic cleansing.’
These armies of thugs burned, looted and pillaged Jewish towns. Rape was commonplace, and any man who tried to intervene would be beaten to death.
Stories spread of women committing suicide by throwing themselves from rooftops to escape the rapists. Babies were butchered in their mothers’ arms.
“Kosminski, then in his mid-teens, must have witnessed unspeakable horrors. He and his family fled, struggling across Europe until they arrived penniless in London in 1882. It was this traumatic background that fuelled his mental collapse, and that triggered his obsession with rape and disembowelment, acted out as Jack the Ripper.”
Even if it can someday be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that Kosminsky committed these murders, the reasons why will surely remain shrouded in mystery.
We will never really know if Kosminsky the Ripper – if such a creature existed – was simply a run-of-the-mill lunatic, or if his terrible deeds were the result of what he suffered in Eastern Europe.
Wouldn’t be ironic, though, if the anti-Semitism that Jews fear might result from the revelation that Jack the Ripper was Jewish – were part of the reason the crimes were committed in the first place?

The Zionists Will Always Work to Cover-up 9/11

via Incog Man

This Thursday marks the 13th anniversary of 9/11 — now the real “day of infamy” for America. On this date not so long ago, this country was totally stabbed in the back by a historically devious, self-absorbed and vindictive race — a race who have obviously never, ever cared one lousy bit about any other human being on this planet, regardless of how the arrogant punks describe themselves constantly.

Haven’t you noticed, by now, how the so-called “free media” always tells the story like the government wants you to believe? Haven’t you noticed how no one involved ever got fired, while some were even promoted? And how about other certain “accepted” things in history, that are always carefully protected and any contrary evidence vigorously censored, like the Holocaust from 70 years ago? Hmmm. Methinks a pattern is emerging here.

The Jew’s fingerprints are all over 9/11. If it was a common murder scene, the luminol would be lighting up like a GD christmas tree. Everywhere you turn in the narrative you see smiling, smirking Jews, even in the clean-up efforts and pay-offs to victim families afterwards (to keep any possible inconvenient evidence out of the courts and public exposure).

Let us not mince words any longer: The bloody Zionists (which includes plenty of corrupted Gentiles, sorry to say) are responsible for 9/11. Every single one of the no-good mothers involved in this astoundingly huge crime against this nation and even the world, needs to get dragged bodily out of their big cushy offices at the point of the bayonet and video camera. I don’t care who the ef they are!

Now I might sound real angry at times. Yeah, I am. Living, breathing people were throwing themselves off buildings 80 some stories off the ground, because it was better to fall to death than burning alive. Others died under massive tons of falling concrete and debris. The plane’s passengers may have died fast, but the awful knowing they would die soon in a violent, burning explosion surely filled their souls for a few minutes.

Let me reiterate what I said earlier: The ones really responsible cared nothing at all. The victim’s terrible deaths were deemed necessary to their long-running Geopolitical and Racial NWO Agenda — in the works for decades by September 11, 2001.

The Jews have such a fierce head-lock on America it’s not funny. Money, politics, media, you name it, the Jew is all over the nexus of power in our country. Make note on how freely they talk in the media about all us forever-evil White people controlling things, when not a word is ever spoken about the sacred Jews. Turn on the news (no matter the channel), and you’ll immediately, or very soon, see one of the creeps on the air pushing the NWO Zionist company line, trying to get us to kill more of their Mideast enemies.

People will say “oh, that INCOG MAN is just a racist, anti-semitic hater boy, look at all the things he says about the poor “oppressed” Negro…” Uh, what don’t you get about the equation, fool? These stinking lousy Jews have been busy openly brainwashing us Whites with RACE GUILT for fifty years, at least.

And that includes the business with Hitler and Nazi Germany, in case you haven’t noticed by now. Cripes, the SOBs in the media have been laying down the Nazi stuff thick, lately.

And with the barest of research, you can see that blacks are now going crazy everywhere and attacking us Whites in the streets just for being White.

Hell, things are getting so bad they even did a report on FOX new’s Bill O’Reilly last night about a mob of blacks beating some White shoppers outside a Memphis Kroger store, just the other day. If you watched it, you would have seen how Bill and some blond Goy chick stumbled all over themselves trying to say it wasn’t a “hate crime.” What a laugh. If it was a mob of Whites attacking blacks, the fools would be going nuts.

But that one event is only a drop in the bucket when it comes to blacks racially victimizing us White people — happens all the time. The mainstream media (that includes FOX) knows they had better do some kind of story sooner or later, or too many of the befuddled White Goyim might notice the real deal.

Not surprising blacks are doing this to innocent White people on the street, when you see all sorts of movies out of Jew Hollywood over the years portraying our race as evil incarnate. Hell, just watch the recent movie “12 Years A Slave,” which Hollywood Jews awarded tons of industry accolades. This kind of unmitigated evil White imagery understandably gets the militant black race worked up into a furious lather.

It’s plainly obvious the Jew punks have been steadily, gradually working to turn our race into a spat-upon minority, and to keep us racially at each other’s throats so we don’t do something about them. In addition, the countries that make up the “NWO” are the same countries that have been racially turned upside down with Third World immigration over the last fifty years.

So, let me make another statement here: 9/11 will always stay unsolved because of “PC.” PC? You ask. Yep, PC keeps us from naming the Jew. Or the Zionist because the general public thinks Zionism has something or other to do with the Jews (but are pretty clueless on so much else).

The sorry mothers have been using our White countries, while at the same time screwing us over big time. They just don’t want us Whites to “get it” before it’s too late.

Immoralities of all sorts, the racial destruction of the White race, never-ending support of Israel, no matter what those bastards ever do.

Everything points to the Zionist Jew.

And no, all little Jews are not secretly involved in a massive conspiracy. But each knows that if the general public thinks “9/11 was an inside job” then the next step is looking for the real culprits. Which are other Jews just like them.

Same thing for the “Holocaust.” Each of them knows that if the general public thinks they’ve been lied to (they have), then all bets are off when it comes to their cushy lives here in the US. Hell, they think we’ll probably put in power another Adolf Hitler because of it.

Oh, I know all of this kind of thing is scary as hell to think, without a doubt. You probably don’t like it one bit. Actually, this possibility keeps pretty much keeps everyone sibilant. And the punks know that and use it against us.

A comment recently written by a Jew on my site (left in my moderation que):
You and your conspiracy theories can go to hell, Arab-loving commie-nazi.
Don’t forget that we (Israel) have the best assassins, not that you are worth the bullet it would take to arrange a meeting between you and your 72 virgins. (Assuming you are a closet member of the Religion of Peace, using lies to destroy America.)
– Meir Kahane’s Ghost

Note how the stinking Jew brags about them being such great assassins. That’s how these sneaky, dishonorable people roll. These Jews are totally devious, totally insane when it comes to their race.*

Now the Jew is saying I’m a Arab-loving, Commie-Nazi. Well, being a commie and a Nazi makes absolutely no sense. But being a Jew-commie does. Arab-loving? Hell, I want to see all of them back in Sandnigger land and not in our GD countries, walking around, stinking up the place.

Jews believe when it comes to International Jewry (Jews anywhere on the planet belongs to their diaspora crime family) “the ends justifies the means.” In other words, it’s OK to kill your Goyim ass if needed to advance sacred Israel and Big Jewry controlling the civilized world (well on their way). Hell, the bastards will kill other little Jews if they have to, when it comes to this crap.

It’s not me who’s the crazy one. I’m just the little guy, off to side, angrily and emphatically pointing my finger at the dirty little rat bastards who obviously did it. I’d much rather be getting drunk, laid or going fishing, believe you me.

Hell, I’m definitely not getting rich doing up this site. I’m not even close to breaking even, for crying out loud. If I named the Muzzies, I’d probably be driving a Masarati right now, going on FOX news and sweet-talking all the lovely blonde shiksas they use to dole out NWO Zio propaganda every day.

So, until you “get it” about the stinking Jews and all of us working to put a stop to the creeps, the truth about 9/11 will never, ever come out.

Simple as that.
– Phillip Marlowe

* They are a race, at least that’s how they freely describe themselves now (they always did so, but not as openly as they do these days). And most of them are not even all that religious, many even bragging they don’t believe in a God — except for the part where this non-existent God supposedly promised them Palestine, of course.

Here Is What Alleged 'White Privilege' Costs a Working White Woman

via The White Voice

Let's discuss "White privilege" some more, shall we?

The absurd fallacy is still being used against White people to discredit our achievements and justify immoral "affirmative action" aka "EEO" by non-White (and White, mentally ill), anti-Whites. Therefore, our (White) voice should be heard to bring some reality into the mix! What I'm about to list are yet more examples that I have either experienced, someone I know has, told of during conversation, along with a few observations I've made with a satirical note to point out the absurdity of it all.

Without further adieu, here are merely a few examples of "White privilege"! Take note, this is not about being victimized per se, merely stating facts:

As a legal U.S. tax “paying" citizen, having to wait our "turn" in line at the ER, grocery stores, in traffic, at restaurants, etc. behind many obvious illegal aliens (majority non-White BTW). 

And while we're on the subject, not only waiting in line, but who's footing the unauthorized bill for their medical care, grocery bills, housing? Quite likely, not the recipient class, but us via "taxes" (misappropriated) funds funneled to the IRS, etc.

Those of us who can't afford private/home school/"Whiter parts of town"-our Children are being sent to public schools. There is a host of problems with that. Again-being folded into majority NON-White schools including many illegals. As if dumbing down basic education, taking away National pride (American, Great Britain, etc.), and teachers must accommodate a foreign underclass speaking their language. (Are they required to learn ours)? Of course not, that would be *gasp* "racist"! Being a White minority in a school (or any setting), is anywhere from counterproductive to lethal. This includes the race mixing component/atmosphere. As if all that wasn't more than enough, we now have the unbelievable common core (anti-White at its nucleus), adding insult to injury. And with all of the aforementioned facts, these White children are being indoctrinated to be "tolerant", embracing all these enriching cultures, being programmed-ironically enough-about White privilege while the cultural historical "teachings" glorify other races while demonizing at the White man's expense as they're ironically enjoying the modern day luxuries he has invented. If you think black history month is limited to one month, think again!

Monitor what they are exposed to, undo the damage, take it up with the school boards, legal counsel, etc. Even if it "does no good", you've done something while simultaneously teaching your children not to idly accept what we know is inherently destructive to our own.

White women who do NOT care to date outside of their race: There are much more of us that the lame stream media would admit: We are perversely ogled, flirted with, and at times, worse. It is extremely uncomfortable and at times, dangerous. We have to endure this in our everyday lives. What an example of "White privilege" having to bother with all of this.

 Being a responsible homeowner who obtained the home before the housing market fell through in 2007 thanks to Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac's affirmative action loans mandated by Barney Frank the deranged sodomite. They approved land to non-Whites who didn’t meet the standard requirements of buying a house. When massive foreclosures and repossessions occur, the others suffer the consequences. Preciously enough, the banks bailed out these erroneous loans. We are now stuck with homes worth much less than they should be because of this and in order to move, would take a heavy hit to good credit scores. Oh, and guess what the new neighbors moving in the foreclosed/bankrupted homes via HUD (government funded) housing?

Whites living in very multicultural (mainly non-White) areas: So many languages are being used, and when broken English (often unintelligible as well) used loosely as a 2nd language predictably fails, are left to use universal hand signals to communicate. In this environment, however, "White privilege" should be quite abundant! Not much competition.

A young White man working at a store (who most customers are non-White, using food stamps, and overweight), expressed how difficult it was not only to obtain the job, but how difficult it is living with two other young White men also on minimum wage the diet is mainly ramen noodles and egg sandwiches, which they are so tired of. *This ties into next bulleted item*
Affirmative action=non-White privilege. That speaks for itself!

Working Whites are very "privileged" with stagnant paychecks (if they're able to gain employment in today's climate), due to affirmative action, etc., stagnant pay while prices skyrocket. One personal trend I've noticed: A lot of my funds go to grocery stores. I try my best to go for sales, coupons, more necessities than non-necessities and so on. EBT (aka food stamps): their balances do adjust to accommodate inflation. Isn't that interesting? I can purchase enough to carry out without a cart (bill easily $40.00), while an EBT recipient I see literally brimming over an extra-large cart....what does that tax free (to them), receipt tally up to? While Michelle Obama wants to focus on school dietary programs (another expensive failure), her "people" are loading up on absolute JUNK with the EBT program. This is a FACT. I especially take note of my White privilege during these transactions. And seeing one time where a mixed couple had two of these carts overflowing, “paid” via EBT card, and proceeded to load it into their brand new Mercedes! 

Again with stagnant pay and all costs going up, we're "living paycheck to paycheck" even more. A White male friend of mine on social media posted recently that he had just finished paying his bills and such, with literally 17 cents left in his bank account until next payday, a week away. If that isn't White privilege, I don't know what is! 

Shall we talk about the police and profiling a bit? I was repeatedly targeted as a teen by police, arrested and almost shot due to mistaken identity... Now more than ever, especially, White police officers are likely paranoid of the racial aspect of apprehending a suspect. Make no doubt; they'll atone for that shortcoming in other ways-easy cases.

I earn a moderate pay despite affirmative action (discrimination) setbacks. I live within my means, yet even with a recently granted long overdue promotion, have had to recently use a credit card here and there for everyday transactions. I was formerly glad it had been a good five years since that had happened.

White privilege is certainly something to be envied!

Right-Wing Extremists Like The Order

via MajorityRights.com

Bob Mathews, leader of “The Order"
JamesUK has raised the topic for discussion - heretofore leading exponents of White/European Nationalism, those we know to have taken an active lead in advocating European peoples and their discreet nations/kinds.

It’d “be good (to have) a post critiquing far right nationalist movements and leaders:”

Enoch Powell
Jean-Marie and Marine Le Pen
George Lincoln Rockwell
John Tyndall
Nick Griffin
Jarod Taylor
Don Black
David Duke
John DeNugent
Tom Metzger
Norman Lowell
Golden Dawn
Jobbik
“or any other high profile organisations or individuals you can think of.”

I would be quick to add William Pierce among others.

Rather than relying on extant articles surveying these peoples and platforms, we may look at these matters afresh with the interest of MR commentariat.

Taking as a point of departure the terminology that JamesUK’s adopted upon broaching the topic, what jumped-out as salient and perhaps in need of re-naming or re-framing was The Order designated as “Right-Wing Extremist”: “. . . right wing extremists like The Order”

Józef Piłsudski, leader of “The Bojówki”
What The Order was attempting, in a far more elaborate plan than most people realize, was fairly analogous to what Józef Piłsudski and his “Bojówki group” did with the Bezdany train robbery and other operations in order to fund the reinstating of Poland.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bezdany_raid
There are also parallels with “The Sons of The Revolution” who fought for independence from Britain; we might go on to discuss them among other guerrilla campaigns which fought for independence. That is, naturally, revolution and the taking or re-taking of a nation can entail “extreme” activities according to the status-quo and powers that be.
But to begin discussion, a comparison of Bob Mathews and Józef Piłsudski is relevant to normalization as the parallels are clear, yet Piłsudski is not stigmatized, he is widely accepted a nationalist hero.

from wiki:
“I am not going to dictate to you what you shall write about my life and work. I only ask of you not to make me a ‘whiner and sentimentalist.’ [...] I fight and I am ready to die simply because I cannot bear to live in this latrine which is what our life amounts to [...] Let others play at throwing bouquets to Socialism or Polonism [...] My latest idea, which I have not yet fully developed, is to create in all parties, and most of all our own, an organization of physical force, of brute force. I have already done much towards its fulfillment but not enough to rest on my laurels. So now I am staking everything on this last card [...] I may die in this ‘expropriation’ and I want to explain [...] Money [...] may the devil take it! I prefer to win it in a fight than to beg for it from the Polish public which has become infantile through being chicken-hearted. I haven’t got money and I must have it for the ends I pursue.”[4] - Józef Piłsudski
The Robbery
September 1908, the Bojówki assaulted a Russian mail train near Vilnius. The train was carrying tax revenues from Warsaw to St. Petersburg.
Piłsudski personally led the raid; it was the only one he personally took part in, the rule of the bojowka being that each member must take part in at least one armed attack.[5]
The group that took part in the robbery numbered 20 people — 16 men and 4 women[6] Among the members of the Bojówki who took part in that action was his lover and future wife, Aleksandra,[6][7] and three future Polish Prime Ministers:
Tomasz Arciszewski,[8] Aleksander Prystor[6] and Walery Sławek,[6] and other notable politicians and activists of the Second Polish Republic era, like PSP activists Edward Gibalski[8] (or Franciszek), Jerzy Sawicki, and W. Momentowicz.[8]
The Bojówki group had known about the train for weeks and took that time to familiarize themselves with the area.[6] On the 26th of September, six of them were on the train as passengers,[6] the rest assembled at the little train station at Bezdany, in the presence of several guards unaware of their intent.[8] When the train stopped at the station, the revolutionaries sprang into action, dividing into two groups: one assaulted the train, the other took control of the train station offices, cutting the telephone and telegraph wires. The Poles had several bombs; at least two were thrown into the carriage with the escort by Gibalski and Balaga. One Russian soldier was killed and five were wounded[6] in the short firefight[6] before the rest surrendered. Piłsudski with others prepared the final dynamite charge which opened the mail car and destroyed the iron boxes within.[6] After the Poles took control of the station and the train, they put the money in bags and escaped. Piłsudski went with the group that carried the heaviest bags and escaped through the nearby river.[6]
Aftermath
The loot from that raid was about 200,000 Russian rubles (under the gold standard, equivalent to approximately 5,000 ounces of gold, worth $100,000 in 1908 or 8 million dollars at the price of gold in 2012), a virtual fortune in contemporary Eastern Europe.[a] The money was supposed to cover the costs of building a tram system in Vilnius.[9] Piłsudski used those funds to aid his secret military organization.
Sparking this comparison was JamesUK’s suggestion of a survey of WN leaders that did not yet include William Pierce. I suggested that he should be discussed and JamesUK responded that:

“he was influential to wing extremists like The Order”


That phrasing seems very much derived of Jewish controlled media.

Thus, we might do well to begin the critique by deconstructing the designation of “right-wing extremist,” as a necessary deconstruction to make-way for the normalizing and institutionalizing of our nationalist efforts: A comparison of Bob Mathews and The Order and Józef Piłsudski and “The Bojówki group is useful in that regard as parallels are clear, yet Piłsudski is not stigmatized, he is widely accepted a nationalist hero.
 
Nor was Piłsudski a right-winger, in fact, he was a socialist.

Oh behalf of fostering the organization and coordination of our people into effective forces, I have ventured to re-define “White Leftism” as the union of Native European peoples and to separate it from the albatross of universalist Marxist associations – note that Piłsudski was an arch enemy and hero in war against the Marxist Soviets. We may take occasion to distance ourselves from pejorative Marxist associations of “The’ left”such as the prohibition of private property, while availing ourselves of its socially responsible and organizational capacities.

Even so, I would agree that yes, The Order still had some right-wing ideas circulating amongst. However, it, “right-wing”, is a designation and a means that they were moving away from – David Lane was explicit about that, describing “The Right” as full of speculative crazies.

14 Words
Nevertheless, as nationalists, we ought not lose site of the fact that revolution has been a normal means by which our nations achieved sovereignty.

Coming back to JamesUK’s suggestion of a survey of WN leaders, which did not yet include William Pierce, when I suggested that he should be critiqued, JamesUK added that Pierce:

“wrote inflammatory books most noticeable The Turner Diaries.”

When we interviewed Metzger, I had hoped to have him say some things about Pierce. Metzger does not like The Turner Diaries, citing nukes in particular as a bad solution. Pierce supposedly called Metzger “a bolshevik” because of his leftism.

My concern with Pierce is for his rightism indeed, but looks a bit more on his insufficient historical understanding regarding some epochs, probable scientism and corresponding with that fact is that people who couple Hitler and WN almost invariably seem to come through his school of thought.

JamesUK writes:

“There are more points but this is how I would clarify the WN movement especially in the US that I could go into detail on each point.

1) Jew obsession
2) Victimology
3) Stereotypes
4) Egos/Narcissism
5) WW2 “


This list of complaints isn’t exactly how I’d characterize the right wing, but more as how liberals would view WN - with some truth and some criticisms better than others.

1) Jew obsession


Maybe some, but even if we wanted Jews to identify with us, most of it would be disingenuous. They see themselves as a separate people. While we state our agenda as separatists, not Nazis who seek to eliminate them from the earth, we have the moral high ground; and if by chance, we are off-the-mark or exaggerate their causative agency in certain problems, we have not enacted something that cannot be corrected.

That said, it is clear enough that we need to return to them as often as any problem for us, though turning to other problems in turn and as they arise, we should. Agreed that focus on them alone as antagonistic is a mistake - some have gone so far as to take the position that we ought to drop everything else until we depose them. The argument is valid - they have a line of limitless credit for themselves and can readily buy-off people as they have with The US Congress and Senate, as they have in co-opting Ukrainian nationalism. But we should not chase the red cape of Judaism, in what may not be a goal achievable on-time (viz. removing them from all power positions) but we should rather center our focus on our functional autonomy from them; and turn to our various problems accordingly.

2) Victimology

I disagree. In fact, I think the right wing is didactically “macho”, not utilizing the valid feedback that victimization can provide. The right tends rather to value Nietzschean stoicism, the impervious superman. It buys into some of the toxic notions of honor that have taken us into various kinds of “Pickett’s Charge” type scenarios.

Rather, Jewish interests would use this kind of incitement (of wimpish complaining and “victimization”) to distract from the nepotism of theirs and others (e.g., Muslims) and the deceptive tactics they have used to gain power.

3) Stereotypes

This criticism sounds “Jewy.” On the contrary, we are about reconstructing legitimacy of characteristic patterns and discrimination on their basis, as opposed to the liberal hegemony of being forced to judge every individual on “their own merit.”

At first blush, to criticize stereotypes seems to introject a Jewish PC criticism provided to sophomores. Perhaps more explanation and refinement of the criticism is necessary.

Certainly there are those who draw vulgar stereotypes, but the legitimacy of stereotyping appears central in what we need to do.

4) Egos/Narcissism

There is some of that, sure. And I would agree that it is characteristically right wing.

5) WW2

Definitely. Most normal people concerned for White/European interests should be sick of would-be WN advocates associating our cause with Hitler - how wonderful Hitler was, how perfect NS Germany was! how they were only victims and everyone who opposed them was on the wrong side.

It is hindsight, and if hindsight is to be invoked then why not lament the fact that an inter-European war was initiated at all and work to prevent inter-European war from happening again?

Present day Germans do not want guilt-trips and that is correct and fine, they should not have guilt-trips and penalties put upon them, but revisionist types turn around and want to lay guilt-trips and perhaps penalties on those of this generation who have nothing to do events of WWII. Enough.

Before we fully buy-into designations by the powers that be of the status-quo, that we are represented by this or that, or that The Order, for example, were “right-wing extremists”, we ought to compare their efforts to revolutionary movements that are now respected as a part of our tradition and given mainstream acceptance as having been eminently valid. In that regard, we might also compare Bob Mathews and The Order with “The Sons of The Revolution – veritable American terrorists in separatism from Britain, just as they and their Declaration of Independence are now looked upon as sacrosanct by Americans, so too Piłsudski is now esteemed as nationalist hero. And just as The Sons of The Revolution were breaking the law and broaching stigma, great danger and execution if caught, Piłsudski was flamboyantly breaking the law - if he had been captured he would have been executed…