Oct 7, 2014

Zionist Rhetoric Infiltrates White Nationalism

via National-Socialist Worldview

Golda Meir
This is an interesting piece of twisty rhetoric that I've seen disciples of Bob Whitaker (BUGSters) and a few others use.

The rhetorical formula, "They hate Jews more than they love their own ..." can be found in Zionist-Jew propaganda going back many years. It's adapted from a statement attributed to Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir (1973). It's a way of saying that people who have a conflict with Jews -- foremost the Palestinians and populations of the various Arab states that have had wars with the State of Israel -- are pointlessly self-destructive and therefore crazy. It dismisses out of hand the possibility that there might be some justified grievance.

It is a characteristically Jewish piece of rhetoric, insofar as the Jews alone among peoples are in the habit of claiming that they are targeted with irrational hatred.

Recently this rhetoric has cropped up in what is supposed to be White Nationalist media. This is an attempt to trace that development and to show who introduced this form of ad hominem argument into the WN milieu and who has taken it up.

Jack Wheeler, an aide to President George W. Bush, may have been the first to adapt it for use against political dissenters within the United States, specifically against conservative Republicans who disagreed with fighting foreign wars for the Jewish State.

This rhetoric seems to have made its way into White Nationalism via a route that you can see traced in the examples below. The course of development, roughly, is this: first it was adapted by Zionist Republicans to attack conservative Republicans; then it was used by Jews on the fringe of White Nationalism to attack White Nationalists; then finally it was adopted by a few individuals within White Nationalism to attack other White Nationalists.

"What would drive conservatives to such craziness? Let’s not pussy-foot around and face the core ugliness squarely. The cause is anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism trumps patriotism to America. Hatred of Israel causes a desire for America’s defeat. Blame-America-First Conservatives hate Israel more than they love America, they hate Jews more than they love their country." -- Jack Wheeler (attacking Pat Buchanan and Robert Pape), 12 July 2005. http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/1598/126/

* * *

"Hitler’s two biggest complaints were as follows IMO:

1) There are not enough Muslims. These Muslims hate the Jews really well.
2) Whites are not ethnocentric enough.
"These New Age fools answered his prayers. We now have a common sense of oppression among Whites which is unprecedented. Of course, they hate jews more than they love us . . ." -- BUGSter Tim, 15 January 2008. http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2...#comment-41506

* * *

"Recently I got involved in an argument in the comments to the Brussels Journal blog. One of the commenters insisted that Jews have too much power in his country, that they support immigration, and therefore they are the main reason for Islamization.

"I answered that it is also possible to explain why anti-Semites cause Islamization. Namely,
they hate Jews more than they love Europe; so they invite Muslims in to do away with their Jews. He was insulted and answered that he personally did not invite anybody." -- Dimitri K., "Gates of Vienna" 14 April 2008. http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/20...amization.html

* * *

"Correct. And why is this so? Because, as I’ve said so many times, the anti-Semites hate the Jews more than they love the things that they profess to love.
"It’s analogous to Arafat and the “peace” process. In 2000 he turned down the offer from Ehud Barak to establish a Palestinian state on 97 percent of the West Bank, by far the best deal the Palestinians could ever hope to get from Israel. Why? Because Arafat didn’t want a Palestinian state and peace with Israel. He wanted to continue to wage a war of annihilation against Israel. That’s what he lived for. Had he accepted peace with Israel, his life would have become meaningless to him.

"Similarly, the anti-Semites really have no positive beliefs, they have no vision of a good society they want to achieve. The things they profess to believe in, such as white preservation and stopping nonwhite immigration, are in reality merely fronts to justify their anti-Semitism. It is their opposition to the Jews that is the organizing idea of their lives, and without it their lives would become meaningless to them.

"For example, Kevin MacDonald ... " -- Lawrence Auster. 16 July 2010. http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/016984.html

* * *

"aren't you swell...willing to join with avowed enemies of the west because they hate jews(as a jew myself i want to preserve the west and european culture) as much as you do. and that is why you will forever be marginalized and ridiculed. you hate jews more than you love yourself!" -- self-proclaimed Jew posting on Stormfront, 14 March 2011. https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t32...76#post9040068

* * *
"But some people hate Jews more than they love their own people. They hate Jews so much that they want them to be harmed, even if it harms us too—even if it harms us more." -- Greg Johnson, 5 August 2011. http://www.counter-currents.com/2011...h-nationalism/

* * *

"I hope this convinces those (few of) you on the racial right that started out having at least a little bit of sympathy for the Occutards that they’re hopeless. Otherwise, I’ll have to conclude what I have always thought about some of you, that you reallly hate Jews more than you love Whites." -- anonymous conservative blogger on a former C of CC url, 21 February 2012 https://countenance.wordpress.com/20...tient-prisons/

* * *

"The other problem is that some people who talk about Israel endlessly don’t really care about Whites at all, they just hate Jews. From my limited experience, they do more harm than good. They will step all over good pro-White points in order to get the thrill of verbally insulting Jews." -- BUGSter Jason, 7 May 2012. http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2...#comment-56254

* * *

"Unfortunately, many so-called “white nationalists” hate the Jews more than they love their people. I don’t need to point out how psychologically sick that is." -- Greg P (frequent commenter on Greg Johnson's blog), 23 July 2012. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...#comment-82534

* * *

"In other words, don’t fall for people who hate Jews more than they love Whites." -- BUGSter Jason, 31 August 2012. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...#comment-87624

* * *

"The Jew-centrics are basically only anti-Jewish, not pro-White, in my experience. They hate Jews more than they love Whites (if they like Whites at all)." -- BUGSter Jason, 21 September 2012. http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2...#comment-58196

* * *

Obviously you hate Jews and Americans more than you love white people and more than you care about white ethnonationalism. -- Greg Johnson, 4 March 2014. http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/03/the-ukraine-crisis/#comment-45661

* * *

"That is doubly ironic, since you appear to be one of those people who hates Jews more than he loves whites." -- Greg Johnson, 4 March 2014. http://www.counter-currents.com/2014...#comment-45665

* * *
"But some people hate Jews more than they love their own people. They hate Jews so much that they want them to be harmed, even if it harms us too—even if it harms us more." -- Greg Johnson, 23 July 2014 http://www.counter-currents.com/2014...-palestinians/

* * *

So, this twisted form of rhetoric, which comes from Zionism and is especially used by Zionists -- usually with Palestinians or Arabs more generally as the ones who hate Jews more than they love "their own children," "their own lives," etc. -- can be documented within White Nationalism first as used by BUGSter "Tim" in 2008; then in 2010 by Lawrence Auster, a Jew on the fringe of WN who said however that he had uttered it "many times"; then it was used by an anonymous Jew posting on Stormfront in 2011. Of those three early users of this verbal formula on the racial right, we have information that two, Auster and the Stormfront poster, were Jews, while BUGSter "Tim" is unknown. It turns out, however, that BUGSter Tim was an admirer of Lawrence Auster, commending Auster to other BUGSters on 24 August 2006, a few months after his use of the verbal formula. Thus it appears likely that the influence of Lawrence Auster was the key factor in getting White Nationalists to mouth a Zionist slogan that discourages criticism of Jews.

Since 2011 it has been used three times (that I could find) by BUGSter "Jason" and four times by Greg Johnson (the last time recycling a three-year-old essay by giving it a new title).

What kind of White Nationalist tries to make his fellow White Nationalist interlocutor shut up by calling him, in effect, a crazy Jew-hater -- while paraphrasing Golda Meir?   

I have a couple of considerations to offer in regard to how to answer that question.

The first is the revelation from Jimmy Marr, a recent collaborator with the BUGSters, that Bob Whitaker's "handler" is a woman married to a Jew or part-Jew who is also a BUGSter. The BUGS organization, says Marr, is under Jewish influence.
The second is that Greg Johnson, the other ostensible White Nationalist prominently using this rhetoric, has written an essay called "Dealing with the Holocaust," which argues that the central piece of Jewish and anti-White propaganda, the Holohoax, must not be challenged. Not getting involved in historical revisionism oneself is a matter of personal choice, but for a supposed White Nationalist to go out on a limb telling others that they should not question the Jewish Holocaust myth is extraordinary.

Johnson also happens to take the eccentric position that White Nationalists "have an interest in the continued existence of the State of Israel" (Greg Johnson, "White Nationalism and Jewish Nationalism," Counter-Currents, 5 August 2011).

You decide what it means. 

In what may be a related matter, Nick Griffin of the British National Party reveals that he was offered money by Zionists to stop discussing certain topics: How Patriotism is Co-Opted and Misdirected

Living in Hitler's Germany

via 14 Words

A letter from Hans Schmidt of GANPAC
Published in the Hoskins Report, Dec. 1993
Richard Kelly Hoskins, publisher. 
You asked for someone who had lived in Hitler’s Germany to tell what it was like. Permit me, someone who lived under the Swastika flag from 1935, when the Saar was reunited with Germany, to 1945, to give a short answer.
To be a boy or girl at that time was wonderful. In the Hitler Youth the differences between Christian denominations or the different German states didn’t count. We all truly felt that we were members of one body of people – one nation. Youth hostels were opened all over the Reich, enabling us to hike from one beautiful town to another seeing our fatherland. Every effort was made to strengthen our minds and bodies. Contrary to what is said today, we were encouraged to become free in spirit, and not to succumb to peer (or authority) pressure. In peacetime, NO military training was allowed by the Hitler Youth leadership; scouting yes. Incidentally, to “snitch on our parents” was frowned upon.
 At the very time when America’s allies, the Soviets, destroyed most of the Christian churches in Russia and Ukraine, about 2500 new churches were built in Germany. NOT ONE Christian church was closed. It was the law that school and church had priority over service in the Hitler Youth. As late as the fall of 1944, the Waffen SS barracks in Breslau supplied two buses to take youth to either the nearest Catholic or Protestant church every Sunday. To be a registered member of a Christian church did not prevent advancement in the National Socialist Party.
 Germany was National Socialist, but free enterprise flourished during the entire Hitler years. No company was nationalized. No small businessman was stopped from opening up his own store. I myself worked during the war for a company that can only be called part of international capitalism. If you owned shares, nobody confiscated them, like the allies did in 1945.The accomplishments of the ‘Nazis’ were incredible. Starting without money and with six million unemployed (a third of the workforce), they constructed the entire German Autobahn road network in a short span of 6 years – almost without corruption – while seeing to it that the new road system did not unnecessarily destroy either the German landscape, or wildlife habitats and forests. Two years after the NS were elected to power, conditions were so improved that workers had to be hired in nearby friendly countries to help alleviate the worker’s shortage in Germany. 
Germany was booming while Britain, France and the US were in the depths of depression.To help the workers get cheap transportation, the VW was designed and a factory was being built for their manufacture when the war started. Also, for the common people, villages of small single family homes were erected. The monthly payments were set so low that almost anyone could afford his own house. In Hitler’s Germany there were no homeless; no beggars. Crime was almost non existent because habitual criminals were in concentration camps. All this was reported in the newspapers and was known by everybody.The German press during the Third Reich had fewer taboos than the American press today. The only taboo I can think of evolved around Hitler, and, during the war, there was a law that prohibited “defeatism”. This was because of the negative role the German press played in the German defeat of 1918.It bears remembering that the ‘European Economic Community” was first coined by the Third Reich government. I remember many articles, both pro and con about this subject. One should also not forget that during the war at least seven million foreign nationals (nearly 10% of the population) worked in Germany, either as voluntary workers (Dutch, Danes, French, Poles, Ukrainians come to mind), or as forced laborers or as prisoners. I know of no instance where foreigners were attacked or molested (much less killed) because they were foreigners.
Speaking of the press, I have an article from 1943 in my possession that spells out how necessary friendship is between the German and Russian peoples.
Between 1933 and 1945 there was a tremendous emphasis on culture: theatres flourished; the German movie industry produced about 100 feature films per year (of which not one was anti-American. Only 50 of them can be considered pure propaganda movies). Some the best classical recordings still extant were made in Hitler’s Germany. Actors from all over Europe, but mainly from France, Sweden and Italy were stars in German movies..Germany always loved sports, and there was no lack of opportunities to partake in any sport one liked. The 1936 Berlin Olympics was merely a showcase of what transpired all over the Reich. In a book on these Olympics issued by the Hitler Youth that is still in my possession, Jesse Owens is shown several times and mentioned favorably. During the Schmeling boxing fights, we kids all knew of Joe Louis, the brown bomber. Nowhere did I ever read derogatory remarks about other races. Certainly the accomplishments of Germany and the Germans were given prominence, similar to ‘the ad nauseum’ statements of today that the U.S. is the land of the free, etc. In my ten years in the Hitler Youth (actually 8, since I obviously couldn’t attend while a soldier), the Jews were never mentioned.
Other sports that gripped our attention were flying (there was Hitler Youth flying training with their own sail planes), car races (British and Italian drivers dominated) and riding.
 Frequently I am asked about gun control during the Hitler era. Claims are made that Hitler could take power because he disarmed the German people. That is nonsense. In Germany gun ownership was never as prevalent as it is in America. I would say that for hundreds of years one needed a gun license in order to keep a weapon. On the other hand, my father owned an old pistol clandestinely (about which we children knew), and there were gun clubs all over the Reich. Furthermore, Germany was always a country with many excellent gunsmiths. It is doubtful that they could stay in business if the laws were too stringent. I would surmise that while Germany was Germany (before it was ‘liberated’ by the allies) gun ownership probably was far more widespread than is acknowledged today. Laws on the books were mainly to give the police a handle to arrest criminals with guns, not the ordinary citizen. Incidentally, just as Hitler had forbidden so-called ‘punishment exercises’ in the army (the brutal methods still employed in the American army), so had he forbidden the use of clubs by the police. He considered it demeaning to the German people.
Finally this: I don’t believe I’ll ever see again a people as happy and content as were the great majority of Germans under Hitler, especially in peacetime.
Certainly some minorities suffered:
former parliamentary politicians – because they couldn’t play their political games;
the Jews – because they lost their power over Germany;
the gypsies – because during the war they were required to work;
and crooked union bosses – because they lost their parasitical positions.
To this day I believe that the happiness of the majority of a people is more important than the well-being of a few spoiled minorities. In school there should be emphasis on promoting the best and the intelligent, as was done in Germany during the Hitler years – a fact that contributed after the war to the rapid German reconstruction. That Hitler was loved by his people, there can be no question. Even a few week’s before the war’s end and his death, he was able to drive to the front and mingle among the combat soldiers with only minimum security. None of the soldiers had to unload their weapons before meeting with the Fuhrer (as was required when President Bush met with American soldiers during the Gulf War).
Germany under Hitler was quite different from what the media would have you believe.

Airborne Ebola?

via Thulean Perspective

They say it is not airborne, but they don’t know that (and they don’t even seem to understand what ‘airborne’ means). It probably is; how else could a professional nurse become infected in a Spanish hospital? Are they completely incompetent there or what? They had one single patient with Ebola, and now (at least) one nurse is infected. That’s bad statistics, and is not very encouraging for the medical personnel. What happens if they get ten patients? Or one hundred? Or thousands?! They will quickly run out of medical personnel…

How long will the nurses keep working, before they say ‘stop’ and refuse to go to work? What happens then?

How long will the policemen keep working, before they say ‘stop’ and refuse to go to work? What happens then?

How long will ordinary workers keep taking the bus or the metro?

How long before it all collapses?

..and the airlines still fly between West Africa and the rest of the world. You know: Globalism comes before anything! They need to shift people between the continents, and keep this world a ‘global village’. Entire villages have been wrecked by Ebola already… and that will happen to the ‘global village’ too.

Brace yourselves. S will soon HTF!

The Silencing of the NPI in Budapest

via The Occidental Observer

From a correspondent: Richard B Spencer, president of the National Policy Institute, was arrested in Budapest last night as Hungary’s government stepped up its attempts to disrupt a gathering of nationalists, traditionalists and identitarians. It is not known if he is still in custody or has been deported.It is the latest development in a blatantly naked series of co-ordinated repressive measures against dissidents which has seen the NPI’s chosen venue forced to cancel, hotels forced to cancel bookings and Russia and France asked to hinder the movement of conference speakers.  Even Jobbik withdrew its endorsement as did the Budapest-based publisher Arktos, which withdrew its support with great reluctance.

Around 60 police officers in a dozen police vehicles converged on the Clock House Cafe in Buda late on Friday evening and took the names and passport numbers of everyone in attendance.  Only Spencer and another unnamed  American associate were arrested and taken away.  Present were 60 nationalists, traditionalists and identitarians from across Europe and the USA. Spencer gave a V-for-Victory sign from the back of the police bus as he was driven away.

It is an escalation of a posture adopted by the government of President of ‘conservative’ Viktor Orban who  has been shamelessly pandering to left- wing voices from the European Union and the USA. He promised to take all ‘legal’ means to prevent NPI’s  annual congress from being held in Budapest.  It was  scheduled to take place on October 3 – 5 but the original venue cancelled owing to pressure and the organisers were forced to take their meeting ‘underground’.

It is thought that the government of Orban, is seeking to ingratiate itself with the European Union and other US influences by showing that tolerance and freedom of speech were not to be extended to those who speak out for traditionalist, nationalist and anti-immigration viewpoints. It is the latest example of breathtaking double-standards across the length and breadth of the European Union – it is hard to imagine a left-wing conference of any stamp being forcibly cancelled by a government.

One  Englishman who was arrested and released said “It was  Hungary’s version of ‘kettling’ which the British police use to lock down nationalists demonstrators at home.  We were held in the restaurant for three hours while they took names.  There were only two arrests.”  Most of the other delegates continued eating, drinking and singing Flemish folk songs to about 1.30am.  The restaurant staff could not have been more understanding and invited us all back the next day.  The police obviously had little idea what was really going on.”

The conference attendees went ahead with an impromptu gathering in a restaurant on Saturday night and were addressed by two of the original four speakers, Tom Sunic and Jared Taylor both of whom were given standing ovations by an audience of about 150 which included attendees from Japan, Mexico, Canada and Russia especially for the occasion.  The event was also attended by BBC Radio, Die Welt and a freelancer who claimed to be working for Foreign Policy.
Ironically the entry of Hungary into the European Union was only possible after the country passed certain democratic tests.  Todays events reinforce the suggestion that left-wing hegemony was always the goal and ‘conservative’ democratic states like Hungary do not mind what they have to do to fit in with the powers that be in Brussels.
Addendum, 10/5:
Richard Spencer of the National Policy Institute expects to be deported from Hungary on Monday morning after being kept in police detention more than 48 hours after being arrested at a gathering of nationalists, traditionalists and identitarians at a bar Budapest on Friday evening. He is still in detention though police have confirmed they are not investigating any public order or travel documents offence.
The Hungarian government’s determination to disrupt  a legal gathering of the  NPI’s European congress marks a worrying escalation in state oppression of dissident right meetings. What has caused more concern is that it seems to have been organised with the co-operation of the governments of  France and Russia, both of which have either asked speakers not to attend or disrupted travel arrangements.
Richard Spencer of the National Policy Institute expects to be deported from Hungary on Monday morning after being kept in police detention more than 48 hours after being arrested at a gathering of nationalists, traditionalists and identitarians at a bar Budapest on Friday evening. He is still in detention though police have confirmed they are not investigating any public order or travel documents offence.
The Hungarian government’s determination to disrupt  a legal gathering of the  NPI’s European congress marks a worrying.

escalation in state oppression of dissident right meetings. What has caused more concern is that it seems to have been organised with the co-operation of the governments of  France and Russia, both of which have either asked speakers not to attend or disrupted travel arrangements.

Vandalism by the 'Sensitive' Left

via Golden Dawn, New York

The aesthetic decline of Greece’s monuments and landmarks in urban settings is a manifestation of an absence of values and exasperating tolerance for gangsters of the “educated” and “artistic” humanitarian left. These individuals have essentially gone throughout Athens desecrating public spaces and monuments with their slogans and threats of violence towards anyone who has a different opinion than them. They do this to create an environment of perpetual psychological violence in a time period of Greece’s history that is already tense.  

Anarchist thugs, known for their nihilism, hatred, and drug problems, are not the only culprits however. The “Peace” Youth of SYRIZA, KKE, and ANTARSYA (Antar-CIA) members have also committed such foul acts of vandalism and public property destruction, which has cost Greek taxpayers millions of Euros to repair the infrastructure.

 In this report we present photos of acts of extreme disrespect and revelations of a deep psychological complex: the rabid hatred of one’s own race.

September 4, 2013: The desecration of the statue commemorating the Pontian genocide at St Sophia square in Thessaloniki is one of the most sad hate crimes we’ve documented.  The statue was covered in red paint, and vulgar mocking slogans were scrawled all around it. It is hard to understand what kind of psychologically warped person would commit such an attack against a monument commemorating the lives of 353,000 helpless non-combatants, women and children. The outrageous act can only be motivated by a blind and foaming at the mouth hatred of Greeks and Hellenism. 

April 1, 2014- Here below is a desecration of Theodore Kolokotronis’ statue on Stadium road in Athens by anarchists. The stupid MTV style slogan written on it shows the intellectual rot and hypocrisy of the media-created “champions of human freedom”.

June 16, 2014- Here below is another desecration of the same statue by participants of the “Athens Gay Pride parade”, which was of course endorsed by the mayor of Athens, the U.S. embassy, and the European Union commissars, and later characterized as a statement against Golden Dawn.  The “parade” was attended by official parties of the Greek government , who united alongside anarchists, seem to always be around when these vandalisms occur. 

Paul Fromm's Campaign Is Opening Up the Immigration Debate

via Pro-White American

From: Craig wilson <vinylandtubes420@gmail.com>
Subject: traffic
Message Body:
I am very interested in hearing how stopping immigration would somehow lower the amount of traffic in Mississauga? I would like actual data if you can provide any, and I’m not interested in your opinion  which seems to be based on nothing factual. Would you also stop “immigrants” from moving to mississauga after banning new ones? If not, how would you lower the amount of cars in mississauga if you dont also ban people from coming here from other places in Canada? Would you ban drivers from other provinces who don’t live here? How about tourists? Also I would like to know how you would deal with effects of a falling population level in Canada if we stopped immigration? What type of tax increases are you suggesting to make up for the lost revenue if you plan on continuing the same level of  basic civil and social services with a falling population? So far it appears to me that you are basing your platform on nothing but misguided views, no facts or evidence. I would sincerely appreciate even a short reply to any of my question.

This e-mail was sent from a contact form on A WordPress Site (http://frommmayormississauga.com)

Mr. Wilson:
From your tone, I think you’ve already made up your mind.
Traffic gridlock is a result of two factors — massive population increase (now mostly driven by immigration) and a failure to build or expand transportation infrastructure. According to stats published on-line by Peel Region, Peel will grow by 71,000 more people over the next four years.
An effective approach to traffic gridlock requires dealing with both factors. A five year moratorium on immigration — to Canada, not just Peel — would alleviate most of the anticipated growth. A massive spending commitment mostly by the Province would be needed to build the transportation network necessary just for the population already here. Other less expensive measures — synchronizing green lights on major thoroughfares, better use of the Go Trains — would provide some short term relief.
Don’t be silly. Of course, tourists and other Canadians would be free to drive to Mississauga. I am talking about population increase. We have freedom of mobility in Canada and immigrants already here and other Canadians would be free to move here.
I don’t think we can reduce the number of cars in Mississauga. We can, however,  try to stop further population and car growth here.
I have heard about the scary “falling population” bogeyman since the mid-1970s. For one thing, population will not begin to decline for another couple of decades. The key issue is jobs. today, Canada has 1.5-million people unemployed; a further 900,000, according to Statistics Canada are involuntarily in part-time jobs. Thus, we have nearly 2.5-million unemployed or underemployed Canadians.  There are not enough jobs for our existing population. Immigration simply heaps more misery on the unemployed. There are not jobs for the newcomers. Until we approach full employment — effectively a 2 per cent unemployment rate — immigration is folly. It keeps Canadians unemployed and disillusions the newcomers, many of whom cannot find the good jobs they’d hoped for.
You ask: “What type of tax increases are you suggesting to make up for the lost revenue if you plan on continuing the same level of  basic civil and social services with a falling population?” Well, first, if there is a declining population, surely there will be a declining demand for “basic civil and social services”. Sp So, where is the problem?
I have heard the ageing baby boomers and potential declining population argument since the mid-1970s. There has been no such decline. We were once told that we needed hordes of immigrants to pay for the pensions of the baby boomers. This all but admitted that CPP was a Ponzi scheme, The immigration lobby seems to have withdrawn from that blackmail argument. In the early 2000s, then Finance Minister Paul Martin put the CPP on a more actuarially  viable basis. The notion of immigrants supporting future social progrrammes is highly problematic. The vision of young, high wages immigrants paying hefty taxes to support the ageing baby boomers just doesn’t jibe with reality. Actually, the average immigrant is slightly OLDER than the average Canadian.  Immigrants age and they, too, will make increasingly demands on social services.
The fact is since the 1980s newcomers have done very poorly economically. A C.D. Howe Institute study found that newcomers were 20% more poorly off than comparably qualified Canadians five years after arrival in Canada. They face twice the rate of unemployment as Canadians (not surprising, considering our high unemployment levels). Clearly, these people will not be contributing to the tax base. A devastating 2011 study by Professor Herb  Grubel, a former Reform Party MP and economist at Simon Fraser Institute, showed that the cohort of immigrants arriving from 1984 to 2005 were an annual net $25-billion detriment to the Canadian economy. He studied the taxes at all levels the paid as against the services they used from the tax pool. In sum, they took more than $25-billion a year than they contributed.
Interestingly, if we had a moratorium on immigration, and gradually returned to full employment, young people might feel an increasing sense of optimism and confidence — as their grandparents did after World War II — and start having more babies, thus addressing the declining population fear you raise.
Paul Fromm
Candidate for Mayor

The Long Road to Hell

via Renegade Tribune

There are shortcuts to hell.  White Russia learned that the hard way in 1917 with the Bolshevik Revolution that began the Jewish Bolshevik slaughter of white Russians.  The nightmare would continue until 1953, and the death toll in terms of white Christian lives would ultimately reach at least 66 million.  White Ukrainians learned it the hard way 1932-1933, when at least 10 million of them were starved and/or frozen to death by the Bolshevik Jews in one year alone, and some estimates say as many as 14 million white, Christian Ukrainians died in that genocide.  All of it hidden from history, and all of it engineered by Jews.

When the all-out slaughter of white Russians finally ended in 1953 the Jews sort of faded into the back ground and allowed their well-trained Slavic lackeys to subjugate the Russian people to decades of jewish communism, brutality, and material barrenness, devoid of all the amenities that the white world of the west takes for granted.  The white people of Russia had been beaten and literally slaughtered into submission, and the “multicultural” Soviet state was born in conjunction with the slaughter of so many white Orthodox Christians behind the so called “Iron Curtain, and the interests of “White Russia” suddenly became “Eurasian” under the tutelage of the jews, as opposed to aligning with the interests of their racial family of whites in the west, and as it remains to this very day as they pull western Europe toward a false savior in the person of jewish sock puppet Vladimir Putin in the jewish quest to arrange a third “world war” between white brother nations in the east and the west.

Ultimately the Soviet state would “collapse,” which was essentially nothing more than a solidification of jewish control over the Russian empire once again, disguised as “western democracy.”  You know, “voting rights” and all that jive.  Russia has now arrived on the doorstep of jewish “democratic” hell.  And she has done so immediately upon emerging from the chains of the hell that is jewish communism.  And they (White Russia) took a shortcut to hell in 1917 that they have yet to emerge from even after almost 100 years.

Upon the advent of jewish Bolshevism in Russia, the nation almost immediately became such a place where the KGB or some other government entity would just go and get an individual and take them to a particular locale and simply execute them, or perhaps ship them to a Soviet gulag, in which they would shortly be worked to death.  Photos of mass graves of dead White Russians have been used for decades in the process of manufacturing the jewish Hollow Co$t, and the claim has been that those piles of dead White Russians are piles of dead jews killed by the Germans, as the claim has been in reference to the many, many photographs of piles of dead Germans killed by the Allies and their jewish masters.  That was the nightmare that white Russia lived through, and it is the nightmare that white America is being set up to live, only white America took the long road to hell.

White America’s long road to hell officially began in 1914, three years prior to the short cut taken by White Russia in 1917, with the advent of the “Federal” Reserve and the ADL.  1914 was the year the jews gained ultimate control over the monetary system of the wealthiest nation on the planet (at that time) and began to institute the mechanisms to effectively silence any talk of their crimes, either past or future, with the establishment of the jewish “ADL.”  It would be followed up by jewish control of the media and educational system in western civilization that effectively wiped even a reasonable facsimile of truth from the historical record.

And the band just played on, bringing with it the first full frontal assault on white, traditional values with the so called “Roaring Twenties,” as hedonism and over indulgence were advertised in the jewish media as “normal.”  We see the end result of this today when a whore like Miley Cyrus simulates fellatio on a rubber doll in a live “music” concert in front of our children and young adults.  This, it is said, is a sign that we are “free.”  If that is the case, “freedom” is not something I desire.

For the brainwashed and/or brain dead sheep the long road to hell was a pleasant one, even comfortable and fun.  Meanwhile they have taken your neighbor’s fully owned house and property for unpaid “property taxes” they have absolutely NO authority to levy, and your friends are being robbed of their property by government agents with guns and incarcerated with negroid simian beasts and other shit colored demons and subsequently beaten, raped, and just generally assaulted for no reason other than possession of a plant that has been “holy” to the white race since we arrived in this matrix, among a myriad of other “offences” for which white America is constantly being locked away with negroid simian beasts and other shit colored demons who are guilty of unspeakable atrocities against not only their own kind but against the non-violent, generous, and trusting white, indigenous population.  This is the long road to hell.

This is the road where White America sits broken down on the side and does nothing but watch as their family, friends, and neighbors are hauled away unlawfully and illegally.  This is the road where they sit and idly peruse the roadmap of life as they have been programmed to perceive of it, and find no reason to concern themselves with the plight of their fellow white brothers and sisters, feeling no sense of racial unity with their fellow whites, as their entire civilization and ability to survive is being methodically destroyed around them, a pace that has now quickened in intensity to satisfy all the “end time” scenarios with which the white sheep of America have been programmed.  Their bellies are full, their gas tanks are full, their kids are pacified with television and video games that brainwash them with an anti-white and anti-SELF view of the world, and in all reality they believe they have not a care in the world save being on time to punch the clock like a robot to do the job that makes all of it possible.  Life is good and Jesus loves them.  And that is all they need to know.

In the process of establishing an authoritarian system in which armed agents of the government just come into your home and take you away if it suits their fancy to do so the jews were seeking the answer to one question and one question only, and that is will White America lie down for the same treatment White Russia laid down for, and if not, just how far can they be pushed and how many of their rights can ultimately be stripped from them without resistance?  The answer to the first part of the question has been a resounding “yes” and the answer to the latter has been right over the edge and every last one of them, as long as the white sheep get to keep football, The X Factor, and all the depravity that comes with the subcultures of the jews and negroid simian beasts, both of which are ubiquitous in the media and the world of entertainment, all of which is and has been under full ownership and control of the jews for quite some time.

The long road to hell for white America involved the abandonment of all traditional values that can be considered “white” and/or “Christian” in favor of homosexuality, negro and mestizo violence, robbery, rape, mutilation, murder, and parasitism in conjunction with jewish parasitism and jewish ritual sacrifice (which alone explains the disappearance of most of the white Christian children of the world within our white nations), socialist communism, egalitarianism in the face of clear racial disparities that highlight beautifully that which is inferior, and just an all-around hedonism characterized by a lack of moral values that is perfectly embodied in the phenomenon referred to as “race mixing,” in which an intelligent, civilized, highly cultured and superior species of hominid (Whites) is destroying what has historically been viewed (with good reason) as a SACRED gene pool by breeding itself out of existence with various species of apes, another phenomenon encouraged and celebrated by the jew owned media and jew controlled government.

Renegade Tribune Editor's Note: There could be more to this piece, but I could not find a cache of Page 2..

Survive Now, Thrive Later: The Difference Between Preppers and Those Who Can See

via Stuff Black People Don't Like

Entering the ranks of Those Who Can See
If you haven't, go watch the first episode of AMC's The Walking Dead.

From the first season.

Quite possibly, it's one of the perfect episodes of television in the history of... television.

Watching any other episode is unnecessary.

Just watch this episode of the wildly popular program.

An abridged rundown of the episode: a white cop is shot, and goes into coma. He wakes up weeks later, with the hospital completely abandoned and in disarray. Blood is everywhere, as are bullet holes in the walls.

A room is sealed off, with locks: the message simply reads, "Don't Open, Dead Inside."

The rest of the episode is about the white cop, Rick Grimes, trying to acclimate himself to a post-civilization world, where the state has completely broken down and the only rule is survival.

Unlike "preppers," I do not want to merely survive; my goal is to live in a world where myself, my family, my community, and my people are allowed to thrive.

But like "preppers," I do believe we must survive what was is coming, to ensure we can thrive one day (remember, we went to the moon with the slide rule...).

Maybe not tomorrow or the next, but down the road.

Like the character of Rick Grimes in The Walking Dead, many whites will face a similar reality: waking up to a world gone mad, alone and one their own. It's a world those who can see have long inhabited.

It's why this story has me laughing hysterically. [White House says it has Ebola virus under control, The Hill, 10-3-14]:

Top White House officials on Friday worked to reassure the American public that the national response to Ebola is under control.
Leaders of the country’s health, defense and military branches stressed that they are taking the right steps to contain the spread of the deadly virus, which was first diagnosed in the U.S. on Tuesday.

“We know how to do this, and we will do it again,” Lisa Monaco, assistant to the president for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, said at a press briefing.
“It’s very important to remind the American people that U.S. has the most capable healthcare system and the most capable doctors in the world, bar none,” Monaco said.
The press conference appeared to be aimed at calming a public worried about a possible outbreak in the United States of the disease, which has killed more than 3,000 people in Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea.
The first case of Ebola in the United States was revealed this week. Fifty people who came in contact with Thomas Duncan, who traveled to the United States from Liberia, are under observation, including 10 who are considered at high risk of getting the disease.
Duncan’s entry to the United States has led to calls to cut off travel to the country from the African nations where Ebola has spread. The White House has rejected those calls, calling them counter-productive.
Two hospitals — in D.C. and Maryland — reported Friday that they were monitoring patients with Ebola-like symptoms, adding to the sense of urgency. Both cases are unconfirmed, and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) chief Sylvia Mathews Burwell said the D.C. case appeared to be “malarial” related. 
With that backdrop, the officials at the White House made the case for why the U.S. is well equipped to handle Ebola.
Monaco said the U.S. healthcare system “could not be more opposite” than those in countries most affected by Ebola.
Anthony Fauci, director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, stressed the U.S. healthcare care is “very, very, very well-established.”
While he acknowledged that the disease has spurred “a lot of fear” across the country, he reiterated that an outbreak is extremely unlikely.

Nothing is under control.

For one reason. The Liberians are here and we aren't closing our borders (in fact, President Obama has made it perfectly clear his goals are tied with turning white Americans into a disenfranchised minority in their own country).

Take a look at this breakdown on where Liberians are in America:
Liberian American organizations estimate there are between 250,000 and 500,000 Liberians living in the United States. This figure includes Liberian residents that have a temporary status, and American of Liberian descent. The metropolitan areas with the largest Liberian immigrant populations are New York and Washington, D.C.; other cities with significant numbers of Liberians include Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Houston and Fort Worth (Texas), Hartford (Connecticut), Los Angeles and Oakland (California), Miami, Minneapolis and Philadelphia. So, as states such as Rhode Island and New Jersey.

Most Liberian Americans live on the east coast of United States (New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina). So, it is thought Rhode Island (specifically Providence) is the state with the largest Liberian population in the country (about 0.4% of the city's population is of Liberian ancestry).

Specifically in the western part, most Liberian Americans living on his coast, live in California, especially in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Oakland and Stockton. In fact, the Liberian Community Foundation, in Vallejo, California, estimated that about 4,000 Liberians living in Northern California. Meanwhile, the Liberian Community Association of Southern California, estimates that another 2,000 Liberian Americans live in Southern California. Also Chicago has an important Liberian community because there is the Midwestern Consul General of the Honorary Liberian Consulate. More than 30,000 people of Liberian descent live in Minnesota.
 No, the White House, the CDC, and the federal government are lying to you. The State Department has made it a goal to ensure Liberians are spread throughout America, creating potential weaponized communities where biological agents from Liberia can spread an African disease in "our" (sic) nation.

Those Who Can See already know we live in the world Rick Grimes of The Walking Dead inherited once he woke up. Every passing moment, our ranks grow larger.

For now our job is survive.

One day, it will be to thrive.

Commending VDARE

via Radix Journal

During the trials and tribulations of the Budapest Conference, one site managed to publish up-to-date and accurate reports from the ground in Hungary. That was VDARE.

In case you didn't know, there's some differences between us and Peter Brimelow's project. We'll leave it at how Brimelow put it in his response to why they covered the NPI conference(one correction though: we don't take an editorial stance in relation to the Ukrainian conflict):
Nevertheless, the plain fact is that all of us on the Dissident Right are now NPI’s Richard B. Spencer, jailed, brutalized, deported and reportedly barred for three years from most of the European Union for…the peaceful expression of political opinion.
At VDARE.com, we are regularly urged by readers who think they live in a free society to hold conferences. (We have managed a private webinar). Well, this is the reason we have not—we have no faith that modern governments will defend our rights and enforce the equal protection of the law. We live under what the late Sam Francis called “anarcho-tyranny.”
While we may disagree on many things, we are all in the same boat and rebelling against the reigning orthodoxy. When it comes to important issues and crises--like the situation in Budapest--we are able to put aside our differences and come together for a unified cause. NPI and Radix is glad we could count on their support during this time.

VDARE and Radix will likely have professional disagreements on issues and matters going into the future--but that doesn't mean we aren't allies. We thank all of our friends and allies who gave us support during this time (especially Jared Taylor) and ensured the conference persevered in the face of incredible adversity.

Slutshaming the Outlander Whore ('Cuz Somebody's Got to)

via Alternative Right

Goodbye, loving husband, hello hunky Scotsman!
In this, his latest vlog (this time minus the "v"), Andy Nowicki discusses the disgraceful moral bankruptcy of the new chick-show Outlander, in which, following an inexplicable temporal separation, a young woman flagrantly breaks her marital vows to her loving, caring husband, but that's okay because her hubby is SOOO boring and her new lover really looks hot in a mini-kilt. 
Listen to the vlog (mlog? slog?) here, at Andy's Soundcloud page:


Also discussed: And While We Were Here, featuring a glorification of yet another faithless wife.

On Islam & Zionism

via Counter-Currents

Counter-Currents Editor’s Note: The following text is a transcript by V. S. of part of Jonathan Bowden’s interview at the Union Jack Club in London on Saturday, November 21, 2009, after his famous lecture/performance on Punch and Judy. The title is editorial.

Question: Liberals are very afraid of Islam, militant Islam. 

Jonathan Bowden: Yes, I know.

Q: Are they right to be so?

JB: Yes, they are, actually, because it’s illiberalism as a religion. I’m slightly odd, of course, because I don’t want the Islamification of Europe or of this country, but I admire Islam. I’m known to be slightly dissentient on these things. They should exist in their part of the world between Morocco and Indonesia. They have their part of the world. They basically have a sixth of the world. They should keep their bloc; they should keep the ummah; they should keep their potentialities. It’s a different way of being human.

Most Westerners can’t even understand a metaphysical objectivism which is so absolute and you’ve surrendered to the slavery of God’s love as the basis of the system. Most Westerners can’t even begin to understand what that’s about partly because they’ve drifted into such a degree of secularity, all religious ideas leave them slightly cold in present modernity, post-modernity.

Islam is a very real threat to contemporary liberalism, because they have misunderstood the nature of the multiculturalism they’re trying to bring about. One, many of the people who are flooding into the West are less liberal than the people who are here already. Two, many of them don’t like quite a bit of what they see in the West, and it’s not that they feel sorry for us. They feel that we’re a bit weak and hopeless and will be pushed aside.

Islam is a very Right-wing, if you want to use that conception, sort of system of the world. That’s why extremist Catholics converted to it after Vatican II. Some Fascists and National Socialists converted to it as well. Because it’s total and absolute.

It’s not our way. Our civilization is based upon, in my review, a reverse principle of open-mindedness and reflexiveness and the evidentialism of which Lady Renouf speaks and the Socratic tradition. I see Western civilization as primarily, but not exclusively, Greco-Roman, primarily in the discourse it uses to think about itself. We begin with the view that there are certain absolutes and certain truths, but we are slightly less certain of what they are, and we wish to test them through life, struggle, evidence, and so forth. That doesn’t mean that there are no truths. It doesn’t mean that there aren’t things that stand outside life. What’s happened is we’ve become confused about our own ideas as a civilization, and that’s made us autumnal. We’re now in danger from other groups because we’re hesitant and have lost the convictions which the West has been traditionally based upon.

Islam’s not really a threat to us, because it can’t conquer the West from inside. This is my view. It can conquer the West from outside, physically through violence, through demographic shift, through militant propagandization. But the West is based upon a contrary civilizational ethic, and therefore it can’t conquer in here. If you notice, virtually no indigenous people, apart from radical extremists and outsiders, have any interest in it at all. It doesn’t attract Westerners. It doesn’t attract the Western mind. Even people who are interested in it for reasons of religious parallelism or perennialism or discourses of that sort, deep down hardly ever convert, and if they do they convert to Sufism, the most open-minded element of it, or they move away very quickly. So, it can’t come from the inside. It can only conquer from the outside. But, of course, if people are weak and broken down and somebody’s stronger than them they can hold a gun over them. That is true.

Q: You mentioned Islam from the Maghreb to Indonesia and many Western, or so-called Western, politicians have a sort of dual loyalty to a certain country in the Middle East, which used to be called Palestine.

JB: That’s right. Yes.

Q: How would you regard the Islamic challenge to this part of the world?

JB: Well, I think on that issue from their point of view, which is not the same as our point of view . . . This is the point, you see. You can understand another’s position, but you don’t share it. Liberalism has thought about these relativities, you see. I feel your pain so much I want to stand in your place. Well, no one would really do that in relation to us. But that’s a logical position. I mean, the Islamic condemnation and/or the Arab nationalist and sort of persons of color attitudes towards Israel is completely legitimate, because it’s a terrorist state which has seized Palestinian land and held it by force.

It’s not totally our problem, but we will always be dragged into it by virtue of the power that group has and manifests in the United States and the fact that Britain is beholden to the United States to such a degree. Michael Portillo virtually said in the 1990s when he was Defence Minister under the Tories, “We have no foreign policy. It’s dictated to us by the United States.” This means we are drawn endlessly into their firefights and their micro-wars and their micro-just-about-to-go-major wars in the Middle East and further afield, all of which, in an attenuated way, are done in order to make that state safe.

However, that state is armed with nuclear weapons and is determined to tough it out and fight it out if there’s no other option. So, it’s a very difficult proposition, and the trouble is that liberals have made a mess of things. They have mixed everything together. There could be a benign outcome, there could be a middling and confused outcome, and there could be a terrible outcome for many, many people as yet unborn. And we don’t really know.

Don’t forget, when Obama came to power, the CIA–who got many, many things wrong including weapons of mass destruction in the destroyed country of Iraq, but then again they may have known that these theses were incorrect from the very beginning–told Obama that there would be a nuclear war, that means a nuclear exchange, in the Middle East in the next 25 years. And they don’t get everything wrong, because they predicted the war between Georgia and the new Russia under Putin and Medvedev a year before it happened. Now, it’s only an intelligence report, and they produce these reports all the time. Russia had a war game recently in which Poland and the Czech Republic were annihilated. So, governments and states do these things all the time. But there is a real civilizational flashpoint there, a tectonic plate flashpoint between the peoples and cultures of the world, and Israel is there forcing, forcing, forcing the flashpoint as a charger.

My view is that the West should decouple from Israel. They have their own destiny. They should do what they want. My view, ultimately, is the view of Islamic radicals in reverse. That they leave the West, that they build Islam in the ummah. But there’s a price to pay there for us and that is that we leave the Middle East, we leave trying to meddle, we leave trying to seize their oil, we leave intervening in their countries, we leave overthrowing groups in their countries that we don’t like. It’s not our business. We’re in a post-imperial world now.

And we throw Israel over, and we say that Israel is not our concern. People will put it in different ways and people will say they’re not really anti- but they wish to be neutral and so on, but the consequence is the same. We move back and there’s a separation.

Deep down, many Muslims want a separation. They want a world of blocs, because they sort of realize that they might conquer the West in certain demographic terms, although many worry that Muslims will secularize under Western influence. Western ideological power is very severe, and the West is very weak but incredibly highly armed. Bush took down Saddam’s regime in 10 days, and it was one of the most ferocious governments in the Third World. Never forget the power the West can unleash. Leaders even like Nick Griffin are not liberals. If they had power they would use it in certain circumstances.

Blair once said that we are going to war in relation to Iraq and these other matters because if we don’t, and we don’t protect Western societies even in their present constitutedness, others will come behind us who do not share our values, and they will do it for the masses. He’s talking about what he would call non-humanist forms of opinion, by which he means certain well-known political tendencies, about which liberals think all the time. They never stop thinking about these tendencies, because they are their inverse, you see.

Q: Do you think there will be a war with Iran? Israel–Iran? America–Iran?

JB: One doesn’t know. It’s difficult to predict. There are tendencies both ways. I think if there was going to be a really devastating first strike it would have happened under Bush. Ashkenazi lobbies in the United States never trusted Obama, don’t really want it, didn’t really want him to be president, wanted Hillary Clinton to be president. She was really their candidate. She promised a devastating attack upon Iran if Israel ever experienced a first strike.

Iran is still quite a way off a nuclear weapon. My understanding is they’ve hidden their nuclear sites in 56 or 57 places. Many of them are under schools; many of them are under hospitals; many of them are under mountains. My view is that they will probably be able to develop fissionable material for a warhead each year from now on, but Mossad is said to believe they won’t be able to weaponize it until at least 2015. That’s a window of 5 to 6 years.

One doesn’t know. If Israel is to hit them, they will have to refuel in the air. They will not take the risk of their pilots having to bail out across the Middle East where they will be hunted down and killed by whatever Arab country they come down over. America will have to refuel them, which means we’ll have to basically allow the strike to take place. Russia has sold Iran a lot of very advanced kit, which they can use to hit the Israelis if they attack them in the air. Iran is basically on the cusp of developing a large number of missiles that can hit all the American bases in Iraq and in Afghanistan. If Iran orders the Shia to rise against the American forces inside Iraq there will be utter chaos, and the Shia are loyal to them, not to anyone else.

Americans have achieved the exact opposite of what they wanted in the Iraqi adventure. They’ve extended the Shia caliphate from Tehran to the borders of Israel, and that’s exactly the reverse of what they wanted. Yet another example of people get the worst of what they want.

What we have to do is try to decouple ourselves from Third World revenges, particularly against this state in the Middle East, that don’t really concern us and that we could be dragged down into the welter and tail-end of in a way that’s totally counter-propositional and not really in our interests at all.

Q: So, if we decouple ourselves from Israel how will the very influential Jewish minority in Britain . . .

JB: Particularly in the United States. Well, they’ll go berserk and they’ll start screaming and screaming and screaming. You’ll just have to face that screaming down. I believe you adopt the following proposition: that no one is physically harmed, but the West has certain specific interests which are its and with which it must align with if it is to survive.

I take the example of the Mel Gibson film. I’m not a Catholic. I’m not a Christian. When Gibson, who is a Hollywood star admittedly, the son of Australia’s most controversial man, he’s a combination of the Pope and Colin Jordan as was, produces a film and everyone in American mass media screams and screams and screams for months. And yet it’s on at every multiplex, he gets it distributed by Disney affiliates and by Icon Films; it’s on every bus shelter kiosk; it’s in every WHSmith’s; it’s on Amazon; it’s on the side of billboards. It’s now grossed 500 million dollars. It’s the ninth most successful film in world cinematographical history.

So, what do we think of that? In the end, he’s just stood up to a lobby and stood up to its screaming, and he stood up to its abuse, and he’s faced it down. He’s still alive and he’s made other films, one film anyway, and he’s gone on. In a way, you have to sort of take the screaming and fight the cultural war. But many people find it very, very difficult not because they’re so frightened that when somebody waves their fist at them they won’t do anything. It’s a moral fear.

Again, it’s to return to what we began with in our little question and answer session here tonight, and that is ethical issues. I think that everything that is wrong with the West isn’t structural, isn’t socio-economic. These are the epiphenomena and the symptoms of the decline. The decline is inside, and the decline is mental. Only when the mental processes change all the physical outside phenomena can naturally be reorganized. Not easily, it will be very difficult, but when the mentality is different everything else changes. What you see around you is the expression of the mentality, not the reverse.

The real question you always have to ask is why have Westerners got so slothful about their self-regard and why do they believe in ideas which could be sleepwalking towards the near extinction of their kind, their culture, their civilization? No one knows how it will work out, because no one ever does. But why are they so asleep in relation to the processes which are occurring? But the truth is they aren’t asleep, because they talk about these things often in a silly and attenuated way all the time.

Q: Someone likened the inherent existence of the Jews as a race to the giant panda as a species. The giant panda is often referred to by naturalists as a species already on the brink of extinction via natural processes and that the giant panda’s continued existence may only be attributable to external intervention. Do you agree with this view and, if so, to what extent?

JB: Yes, I haven’t had it put like that. Many Jewish leaders, of course, are deeply worried by the processes of assimilation, nice humanism, and integration that are eating into them. The Jewish census says that 3,000 Jews cease to be Jews in a self-definitional way every year within Britain. Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, who is the leader of that community in a titular way and is a conservative man really, believes that they are being assimilated to the point of semi-destruction, and there’s a streak of truth to that.

But of course you cannot proselytize a liberal humanism, particularly from the reform Jewry’s perspective, for decades and not expect it to boomerang and come back on you. Many people aren’t vanguardists. You know, most people just want an easy life based on commerce and family, and any chance to deconstruct they’ll take it. So, if you advocate the deconstruction of groups it will reverberate and come back on you.

No group can escape the logic of part of its own thinking. Particularly, you cannot say in this world, “What I want for others is not what I want for my own group” if you’re spreading a universal message. If you’re a tribalist, which is philosophically a nominalist, you can talk in specific group-based terms. But not if you want the whole of the rest of the world to be different from the way that you are. You would just join the rest. And the gentilization of many Jews is well underway in Western Europe, so much so that Israel is too much of an indentification. Many of them do not want to go fight for that country, do they? They want to stay here in the West.

Report from Budapest: A Full Report on the 'Forbidden' NPI Conference

via American Renaissance

Jared Taylor speaking to the press outside the
restaurant. He asked the cameras not to show his
face for fear he would later be recognized and arrested
It was a bold idea from the beginning. The National Policy Institute (NPI), an American organization, was to hold a conference in Budapest on “The Future of Europe.” In addition to well-known identitarians such as Philippe Vardon of France, Markus Willinger of Germany, and myself, the controversial Russian academic Alexander Dugin, was to take part. Hungary’s Jobbik party would provide essential support on the ground, and one of its elected representatives was to address the meeting.

However, about two weeks before the conference, Prime Minister Victor Orban came under pressure from the Hungarian Socialist Party and condemned the conference. His statement mentioned Prof. Dugin by name, and characterized NPI as a “xenophobic and exclusionary” organization. Those of us scheduled to take part began to worry that pressure would build on the Larus Event Center to cancel its contract to host the conference.

Things got worse. A little more than a week before the conference, the Interior Ministry issued a statement forbidding the meeting, and warning that all speakers would be stopped at the border or deported if found within Hungary. Again, Prof. Dugin was cited as a particularly offensive speaker, but others were cited as “racists” who might violate the Hungarian fundamental law that forbids “violating the human dignity of others.”

I arrived on September 29, the Monday before the weekend of the conference, and had no trouble with border control. Others were not so lucky. William Regnery, the NPI board chairman, was scheduled to fly in for a Tuesday meeting with the general manager of the Novotel City Center hotel, where a number of conference events were planned. Mr. Regnery had asked me to attend the meeting with him, but when I got to the hotel, I was dismayed to learn that Mr. Regnery had not arrived. The hotel manager confirmed that the Larus Center had canceled its contract. He also said that many people attending the conference were booked at the hotel and that since the meeting was now forbidden, he had to make a decision about whether to hold the rooms.
Later that day I later learned that Mr. Regnery had been stopped at the Hungarian border by the police, put in a detention cell overnight, and deported to London. That same day, the hotel manager unilaterally canceled all the room reservations and planned events.

Likewise on Tuesday, I was shocked to learn that Jobbik support had completely melted away, and that no one was looking for an alternate venue. I knew that Jobbik representative Marton Gyongyosi, who had been scheduled to speak, had withdrawn, accusing the organizers of “racism,” but I assumed we still had some local Hungarian support. I was wrong. We had no one. Mr. Regnery telephoned from London and asked me to find a suitable venue. We were also in contact with Richard Spencer, the director of NPI, who asked me to find a private room in a restaurant for a dinner–for an estimated 70 people.

The forbidden conference was now big news. The press was full of stories about Russian extremists and American “racists” about to converge in Budapest. I was afraid it would arouse suspicions if an American phoned up restaurants trying to book a last-minute dinner for 70. I decided to wait until the next day, when I knew a Hungarian-American would be arriving, who could make calls in Hungarian.

We finally got to work on Wednesday, and found a charming, traditional restaurant that was willing to serve as many as 100 people in a private room. We took a taxi to the restaurant, worked up a menu, and made a down payment. We had a venue!–so long as we could keep it secret. We scouted the neighborhood and established a redirection point nearby so that we could tell people to meet there and be taken to the restaurant rather than reveal its name and address in advance. Mr. Spencer was thus able to send e-mail messages to everyone registered for the conference, telling them that the event was still on, and that they were to meet Saturday evening at the redirection point.

Mr. Spencer was to arrive the next day, and we were all worried he would get the same treatment as Mr. Regnery, but he slipped across the Austrian-Hungarian border by train without attracting attention. He gave a number of interviews to the press, and he and I met Thursday evening to toast to the success of the conference.

Disaster struck the next day. Mr. Spencer had sent a message to a number of supporters inviting them to meet him informally at the Clock Café in Budapest that evening. Late that night, an estimated 40 police officers descended on the café and locked it down for two hours, while they asked for identification papers and grilled people.

Some 20 people who did not have papers were taken outside for interrogation. Mr. Spencer, who did not have his passport with him, was arrested and asked police to let everyone else go. He was detained along with French-American journalist James Willy, whom the authorities appear to have thought had some role in organizing the conference. We have since heard from Mr. Spencer that he is safe and unhurt, but is likely to be in detention until Monday, when he will be deported. Fortunately, I was not at that gathering; otherwise, I suspect I would be sharing a cell with Mr. Spencer.

The arrest was a terrible blow. We don’t know how the police knew to go to the Clock Café, so we didn’t know how much our security was breached. I felt sure the police did not know about the restaurant, but did they know about the redirection point? This was a forbidden meeting. Would they arrest everyone who showed up?

Mr. Regnery had planned to come back to Hungary at the last minute for the dinner but after Mr. Spencer’s arrest, he decided that would be foolish. On Saturday morning we consulted by phone and had to make some hard decisions. Cancel for fear the police would break up the meeting? Tell only trusted people the name of the restaurant and tell everyone else the dinner was off?

I met with a trusted associate of Richard Spencer. We looked over the list of 65 or so people who said they planned to come to the redirection point and recognized only about 20 names. It didn’t make sense to have a small dinner for people we already knew. We sent them a message with the name and address of the restaurant, but told everyone else to go to the redirection point. I went directly to the restaurant, and another man went to the redirection point early, to keep an eye out for the police. If there were no police, he was to bring people to the restaurant. How much did the police know? I packed a change of clothes and a toothbrush in my briefcase in case I had to spend a night in a cell.

As it happened, there were no police at the redirection point, and people were skillfully in groups to the restaurant. Before long, we had 76 people in all–more than half the original number of registrants–including guests from Sweden, Germany, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Denmark, Switzerland, Australia, Slovakia, Britain, Ireland, Croatia, the United States, Spain, Canada, Russia, and even Mexico and Japan. To my disappointment there was only one Hungarian. He explained that the conference had been virtually unknown in Hungary until the scandal broke, and that a few others who had registered dropped out when the police prohibited the meeting.

We admitted three journalists who had been cleared in advance by Mr. Spencer, but kept out half a dozen more who showed up but had not been cleared. I stepped outside and answered their questions for 20 minutes, but decided not to let them cover the event.

Back at the restaurant, I welcomed everyone in the name of NPI. After an excellent dinner, I apologized for the thin program–only two scheduled speakers–but pointed out that speakers had been expressly forbidden to enter the country.

I explained that at least two other speakers had been directly intimidated. The Hungarian government had prevailed on the French to send the police to tell Philippe Vardon that since he was a “notorious racial activist” he was unwelcome in Hungary and would arrested if he tried to come. The Russian police told Alexander Dugin the same thing: He would be expelled immediately if he tried to come to Hungary.

I then introduced the only other scheduled speaker who was able to attend: the author and academic, Tom Sunic. Mr. Sunic lives in neighboring Croatia, and took real risks to come to Budapest. Croatia is not in the free-travel Schengen area of the European Union, and there was a good chance he would be turned back or even detained at passport control. It would be a considerable professional liability to have been officially rejected as an undesirable by a neighboring country.

Mr. Sunic spoke on the failure of the European Union. He pointed out that it was originally established as an economic community, and criticized the role of capitalism in dissolving ethnic and racial bonds: “Merchants have no country.” He spoke of the guilt that seems to be part of Catholicism and that causes Europeans to welcome Third-World immigration. Mr. Sunic urged all Europeans to rise above old antagonisms left over from past conflicts and to embrace a larger destiny. He stressed the dangers of petty nationalism that resulted in the terrible bloodshed in his own country, the former Yugoslavia, and concluded with a rousing call for all Europeans to work together to preserve their common culture and heritage.

My talk (full transcript here) was called “Towards a World Brotherhood of Europeans.” I argued out that it is not only on the continent of Europe that we find Europe but in all those places overseas where Europeans have built new societies. I said that I speak for many Canadians, New Zealanders, Australians, and Afrikaners when I call myself a European and refer to Europe as my spiritual and cultural homeland. I said that only Europeans–white people–could defend Europe and carry its heritage forward in a meaningful way, and that our people and civilization are under threat everywhere. I argued that the genetic and cultural effect of alien immigration is no different from armed invasion, and concluded that although the crisis is not sharp, nor the lines so clearly drawn, the struggle of our generation to defend Europe is no different from Marathon, Poitiers, the Siege of Vienna, and the Battle of Blood River.

We had booked the restaurant from 6:00 to 11:00 p.m., and the crowd was thick and exuberant until 11:30 when the management politely sent us out the door to catch the last subway trains home. Late that night I sent out a message to all conference registrants, announcing a 2:00 p.m. gathering on Sunday at the Heroes’ Square, where our European brethren planned to gather and continue informal fellowship.

We did our best despite the outrageous behavior of the Hungarian authorities. We suspect that after the press reports on the meeting are published, the government will have even more reason to be ashamed of their heavy-handed behavior.

We look forward to future meetings under friendlier circumstances.