Dec 2, 2014

About ‘Santa Claus’ & the Yule Tide

via Thulean Perspective

Halloween; hallow evening, is the evening when the hallowing (initiation) of the children starts! In the Pagan world, the children were not seen as real human beings until they had gone through this ritual. They were not even given a proper name before that! In order to become a real (hu-) man each child had to go trough this scary, dangerous and difficult ritual. They had to overcome their fear of the dark, or the bear, of the dead and of the unknown – and they had to fend for themselves for a long time too. 

The ritual started with their descent into the underworld, into the realm of the dead; usually a cave, or a hollow tree or (later) a burial mound. There they would find the remains of the dead person whom they wanted to take the name from; the dead person whom they wanted to become themselves. 

They chose themselves whom they were to become, and naturally only the honourable were chosen for rebirth. The more honourable, the more posthumous fame a person had, the more likely he was to be chosen. Later men brought with them their riches into their graves too, not just their names, to make sure they would enjoy these in the next life too (or perhaps to increase their chances to be chosen for rebirth…). And yes; the children went into the graves, and found these valuables, and brought them out into the world of the living. They gave them to the sorcerer, and thus showed him whom they wanted to be reborn as. 

This was only the beginning of the initiation though, so the sorcerer kept the valuables, for safe keeping, all the way until the Yule evening – when TîwaR (Týr), the honourable, is (re-) born! 

Between Halloween and the Yule eve the children went through many trials, that I will not discuss here, and then on the Yule eve the successful ones returned to their families – in the night, guided by the sorcerer. Thus the ‘elves’, i. e. the spirits of the honourable dead, visited on the Yule night. Naturally, the children were often very hungry, after living alone for so long, so their parents placed food to them in the living room on the Yule eve: a big bowl of porridge, perhaps? Later, after the Christianization, this was too Pagan for those in power, and the Pagans (i. e. the people…) had to move this feeding of the returning dead, of the small ‘goblins’ (as these children were called by the Christians), to the barn. Finally, the children were reborn, as the individuals they had chosen from the grave. The sorcerer then gave them the valuables they had collected from the graves; because the children were now reborn as the dead persons in the grave, and these items were theirs. So they just got back what they had brought with them to the grave from the last life. 

Not all the children made it though, they were not ‘good’ enough, and thus perished before the Yule night came, and the ‘bad’ children were instead just given ashes from the grave. They remained children, and had to try to gain a name for themselves again the next Halloween. The sorcerer then returned the items of the dead that had not yet been reborn to the grave; or rather he just left the items in the grave opening. 

The children who made it were given a name, a real name, and thus they travelled from farm to farm, to greet their family members and neighbours, and to introduce themselves with their new names. Thus we call this custom for ‘julebukk’ (Yule-bow); they bowed politely when they introduced themselves, after they had been (re-) born on the Yule eve. 

More about this can be found in my book Sorcery and Religion in Ancient Scandinavia, and actually much more in MYFAROG, but my main purpose to bring this topic up now is that we are getting nearer the Yule eve, and as we know; every single year we hear the nonsense of the Christians and the Atheists and others too, about the Yule celebration, about why we have a ‘Santa Claus’ about why ‘good’ children receive gifts, about goblins eating porridge in the barn and you-name-it. Their ignorance is extreme, their will to spread lies even more extreme, and I think it is worthwhile to write a little bit about this here, to show you what this tradition really is all about. 

My wife will with time explain even more about this on her YouTube channel, and will go in even more detail than I do in MYFAROG, and will go even further back in time than I have done in any of my writings. So I advice you to subscribe to her channel, and wait for more. 

We can fight the enemies of our culture and traditions with all sorts of means, but I think the best means is to simply show people the obvious truth, and thus banish their darkness with light.

New ALTERNATIVE RIGHT: Flying High on Cheap Fuel

via Alternative Right

Up, and away!
As we enter the "holiday corridor" which marks the end of the year, a word of thanks is due to all of our faithful readers, both friendly and otherwise. Our year started off a bit bumpy at the time of our 2014 takeoff, but things smoothed out in no time, and we finally began to coast on a bracing tailwind which took us high into the stratosphere of success.
As your dapper and dutiful pilots on this journey, who also double as flight attendants (since our budget is very tight), we look forward to "serving" you with a great deal more provocative and enticing material in 2015. We are grateful to everyone who has chosen to come aboard. If you happen to have any shekels to shuffle into the collection box during the in-flight movie, we would of course be graciously accepting of your generosity. (Here the speakers rub their hands together with a deeply unseemly, sneaky, Satanic sneer, one which looks oddly familiar...)
Portrait of Andy and Colin as they contemplate taking your money
In any case, even if you have no spare shekels whatsoever (here the speakers parenthetically shake their fists and subliminally add, " You cheap, tight fisted Schlomo schlemiels!!!!!"),  please keep you seat belts fastened, as you never know when we might hit another patch of turbulence. And thanks for continuing to fly with us!
                                                                              –Your co-pilots, Colin and Andy

If you're no Schlomo, please click on the button on the top right corner of the page to contribute your fortune to our shared cause!

Golden Dawn Will not Be Intimidated by Zionist-Sponsored, State-Run Terrorism

via Golden Dawn, New York

A failed terrorist attack was uncovered recently at the local Golden Dawn office in Perama, a port suburb of the city of Piraeus. A backpack filled with an explosive device was discovered outside the office, however the firing mechanism failed to ignite the bomb, ensuring no damage or injuries in the densely populated area.

This planned act of terrorism is obviously indicative of the works of the criminal leftists, who act as proxies for corrupt regime. This failed terrorist attack is just further proof of how spineless and evil the leftists truly are, as the local area where the bomb was planted is a highly active area, where numerous locals, workers, and other civilians frequent. Ask yourself this -how would these leftists terrorist feel if an innocent child was nearby at the time of explosion? Probably the same lack of feeling they experienced when they murdered the innocent pregnant woman who worked as a bank teller during their primitive riots and arson attacks.

Golden Dawn continues to stand tall against all odds – countless attacks, unconstitutional arrests, and even gutless murders have proven unsuccessful in stopping the rise of the Nationalists in Greece. The efforts of the terrorist forces against only further strengthen our will to claim victory.

In response to the cowardly planned attack, Golden Dawn announced a protest to show that we will not be shaken by terrorism. Hundreds of Golden Dawn supporters and dozens of senior members gathered at the local office in Perama. The message was loud and clear; Golden Dawn is here! Terrorist attacks will not scare us, we are here to stay. Neither bullets or prisons will stop us, nothing will stand in our way.

Blacks in St. Louis 'Avenge' Mike Brown, Kill White Immigrant -- Media Silent

via Stuff Black People Don't Like

It was a slap in the face when black members of the Washington Redskins raised their hands in solidarity with the spirit of Michael Brown in mid-August; it was an outright declaration of war when black members of the St. Louis Rams decided to embark in keeping alive the fictional myth of the Gentle Giant on November 30th, when they too raised their hands in solidarity.

A number of rappers joined forces to rhyme the Michael Brown-inspired "Don't Shoot" (the forensic evidence showing Brown tried to steal Officer Darren Wilson's gun obviously inadmissible in the court of black logic/opinion).

Black public school students in metropolitan St. Louis have been fed a constant diet of "white police are out to get you" and "white racism" is behind your pitiful existence. Clergy United for Peace has been conducting workshops in public schools on how black students should deal with the situation in Ferguson, "urge[ing] the teenagers to express themselves in a nonviolent way if the grand jury chooses not to indict Wilson.

(Rev. Robert) White advised them to “get mad, just don’t seem it.” [Clergy reach out to wary high school students in wake of Brown shooting, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 11-14-14]:
The question has become a common one posed to black high school students when the shooting death of Michael Brown is discussed. But the responses aren’t always as predictable.
“How many of you had that thought it could have been me?” said the Rev. Robert White, a St. Louis pastor, to nearly 50 students in the library of East St. Louis High School Thursday.
About 30 hands shot up.
“That’s interesting,” White said. “I see females with their hands up.”
“Tell me,” he said to a girl at a front table. “Why are you saying that could have been you?”
“Because I’m black,” Monecia Hudson, a junior, told him. “It really doesn’t make a difference what gender you are. Police — they don’t care who you are. If they feel you’re doing something wrong they’re going to do whatever they feel.”
In high schools across the St. Louis area — particularly at those with high percentages of African-American students — conversations like this one are exposing levels of vulnerability that black students are feeling three months after Brown’s shooting.
Pastors and educators are concerned. White and other members of Clergy United for Peace, which formed after Brown’s shooting, are going into schools to help educate students about the legal process, including the role of a grand jury. They want young people to talk openly about their fears, frustrations and other feelings, but also be fully aware of the law.
“How many of you think Darren Wilson should be indicted?” asked the Rev. Michael Robinson.
About half the hands went up. Several said they weren’t sure.
One East St. Louis student asked why a police officer would shoot someone repeatedly. Another asked why police Officer Darren Wilson hasn’t been arrested.
Officer Darren Wilson wasn't arrested, nor charged with any crime by the grand jury because he did nothing in confronting Michael Brown or subduing the charging, attacking, violent Gentle Giant.

But as this article makes clear, Clergy United for Peace was going around metropolitan St. Louis public schools (particularly those with high black populations) basically telling them they could be next in joining Michael Brown in the afterlife, courtesy of a trigger-happy, racist white cop.

Which brings us to the story of the young blacks wielding hammers mob in St. Louis and their fatal encounter with a white man who just happened to be a Bosnian immigrant. [Fatal hammer attack on Bosnian immigrant not racially motivated, St. Louis police say, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 12-1-14]:
A 17-year-old St. Louis man has been charged with first-degree murder and armed criminal action in the bludgeoning death of a Bosnian immigrant.
Police say Robert Mitchell along with two other teens, both juveniles, attacked the 32-year-old man with hammers early Sunday. He was pronounced dead at a hospital. Mitchell and one of the juveniles are black and the other teen is Hispanic, according to police.
A police spokeswoman said investigators do not believe race played a role in the bludgeoning death of a Bosnian immigrant early Sunday, but declined to say what authorities believe is the motive in the killing.
Many at the scene of the murder near Gravois Avenue and Itaska Street speculated that the four men who beat Zemir Begic, 32, to death with hammers targeted him because of his Bosnian descent.
But detectives do not believe Begic’s Bosnian heritage or the color of his skin served as a motive in any way, police spokeswoman Schron Jackson said.
Witnesses told police that the victim and the suspect exchanged some words as Begic was walking past them on the way to his car, Jackson said.
Someone then hit Begic’s car with something or kicked it, and Begic stopped his car, got out and exchanged words with the suspects once more. That’s when he was attacked, Jackson said.
“We think it was wrong place, wrong time,” Jackson said.
Homicide detectives do not believe the suspects took anything from the victim during the attack.
Jackson said Chief Sam Dotson noted that none of the suspects appear to have anything in their criminal backgrounds to suggest they would do something of this magnitude.
Dotson said more than one hammer was used in the killing, but he would not say how many.
Police arrested two suspects, ages 15 and 16 Sunday. Mitchell turned himself in to police Sunday night. Detectives believe they know who the fourth suspect is, but have not yet made an arrest, Jackson said.
"We think it was wrong place, wrong time..."

A possible explanation for the Darren Wilson/Michael Brown encounter; an implausible explanation for a black/brown coalition - injected with lethal doses of "the white man is keeping me down" pep talks from organization like the Clergy United for Peace - encountering a white man and beating him to death as they randomly carried hammers.

They were actively seeking the right place and right time to exact racial revenge for Michael Brown.

And they got racial revenge on Zemir Begic, a man they didn't know was Bosnian, but soon introduced their hammers to because he was white. As Bob McCarty reports
Conversely, a video shot by a resident of South St. Louis’ Bevo Mill neighborhood reveals heretofore-unpublished details about what happened near the intersection of Gravois Avenue and Itaska Street before the attack that left Zemir Begic, 32, dead.
At the 45-second mark, the woman who recorded the video — whose name I will not share for reasons of her personal safety — says, “And, of course, it’s a white kid, right after black people running up and down the street saying, ‘Eff the white people, kill the white people.’ This is what we have.”
Thanks President Obama and Attorney General Holder; thanks Washington Redskins and St. Louis Rams; thanks Clergy United for Peace; thanks CNN, MSNBC, and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch for peddling lie after lie after lie in an effort to turn an 18-year-old Swisher Sweet liberating thug into the second coming of Jesus Christ.

Zemir Begic represents the consequences of persisting in living by lies and disseminating a false narrative surrounding the life of anything-but-angelic Michael Brown.

His death, at the hands of black (and a brown) youths, is an indication we are witnessing the Birth of a New Nation; one conceived in the notion Django Unchained offers a worthy glimpse in how one must deal with the white man.

To Learn Who Rules over You . . .

via British National Party

Amazing to think that those who incessantly preach tolerance can vilify a young, black lad for such a relatively innocuous, humorous comment.

As the article in the Telegraph reminds us, the same treatment was dished out to the highly-respected Wigan chairman Dave Whelan a couple of weeks ago.

The fact of the matter is that black people do have considerable athletic prowess and Jewish people are particularly clever with money.

Everybody knows that, what a shame it is that we can't live in a mature and stable enough society where people are free to laugh without incurring the wrath of the Race Inspectorate.
I thought we were supposed to be the fascists?

Arab Subversion and Al Jazeera

via Occident Invicta

Throughout the duration of my blogging, I have frequently relied on Al Jazeera America to inform my various posts. While I use Al Jazeera for news, I make even greater use of their editorial page, as it serves as a treasure trove of leftist thinking for me to deconstruct. However, I’ve always wondered why it is that a news publication funded by the ruling family of a Gulf Arab state such as Qatar espouses such radical and progressive politics. After all, Qatar (along with other Gulf Arab states) is not exactly renowned for its progressive record on political freedom, protections for minorities, or workers’ rights. I don’t think I even need to provide a link to an article to support such a claim, as the blatant chauvinism and shameless greed of Gulf Arabs speak for themselves. Dota certainly has more than a few stories to tell about the value system of Gulf Arabs.

However, perhaps my initial skepticism was unfounded. Maybe Al Jazeera was one of those rare progressive non-Western entities that challenges its own society and culture in the same way that they deconstruct and pathologize the West. Therefore, when I saw an editorial that discussed changes in Qatar’s foreign policy, I had some hope. The time had come for Qatar to receive the same critical treatment so often dished out to the West. Of course, I wasn’t too surprised to discover that the editorial was little more than a paean to the humane, just, and amazing foreign policy of Qatar. At that point, I decided that I had had enough with the hypocritical, selective progressivism of Al Jazeera’s editorial page. Therefore, I left an initial comment poking holes in the absurdity of the usual disclaimer that the views of editorial writers do not reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy:
“Oh really?
I must say, I am shocked that a paean to Qatar would appear in no less than Al Jazeera, which conveniently happens to be owned by the ruling family of Qatar.
I guess Al Jazeera’s leftist editorials that consistently pathologize and critique Western societies are consistent with the progressive values of Qatar, bastion of human and workers’ rights that it is.
What a joke.”
Indeed, I find it highly laughable that the rulers of Qatar who fund Al Jazeera genuinely embrace universalist progressive values. I’m also fairly certain that they wouldn’t tolerate having the Arab Muslim character of Qatar pathologized or deconstructed in anti-Western fashion. One of the commenters even suggested that the U.S. should undermine Qatar from within in a similar manner to Al Jazeera’s ideological critiques of America. Here’s what I had to say in response:
“It would be like if wealthy conservative Christians in the U.S. funded a publication that consistently ran editorials by far-left Arabs and others that critiqued and deconstructed Arab culture, Islam, and unrelentingly criticized various Gulf Arab monarchies.
Something tells me that that the intrepid seekers of truth at Al Jazeera would not be too amused.”
Just like many Jewish activists, the Arabs in charge of Al Jazeera only embrace left-wing thought when it serves their own interests, and primarily deploy progressivism as an ideological tool against the white West. While they embrace editorials from a variety of leftists that offer strong critiques of white Western culture, they exempt their own society and culture from such scathing criticism. Such hypocrisy from Arab Muslim nationalists, moderate or otherwise, is not the sole domain of Al Jazeera. In his excellent book From Plato to Nato, David Gress perfectly describes the duplicity of Islamic revivalists and reformists, which is essentially similar to Al Jazeeras:
“The revivalists emphatically rejected “modernism” as applied to Islam, but for the same reasons they welcomed postmodernism in a particular sense. Islamic revivalists wanted Western postmodernism if it weakened the West, made Westerners feel insecure and guilty, and made it easier to enforce claims for political and economic concessions on the West. They absolutely did not want postmodernism if it meant that they themselves should question their own morality, their own Grand Narratives, and their own forms of knowledge. Postmodernism was fine, in their view, if it helped to undermine a Western culture that was anyway, in their opinion, immoral and heretical; as a general attitude of skepticism and epistemological doubt applied to any system of universal belief and morals, it was not…The Islamic revivalist insisted that the West be relativist but that his own religious knowledge remain exempt from postmodern deconstruction.”
-Pages 533-534
In Dr. Jamal Abdullah’s editorial, there does indeed seem to be a significant dearth of skepticism and epistemological doubt as applied to Qatar. While he acts as a professional cheerleader for his home team, I wouldn’t be surprised if he later wrote an editorial denouncing Western cultural imperialism, Islamophobia, and various other real or imagined Western sins.

As I pointed out in a recent post, I sincerely believe that it is only whites who are foolish enough to embrace leftist beliefs. The Arabs of Qatar, like virtually all non-Western peoples, embrace nationalism and some measure of chauvinism. They would never embrace progressivism if it meant compromising the various comforts and advantages they enjoy within Qatar. Therefore, don’t expect any editorials denouncing “Gulf Arab privilege” to appear in Al Jazeera anytime soon.

Given the platform enjoyed by Al Jazeera and the millions of people that their writing and broadcasts reach, I deem it necessary to expose their hypocrisy and warn my fellow white people not to be fooled by their progressive posturing. The time has at last come to deconstruct these professional deconstructors.

Guilty as Charged: A Police Officer's Perspective on Ferguson

via Radix Journal

The grand jury in St. Louis announced its decision Monday, November 24 to an eagerly awaiting public on whether to indict White police officer Darren Wilson on charges of wrongfully killing Black teenager Michael Brown. Many of those waiting simply wanted the moment to pass, as the sooner the inevitable destruction began in its wake, the sooner it, too, would pass. Sweet normalcy would return in its stead.

And why shouldn’t it? The facts were clearly on the officer’s side. Michael Brown, high on marijuana in addition to the adrenaline from strong-arm robbery of a convenience store, had been walking down the middle of the street with his accomplice in a classic show of bravado when Officer Wilson approached and told him to get out of the street and on the sidewalk. When Brown refused, Wilson attempted to get out of his vehicle, and Brown attacked. The much larger Brown grabbed at Wilson’s firearm while punching the officer across the face and at some point the firearm went off. Brown began to run, and Wilson exited the vehicle to pursue on foot. When Wilson ordered him to stop, Brown turned around and rushed at the officer. Wilson did what anyone else would have done in the same situation, and fired at Brown, stopping the threat, and ending his life in the process. Everything was as it normally was: a violent robber had died while attacking a police officer.

To many throughout the institutions of the media and government, along with many Blacks, other minorities, and left-leaning Whites, things were not as they should be, but business was still as usual. The line was repeated that a White police officer had killed an unarmed teenaged Black man. The actual verdict did not need to wait on the grand jury and was apparent that day as it was published in newspapers and aired on television across the country. This verdict has little to do with the truth and everything to do with reinforcing a legend. Precious reason withers against the hot winds of identity.

Some were bracing for violence, but others waited for vindication- namely, that the system is broken and stacked against Blacks and other minorities. Few believe that Officer Wilson should be indicted, but as usual, that matters little. The day Wilson crossed Brown’s path, his life would change unalterably, regardless of the actions he took or the decision of the grand jury.

Wilson’s Lack of Options

Wilson has claimed in an interview following the grand jury decision that he just wants to live a normal life, but whether that is possible remains to be seen. Other police officers I have spoken with thought Wilson foolishly exposed himself further to civil lawsuits by speaking publicly on the shooting, and some said that the interview only makes it easier for militants to identify and harm him. I for one am glad he is defending himself. If he does not, those who would rather see him dead or in prison will have a monopoly on the microphones.

The consequence of the true verdict will be a lifetime of exile for a White man who had the audacity to defend his life from a Black thug threatening it. In all likelihood, Wilson has no real racial consciousness, let alone the racial animus commentators are fastening to him. It is very possible he notices race differences from time to time, but like other Whites who want to be good, moral people, he probably celebrates the exceptions to these differences that stand out from the mean of Black dysfunction. Like the case of George Zimmerman, however, he and others have seen that while you might not be thinking about race, race is thinking about you.

Professional death will likely accompany Wilson throughout his life. Suppose he stays on as a Ferguson police officer, what then? Every call for service Wilson would respond to and every traffic stop he initiated would focus around his infamy rather than solutions to the problem at hand. Simple domestic disturbances where no arrests would normally be made would easily explode further should Officer Wilson arrive on scene. Police officers already face targeted violence even when they are sitting down for pizza at a restaurant. Given the attitude many militants have for Wilson, how could he even take a lunch break in public again? In order to do his job, Wilson would have to be mostly out of the public eye, delving into the public only when necessary. Such a method is fit for Navy SEALS, not for police officers who are supposed to be a part of the community--or what community there is in a town like Ferguson.

It did not have to be this way. Wilson could have holstered his weapon after exiting his vehicle, and refused to shoot at Brown. Due to Brown’s lethal intent that was demonstrated when he struggled for Wilson’s firearm and the discrepancies in size between Brown and the officer, Wilson could have easily ended up on the Officer Down Memorial Page. Police recruits around the country would listen as one of them stood before the rest and read out loud the circumstances of Wilson’s death, and the academy instructor would subsequently remind the recruits that the most important thing to remember on the road is officer safety--something which Officer Wilson apparently forgot, had he holstered his weapon while facing a threat to his life. The local news would mention the incident, his body would be buried, and the world would scarcely notice the death of yet another White police officer killed by a Black thug. Few would hear his story, because we do not yet have the strength of voice to make people listen.

Or perhaps other units could have arrived in time to help Wilson in a hands-on struggle with Brown. His supervisors would wonder why he did not pull his weapon. Officers can be fired when they draw their firearm when they are not supposed to, but they are also terminated when they fail to display their weapon when the situation demands it. No matter what Wilson’s decision, there were significant consequences. The Narrative never smiles on a White man winning over a Black man, no matter the circumstances.

The New Normal

As the torched cars are towed away, the businesses rebuilt or abandoned, and the National Guard returned to its posts, Darren Wilson and the residents of Ferguson will attempt to live a normal life. A police officer killed a criminal threatening his life, race was an unimportant detail, and the world goes on as it always has--or so good White people want to believe. The problem for us is that the recurring race crises are the normal life for us now. Men standing atop cars and shouting “Burn this bitch down” isn’t normal, but in a diverse society, it is. Race is always in the equation.

Meanwhile, everyone on Brown’s side will continue to work diligently to obtain political victories from this episode. It is worth noting whenever reading coverage of the Ferguson controversy how little is often mentioned of the actual shooting by anti-White commentators. This makes sense, as the more nebulous the meaning of Brown’s death, the more flexible it will be to mold it into their message. Our enemies are not about to stop, and that is why despite the absurdity of their words, they can gain from this, and whites will continue to lose for the time being. We can continue to want safety and normalcy, or we can create our own new normal where the exile of a good man is out of the question.

Our Options

Like Darren Wilson, we face a number of choices, none of which are easy. Europeans can confront our opponents who outsize us, or we can look the other way as they own the street. We can defend ourselves and be hounded, or we can leave our fate in the hands of our enemies. Whites can seek shelter and silence, or we can unapologetically and thunderously proclaim our right to life. The truth is not enough to defend us, it needs a voice. Our voice.

Whites have the option of fulfilling small niches in increasingly diverse and atomistic countries. We could put our lives on the line in police and military forces for alien peoples that hate us, and we could serve them in business. We can seek such “normalcy.” But what is mundane is not normal for us. Living a normal and quiet life for us is far more horrifying than any riot.

“We’ve forgotten who we are: explorers, pioneers . . . not caretakers.” Europa is a race of conquerors in all fields. We shall conquer this challenge as well.

Charles de Gaulle on the Jews: 'An elite people, self-confident and dominating'

via Counter-Currents

Press conference of November 27, 1967, responding to a question on the Six Day War. 

The establishment between the two world wars, because one has to go that far back, the establishment of a Zionist home [foyer sioniste] and then, after the Second World War, the establishment of a state of Israel, raised a certain number of apprehensions. One could ask, indeed, and many Jews did ask, whether the settlement of this community on lands which had been acquired in more-or-less justifiable conditions and amidst Arab peoples who were fundamentally hostile to them, would not lead to incessant, unending frictions and conflicts. Some even feared that the Jews, until then dispersed, who had remained what they had always been, an elite people, self-confident and dominating, would not come, once they were reassembled at the site of their former greatness, to change into an ardent and conquering ambition the very touching wishes they had expressed for 19 centuries: next year in Jerusalem!

However, despite the sometimes rising, sometimes receding flow of ill-will they provoked, that they aroused [suscitaient], to be precise, in certain countries and in certain periods, a considerable capital of interest and even of sympathy had accumulated in their favor, especially, it has to be said, in Christendom; a capital which came from the immense memory of the Testament, fed by all the sources of a magnificent liturgy, maintained by the commiseration which their ancient misfortune inspired and which among us was romanticized [poétisait] by the legend of the Wandering Jew, heightened by the abominable persecutions they had suffered during the Second World War, and swelled since finding a homeland [patrie] again, by their constructive works and the courage of their soldiers. It’s why, independently of the vast support in money, influence, and propaganda that the Israelis received from the Jewish circles of America and Europe, many countries, including France, watched with satisfaction the establishment of their state on a territory which the Powers had recognized for them, at the same time desiring that they manage, using a bit of modesty, to reach with their neighbors a peaceful modus vivendi.

One has to say that these psychological facts had changed somewhat since 1956, with the Franco-British Suez expedition we saw indeed the emergence a state of Israel which was warlike and determined to expand. Then, the action it undertook to double its population through the immigration of new elements, suggested that the territory it had acquired would not be sufficient for long and that to expand it would be led to seize any opportunity which would present itself. It’s why, incidentally, the Fifth Republic extricated itself vis-à-vis Israel of the special and very close ties which the previous regime had formed with this state, and had worked on the contrary to promote a détente in the Middle East. Of course, we conserved with the Israeli government cordial relations and, even, we provided it for its eventual defense the weapons it asked to buy. But, at the same time, we advised moderation, notably on the disputes concerning the waters of the Jordan or the recurring skirmishes between the forces of the two sides. Finally, we maintained our embassy at Tel Aviv, and we refused to give our official approval to its installation in a neighborhood of Jerusalem which they had seized.

Once the Algerian affair was over, we resumed with the Arab peoples of the Orient the same policy of friendship, of cooperation which had been for centuries that of France in this part of the world and which reason and sentiment make necessary that it must be today one of the fundamental bases of our foreign policy. Of course, we let the Arabs know that, for us, the State of Israel was a fait accompli and that we would not allow it to be destroyed. Thus one could imagine that a day would come when our country would be able to directly help in the conclusion and guarantee of a peace in the Orient, so long as no new tragedy would come to break it.

Alas! The tragedy came. It was prepared by a great and constant tension which resulted from the scandalous fate of the refugees in Jordan, and also of the threat of destruction directed against Israel. On May 22, the Aqaba affair, unfortunately created by Egypt, would offer a pretext to those who dreamed of coming to blows. To avoid the hostilities, France had, as early as May 24, proposed to the other three great powers to forbid, jointly, each of the two parties from initiating combat. On June 2, the French government officially declared it could, potentially, side against [donnerait tort] whoever initiated first the action of weapons, and it is what I myself, on May 24 last, declared to Mister Eban, Foreign Minister of Israel, who I saw in Paris. “If Israel is attacked,” I told him in substance, “we would not let it be destroyed, but if you attack, we will condemn your initiative. Of course, despite the numerical inferiority of your population, given that you are much better organized, much more united, much better armed than the Arabs, I do not doubt that if need be, you would achieve military successes, but then, you would find yourself engaged on the ground and from the international point view in growing difficulties, especially as a war in the Orient could only increase in the world a deplorable tension and have very unfortunate consequences for many countries, so much so that it would be you, having become conquerors, who would be little by little blamed for the problems.”

We know that the voice of France was not heard. Israel, having attacked, has reached, in six days of fighting, the objectives it wanted to achieve. Now, it organizes on the territories which it has seized the occupation which cannot exist without oppression, repression, and expulsions, and a resistance to it is manifesting itself, which in turn it qualifies as terrorism. It is true that the two belligerents are respecting, for now, more-or-less precariously and irregularly, the ceasefire prescribed by the United Nations, but it is quite obvious that the conflict is only suspended and that there can be no solution except by the international route.

A settlement by this way, unless the United Nations were to itself tear up its own charter, must have as a basis the withdrawal from the territories that have been taken by force, the end of all belligerence, and the mutual recognition by each of the states in question by all the others. After which, by decisions of the United Nations, in presence and under the guarantee of their forces, it would probably be possible to determine the exact demarcation of their borders, the living conditions and security of both sides, the fate of the refugees and minorities, and the conditions of free navigation for all, notably in the Gulf of Aqaba and the Suez canal. In France’s view, in this eventuality, Jerusalem would need to be granted an international status. For such a settlement to be implemented, there would need to be the agreement of the great powers (which would lead ipso facto to that of the United Nations) and, if such an agreement were to see the light of day, France is already ready to lend its political, economic and military support on the ground, so that this agreement is effectively applied. But one cannot see how any agreement could be born, not fictitiously through some empty formula, but effectively through common action, so long as one of the four greats is not extricated from the odious war it is leading elsewhere. Because everything holds together in the world of today. Without the tragedy of Vietnam, the conflict between Israel and the Arabs would not have become what it is and if, tomorrow, Southeast Asia were to see the rebirth of peace, the Middle East would soon reach it again with the general détente which would follow such an event.

The Chinese Believe that Jews Control America

via The Occidental Observer

Tablet has an article reflecting Jewish angst over the possibility that the Chinese might think that Jews run America (“The Chinese Believe That the Jews Control America. Is That a Good Thing?“). Unlike in the U.S. where the ADL will threaten the livelihood of anyone who says that Jews have any power or influence, one might think that the Chinese are free to make up their own minds about the subject based on rigorous academic research. Think again.
“Do the Jews Really Control America?” asked one Chinese newsweekly headline in 2009. The factoids doled out in such articles and in books about Jews in China—for example: “The world’s wealth is in Americans’ pockets; Americans are in Jews’ pockets”—would rightly be seen to be alarming in other contexts. But in China, where Jews are widely perceived as clever and accomplished, they are meant as compliments. Scan the shelves in any bookstore in China and you are likely to find best-selling self-help books based on Jewish knowledge. Most focus on how to make cash. Titles range from 101 Money Earning Secrets From Jews’ Notebooksto Learn To Make Money With the Jews.
The Chinese recognize, and embrace, common characteristics between their culture and Jewish culture. Both races have a large diaspora spread across the globe. Both place emphasis on family, tradition, and education. Both boast civilizations that date back thousands of years. In Shanghai, I am often told with nods of approval that I must be intelligent, savvy, and quick-witted, simply because of my ethnicity. While it is true that the Chinese I’ve met are fascinated by—rather than fear—the Jews, these assertions make me deeply uncomfortable.
“Deeply uncomfortable.” The author, Clarissa Sebag-Montefiore, is proud that the Chinese understand that Jews are powerful and influential in the U.S. But she sees the situation from the standpoint of an American Jew for whom ideas that Jews have power or control are anathema because such ideas touch on major themes of historical anti-Semitism, such as media control.
Just before my visit to Nanjing, the Chinese tycoon Chen Guangbiao made international headlines by publicly announcing his ambitions to buy the New York Times and later the Wall Street Journal. In a TV interview he explainedthat he would be an ideal newspaper magnate because “I am very good at working with Jews”—who, he said, controlled the media.
The author interviews the head of the Institute of Jewish Studies, founded by a Chinese professor to provide “a more nuanced view” of Jews. However, it’s rather clear that the institute fails a basic test of scholarly independence:
The institute is funded largely by foreign Jewish donors, who have their own interest in seeing portrayals of Judaism propagated in a more balanced way. “Hatred and intolerance are bred in ignorance,” the executive director of the China Judaic Studies Association, Beverly Friend, a patron of the institute, wrote to me in an email. “The institute provides knowledge.”
“Balanced”?  Reminds me of the pro-Israel donors having veto power over which professors are hired at the University of Illinois. Having academic departments with divergent, balanced views on Israel is definitely not high on the agenda of Jewish activist donors.
Given the economic realities, it’s not surprising that a Chinese doctoral student interviewed for the article, Liu Nanyang, has views that the ADL would definitely approve. It’s all about Nobel prizes and about Jewish tolerance for divergent opinions. Comparing Chinese to Jewish culture, he notes that “Chinese culture is not so tolerant.” (Israel, as we all know, is famously tolerant.)
It is this space and allowance—even encouragement—for debate that has helped Jews make cultural and scientific strides in the world, Liu said he believed: “In the Talmud, for one question they have different answers. But in China we have [either] correct or incorrect. If someone has different opinions, it is difficult to live.”
“Do you know how many Chinese Nobel Prize winners there are?” asked Liu, not waiting for an answer. He didn’t have to. The Chinese have long articulated ambitions to win more Nobel prizes. (No Chinese-born scientist, for example, has ever been awarded a Nobel Prize for work in the mainland.) “The Jewish population is very small but the Chinese is big,” Liu said. “Compare that, if you will. When we know that the Jewish people are so successful in both science and human studies, we feel that maybe we can learn from them.”
The doctoral student needs to read more Jewish history. Divergent opinions were completely within a very narrow range, and dissenters were expelled: “There was little history of free speech within traditional Jewish societies.
Mr. Liu, however, understands how the world works well enough to keep the money flowing to the Institute of Jewish Studies:
As the afternoon drew to a close, I mentioned Chen Guangbiao, the billionaire who declared he is good at working with Jews. Liu was exasperated by such reductions.
“In their minds, Jewish people control the banks in America. It means for them that Jewish people control the world, controls the governments,” he railed, shaking his hands in disbelief. “I feel it’s a joke.”
Prof. Xu was more understanding. “Stereotypes are overemphasized. But in China this is positive,” he said calmly. After all, he added: “Had the Jews achieved nothing, no Chinese would be interested in them.”
By taking an extreme, vastly oversimplified rendition of Jewish influence, Mr. Liu (and Ms. Sebag-Montefiore) effectively preclude an honest, empirically based discussion of Jewish power and influence3.
So the proper attitude is to revere Jews for their accomplishments in being awarded Nobel prizes and their “tolerance” but eschew any discussion of Jewish power in other areas and how that might conflict with the interests of others — the theme of Jews as a hostile elite. Ms. Sebag-Montefiore is very proud of Jewish intelligence and accomplishment, but she is also “deeply uncomfortable” that non-Jews, whether Chinese or American, might think that that’s not really a good thing for others. Honest discussions of Jewish power and influence — whether its the Israel Lobby, Hollywood and the media, Wall Street, or immigration and multiculturalism — are to be made off limits, not only in the U.S., where there is an elaborate, lavishly funded infrastructure to ensure it, but also in China where Jewish money is already having a major effect on the boundaries of legitimate discussion.
Being admired as influential and powerful is great, but Ms. Sebag-Montefiore and the organized Jewish community generally certainly wouldn’t want serious discussions about how that power and influence might compromise the legitimate interests of others.
China as a rising power would do well to view Jews through the lens of realism and empirically based discussion. As elsewhere, however, there are already forces that are pushing in the opposite direction.

Cruz Schmoozes Jews

via Age of Treason

Here we have another illustration of the increasingly de rigueur public display of fealty and deference to the jews by the very highest level politicians. Texan Ted Cruz, ’16 Hopeful, Woos New York Jewish Donors, by Ken Kurson, New York Observer, 24 November 2014:
Last night, Mort Klein’s Zionist Organization of America dinner featured Mr. Cruz, known for his steadfast and aggressive support of Israel, in a prominent speaking role.
Attendees included Alan Dershowitz, Pastor John Hagee, and Home Depot founder Bernie Marcus. Those who made the scene at a fancy VIP pre-dinner buffet included billionaire Ira Rennert, Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann, former Westchester District Attorney Jeanine Pirro, Public Relations authority Ronn Torossian, Bernstein Global Wealth Management (and recent Observer subject) Jeff Wiesenfeld, plus Rabbis Avi Weiss and Shmuley Boteach. Reviews of Mr. Cruz were uniformly positive as many New York Jews got their first taste of the tea party darling and discovered, to the shock of some, that the Princeton-educated lawyer was rather well-spoken and engaging.
The article emphasizes the bipartisan mix of jews and their overarching concern for Israel.
Mr. Boteach said, “You are arguably the strongest US Senator when it comes to Israel. But if you run, can you win? You’re seen as a champion of the tea party. And the media tends to caricature.”
Mr. Cruz replied, “Historically, the media has had two caricatures of Republicans. We are either stupid or evil.”
“Sometimes both!” volunteered one of the lunchers.
Mr. Cruz laughed and continued. “Reagan was stupid, according to the media. George W. Bush, Dan Quayle, stupid. Nixon was evil, Cheney was evil. I sort of take it as a backhanded compliment that they’ve invented a new caricature for me – crazy.
The jewsmedia does indeed caricature Whites, pathologizing and demonizing even the mildest, most unconscious expression of White racial interests, like the tea party, as stupid/crazy/evil. Knowing this, Cruz went straight to the belly of the beast, the New York kehillah, to explain his plan to become president. Part one is to get jewish money and media backing by professing how ardently he identifies with them and their exclusive ethnostate. Part two is the brown masses, the “hispanics”, who he argues are already in his pocket out of quasi-racial solidarity. Part three is a phony rhetorical appeal aimed at cutting into Hillary’s White base. White conservative and tea party support is taken for granted.

A video of Cruz performing his “blue-collar” “working-class” shtick for all these slimy “heavy macher” “power jews” would be pure gold, and potentially sink Cruz. Of course, as with Mitt Romney’s “entitlement” scandal, if such a video did surface, and some kind of scandal erupted, the jewsmedia would “blur out” the jewy essence of the political schmoozing and transform it into a reason to whine about “anti-semitism” at the same time.

Have You Ever Heard of a German Named Bruno Tesch?

via Renegade Tribune

Some may have.

And a search may come up with something like the following Bruno Guido Camillo Tesch (Born 22 April 1913 – Died 1 August 1933) was a German antifascist and member of the Young Communist League of Germany. At aged 20, he was convicted of murder and executed in connection with the Altona Bloody Sunday (Altonaer Blutsonntag) riot, an SA march on 17 July 1932, that turned violent and led to 18 people being shot and killed. His conviction was overturned 60 years later in November 1992.

Born in Kiel to an Italian mother, Tesch as a child was raised in Italy before moving to live with his stepfather in Hamburg in 1925, where he was an apprentice plumber.
Like many Germans especially young Germans of that day, found himself unemployed shortly after his apprenticeship was over, He like many entered the Freiwilliger Arbeitsdienst (FAD), or Volunteer Work Service. Politically radicalized, he joined the Socialist Worker Youth (Sozialistische Arbeiterjugend) in 1930, but soon switched to the Young Communist League of Germany (Kommunistischer Jugendverband Deutschlands).

On 17 July 1932, later known in German history as the Altonaer Blutsonntag, some Communists, with Tesch among them, tried to disrupt a march by the National Socialists through a working-class area in Altona. Arguments and shoving escalated, culminating in gun fire that killed four SA members and 16 others, the latter group likely by uncontrolled police gun fire. Tesch, who was involved in the violence, was later alleged to have fired shots in the incident.

After the National Socialists were elected to power, the case was brought before the German Special Court (Sondergerichte) in Altona. Tesch was convicted and sentenced to death along with Walter Moller, Karl Wolff and August Lutgens. Despite national and international communist protest and pressure Hermann Goring refused to commute the sentences of the four convicted, On 1 August 1933, in the courthouse courtyard now home to Altona’s Local Court they were given the traditional Saxon punishment for murder, they were beheaded.

These were the first executions of justice in the Third Reich.

Altona Bloody Sunday the name given to that violent confrontation between the Sturmabteilung (SA) and Schutzstaffel (SS), the police, and Communist Party (KPD) supporters on 17 July 1932 in Altona (Now in Hamburg, but at the time, was a part of Schleswig-Hosltein, which was part of Prussia). No longer able to legally suppress the National Socialists Party’s lawful rights , under The Constitution of the German Reich (Die Verfassung des Deutschen Reichs), better known as the Weimar Constitution Franz von Papen’s government on 28 June 1932 lifted a ban on the SA and SS which had been in place since April.

This led to recurrent riots and open street fighting as the Communists renewed their relentless attacks against the National Socialists. In July, an SA and SS demonstration through the workers’ quarter of Altona was approved by Social Democratic police president Otto Eggerstedt, despite threats of violence by the Communists. The day of the march, Eggerstedt conveniently was on an election trip, and his deputy was on vacation. Knowing the National Socialists would never be disuaded by fear, or intimidation, but would obey the law. Therefore the march was legally approved and proceeded as planned.

As expected, it triggered a major confrontation between 7,000 National Socialists and Altona’s Communist residents, leading to massive police intervention.

Sixteen people, including two SA members, were killed, most of them by police bullets. The riots were used by Papen as an excuse for his Prussian Coup on 20 July.

In 1932, the Preußenschlag, or “Prussian, coup”, was one of the major steps, towards the end of the German inter-war democracy, of the Weimar Republic, which would later greatly facilitate the “Gleichschaltung” of Germany, after Adolf Hitler’s rise to power. Despite all the usual so-called ‘historical’ tripe you are fed about those damn Nazis, seizing control and establishing a fascist dictatorship in Germany.

We are told that under the Weimar Constitution, the President could rule by decree in times of emergency using Article 48. We are also told, the unprecedented element of the Enabling Act, was that the Chancellor possessed the powers. Unprecedented is defined as, never done or known before. An Enabling Act was only supposed to be passed in times of extreme emergency and had only been used once, in 1923–24 when the government used an Enabling Act to end hyperinflation. To pass an Enabling Act, a party required a vote by a two-thirds majority in the Reichstag.

We are also told, that in January 1933, Those Damned Nazis had only 32% of the seats. During the election campaign, the Nazis alleged that Germany was on the verge of a Communist revolution and that the only way to stop the Communists was to pass the Enabling Act. The message of the campaign was simple: increase the number of Nazi seats so that the Enabling Act could be passed. To decrease the number of opposition members of parliament who could vote against the Enabling Act, Hitler planned to ban the Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (the Communist Party of Germany or KPD), which at the time held 17% of the seats, after the elections and before the new Reichstag convened. We are told that this was the pretext for the so-called Nazi false flag Reichstag fire that the Demonized Hitler used to take the Germans in one hand, the rest of the world in the other, down the path in to the burning fires of war and hell.

But did you know that on July 20, 1932, President Paul von Hindenburg issued an emergency decree under that same Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution, which dismissed the cabinet of the Free State of Prussia, at that time the largest German state.

The pretext for this measure was violent unrest which was occurring in some areas of Prussia and the alleged inability of the Prussian government to handle the matter. The main trigger was the “Altonaer Blutsonntag” (“Altona Bloody Sunday”) shootout.

The true reason however, was that the Prussian government, headed by Minister-President Otto Braun, with authority over the powerful Prussian police force, was one of the last major forces standing in the way of Chancellor Franz von Papen’s plans to replace Weimar’s foreign-dictated internationalism, with home-grown nationalist rule. The move was facilitated by the unstable situation of the Prussian government. The centre-left coalition of the Social Democrats, Centre Party and liberal German Democratic Party, which had ruled Prussia without interruption since 1918, had lost its majority in the recent elections to the Prussian Landtag (state parliament). However, a provision in the Prussian constitution stipulated that a government could only be removed from office if a prospective successor also had a majority. The opposition, consisted mainly of Communists and National Socialists, stunting the growth of the National Socialists while indirectly fostering the growth of Communists knowing they would not cooperate with each other or with other parties. As a result, no politically realistic alternative government was possible, and the Braun-led coalition remained in office.

Papen also lacked majority support in the Reichstag. His only means to govern was through presidential emergency powers and the decrees issued by President Hinden burg, over whom Papen with the alliances withf Hindenburg’s son, had great influence. Papen and his supporters, mostly right-wing nationalists, industrialists and monarchists (his cabinet, packed with aristocrats, was dubbed “Kabinett der Barone”,”cabinet of the barons”) …. They loathed Weimar’s foreign-dictated internationalism and hoped to replace it with a home-grown nationalist government under their control. The emergency decree of July 20 declared Papen Reichskommissar (Reich Commissioner) for Prussia, which vested in him all the competences of the Prussian ministries and thus gave him direct control over the Prussian government.

The Preußenschlag was declared partially unconstitutional on October 25, 1932 by the German Constitutional Court, but only in so far as the formal existence of the Prussian cabinet was concerned. The transfer of power to Papen was upheld, while the Braun cabinet retained the right to represent Prussia in the Reichstag.

The aristocratic Papen and the “Kabinett der Barone” next move was thinking they had a commoner dupe in a corporal from the backwater province of Bavaria, Adolf Hitler, hoping the National Socialist would in time, shoot themselves in the foot with all nationalist running into their waiting arms, this proved to be the opposite.

Prussia remained under direct administration of the federal government until April 1933, when the Prussian parliament, now controlled by the National Socialists, elected Hermann Goring as its Minister and President. German states post world war one, were independent state powers which were no more than a charade that facilitated foreign influence and control were brought back in to being more of provinces, this was the lynchpin to regaining a national unity. The state of Prussia was finally dissolved by the Allies after the end of World War II.

Rewriting History and criminals become martyrs and heroes become villains.

The Jew Arnold Zweig’s 1947 book The Axe of Wandsbek, was written about Altona Bloody Sunday and was subsequently filmed in East Germany in 1951 (and, again, in West Germany in 1981). Zweig volunteered for the German army in World War 1 and saw action as a private in France, Hungary and Serbia. He was stationed in the Western Front October 1916, when the first ever Judenzählung (the Jewish census) was administered in the German army. This was 1916 the year of the two great battles on the Western front, at Verdun and Somme.

The Battle of Verdun was fought from 21 February till 18 December 1916 during the First World War on the Western Front between the German and French armies, on hills north of Verdun-sur-Meuse in north-eastern France. An average of 70,000 casualties for each month of the battle. It was the longest and one of the most costly battles in human history; estimates of the number of casualties were 976,000.

The battle at the Somme, was one of the largest of World War 1, in which more than 1,000,000 men were wounded or killed, making it one of humanity’s bloodiest battles. It took place between 1 July and 18 November 1916 on both sides of the River Somme in France.

The harvest was poor all across Europe, and the potato supply ran short, and Germans substituted almost inedible turnips; as they embarked upon the “turnip winter” of 1916–17, remembered with bitter distaste for generations. White bread used imported flour but, with strategic British blockades at sea it became unavailable, but there was enough rye or rye-potato flour to provide a minimal diet for all civilians. Many migrants had flocked into cities to work in industry, which made for overcrowded housing. Reduced coal supplies left everyone in the cold. Daily life involved long working hours, poor health, and little or no recreation, an increasing fears for the safety of loved ones in the Army and in prisoner of war camp. The men who returned from the front were those who had been permanently crippled; wounded soldiers who had recovered were sent back to the trenches.

Every one was sacrificing, on both sides of the great conflict. In the midst of such a great conflict, a common question was asked among many people of different walks of life, in different regions of the Empire, in the many trenches carved out on both sides of Germany. The last thing the German command needed at this key time, was dissent. Since they themselves personally were not aware, but obliged to answer the blood soaked inquiry, they officially asked, “where were the jews”. The census was seen as a way to prove that Jews were not betraying the Fatherland by shirking military service. The census was intended to discredit growing anti-semitic sentiments and rumors, to determine the actual number of Jews on the front lines as opposed to those serving in the rear. Ignoring protests in the Reichstag and the press, War Minister Wild von Hohenborn proceeded with his head count. The results were not made public, to “spare Jewish feelings” and further dissention among the ranks. Zweig wrote in a letter to Martin Buber, dated February 15, quote, “The Judenzählung was a reflection of unheard sadness for, Germany’s, sin, and our agony…(oy vey)

If there was no antisemitism in the Army, the unbearable call to duty would be almost easy.” unquote. That their fellow countrymen could turn on them was a source of major insult and dismay for most German Jews, and the moment marked a point of rapid decline in what some historians called “Jewish-German symbiosis.”

Judenzählung, denounced by German Jews as a “statistical monstrosity”, was a catalyst for intensified antisemitism. The episode also led increasing numbers of young German Jews to accept Zionism, as they realized that full assimilation into German society was unattainable.

By the end of the war Zweig was assigned to the Press department of the German Army Headquarters in Kaunas (off the front lines and where else but, in to the rear) and there he was first introduced to the East European Jewish organizations. Arnold Zweig became a pacifist after world war 1, his only complaint of the whole affair was. “it pitted Jews against Jews“.

After World War 1 he was an active socialistic Zionist in Germany. In 1923 Zweig went to Berlin and worked as an editor of a newspaper, the Jüdische Rundschau. In the 1920s, Zweig became attracted to the psychoanalytical theories of Sigmund Freud and underwent Freudian therapy himself. In March 1927 Zweig wrote to Freud asking permission to dedicate his new book to Freud. In the letter Zweig told Freud: “I personally owe to your psychological therapy the restoration of my whole personality, the discovery that I was suffering from a neurosis and finally the curing of this neurosis by your method of treatment.” Freud returned this ardent letter with a warm letter of his own, and the Freud-Zweig correspondence continued for a dozen years – momentous years in Germany’s history.

From 1929 he was a contributing journalist of anti-Nazi newspaper Die Weltbühne (World Stage). That year, Zweig would attend one of Hitler’s speeches. He told his wife that the man was a Charlie Chaplin without the talent. Zweig later witnessing the burning of his books by German students, remarked that the crowd , “would have stared as happily into the flames if live humans were burning.” He decided to leave Germany that night.

When the National Socialist took power in Germany in 1933, Zweig was one of many Jews who, not forced or persecuted in any way, immediately went into voluntary exile.

Winding up in Palestine

During his stay in Palestine, Zweig may have been the main link between Freud and the local psychoanalytic community. In 1948, disillutioned with Zionism he accepted a formal invitation from the East German authorities (so much for the Stalin jewish purge myth), Zweig decided to return to the Soviet occupation zone in Germany (which became East Germany in 1949). In East Germany he was heavily involved in the communist system. He was a member of parliament, delegate to the World Peace Council Congresses and the cultural advisory board of the communist party. He was President of the German Academy of the Arts from 1950 to 1953. He was rewarded with many prizes and medals by the regime. The USSR awarded him the Lenin Peace Prize (1958) for his anti-war novels.

In East Germany, a school in Klausdorf as well as a street in Wismar were named after Bruno Tesch. Despite political resistance, a former comprehensive school in Hamburg-Altona was named after Bruno Tesch. All those sentenced to death had their convictions overturned on 13 November 1992 by the Hamburg State Court. Further sentences meted out by the Sondergericht in connection with the Altonaer Blutsonntag were reversed on 21 June 1996 and 29 June 1998. And history is forever re-written for future generations, backed by new official records.

But no, this is not the Bruno Tesch, I wish to speak with you about.

The Bruno Tesch I want to speak of, was a real German, a brilliant German, a honorable German, which in todays Jew Dazed world, means a disgraced, discredited, and victorious allied powers legally murdered, German. His name was, Bruno Emil Tesch, a German chemist and entrepreneur, one of the inventors of the life saving insecticide Zyklon B.


In the opening scene of Martin Scorsese’s 2004 film, The Aviator, In 1914 Houston, nine-year-old Howard Robard Hughes, Jr. receives a careful bath from his mother, who cautions him about the typhus plague and the resultant quarantine that has beset the city and warns him that he is not safe.

The dangers of typhus and cholera is reinforced when she asks him to spell the word “quarantine.” After making sure he understands the danger of disease and germs, she adds, “you are not safe.”

In 1942, as the Allied armies prepared to push into Europe from the Mediterranean they ran into typhus, they were so panicked by it, they threw every chemical they had into the outbreak. Lucky the newly experimental DDT worked.

In 1942, a team of USDA entomologists, led by one Walter E. Dove, were drafted into the project of preventing louse-borne typhus in troops. They worked methodically, testing every chemical they could find to see what would kill lice. Among thousands of other samples, they received a waxy, granular substance from the Geigy Corporation in Switzerland.

Swiss chemist Paul Mueller had labored intensively at Geigy for four years to synthesize dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT); the basic Swiss patent was granted in 1940. This compound was originally made in 1873 by an Austrian student, but had never received any particular attention.

Field trials now showed it to be effective not only against the louse; but also against a wide variety of pests, including the common housefly, the Colorado beetle, and the mosquito. Geigy began manufacting two products based on DDT, Gesarol and Neocide, in 1942.

Gesarol did kill lice, and every other insect in the lab, but a crumbly wax doesn’t work well as a delousing treatment, so the USDA crew did the unglamorous but essential job of reformulating it. By 1943, they were producing large quantities of several formulations, including powders and sprays, and they were referring to Gesarol by its generic name, abbreviated to DDT.

Epidemic typhus (also called “camp fever“, “gaol fever“, “hospital fever“, “ship fever“, “famine fever“, “putrid fever“, “petechial fever“.

Epidemiclouse borne typhus, and “louse-borne typhus” is a form of typhus so named because the diseaseoften causes epidemicsfollowing wars and natural disasters. The causative organism is Rickettsia prow wazekiitransmitted by the human body louse (Pediculus humanus corporis). Feeding on a human who carries the bacillus infects the louse.

R pro wazekii grows in the louse’s gut and is excreted in its feces. The disease is then transmitted to an uninfected human who scratches the louse bite (which itches) and rubs the feces into the wound. The incubation period is one to two weeks.

Rickettsia can remain viable and virulent in the dried louse feces for many days. Typhus will eventually kill the louse, though the disease will remain viable for many weeks in the dead louse.

Epidemic typhus is thus found most frequently during times of war and deprivation.

In 1942, as the Allied armies prepared to push into Europe from the Mediterranean the following year, several groups of medical officers and civilian advisors worked on ways to control or eliminate the typhus fever that had already emerged in some parts of eastern Europe and North Africa.

Louse-borne typhus fever was a familiar by-product of wartime troop and refugee movements, crowding in camps and prisons, under nourishment, and lack of bathing and laundry facilities.

Massive allied indiscriminate bombing for examplecreated enough damage to create the perfect conditions fortyphus epidemicswhich killed hundreds of thousands of people in German work camps during World War II.

The deteriorating quality of hygiene in camps such as Theresienstadt and Bergen-Belsen created conditions where diseases such as typhus flourished.

Situations in the twenty-first century with potential for a typhus epidemic would include refugee camps during a major famine or natural disaster. In the periods between outbreaks, when human to human transmission occurs less often,
The flying squirrel serves as a zoonotic reservoir for the rickettsia pro wazekii bacterium.

Although the causative microbe and its vector had been discovered, efficient methods of preventing typhus fever had not.

Methods of delousing were still cumbersome, and would not prevent reinfestation.

Fred Soaper was assigned to the U S A Typhus Commission (USATC) to help develop an efficient, direct chemical attack on the body louse, and thus contain or prevent epidemic typhus.

Before a vaccine was developed during World War II, typhus was a devastating disease for humansand has been responsible for a number of epidemics throughout history. These epidemics tend to follow wars, famine, and other conditions that result in mass casualties.
  • During the second year of the Peloponnesian War (430 BC), the city-state of Athens in ancient Greece was hit by a devastating epidemic, known as the Plague of Athens, which killed, among others, Pericles and his two elder sons.
  • The plague returned twice more, in 429 BC and in the winter of 427/6 BC.
    Epidemic typhus is a strong candidate for the cause of this disease outbreak, supported by both medical and scholarly opinions.
  • Typhus also arrived in Europe with soldiers who had been fighting on Cyprus.
    • The first reliable description of the disease, appears during the Spanish siege of Moorish Granada in 1489.
    • These accounts include descriptions of fever and red spots over arms, back and chest, progressing to delirium, gangrenous sores, and the stench of rotting flesh.
    • During the siege, the Spaniards lost 3,000 men to enemy action but an additional 17,000 died of typhus.
Typhus was also common in prisons (and in crowded conditions where lice spread easily), where it was known as Gaol fever. Gaol fever often occurs when prisoners are frequently huddled together in dark filthy rooms. Imprisonment until the next term of court was often equivalent to a death sentence.

It was so infectious that prisoners brought before the court sometimes infected the court itself.

Following the Assize held at Oxford in 1577, later deemed the Black Assize, over 300 died from Epidemic typhus, including Sir Robert Bell Lord Chief Baronof the Exchequer.

The outbreak that followed, between 1577 to 1579, killed about 10% of the English population.

During the Lent Assize Court held at Taunton (1730) typhus caused the death of the Lord Chief Baron, as well as the High Sheriff, the sergeant, and hundreds of others.

During a time when there were as many as 241 capital offences, more prisoners died from ‘gaol fever’ then were put to death by all the public executioners in the whole of the realm. In 1759 an English authority estimated that each year a quarter of the prisoners had died from gaol fever.

In London, typhus frequently broke out among the ill-kept prisoners of Newgate Gaol and then moved into the general city population.

Epidemics occurred throughout Europe and occurred during the English Civil War, the Thirty Years’ War and the Napoleonic Wars.

    • During Napoleon’s retreat from Moscow in 1812, more French soldiers died of typhus than were killed by the Russians.
    • A major epidemic occurred in Ireland between 1816–19, and again in the late 1830s, and yet another major typhus epidemicoccurred during the Great Irish Famine between 1846 and 1849.
      • The Irish typhus spread to England, where it was sometimes called “Irish fever” and was noted for its virulence.
      • It killed people of all social classes, since lice were endemic and inescapable, but it hit particularly hard in the lower or “unwashed” social strata.
      • In Canada, the typhus epidemic of 1847 killed more than 20,000 people 1847 to 1848, mainly Irish immigrants in fever sheds and other forms of quarantine, who had contracted the disease aboard coffin ships.
    • In America,
      • a typhus epidemic struck in Philadelphia in 1837
      • typhus killed the son of future President Franklin Pierce in Concord, New Hampshire in 1843.
      • Several epidemics occurred in Baltimore, Memphis and Washington DC between 1865 and 1873.
      • Typhus fever was also a significant killer during the US Civil War, although typhoid fever was the more prevalent cause of US Civil War “camp fever.”
        • Typhoid is a completely different disease from typhus.
    • During World War 1 typhus caused three million deaths in Russia and more in Poland and Romania.
    • Delousing stations were established for troops on the Western front but the disease ravaged the armies of the Eastern front, with over 150,000 dying in Serbia alone.
    • Fatalities were generally between 10 to 40 percent of those infected, and the disease was a major cause of death for those nursing the sick.

Between 1918 and 1922 typhus caused at least 3 million deaths out of 20–30 million cases.

  • In Russia after World War 1, during a civil war between the White and Red armies, typhus killed three million, largely civilians.
  • During World War II typhus struck the German army as it invaded Russia in 1941.
  • In 1942 and 1943 typhus hit French North Africa, Egypt and Iran particularly hard.
Typhus epidemics killed inmates in the German work camps; infamous pictures of typhus victims’ mass, graves can be seen in footage shot at the Bergen-Belsen camp. British and American bombing of civilian and other non military targets, water facilities, food, medical, refugee, and supply transports, left appalling conditions in German cities as well as the camps.

Supply transports which included shipments of Zyklon B, which at the time combined with strict hygine were the only suc cess full method of controlling and subsiding typhus epidemics. In particular, bombing left work, refugee, and prisoner of war camps such as,Theresienstadt and Bergen-Belsen without the necessities needed to combat typhus, this led directly to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of typhus victims during World War II, including Anne Frank at the age of 15 and her sister Margot.

Even larger epidemics in the post-war chaos of Europe were only averted by the widespread use of the newly discovered Deedee Tea to kill the lice on millions of refugees and displaced persons. Following the development of a vaccine during World War II, epidemics have usually occurred in Eastern Europe, the Middle East and parts of Africa, particularly Ethiopia, where its eradication was the focus of major research efforts by Naval Medical Research Unit Five.

Bruno Emil Tesch (born 14 August 1890 was murdered 16 May 1946) was a German chemist and entrepreneur.

Together with Gerhard Peters and Walter Heerdt, he invented the insecticide Zyklon B, infamous for having been accused of being used extensively by the Germans to kill millions of people during the so-called Holocaust.

Tesch, along with fellow chemists Gerhard Peters and Walter Heerdt, with the support of I G Farben, began research into the use of hydrogen cyanide as a fumigating agent. They discovered a process in which the hydrogen cyanide could be manufactured and used in a solid form.

The patent was assigned to the firm Degesch, “Deutsche Gesellschaft für Schädlingsbekämpfung mbH” (German Limited Company for Pest Control), subsidiary of I G Farben.

With Walter Heerdt being the only one of the inventors to receive patent rights, a portion of the proceeds from the manufacture and sale. Peters joined Degesch and would become managing director during World War II.

Degesch was designated by the German government to set the safety rules and standards for the use of Zyklon B, and was given the authority to authorize shipments from the manufacturer to the customer after the strict criteria were met.

Tesch & Stabenow did not manufacture Zyklon B nor any other chemicals.

It was primarily a pest control company specializing in fumigation of commercial properties such as the warehouses and freighters in the Port of Hamburg.

Zyklon B was produced by Dessauer Werke and Kaliwerke. In 1925, Tesch & Stabenow partly due to the largesse of Paul Haber of Degesch received the exclusive rights to distribute the insecticide Zyklon B east of the Elbe River. In 1927, Stabenow departed from the firm. Tesch held a 45% share of the company and Degesch 55%. He would assume sole ownership of the company in 1942.

Tesch & Stabenow (called Testa), was a major supplier of Zyklon B to the German work camps. For that at the end of World War II, he was arrested by the British as a war criminal, tried, and executed.

A war in which Over sixty million people were killed, over 2.5% of the world population, and claimed many more in it’s aftermath. A war started by world jewery, which wound up killing a few hundred thousand of their own by their policy of total destruction and indiscriminate mass bombings.

Bruno Tesch’s efforts was one of the few that actually saved lives.

Zyklon B also spelled Cyclon B or Cyclone B consisted of hydrogen cyanide (known as prussic acid), a stabilizer, a warning odorant (ethyl bromoacetate), and one of several adsorbents. Zyklon A was a previously produced liquid pesticide, which released hydrogen cyanide in a chemical reaction with water. After the invention of Zyklon B, Zyklon A production ceased.

From 1929 onwards the United States used Zyklon B to disinfect the freight trains and clothes of Mexican immigrants entering the U S. Farm Securities Administration photographer Marion Post Wolcott recorded the use of cyanide gas and Zyklon B by the Public Health Service at the New Orleans Quarantine Station during the 1930s. Today Zyklon-prussic-acid is known on all continents as the “means of choice” not only for debugging and delousing but also, in general, for disinfesting large rooms.

Zyklon B is still in production in the Czech Republic in the factory Draslovka Kolín a.s. in the city of Kolín, under the tradename Uragan D2, and is sold for the purpose of eradicating insects and small animals. The Czech word uragan means “hurricane” or “cyclone” in English.

As the blood bath of world War II dragged on, with the administration demanding unconditional surrender in the Pacific, even though they were out matched the ferocity of the Japanese indicated a long and total effort would be required to invade the home islands.

Wounded soldiers and parents of the dead were questioning the purpose and cost of even being in the European theater allied with Bolsheviks, when our fight was in the pacific. Rank and file soldiers were witnessing first hand the devastation as they marched through France and Germany.

April 4, 1945, Orr druff near Gotha, Germany a sub camp of Buchenwald was the first camp found by none Rushin allies, on German soil, General Dwight D. Eisenhower, Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe busted his ass to get to the camp but had to make sure he dragged along his main fighting Generals, George S. Patton and Omar Bradley.

It was finally coordinated it on April 12. In the meanwhile the inmates were given high calorie rich food and right away many gorged themselves to death. This too were attributed to the germans and used for much propaganda.

After his visit, Eisenhower cabled General George C. Marshall, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in Washington, describing his trip to Orr druff. He kept pestering Marshal on how he wanted the world to know how Evil those notsees were.

On April 19, 1945, he again cabled Marshall with a request to bring members of Congress and journalists to the newly liberated camps so that they could bring the horrible truth about Nazi atrocities to the American public. That same day, Marshall received permission from the Secretary of War, Henry Lewis Stimson, and President Harry S. Truman for these delegations to visit the liberated camps.

Bodies were left strewn about for the visit, also for next 9 months right into winter any troops passing that sector were diverted through the camp to quote “show the boys, why they were in Europe fighting the ‘Notsees’ “unquote.

When questions cannot be honestly answered, resort to:

The Big Lie

The allies inherited the mass refugees and horriffic conditions of the work camps, they themselves had created. People were dying at a faster rate under their control then when the last days when Germans ran the camps. People were now asking questions, the world was now getting a glimpse of the unecessary inhumane damage perpurtrated by the Allies.

When you need The Big Lie

Who do you call?

Counter Intelligence Corps and Psychological Warfare Division units staffed by people like Albert G. Rosenberg in charge of documenting the camps such as Buchenwald started to show up. Armed with a rare special pass called a “SHAEF Pass”, which gave him the power to confiscate the posh villa belonging to Baldur Von Schirach, where he gathered the communist prisoners to create his documentation.

Most of the unit’s, interpreters, interrogators, and guards were jewish. They were soon known as the:

Jewish intelligence and Psychological Warfare Corps

The Ritchie Boys was a US special military intelligence unit in World War II comprising mainly German-speaking immigrants to the USA. They were predominantly Jews.
The Ritchie Boys consisted of approximately 9,000 young Germans and Austrians, who were mostly Jewish, and who had escaped from their countries of birth and immigrated to the US as refugees. Most had been drafted or volunteered into the United States Army. Some had originally arrived in the USA as children, many without their parents so that these were also known as the One Thousand Children.

The One Thousand Children (often simply “O T C”) refers to the approximately 1,400 mostly Jewish children came from Europe directly to the United States mainly from 1934 through 1945 in quiet operations designed to avoid attention from isolationist and antisemitic forces.

Ranging in ages up to the age of sixteen arrived unaccompaniedleaving their parents behind, and were then placed with foster families, schools and facilities across the U.S. The children came through the unofficial program run by refugee Agencies such as the German Jewish Children’s Aid (G J C A), The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (H I A S), the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, “(the Joint”), and the Society of Friends (the Quakers). Also, to a lesser extent the U S Committee for the Care of European Children. In advocacy efforts some relevant work was done by the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, and the National Council of Jewish Women.

Raised as orphans with the knowledge they were rescued from Nazi Germany and Notsee occupied or threatened European countries. Told they had to leave their parents behind in Europe and these parents were murdered by?

You guessed, the Notsees.

The British had their Number. 10 (Inter-Allied) Commando/Special Services Brigade. They were virtually all German speaking Jewish refugees mainly from Germany and Austria (but also some from Czechoslovakia, Hungary and other European countries).

The Russians had their very experienced ex Cheka and NKVD.

Soon, shrunken heads,human lampshades Human Soap started to appear. Various methods used to kill only the jews began to circulate.
  • Hideous medical Experiments,
  • Forced sterilizations,
  • gas vans,
  • reproductive organs burned out by X-rays,
  • human hair for stuffing mattresses,
  • death squads,
  • hangings of all sorts,
  • underground electric crematorium,
  • vacuum chambers,
  • steam chambers,
  • chlorine gas chambers,
  • electric conveyor belts,
  • glasses of liquid hydrocyanic acid,
  • masturbating machines that often killed their subjects,
  • Buchenwald bears mauled you and then an eagle swooped down to pick the bones clean,
  • a captured Soviet submarine engine which made the gas that killed,
  • captured soviet tank engines fumes to kill,
and much more jewish psy ops nonsense were spewed out ad nauseam.

All this apparently accomplished under the noses of the Wehrmacht, the Red Cross, all foreign intelligence agencies, and most of all the publics knowledge.

It was as if, alright goyim, now that the heavy lifting is done, the jews have landed with nothing left to do except to torture and bring justiceto those Evil Nazis, now go on beat it get lostscram, we’re taking over.

But how can they justify this jewish take over of post war occupation administration, interrogations, war crimes investigations,historical documentation, policy recommendation, tribunals, retributions and restitutions upon Germany?

Now, you have to understand, even though yes, Americans were duped in to World War 2, they were basically isolationists and drafted. Most of Americans were from farming communities and small towns, they did have a basic sense, more in tuned with nature, and self, Reliance most had basic mechanical knowledge, then we have today.

Jewish Intelligence and Psychological Warfare Corps knowing they could present shrunken heads to a shocked German populace by threat of a gun or hordes of mongol rapists straining on the leash.

The British under centuries of jewish dominance, more used to European rivalry and resulting wars, experienced the bombing of their Island, with the slipping of their Empire could be swayed.

But, America who needed a sneak attack to be dragged in to the conflict still had doubts about being in Europe allied with Bolsheviks.

Americans, weened on a constitution, no matter how flawed, no matter how many jewish and communist liberal chisels have chipped at it. To this very day..

America is the only white country that have not given in to the jewish muzzle of anti revisionist laws and hate speech laws

becoming the land of refuge for truth seekers of Europe.

Even though the banker elites and jewish gangsters had, great success in penetrating and perverting much of America,
  • a firm control of the Federal Government,
  • a firm grip on their mass media,
  • instituting the Federal Reserve Banking system,
  • instituting a Public School System,
  • massive immigration,
  • control of the food production and distribution,
  • disasterous farming policies that exasperated the dust bowl,resulting in up to 9 million deaths,
  • disasterous economic policies creating horrendus recessions and depressions,
  • imperialist foreign policy,
  • destructive racial policies,
  • deep penetration in to their churches and social events,
  • a bloody civil war that pitted brother against brother,
  • continuous class war
the people were still far from being controlled. When the American people finally pushed back, it was relentless and powerful. Their sense of judgement could be remarkably sober and down right brutal as the jews found out in previous struggles with them.

The continual chipping away of the Naturalization Act of 1790 which limited naturalization to “free white persons“.

In the early years of the United States, immigration was fewer than 8,000 people a year, including French refugees from the slave revolt in Haiti. After 1820, immigration gradually increased. From 1836 to 1914, over 30 million Europeans migrated to the United States.

The Page Act of 1875 designed to break the American Coolie system created by rail roads, large land holding farmers and ranchers, mining firms, and factory owners. It prohibited the entry of immigrants considered “undesirable.” This included any individual from Asia who was coming to America to be a forced laborer, any Asian woman who would engage in prostitution, and all people considered to be convicts in their own country.

After 1870, steam powered larger and faster ships, lower fares and faster transatlantic travel provided opportunity for new waves of immigration. Nearly 25 million new immigrants arrived in the United States after 1870. Among immigrants to the U.S., young people between the ages of 15 and 30 predominated. Immigrants were packed into large cities providing the workforce to power the new factories and rise of the industrial city. The impact of this changing landscape along with the new opportunities was, heavy pollution, homelessness, all forms of vice,corruption and crime.

This wave of migration, which constituted the third episode in the history of U S immigration, could better be referred to as a flood of immigrants.

Italians, Greeks, Hungarians, Poles, and others speaking Slavic languages constituted the bulk of this migration. Included among them were 2.5 to 4 million Jews. They came from Russia, the Pale of Settlement (now modern Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova), and the Russian-controlled portions of Poland. Clustering in groups they over ran the large cities in particular New York City.

While most new immigrants worked very hard and nobley at adapting, learning the language, the task of assimilation while maintaining the best of their heritage, the jews, were the exact opposite. Anarchists had been a serious social problem in Europe for the last 30 years, since many of them adopted the policy of haphazard terror and assassination to destabilise what they termed as ‘bourgeois society’.

No crowned head was safe from their pistols and bombs, and no reespite from their activities can be predicted until they have stirred some cataclysmic upheaval in Europe.

Technically the terrorist anarchists are a very small section of a minority group within the international revolutionary movement, which embraces constitutional ‘Fabian’ socialists at one end, and the violent revolutionary extremist Social Democrats at the other.

Every anarchist, terrorist, political assassin and left-wing revolutionary from Europeseemed to be drawn to London and given asylum.

Russian political exiles and the immigrant Jewish community in the East End introduced these doctrines to England.

From there the growing jewish empire, masqueraded as the British Empire could inject mass confusion and destabilization on to the continent in its assault upon the europeans and march to control, dominance, and destruction.

When the second choice, Paris, France for radicals and Communards who were members and supporters of the short-lived 1871 Paris Commune was suppressed that choice became the young nation of America, far from the arms of European law. In America, they could reinvent themselves, and a large newly arrived immigrant population presented ripe opportunity for their dreams of hope and change.

They tried intimidation, outright bribing, feigned persecution, and applied new forms of psychological warfare.

Statue of Liberty symbolism.

The statue, designed by free mason Frederic Auguste Bartholdi and dedicated on October 28, 1886, was a gift to the United States from the people of France. The statue is of a robed female figure representing Libertas, the Roman goddess of freedom, who bears a torch and a tabula ansata (a tablet evoking the law) upon which is inscribed the date of the American Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776.

A broken chain lies at her feet. The statue is an icon of freedom and of the United States and a welcoming signal to immigrants arriving from abroad.

Exhibitions designed to get Americans to help fund the project were total failures. The torch-bearing arm was displayed at the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, in 1876, and in New York’s Madison Square Park from 1876 to 1882.

When the cumbersome montage, but racially homogeneous of Americans finally had enough, realizing the jewish attempt to weaponize immigration in to a a heterogeneous tool of subversion and take over. The Immigration Act of 1921 then even stricter Immigration Act of 1924, including the National Origins Act, and Asian Exclusion Act, were the results.

It took a raising of a new generation of traitors and the media selling of the Kennedy clan as some sort of American royalty, to subvert them.

Take it from the top, roll em,now, action:

A Handbook for Military Government in Germany was ready in August 1944it advocated a quick restoration of normal life for the German people and reconstruction of Germany. Henry Morgenthau, Jr. brought it to the attention of President Franklin D Roosevelt who, under Morgenthau’s influence, after reading it rejected it with the words:
Too many people here and in England hold the view that the German people as a whole are not responsible for what has taken place that only a few Nazis are responsible. That unfortunately is not based on fact. The German people must have it driven home to them that the whole nation has been engaged in a lawless conspiracy against the decencies of modern civilization.
A new document was drafted, the Joint Chiefs of Staff directive 1067 (JCS 1067). Here the US military government of occupation in Germany was ordered to “take no steps looking toward the economic rehabilitation of Germany [or] designed to maintain or strengthen the German economy” and it was also ordered that starvation, disease and civil unrest were to be kept at such levels where they would pose no danger to the troops of occupation. On March 20, 1945 President Roosevelt was warned that the JCS 1067 was not workable, that millions of Germans would starve to death.

Roosevelt’s response was, “Let them have soup kitchens!, Let their economy sink!”  Asked if he wanted the German people to starve, Morgenthau replied, “Why not?

On May 10, 1945 when the JCS 1067 was signed, Morgenthau told his staff that it was a big day for the Treasury, and that he hoped that “someone doesn’t recognize it as the Morgenthau Plan.” The demotions, cabinet shifts, and mysterious accidents like the December 21, 1945. of General George Patton left all Germans, and the world, in the hands that would write,administer, and execute the policies of death by the lowest levels of humans against the highest level of humans.

In this new world, millions of men and women, such as, Bruno Emil Tesch, never had a chance.

Bruno Tesch and his company director Karl Weinbacher were condemned to death; Joachim Drosihn, the firm’s first gassing technician. was acquitted. Tesch was murdered by hanging on May 16, 1946, by the long-time official hangman of England, Albert Pierrepoint, in Hamelin Prison.

Let us never forget, the Bruno Emil Tesch’s of the world, and one day, name a school after him!