Mar 18, 2015

When I Became White

via Renegade Tribune

I guess you could make a solid case that I’ve actually been white since all 8 lbs. 4 oz. of me came crying & kickin’ into this world back in 1979. Also there had been significant proof in early childhood then later in my teen years that would indicate my race. However the day I became white was the day that I actually understood what it meant to live as a white man.

Up until then the world dictated to me what I was and wasn’t allowed to comprehend. What I mean by “world” was my teachers, my government, my heroes, the media, music, Hollywood and television. Hell, I remember jokes as a kid, they were the best, and we had black jokes, fat jokes, Chinese jokes, gay jokes, Puerto Rican and Mexican ones, and who could forget the blonde jokes.

Prior to becoming white I could comfortably sit through 2 hours and 34 minutes of a movie like Django Unchained and just enjoy some steady action and gruesome violence without feeling offended. Today I’d be insulted on several levels; obviously the inaccurate portrayal of fellow whites as innately racist sociopaths. Secondly, the amount of colorless people such as me willfully feeding into this distorted Hollywood hype was shameful. Thirdly, I’d eventually find myself rooting against the star of the show and his futuristic ghetto portrayal of the original thug, yo.

The sun has yet to set on the day that I became white. It’s still evolving, and it’s a hell of a long day if you ask me. I have begun to notice a wide range of life situations that have contributed to me in a negative way. I’ll begin simply and elementary enough for everyone to grasp, such as why hasn’t anyone with any type of notoriety questioned the existence of B.E.T? Why at the very least isn’t there a counter balance like the W.E.T (oh maybe that’s why).

Before becoming white I never questioned various other overtly anti white occurrences in these here United States and possibly the world. Such as Art Rooney, the owner of my favorite football team, the Pittsburgh Steelers, had created what they refer to as the Rooney Rule which requires teams to interview minority candidates for head coaching jobs. Apparently in 2002 Tony Dungy of Tampa Bay was fired while holding a winning record, and of course it had to be racism, as he couldn’t have been an arrogant prick. He didn’t win the big one till 5 years later. Who knows maybe affirmative action won it for him, just sayin’.

Also as an ex white rock `n` roll guy like me, I must ask how MTV can produce this pure freshly dropped bullshit paying homage to thug life and virtuous ghettoites, cause this is the REAL decline of the Western Civilization. Back in my day Flipper Gore and her gaggle of unsatisfied house wives put advisory stickers on everything and publicly flogged all rockers. These punks get a condescending pat on the afro by liberal elites, while they tell little boys how to keep their bitches in check.

As in earlier writings I’ve done, when you become white, you begin to recognize that you are not supposed to dance, and white men don’t jump either. In 2011 78% of the players in the NBA were black, but that doesn’t mean the 22% remaining were exclusively white, however I heard no salacious undertones of racism.

In becoming white you begin to understand all that your ancestors’ sacrificed for the advancement of their ethos. This Nation in particular, I am still hard pressed to find the patriotic blacks for America fraternity. I don’t feel to far off the mark when I suggest that the sentiment of hostility more than not fuels any black enthusiasms toward America. One would be batting zero if conducting a survey throughout the millions of American blacks residing in the ghetto when asking who the original thirteen colonies were or, shit, what county they were even in.

When I became white, I realized that my culture is dying. I love American history. How could anyone want to be a part of a country or even loyal to it, if they could care less about its heroes and the concepts that made it uniquely divine, whose ideals could only come from God Himself?

Social Justice Baristas

via Radix

In move that could be considered a STIHIE if it wasn't so Onion-worthy and likely to backfire, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz (guess his ethnicity!) now wants his baristas to discuss race relations with customers.
Starbucks published a full page ad in the New York Times on Sunday — a stark, black, page with a tiny caption “Shall We Overcome?” in the middle, and the words “RaceTogether” with the company logo, on the bottom right. The ad, along with a similar one on Monday in USA Today, is part of an initiative launched this week by the coffee store chain to stimulate conversation and debate about the race in America by getting employees to engage with customers about the perennially hot button subject.
Beginning on Monday, Starbucks baristas will have the option as they serve customers to hand cups on which they’ve handwritten the words “Race Together” and start a discussion about race. This Friday, each copy of USA Today — which has a daily print circulation of almost 2 million and is a partner of Starbucks in this initiative — will have the first of a series of insert with information about race relations, including a variety of perspectives on race. Starbucks coffee shops will also stock the insert.
If you think this is a terrible business move and will only further alienate non-lefty Whites from his coffee brand, Schultz dismisses those concerns as nonsense.
In a video addressing Starbucks’ nearly 200,000 workers, 40% of whom are members of a racial minority, Schultz dismissed the notion that race was too hot a topic business-wise for Starbucks to tackle.
“I reject that. I reject that completely,” he said in the video address. “It’s an emotional issue. But it is so vitally important to the country,” he continued, pointing to that the United States is “so much better” than what the current state of race relations portray it to be.
Fortune pointed out the obvious downside of allowing self-righteous twenty-somethings the ability to lecture customers who just came in for coffee. Arguments will break out and service will slow the fuck down as urban elves fight over whether Michael Brown had his hands up or not.

In my opinion, this is a hilarious move that will definitely backfire for Starbucks and urban elves in general. There's only so much lecturing White America can take on race--that's why they try to avoid it as much as possible. The last place they want to hear about it is at their favorite multinational coffee chain. Instead of turning customers into SJWs, it will only drive them further away from the predominant narrative on race.

So the next time you find yourself stuck in the line at Starbucks, bring up the "Color of Crime" to your tattoed server and watch her face contort as she gets a real lesson on race in America.

European Union Failing, Nationalism Surging, Multiculturalism Dying


As the European Coal and Steel Community of Jean Monnet evolved into the EU, we were told a “United States of Europe” was at hand, modeled on the USA. And other countries and continents will inevitably follow Europe’s example.

There will be a North American Union of the U.S., Canada and Mexico, and a Latin America Union of the Mercosur trade partnership.

In an essay, “The E.U. Experiment Has Failed,” Bruce Thornton of Hoover Institution makes the case that the verdict is in, the dream is dead, the EU is unraveling, One Europe is finished.

Consider, first, economics. In 2013, Europe grew by 1 percent compared to the U.S.’s 2.2 percent. In December, unemployment in Europe was 11.4 percent. In the U.S., 5.6 percent. Americans are alarmed by the lowest labor force participation rate since Reagan, 62.7 percent. In Europe, in 2013, it was 57.5 percent.

Europeans may wail over German-imposed “austerity,” but the government share of Europe’s GDP has gone from 45 percent in 2008 to 49 percent today. In Greece, it is 59 percent.

Most critical is the demographic crisis. For a nation to survive, its women must produce on average 2.1 children. Europe has not seen that high a fertility rate in 40 years. Today, it is down to 1.6 children.

Europeans are an aging, shrinking, disappearing, dying race.

And the places of Europe’s unborn are being filled by growing “concentrations of unassimilated and disaffected Muslim immigrants, segregated in neighborhoods like the banlieues of Paris or the satellite ‘dish cities’ of Amsterdam.

“Shut out from labor markets, plied with generous social welfare payments and allowed to cultivate beliefs and cultural practices inimical to democracy, many of these immigrants despise their new homes, and find the religious commitment and certainty of radical Islam an attractive alternative.”

“Some turn to terrorism,” like the French-Algerian brothers who carried out the slaughter at the magazine Charlie Hebdo.

“Such violence,” writes Thornton, “along with cultural practices like honor killings, forced marriages and polygamy … are stoking a political backlash against Muslims.”

Populist parties are surging–the U.K. Independence Party in Britain, the National Front in France, and now the “Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the Occident,” PEGIDA, in Germany, These parties will soon be strong enough to enter governments, impose restrictions on immigration and demand assimilation.

Then the cultural conflicts may turn violent.

A fundamental question has troubled European unification since the Treaty of Rome in 1957, writes Thornton: “What comprises the collective beliefs of and values that can form the foundations of a genuine European-wide community? What is it that all Europeans believe?

“Europe and its nations were forged in the matrix of ideas, ideals, and beliefs of Christianity, which gives divine sanction to notions like human rights, the sanctity of the individual, political freedom and equality. Today across Europe Christian belief is a shadow of its former self.

“Fewer and fewer Europeans regularly go to Church. … It is common for many European cathedrals to have more tourists during a service than parishioners. … This process of secularization–already well advanced in 1887 when Nietzsche famously said, ‘God is no more than a faded word today, not even a concept’–is nearly complete today, leaving Europe without its historical principle of unity.”

Political religions–communism, fascism, Nazism–are substitute gods that failed. “Nor has secular social democracy … provided people with a transcendent principle that justifies sacrifice for the greater good, or even gives people a reason to reproduce.

“A shared commitment to leisure, a short workweek, and a generous social safety net is nothing worth killing or dying for.”

And who will die for Donetsk, Luhansk or Crimea?

Pacifism beckons. Every major European nation in NATO–Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland–will see defense spending in 2015 below 2 percent of GDP.

The idea of One Europe has depended on “the denigration of patriotism and national pride,” writes Thornton, “Yet all peoples are the products of a particular culture, language, mores, traditions, histories, landscapes. … That sense of belonging to a community defined by a shared identity cannot be created by a single currency.”

Christianity gave Europe its faith, identity, purpose and will to conquer and convert the world. Christianity created Europe. And the death of Christianity leaves the continent with no unifying principle save a watery commitment to democracy and La Dolce Vita.

From Marine Le Pen’s France to Putin’s Russia, nationalism and patriotism are surging across Europe because peoples, deprived of or disbelieving in the old faith, want a new faith to give meaning, purpose, vitality to their lives, something to live for, fight for, die for.

Countless millions of Muslims have found in their old faith their new faith. And the descendants of fallen-away European Christians of the 19th and 20th centuries are finding their new faith in old tribal and national identities.

Less and less does multiculturalism look like the wave of the future.

Titanomachia: Pondering Inner-Generational Conflict

via The High Right

Over the last few years I’ve been thinking more and more about the Baby Boomer generation.  The approximation of my generation to that generation, possible biological conflicts, as well as a philosophical rejection of their values, has led me to consider their role in my identity and thought processes.  My parents being a part of that generation, and aligning themselves with the far left hippie movement, has made the Baby Boomer generation one that I find myself in constant conflict with, that leads to deep reflection.  For me to deny their influence, and my subsequent reaction to it, would be a dishonest route to the truth.

First, and foremost, it’s important to understand that I’m not offering any sort of olive branch to the generation in power.  I offer no apologies or excuses for them. I feel that we must analyze our reaction to them to better strengthen our position.  I cannot act as if my view exists in a vacuum, completely isolated from the natural dynamic of child and parent relationships.  Juvenile temper tantrums exist for adults; as well as the thirteen year old juveniles currently controlling our economy.  I, for one, have kept this in mind and try to understand this dilapidated and confused generation as best as possible.

Remove all thoughts of hippie leftism from your mind when dealing with the Boomers.  They were, by a large account, far removed from the media portrayal of long hairs having sit-ins on college campuses.  The people that joined the SDS and hit the streets to bring power to the people were a small minority.  Sure, this minority went onto become the representatives of their generation in the media, academy, and government.  But it’s been obvious that the die had been cast long before their generation came into existence, America had been on a steady decline of leftism since its inception.  A majority of Boomers, especially in the fly-over states, weren’t too far removed from their parent’s culture.

babies (2)

There are certain areas where the Boomers can be classified as united.  The generation was deeply materialistic, not only monetarily, but materialistic in the sense of physical property.  Whether it is fashion or automobiles, one can see through mountains of evidence this was their primary motivation.  They were for the most part strict individualist, having some of the first, now typical, adolescent breakdowns on record.  A juxtaposition of having to be a member of the out-group, to be accepted by the in-group, seemed to be a great concern of the generation.  The glorification of unacceptable behaviors by society, was confused with individualism, and resulted in a rejection of traditionalism.  Tradition driven societies often see the vanity and emptiness of a consumerist lifestyle.  Without any true grounding to their culture, whether by rejection or peer pressure, the Boomers limited their capacity for the esoteric leaving only the materialistic. The Boomers were also very driven and goal oriented people.  One thing they did inherit gladly from their parents was a dedication to work, though I believe it was more about status and materialism than their predecessors.  The Boomer dwelt on material possessions and status positions which resulted in divorce and estrangement of the family, which has plagued the generation.

The Boomers were born in an era of decline, an even more rootless generation in an ever increasingly rootless culture.  The fact of the matter is the Boomers were beset upon by an alarming amount of media propaganda, directed towards consumerism.  The first generation to be raised with televisions, magazines, and popular culture aimed at marketing products to them.  The media has been noticeably hostile to traditionalism, as it realized that a culture steeped in tradition is much harder to sell things too.  Money being the center of the enlightenment democracy the Boomers became emblematic of the excesses of such a system.

There has been mounting evidence in recent years that this generation was beset upon by all angles and created as a product of the industrial era.  Beyond the intentional consumerism directed at them, there’s mounting evidence that the drug use that destroyed the generation was also intentional. LSD has been linked to the Department of Defense, and some of the original gurus of psychedelics were involved in experiments early on in the military and military operations on college campuses.  Along with this are the uncovered records of both CIA and FBI infiltration of high ranking officials in the leftist anti-war movements and counter-culture organizations.  At this point, leftist activists, heavily influenced by psychoanalysis, anthropology, and sociology, were already beginning to dominate the college discourse and leading political figures.  I’ve personally read some intriguing articles by David McGowan that claim even the music and films of the 60’s were part of a covert operation; leading musicians, directors, and actors of the era had deep Military Industrial Complex familial ties.


Evola’s interpretation of the hippie era was, paraphrasing; they had the right response, rejecting the values of the Bourgeoisie that was running amok since the enlightenment.  Evola felt that after rejecting those sentiments they went in the wrong direction, adopting Marxist destruction instead of rightest traditionalism.  Though the fringe of the Boomers did exhibit a subconscious pull of traditionalism by creating communes, becoming interested in the occult, and environmentalism; all of these instincts were quickly infiltrated and frustrated.  Leaving me a tendency to see the era as artificially created, especially when one looks at how much power a few radicals had on an entire culture.  As I’ve mentioned the majority of the era was straight laced and shared their parent’s views on communism and cultural issues.  But a small minority of radicals was allowed unprecedented media attention and influence on power players of the time.  With twenty-twenty hindsight, from a position where the Boomers have already gained power and implemented their programs, it’s difficult not to see it controlled.  Never in world history has an entire culture been changed by a handful of twenty-something’s, let alone change the world as this generation has done.  Unless it wasn’t at all changed by these youths, they were used by those in power to enforce the dramatic change now reflected in the West.

The Greeks of the ancient world used symbols to fight the corrosiveness of time.  As a result we can easily go back to the early writings to find meaning for today.  That’s what makes the gods so alive; it’s the anti-time of the myths and legends that brings their genius to our present.  It’s impossible to read of the gods and come upon a legend that resonates specifically with something that happened recently, and not recognize it as genius.  This genius is essentially what our ancestors worshiped.  When one comes across a certain passage written thousands of years ago that becomes a perfect symbol of today, it shatters the preconception of time as linear, we then see the connection of time as cyclical, even the past touching rushing forward and touching the present, constantly.

The Greeks were aware of the cycles of time even dividing up time into distinct eras.  The Golden Age is first, followed by the Silver, Bronze, Heroic, and then the Iron (the present age).  The Iron Age is the era of decline; the Vedic’s referred to this era as the Kali Yuga.  For our age Hesiod claims, “there will be no help against evil.” It’s a time of no honor or respect, when lies become truth, and misery reigns.  With this short explanation most would agree we find ourselves in the Iron Age.


The Golden Age was ruled over by Cronus, the Titan of the ancient world.  Cronus was born of, his mother, Gaia (the earth) and, his father, Uranus (the sky).  Cronus and his siblings were hidden by Uranus in Tartarus, a deep abyss of torment also known as Hades.  There they stayed until Cronus was urged by Gaia to ambush and castrate his father.  After this deed Cronus ruled the world, The Golden Age was a time of perfection where peace and harmony ruled.  Cronus learned from his mother that he would share the same fate as his father.  His sons would rise up and overthrow him, and rule the world.  Upon hearing this Cronus, most famously, devoured his children as soon as they were born to fend off this fate.  This resulted in his wife giving birth to their son Zeus in secret, hiding him in a cave until he could take revenge and capture the throne himself.

If we look at the modern world as being epitomized by the Baby Boomer generation, we can easily compare them to Cronus and his Golden Age.  The Boomers believed that they would usher in a Golden Age, their utopia, but it never came. The castration of the father is seen in the castration of our culture.  From today’s perspective nothing can display too much masculinity, or any masculinity, unless it’s being portrayed negatively.  We find God castrated by an overemphasis on love and forgiveness.  We find formerly fraternal institutions opened and infiltrated by feminine thought, even the military is being subjected to lower expectations for incoming women soldiers.  Practically everything our ancestors built has had all of the traits of manhood stripped away and watered down; strength, aggressiveness, and power are cursed in the modern age.  Castration is also the destruction of fertility, making sure that what has been castrated can never reproduce, create new life, similar life, life that could at some point become a threat to the castrator.


We can also compare, similarly, Cronus devouring his young.  The Boomer destruction of the historic West damned their children to live an even more rootless and nihilistic life then they themselves lived.  As the Boomers grew older they gladly sold off their inheritance by out-sourcing jobs overseas, passing harmful trade legislation, opening the boarders to cheaper labor, building Wal-Mart’s, plundering the small businesses.  They gave themselves outrageous pensions, racked up massive debts, started war after never ending war that has destroyed their prodigy.  No stone was left unturned in the rush for profits and spoils, and no has been child left behind who will not be devoured by their materialism.

If this is a true symbol of our times this generational conflict will lead to the Titanomachy, a series of battles between the Titans, like Cronus, and the Olympians, like Zeus.  After the war Zeus and his brothers divided the world and ruled it. Though the Olympians succeeded against the Titans it’s interesting to know that Cronus was not castrated or killed.  It seems that there are several accounts of the fate of Cronus, most believe that he was forgiven and given a special dominion to rule over.  Though I’ve strayed from the orthodoxy of the legend, and overemphasized the role of one particular generation, I feel that I have given the concept of our parent’s faults some due.

As I have said I feel that the Boomers and even their children could be seen to epitomize and symbolize the modern world, the Iron Age itself.  And I do believe the symbols and analogies of war are fitting.  Though I do want to stress the aspect of mercy and forgiveness, ironically in the Titanomachy some of the Titans defected to fight with the Olympians and sure enough we do have many boomers on our side.  As for the rest we will never win them over, they will die in belief that they lived a righteous and pure life, some even believing they ushered in the Golden Age.  In their own way they are a victim of their own actions, and possibly even a greater Cronus, a Cronus that devoured them long, long, ago.

Review of J. M. Cotzee's DISGRACE

via The Occidental Observer

This novel is about as spectacular as Camp of the Saints, by Jeanne Raspal of 45 years ago.

It describes the fix we have got ourselves into with our misguided altruism, as well, as mad moralism directly descended from the Old Testament and Talmud and thru the Protestant churches and on to our current liberalism without God, but full of Ahabism per Melville’s Moby Dick.  Nature to be subdued, evolution to be vanquished by Liberal Fiat:  We are all Equal.  Nature does not care for liberal magic. It just goes on and on, like Moby Dick pushing aside Liberals and occasionally killing them as well. Nothing personal.

I suspect that it was not lost on energetic minds in the time of Darwin, that whales being mammals, must have returned to the sea at some very long time distant from our own time, thus providing such obvious judgment on biblical creation of six thousand years ago.  Evolution as Leviathan of the Deep and Remote Past… disinterested in us of course, with neither malice nor favoritism, and just swimming along through the millennia seeding more and more species, more and more genuine diversity, more and more complexity, with Equality of anything a complete joke on Man, especially White folks who obsess about their moral fitness, and waving magic wands over non-Whites (Change! …ping!) thus failing to observe Nature correctly… a realm of total Inequality in all the ranks of animals, and plants, and every bug or dung-beetle rolling its dinner homeward.

I wrote the following review about 3 years ago… and I keep thinking about the novel… Coetzee got a Nobel Prize.  He is an Africaner, from South Africa and has been well situated to view what has been happening in South Africa, as well as the world, his vantage peering out over Blackness at home and thus seeing it and its kin on the other shore.

P.S.  Subsequent to the writing of this review, I discovered that the ‘Education of the eye’ is a reference to Ruskin and his esthetic theory: “to see clearly is poetry, prophecy and religion all in one” which Lurie ironically observes is lost on him with his remark that he has never had much of an eye for anything except pretty girls.  So much for Jewish esthetics.

Read a few years ago, Disgrace has been popping up in my head for a while. It is hailed as a great contemporary novel set in post-Apartheid South Africa.  Rather than go through the whole plot, the reader should consult the Internet, for a lot of material on J.M. Coetzee, including criticism.  The lit-crit bunch has missed a whole lot.  They — and the reviewers — have missed something central to the novel:  the main character is Jewish.

David Lurie is a lecherous lit professor who is obsessed with sex, and exploits the romantic poets to rationalize, if that be the right word, his philandering.  Coetzee cleverly invites the reader’s sympathy for David Lurie by having him besieged by the League of the Righteous & Politically Correct at his university.  Yes, they are Femi-commies and repulsive, but Professor David Lurie, standing up for Principle, that being privacy and against cant/hypocrisy, is not only contemptuous of the academic PC crowd of multi-cultis,  but of his friends as well;  this goes way past reason.  After all, he has more or less violated a 19-year-old student which he readily admits.  Not rape, but barely consenting sex, a cold affair, without the girl-woman’s  passion or enthusiasm.  She has been pushed into it, without mutuality.

It is possible that some alert and certifiably non-zombie-sleep walker of a critic has seen that David Lurie is Jewish.   I have not read all the commentary, but have read some of it.  However, assuming that most, if not all , of the reviewers and critics are aware of Jews, especially in the literary world, and are attuned to  allusion,  as in Lurie’s daughter’s name, Lucy  (the reference is to Wm. Wordsworth’s Lucy poems — Professor David Lurie is a Wordsworth specialist.  Wordworth’s  Lucy is variously innocent of sex,  a goddess of Good, a lost love,  dead,  a romantic vision). I am struck by the blinders that these critics have imposed on their psyches.  See No Evil, Speak No…etc.  David Lurie, the Jew, becomes invisible.

Lurianic Kabbala is one tendency in Cabbala.  Isaac Luria (1534-1572) was the leader.  He claimed to be able to read his students’ souls and commune with the dead.  There is much comedy in this stuff if you are a rational kind of person, but we are concerned here with Jews. One of the other themes in Lurianic Kabbala, is this:  God is not fully formed; he is in a state of Becoming, not Being.  This theme has also been around in Judaism generally.  Thus rabbis instruct God.  Other  historic Cabbalistic tendencies associated with Sabbatianism  go deeply into transgression and very strange sex, indeed a sexual obsession that shows up in prayer,  “theology,” behavior, modern Jewish novels, Freud and psychoanalysis.

So, far be it from me to presume to suggest that J.M. Coetzee, is not conscious of what he is doing, writing about a Jew and his daughter, the mother being Dutch, some of his characters with Jewish names, Cabbalistic cues, various remarks by other characters that cannot be evaded by the clear-of-eye.

Professor Lurie is “disgraced” but only feels ostracism.  He feels that he is in the Right.  He has a right to honor Eros.  He goes to live with his daughter in the countryside around the Cape.  His daughter, Lucy, is a kind of hippie, back-to-the-land, once-member of a commune-now-disbanded, lesbian, and small farmer who also boards dogs and thereby scrapes out a living.  She is surrounded by Blacks and occasional Afrikaner farmers who live and travel with guns and dogs.  (Thousands of White farmers have been murdered by Blacks since 1994 in S. Africa.)

David Lurie, the ex-professor, is not disgraced so much as he is confounded by his life of  sexual experience and, per David Lurie, not much else.  That is what he broods over, although his love for Lucy (the Innocent), his daughter, is great. The girl-woman that he has wronged, her surname is Isaacs, another Jewish name, and the first name of the Cabbala writer above.  Her parents have apparently converted to Christianity, or the family had converted at an earlier time.  I suspect this is lost on the critics as well.  Mr. Isaacs, the girl-woman’s father, treats David Lurie very well, considering Lurie’s  transgression . This is part of David Lurie’s attempt at honesty when he goes to visit and sort of apologizes.

Lucy and her father are home-invaded by Blacks, who set-fire to David Lurie, rape Lucy, ransack the house, and shoot all of her dogs — purebreds, interestingly.  Luckily for David Lurie, he is doused with mentholated spirits which burn slowly, not gasoline, and he manages to get water from the toilet… to put out the flames. (One could connect the Fire of Eros and, with a stretch, the toilet as a related animal function.)  He comes out of it more or less okay,  but for a piece of his ear gone,  another literary device which comments on his, if not tin-ear, then less than competent ear  for the opera he is  attempting/obsessed with, an opera based on the poet Lord Byron’s Erotic futility.  Lucy is okay but pregnant with apparently the doubled bad luck to have been impregnated by the sperm from one of the three donors who is not only Black but mentally deranged.

David Lurie’s present life runs parallel to Lord Byron’s in Italy, down to the last detail of Byron’s Teresa getting squat and middle-aged while David Lurie beds an equally squat and middle-aged friend of Lucy.  This woman becomes someone  David Lurie  odd-couples with at the end.

Lucy meanwhile totally surrenders to her fate, she refuses to leave the farm, to get an abortion, to go home to Holland where her mother is (Mother Europe) which Lurie of course begs her to do.  She will marry the next-door African neighbor for protection from the surrounding Blacks.  She will have the baby of the Black mentally defective-rapist, she will keep part of her farm, while conceding most of it to her Black neighbor who already has two wives, like South African Whites who have ceded their country.

Her rapists are known to her Black neighbor, are even part of his kin.  She sees that her neighbor has set up the rape to force her to come to terms.  The Blacks now run the show.  Why does she submit to this Disgrace?  She replies to her father’s demands for Justice, that she will not go to the police, what happened to her is a “private matter,  [that] in this place, at this time, it is … my business.”   “What place?”, her father demands.  Lucy: “This place being South Africa.” (p. 112).  David Lurie asks her if she is expiating for the crimes of the past and she says that those words are just “abstractions”.

Lucy’s father pleads with her:  she is “defeated” (p. 151),  she sees the Blacks as debt-collectors, and why should she not pay?(p. 158);  she wonders why she experienced such personal hatred from the rapists, Lurie says it is just “history”,  a history of “wrong.”   (Does this “wrong” belong too to J.M. Coetzee?)  Lucy fights with her father, will not listen to him, claims a personal subjectivity that gives her the right to defend the rapists for their payback.

Finally she says, that the rapists, the rape, the mulatto in her womb, are “facts of life”.  “I am prepared to do anything, make any sacrifice, for the sake of peace” (p. 208).
Well, there we have it, the woman in her White Guilt, her love of any child, even the defective in her womb, defective on top of a black African IQ average of 68.  This is a Total Surrender to mere Life.    This is the surrender of the White race, our genetic White Goodness leading to race suicide.  It is our Racial Disgrace.

There are several bits in the novel that whisper “Jew”.  For example, friendship and care are extended to Lurie following his near lynching … by a friend of Lucy’s.   He does not trust it … “Though they are his countrymen, he could not feel more alien among them, more of an imposter” (p. 191).  He reacts to an innocent gesture of  the Black neighbor which in Europe is a gesture for money/Jew (p. 130), a bit like Phillip Roth’s characters sojourning amongst the goyim. The girl-woman’s boyfriend tells Lurie to “stay with your own kind” (p. 194)… all missed by the critics.

So if Lucy, a probable Christian or Christian subvert surrenders to the Blacks and is thereby disgraced, what about Professor Lurie and his “lurid” artistic interests?  He returns to help Bev Shaw, Lucy’s friend, in her dog rescue/euthanasia mission.  He takes a truckload of dead dogs once a week to the local incinerator and officiates with a death ritual.  There are Cabbalistic references here:  “Perhaps he (a dog about to be euthanized) has already been through it.  Born with foreknowledge….” (p. 83).   He also communes with the dead dogs, a Cabbalistic theme. He appears to be less than unrepentant, but chastened in some way.  He develops compassion for dying dogs, but  not for people.  Of course, he is thinking about his own death in the near distance.  He remarked (p. 69) William Blake’s “Sooner murder an infant in its cradle than nurse unacted desires.”

Blake’s ’unacted desires’ was a transgressive erotic urge of revolt for Cabbalists of the Sabbatian type, and  was passed on directly to (the Romantics?) the Freudians, Frankfurt School  sex-pol agitators, and our own sexual revolution of the 1960s, intellectually provoked by all of the above.

Lurie reflects that while he is a Wordsworth scholar (Wordsworth the premier nature poet),  “he has never had much of an eye for anything, except pretty girls; and where has that got him?  Is it too late to educate the eye?” (p. 218).

“Educate the eye”?  The soul or the genome is what needs education.  But the genome is not going to be educated, it is fixed, like Death, which is what he is now thinking about.  Despair of sorts, his beloved daughter gone to seed,  gone with the God of Rape… of “…chaos and mixture, violator of seclusions” (p. 105).  He looks to Lord Byron’s Teresa.  “Teresa may be the last one who can save him.” (p.209)  Hers is a resignation.  She is past honor, she sings and scorns the snickering of her servants and “sings her immortal longings. She will not be dead.”  And, she, like Professor Lurie, has nothing but her Eros.

Professor David Lurie has experienced the link between Eros and Death but does not understand it.  He has enjoyed his transgressions; he mocks the gentiles around him who have tried to help him.  J.M. Coetzee is surely conscious of the Jewish character that he has created.

Lucy, the Innocent, with idiot Black child.  White Civilization is going under to the Blacks.  The Liberals, like perhaps Coetzee, seeing it in some degree but lacking courage to see completely what is right in front of them, like the critics who cannot see that Professor David Lurie is a Jew.

Jewish Invisibility:  Liberals and almost all putative conservatives get up in the morning, dress, put on their blinders, dig into their feed-bags of the New York Times, slip into harness, obey the psychic crack of the whip, and the Israel Cult resumes its thrall.

David Lurie tells Lucy that the Blacks  “want you for their slave.”  Lucy returns:  “not slavery.  Subjugation.  Subjugation.” (p. 159).  Lucy knows she is submitting.  She is clear enough.  Lucy feels that she is doing penance for White “wrongs” to the Blacks.

Lucy intends White Racial Eclipse, surrendering to mere animality, while David likewise, mates with his Teresa, and studies his fate, to usher dogs ritualistically to their deaths, in between his copulations.   He cares about Lucy, but otherwise, Eros is All.

Hollywoodism: The Ideology that Has Devoured Western Culture

via The Realist Report

Western culture has come to define itself through an alien ideology disseminated through Hollywood. It is a superimposed culture, a fantasy structure that we're all living in. True Western European values have been replaced by another, a new global religion called Hollywoodism. Who is behind this new ruling ideology, re-defining western culture?

Below is the excellent new documentary film produced by Henrik Palmgren and Red Ice Radio, whose radio program I recently appeared on. Support Red Ice Radio by becoming a member today!

Mali Principii Malus Finis

via Alternative Right

"An angel came to me and said: ‘O pitiable foolish young man! O horrible! O dreadful state! Consider the hot burning dungeon thou art preparing for thyself to all eternity, to which thou are going in such career’ I said: ‘perhaps you will be willing to shew me my eternal lot & we will contemplate together upon it and see whether your lot or mine is most desirable" —William Blake

We—as a people—have no spiritual identity. Not that pan-Europeans lack spiritual impulse, or spiritual distinctions—we have all that, from New Age to Calvinism — what we lack is an identity of ourselves as a cohesive group of mutually respecting believers: a spiritual identity that encloses all of us as members of our Folk. And it has been to our detriment—it took a long time coming, granted—but we now face a withered future. Shriveled in spirit, shriveled in self-respect, shriveled in unity. We are decaying, spiritually, and have been doing so for a long time (almost 2000 years)—what’s more, it is just getting faster and faster—take the last 60 years as a mere foretaste of what’s coming.
"The fact is that spiritual decay comes from a lack of a cultural identity for the belief itself. Why is this? It is because indigenous religions were formed from the very core of our ancestral soul. They developed through countless eons and are ingrained into the very fiber of our being. In ancient times the world ‘religion’ did not exist, nor were there any distinctions between different beliefs, other than the cultural identity." Mark Puryear, The Nature of Asatru (p. xix)
For the Folk—and by this I mean for the European and European-descended peoples—the difference between Pagan and non-Pagan members of ourselves is sadly reversed these days. We still have a cultural identity—white people—that brooks little distinction between us. Face it, whether Irish or Hungarian or Greek, we as Europeans are cohesively stuck (sometimes whether we want to be or not) being non-people-of-color living in a multi culti colored world redesigned to accommodate everyone except us.
However, we have no cohesive spiritual identity.
What’s that? We did have spiritual cohesiveness, some of you say, before these ridiculous Neo-Pagans reared their raven banners and swayed the crowds with ancient myths and bloody sagas? Well, we did and we did not. What we had, my friends (and, for that matter, my enemies, too) was a couple of millennia’s worth (give or take a millennia depending on where we are talking about; Lithuania didn’t convert to Christianity until 1387) of official pan-European Christianity that lumped all us white Folks together under one big religious assumption: if you are European, you are Christian.
Note that I used the world ‘official’ back there. There was never any complete Christianization of Europe. No—despite all the lumping, all the pretty churches, the impressive cathedrals, the wonderful art and the massive amounts of textual material Christian Europe produced—there was never a time when the true soul of Europa paid anything more than a forced lip service to a foreign god. Sure, sure, there were plenty of pious priests and devout missionaries, sure sure there were lots and lots of Christian soldiers going onward, sure sure there was a lot of ecclesiastic fervor and fanatisicm...
But, the thing is.....for all its hellfire and damnation theatrics, it never really ‘took’ completely.
"Christianity was forced upon Northern Europe with centuries of warfare, inquisitions and political manipulations. Even with the immense power of the Roman Empire behind it, it still took 500 years to convert all of the northern nations, and they never realized their goal of wiping out the ancient religions entirely. This [essay] is living proof of that, as is the entire Asatru nation as it stands today. We mustn’t resent modern Christians for this, for most do not even know about it and just want to live their lives as good people under the standards they were raised by." Mark Puryear, The Nature of Asatru (p. xix)
Modern Christianity—despite the overweaning softness you might encounter in, say, a Lutheran meeting room that is planning a helpful hopeful mission to be set up in rural Uganda for local inhabitants there who might have AIDS—in all its permutations is still Christianity—plain ol’ Burn-the-Witch Christianity. Just as the so called Neo-Pagan faith in all its guises is still purely and only Pagan.
"Neo-Paganism, if in fact there is such a thing, is not a cult phenomenon"[Alain de Benoist, Alain, On Being A Pagan (p. 5)]—putting the prefix ‘Neo’ on the word Pagan is a mean little verbal jab made by Christians (dare I say Neo-Christians?) in an attempt to diminish and denigrate Pagan Faiths. Faiths that have never needed to become newly re-established as they have existed much longer than Christianity has and have never not existed (remember, for countless eons Christianity has not existed). Personally, I think that since Christianity has only existed for about two thousand years and Pagan Europe has been around for, oh.....since the dawn of European time...the term Neo rightfully only belongs to those new-kids-on-the-old-European-spiritual-block: Christianity...and its sibling Islam, too.
"In truth Paganism never died. From the attempts to restore solar worship under the Illyrian emperors (notably under Aurelius, thanks to the support of Plotinus), and from those undertaken later by the Emperor Julian, it has been a constant inspiration. At the end of the 4th century, a time when Christianity, which had become a State Religion, would appear to have triumphed, we can even speak of a ‘Pagan renaissance’. Pagan values subsequently continued to survive, both in the collective unconscious and in certain customary Folk rituals (incorrectly labeled ‘Folklore’), in the theology of certain great ‘Christian’ heretics, and through the expedient of countless literary and artistic revivals. From Ronsard and du Bellay, literature has never stopped finding a fertile source of inspiration in pre-Christian Antiquity, whereas for fifteen centuries political deliberation has been nourished by a meditation on the purely Pagan principle of the imperium, the bedrock of that prodigious enterprise, perhaps the most grandiose in all of history: the Roman Empire."
Alain de Benoist, On Being A Pagan, 2004 (p. 9)
Yes, European Christianity enmeshed itself into the European Soul (but enmeshing is not the same as becoming one with), starting with trying to dig out the Pagan roots of Europe’s first and only true spirituality. (Let me clarify ‘first and only true spirituality’ for the benefit of those readers who are unfamiliar with non-Abrahamic belief systems:
"The race, tribe, or nation is linked to the Gods in a unique relationship; Gods and people might be thought of as expressions of each other. In this world view, the essence of a religion is not transferrable outside the group... All indigenous/native/Pagan religions—not just Asatru—spring from the soul of a particular people and represent the collective experience of that people". Stephen McNallen, Three Decades of the Asatru Revival in America in "Tyr" Vol II, 2004 (p. 205) 
Christianity, still desperately trying to fit in.
Christianity did its enmeshing and digging through projecting its self-proclaimed truth into the unsuspecting Folk soul by merging and blurring the ancient ways—never killing them, mind you, but simply re-casting them with a Christian form:
"Just as Christ, though his death, overpowered the monstrous serpent, so Thor triumphed over the Midgardworm or Midgard serpent, the Mugardsschlange. The similarity of the sign of the cross and of the hammer makes it possible that the newly converted Germans had imagined Christ to be the God of thunder and provider of rain."
Jakob Grimm, Germanic Mythology (trans. Vivian Bird), Washington DC, Scott-Townsend: 1997 (p. 20)
Before the Christians arrived, Europe had religion. Lots of it. There were numerous existent ways of natural and distinct spiritual expression that sprang from the soul of Europe—from the Wodanic to the Druidic to the Hellenic to the Romuva to beyond—all of which were pantheistic. Each one was as unique to its localized micro-culture within the greater pan-Indo European world as a family is unique to the greater race it comes from. Mutual respect between these spiritual systems was a given—it made no difference if a Greek worshipped Zeus while a Celt worshipped Lugh—for one faith cannot diminish another faith when all are held equally respectable.
Since time unfathomable to historical research, in Europe organic faith was not diminished by organic faith, and cultural identity was not diminished by the flourishing of any number of organic faiths up and down and over and across the whole Indo-European people’s world. Remember this, please, for it all changes when Christianity enters Europe’s history. Which is your history, dear reader.
"Only after their conversion to Christianity, whose idea of God corresponded to the intolerant, religious war-waging gods of the Semitic tribe, have Indo-European peoples forced their beliefs on alien tribes; the king of the Franks, Charlemagne forced Christianity on the Saxons who were subjected after a bloody struggle. King Olav Tryggveson of Norway (995-1000) after being baptized in England, was persuaded to force conversion on his own people by cunning, treachery and cruel persecutions, as well as bribing them to submit to baptism. Andreas Hensler has asserted that among the Northern Teutons there was quite enough violence, but never cruelty; only after the introduction of Christianity did converted zealots behave cruelly towards their countrymen. With the conversion of the North, an alien wave of cruelty entered the land."
Hans Gunther, Religious Attitudes of the Indo-Europeans, Sussex, Historical Review Press: 2001 (p. 59)
Christianity is a revealed religion—it doesn’t spring from the core of a Folk, it is wholly revealed to them—taught to them, in other words, part and parcel. It is not instinctual or natural, it is learned. Which is fair enough if you like that sort of thing, but it is not fair enough when you don’t, or if you aren’t familiar with how Christianity works. Christianity works through conversion—it’s not enough that you give it respect, you must adhere to its tenets and you must convert to its masses. If you won’t do so willingly, you do so unwillingly, or you can eat a snake.
"Olaf [I of Norway] routinely used force to compel conversions to Christianity, including executions and torture of those who refused. Several instances of Olaf's attempts led to days of remembrance amongst modern heathens similar to the feast days of martyred Christian saints. Raud the Strong (remembered January 9) refused to convert and, after a failed attempt using a wooden pin to pry open his mouth to insert a snake, was killed by a snake goaded by a hot poker through a drinking horn into Raud's mouth and down his throat."
More number-efficient and less overtly cruel conversions came with little cat feet, "a consequence of the deliberate inculturation of Germanic religio-cultural attitudes within Christianity by Christian missionaries."
"This process of accommodation resulted in the essential transformation of Christianity from a universal salvation religion to Germanic, and eventually European, Folk religion. The sociopsychological response of the Germanic peoples to this inculturated form of Christianity included the acceptance of those traditionally Christian elements which coincided with Germanic religiosity and the resolution of dissonant elements by reinterpreting them in accordance with the Germanic ethos and world-view".
James C. Russell, The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity, New York, Oxford University Press, 1994 (p. 39)
The old if you can’t beat them, let them think you’ve joined them routine, which was played and replayed all over Europe. Hence, Baldur becomes Jesus, Perkaunas becomes St. Michael, Hades becomes Satan and everybody who is anybody is celebrating Easter, Christmas, and building churches in old sacred groves. Hail Frigga! Hail Mary!
New branch of Abraham & Sons opening soon.
But, the Christians failed in their grand scheme to completely convert all the Folk and destroy Europa’s original spiritual orientation. They built cathedrals and the local pagans put Sheela-na-gigs in them, they made crosses out of Thor’s hammers and indigenous Folk masons made solar crosses out of the Celtic ones. We pagans kept everything—some of it mostly out of sight (runes, Folk ways), some of it hidden in plain sight (Folk tales, Folk art, bread and embroidery patterns, hex signs, the names of the week, May poles, Easter Eggs, Yule Logs, the Chivalric Code...the list of pagan components that got swallowed whole [and not chewed up] by Christianity goes on and on).
The old ways of our Folk have survived despite every intention of the alien spiritual usurper religion—there is nothing ‘new’ or ‘neo’ about them. The old ways are part of who we all are, they are not fiction, they are not fancy, they are not romantic dreams—they are the codes, the ways, the values, the ideals, the deepest impulses of our Folk. These pagan, heathen, ancient ways—be they be from Austria, Basque Region, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Cornwall, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Herzegovina, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kosovo, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Scotland, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, and Wales—are the ways of our Folk from time immemorial. These places are the cradles of our civilizations, the cores of our ethnicity/race/culture, the sacred wellsprings of all that European Folk are; these places have traditions and cultures and values and religious beliefs that have existed so much longer than Christianity has, and will continue to exist long after Christianity passes from our world here.
The cause of our people’s cohesive spiritual decay does not lie within the still alive European pagan/heathen/Odinist/Asatru—even Wiccan—traditions; how could it? "All survived in some form or other because they were beloved by the ordinary people and because they were nearer to them and more understandable than newer official religions."[Discovering English Folk Dance]
These traditions were and are part of a Europe that was alive and well when that ‘newer official religion’ of Christianity descended upon it—it’s all been downhill since then.
The decay of the cohesive European soul comes from without—like white sugar on teeth—and it is Christianity. Take that away and our spiritual identity as a Folk is recovered. With a recovered spiritual identity comes a recovered spiritual might—with might comes will, with will comes a future worth having once again. As English essayist Leigh Hunt wrote (in 1818, by the way—this has been a long time coming):
"If you all go on so, there will be a hope someday…a voice will be heard along the water saying ‘The Great God Pan is alive again’,—upon which the villagers will leave off starving, and singing profane hymns, and fall to dancing again."
If you don’t agree with me, that’s okay. As a pagan thinker I don’t feel the need to convert anyone against their will; I realize that an official religion which has a opening date will also have a closing date, so the whole Christian overlay is—assuming the European peoples survive it—pretty irrelevant in the long run of indigenous religious existence (akin to the 1688 invasion of England by the Dutch Republic…honestly, who really cares now?).
I do ask though, before you stop even disagreeing and go on to other things, for you to think back on these last 2000 years (particularly the last 60 or so in the Europe-as-global-village-wonder-spots) and—considering that Christianity is a universalist religion which preaches and practices that all of humanity is equal in the eyes of God, and that every person is deserving of charity (think of the Christian Children’s Fund, The Salvation Army, Feed the Children, and the massive church-aided Christian-charity-spirited migrations of all sorts of third world nationals into first world ‘Christian’ nations) and that this monotheistic Chimaera created from disparate races and cultures has sucked the strengths of spirit and identity out of the world (all over the world, not just Europe—indigenous cultures have been spiritually robbed in the name of Christianity from the Hawaiian Islands to the Orkneys) and that this Chimaera has sadly failed in its goal of world ‘salvation’ [look at me writing this!] and in its failing has left the world to cope with...well...what you see around you every day: the soiled, ruined and sorry leavings of an oppressive, alien, tyrannical and very wrong-minded regime (much like Communism on a more soul-breaking scale)—honestly ask yourself: what has Christianity done for Europe, ultimately? Really.
"O goat foot god of Arcady! The modern world hath need of thee!" —Oscar Wilde

Transvestites Turn the Tables on Feminists

via Occident Invicta

A recent incident marks an interesting twist in the God awful culture war that plagues the Anglosphere. A former member of Planet Fitness had her membership cancelled for protesting the presence of a transvestite in the women’s locker room. Planet Fitness pursued the safest (politically correct) route by getting rid of the complaining woman instead of ejecting the transvestite. Social Justice Warriors (Cultural Marxism’s shock troops) promptly and predictably rushed to the gym’s defense for defending transgender rights.

Social Justice Warriors may claim this incident as a victory for their demented cause, however, a large number of women and feminists are quite wary of transvestites invading their spaces. Some have protested against the transvestite invasion of The Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival:
The male transgender activists have literally formed an encampment each year outside the perimeter of the Michfest festival grounds, which they patrol with weapons and plan sabotage missions into the camp- to write graffiti, to cut the water lines to the handicapped showers, to slash tires, to wreck tents, to flier the camp with pictures of their penises. Last year many of the male transgenders fled their own encampment out of fear of the growing violence of their own group members. Why are these men so angry? Why do they want to destroy a private women’s music festival? Why do they want to force women to look at their penises?
And another:
Call me old fashioned, but I don’t want to use the bathroom along side of any person with a penis, except my husband, and sometimes I lock him out. In our quest for inclusion and political correctness, let’s not lose site of safety and common sense.
SJWs risk alienating the left’s most pampered pet class by dismissing their concerns as illiberal. Can feminists keep transvestites from invading female spaces?

Feminists are ill-equipped to fight this battle

I personally do not believe that transvestites should be allowed access to women’s washrooms as it is a genuine safety issue. Having said this, I can’t resist the instinct to bathe in a surging tide of schadenfreude whenever women whine about the invasion of their space. The irony is especially delicious considering that transvestites have begun invading female space using exactly the same language of “Equality” and anti-foundationalist logic that feminists have historically used to invade male spaces. It is utterly amusing to listen to women pine for a safe space that allows them to be women. No such courtesy is extended to men who must endure female incursions into their spaces (whether Golf courses or online game servers) that often result in the feminization of those spaces. Female solipsism is often amusing to observe from a distance.

These developments are ultimately the dead end of feminist ideology. Traditionalists have long held that gender and sex are irrevocably linked, yet feminists in their infinite wisdom have decreed otherwise; thereby sacrificing empiricism and science on the alter of ideology. The Inner Party would be pleased, 2 + 2 = 5. Feminists have long argued that Gender (and not genetics/sex) is instrumental in defining an individual’s personality and being. Gender, according to these ‘intellectuals’, is socially constructed and thus inherently flexible. Biological differences between the sexes (with the possible exception of strength) are dismissed (such as IQ) as Patriarchal controls aimed at suppressing the interests of women. If this ideology, grounded neither in reason nor science, is taken to its logical conclusion it must follow that transvestites are just as female as biologically born females. They are simply exercising their autonomy in choosing to identify as females and thus have every right to access female only spaces.

Feminists that oppose the transvestite incursion (not all of them do) are incapable of ideologically repelling this invasion because their adversaries have effectively used their own ideology against them. Planet Fitness acted well within the bounds of feminist ideology and SJWs acknowledged it with their support. When little 6 year old Suzy gasps at the sight of another woman’s penis in the restroom her mother can knowingly tell her that this is the price they must pay for equality.

Blogger Dalrock said it best: “Feminists get sick on their own dog food.

Bon app├ętit, feminists.”

Unlimited Government and the Parasite Class

via Radix

Now that Ferguson has been destroyed, the Great and the Good have moved on to their next target—college students. Not college students who beat women; that is forgivable as long as they are black and can throw a ball. The real enemies are White fraternity members who can remember what sex they are and occasionally send emails attached with mean words. 

The mainstream media’s latest campaign against Greek organizations has already spread beyond the University of Oklahoma. SAE is being targeted nationally because of its “Confederate” heritage, a Confederate flag in a private bedroom is cause for furrowed brows and frantic media coverage, and Gawker is doing its best to launch a SJW jihad at UMD as part of their larger campaign to “ban frats.” Needless to say, none of these incidents qualify as real “news” and the excessive media coverage is offensive, not to say obscene, when it is contrasted with the usual pattern of violent minority crime, racially motivated attacks against Whites, and ongoing campaigns of ethnic cleansing like those directed against White farmers in South Africa.

But clarity is achieved if we pretend we are foreigners viewing this hate campaign from the outside. If some Asian or African nation’s press was frantically campaigning against a certain group, calling their control of property and capital “unfair,” and ignoring violence in favor of promoting petty incidents and slights, we might conclude the ground was being prepared for more overt repression including the seizure of property or expulsion from state positions. And if we look past the demands to “ban fraternities” and the caterwauling about “racism,” we can see that the real agenda in these cases is about concrete demands for money, power, and resources.

This battle operates at two levels. The first is at the university itself. At the University of Oklahoma, the group that initially created the controversy was the ironically named black students’ organization “Unheard.” That group is now essentially dictating terms to University of Oklahoma President David Boren and receiving set-asides, including new “diversity” positions, more money for multicultural programs, and, we can assume, increased attention to admitting more minority students.

Each one of these policies acts as a kind of force multiplier for left-wing student activism. Perhaps the greatest weakness of politically right-of-center or White Identitarian youth in the United States is the critical lack of mentor figures permanently entrenched on any given campus. A left-leaning student or racially conscious non-white will set foot on a campus and find a whole network of tenured radicals, lavishly funded resource centers, set-aside housing, and even entirely artificial academic departments (Multicultural studies, Queer Studies, etc) designed to indoctrinate, radicalize, support, and defend any given extremist campaign.

The establishment of such academically questionable but politically valuable programs was the explicit goal of many student protests during the 1960’s and their existence at universities all over the country provides a cushy retirement home for leftists. Just ask Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

The existence of this vast support apparatus sustains both the grassroots student activists and the intellectual elite. Your typical black or Chicano activist is going to graduate, get a job, and operate in the same bourgeois society as everyone else, but he or she will not lose the Identity imposed in the formative years and will dedicate time, political support, and resources to leftist or anti-White causes for the rest of his or her life. More importantly, a smaller number of those graduates will become full time political activists, academics, or political functionaries skilled in the manipulation of language and media to secure further resources.

In the end, it leads to a society where ordinary White Americans find themselves aggressively challenged and dispossessed by angry minorities screaming about once esoteric and fringe concepts like “White privilege” or “institutional racism.” Ideas have consequences, as they say, but they have far greater consequences when there are entire academic departments, academic journals, and conferences at reputable universities discussing them.

What resistance exists? On campus, you might be able to find a professor or two who is willing to sponsor a College Republican club, but that’s about it. Such professors that do flirt with genuinely subversive ideas, even for completely apolitical reasons, are targeted by left-wing students and administrators. (Just ask Dr. Kevin MacDonald). Insofar as there is a “conservative” youth movement on campus, it is largely directed by Beltway Right groups that funnel students down ideological dead ends. The result is that the leftward drift of the universities is largely unopposed, and the most educated members of our society also tend to be those most exposed to overtly anti-Western, anti-White, and far-Left ideologies.

But this battle operates at a second level that extends outside the universities. The battle over fraternities is also about jobs after college and the theory that underlies “white privilege.”

It’s a strange theory of privilege where the supposed elite can have their lives and careers utterly destroyed because of a few seconds of video or a leaked email. Meanwhile, the “oppressed” enjoy the right to collectively organize on racial grounds, receive heavy state subsidies, and are indulged with lowered standards. But what the theory of “white privilege” relies on is the idea that there are closed networks that allow white men to exploit family ties and past success in order to obtain jobs and resources. Fraternities are seen as the most visible example of this.

Thus, the current campaign against fraternities is justified on the grounds of fighting “institutional racism.” As adult diaper avatar PZ Myers put it, fraternities are “a tool for young men of means to associate with other men of means and perpetuate the old boys’ network in ways that will allow them to propagate the same biases and wealth for another generation.” Aggressively integrating and/or destroying fraternities and other traditionally White institutions is a way to open up these networks and remove the competitive advantage Whites enjoy. (And let’s face it, to racially integrate is to destroy.)

Nor is this kind of effort simply limited to white collar jobs. Even blue collar White workers are actually recipients of “privilege.” And the solution of course is state intervention. As “Director of the Center for the Study of Inequality” and Professor Dierdre Royster put it in her 2003 book Race and the Invisible Hand, “Without governmental initiatives that provide incentives for inclusion, white tradesmen will have no reason to open their networks to men of color.” (192)

Taken to its logical conclusion, this justifies an essentially unlimited conception of government. If informal social networks to obtain even modest jobs and resources constitute “privilege,” it allows the government to set racial quotas, intermediary institutions, and official supervisors for every job in the entire country.

As we see with the case of SAE, even informal comments are taken as sweeping declarations of exclusion and privilege that legitimize collective punishment of implicitly White organizations and everyone who belongs to them. And such a theory of “institutional racism” is essentially unfalsifiable. Once you accept the premise of racial equality, the only possible explanation you can have of unequal representation in certain jobs is the presence of institutional discrimination.

There’s also a great deal of hypocrisy involved in such theorizing. Immigrant communities in the United States take over entire industries because of their aggressive use of ethnic nepotism, often subsidized by government programs that reward such behavior. Non-white businessmen enjoy preferences in obtaining government contracts and other state subsidized benefits, which gives them a huge competitive advantage as the government swallows an ever increasing share of the American economy. And the elephant in the room is the “informal networking” of Jewish-Americans as enabled by their ethnic religion, which despite their higher rates of education, income, and political representation are rarely portrayed as recipients of “privilege.”

Yet there’s something else enabled by all this—the emergence of a frankly Parasitic Class that distributes resources and jobs to ethnic minorities while serving as a drain on the overall economy. The best representatives of this class are figures like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, both of whom enjoy huge economic support from major American corporations, seem exempt from tax laws and immune from charges of corruption, and receive respectful and fawning treatment from the media despite long careers inciting racial hatred and division.

It’s important to accurately definite the Parasitic Class. We can call a Hollywood celebrity “worthless” or sneer at a certain lawyer, but these aren’t “parasites.” They provide services or perform tasks that we may not like but for which there is a legitimate economic demand.

A true member of the Parasitic Class is different. The activists and advocates being churned out by all those Studies departments and “nonprofit” organizations don’t produce anything. They don’t meet any demand or provide any necessary or desirable service. They exist as a permanent drain on productive members of society, making all of our lives worse by the sheer fact of their existence.

Indeed, the main purpose of American life is to make enough money to shield yourself against the consequences of their efforts. And once you reach a certain level of success, you have to pay them off, either by creating a phony “diversity” position in your company, throwing some money at a Sharpton or Jackson so they don’t protest you, or by appointing unqualified minorities to meet an arbitrary quota and trusting that your real workers can make up the slack.

The worst part is that the Parasitic Class contains within it a kind of self-reinforcing growth mechanism. The more money you throw at this Class to make them go away in the short-term, the more resources you provide them in the long-term to churn out activists who have no skills beyond screaming about new forms of oppression.

Peter Brimelow and Leslie Spencer estimated that the cost of compliance with affirmative action policies was close to 4 percent of GNP in 1993. For comparison’s sake, it’s estimated that the Italian ‘Ndrangheta accounts for three percent of Italy’s GDP, an astounding figure given that this particularly active criminal syndicate is mostly active in Calabria. This dead weight of corruption is enough to significantly restrict the economic prospects of many young Italians, especially when combined with the efforts of the Sicilian Mafia and the Neapolitan Camorra.  It’s no wonder that Southern Italy is seen as a black hole of economic productivity and prosperous Northern Italy wants out.

But the economic burden of diversity in the United States is worse. A National Policy Institute study of the costs of diversity during the Bush Administration found that tens of billions of dollars are essentially wasted every year, a figure which we can guess has significantly expanded during the Obama years. We also have to factor in the lost productivity due to affirmative action employees, the wasted capital spent paying off professional protesters, the negative effects of economic programs such as the ill-conceived effort to increase minority home ownership, or the ruinous consequences of Section 8 housing, assistance programs for illegal immigrants, or other forms of subsidized degeneracy. We are well beyond 4 percent of GNP being simply thrown away.

What comes next? After implicitly white institutions are destroyed, the next step will be going after accumulated wealth. One of the more worrying campaigns is the media’s current focus on the “wealth gap” between White and non-white households. This includes a sizable difference in the amount of money that Whites and blacks save for retirement. While the outright seizure of 401k’s seems unlikely, the campaign will most likely lead to cries for a “wealth tax” to limit economic racial inequality. After that, reparations is the inevitable next step.

This process has no end.  And as the real economy is squeezed, an ever greater number of people will realize the real money lies in trying to become a member of the Parasitic Class than having to produce anything. After all, complaining about “discrimination” in video games is easier than, you know, having to learn programming. Being a “black poet” is more profitable than having to be, you know, an actual poet. And why bother to contribute something to the world if you can take some half-baked theory and get someone to pay you simply to exist?

The decline of the white race has religious, metapolitical, political, spiritual, economic, sociological, and even biological causes beyond counting. But one of the easiest ways to clarify what is happening is that we are paying for our own dispossession. The institutions that are supposed to preserve our civilization are subsidizing its own destruction.

It’s difficult to determine if we are getting anywhere. After all, read any “white nationalist” book from the last 30 years and you’ll see the same old theories about people finally “waking up,” the inevitability of “collapse,” or the inherently unstable nature of the System. The revolution is always just around the corner or over the next hill.

I have a simpler theory. We can say we are getting somewhere when people start trying to pay us off. The day we have one full time White Advocate in this country that our enemies are paying for is the day we are about to win. And I have faith that day will come if we can organize. After all, even one of ours is worth every Ethnic Studies department in the country.

The First Jewish Lie: Egyptians Debunk Fantasy that Israelites Were Slaves in Egypt

via Renegade Tribune

Jews lie. Jews have always lied. And most assuredly, Jews are still lying today about everything that has to do with themselves and their sordid history.

So considering how they have wrecked the United States, Russia, Germany and so many other countries by mentally lobotomizing and financially castrating all of them, it should come as no surprise that Jews have falsified their own history from the very beginning.

Or to put it more concisely in the words of an Egyptian medical doctor named Ashraf Ezzat, “The truth is that ancient Egypt never knew any Pharaohs nor any Israelites. Egypt was never the land of Exodus and Palestine was never the Promised Land.”

Backed by every reputable expert in the known world, Azzat argues that ancient Hebrew history as we know it today is based on one colossal lie — that events described as happening in Egypt, if they happened at all, really happened in Arabia. Which means that according to his version, the tales of Joseph, Moses and the Exodus might still be true, but the location in which they are alleged to have happened are false.

To the average person, this would seem a farfetched assertion were it not for the supportive testimony of the world’s top Egyptologists, from James Henry Breasted to Donald Redford to Israel Finkelstein. Even some Israeli experts agree, including the head of archeology at Tel Aviv University. Prof. Ze’ev Herzog, in a 1999 article in Ha’aretz, said: “The Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel.”

Needless to say, this revelation has profound implications for all of the world’s major monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam, which all base their deeply flawed legitimacy on these questionable Old Testament legends.

For Dr. Ezzat, the ferreting out of the real story of the Jews is a matter of defending the reputation of his illustrious homeland, the oldest known human civilization, the mysterious land of the pyramids and the Sphinx. Ezzat seeks merely to uncover the truth buried beneath two thousand years of deliberate and slanderous misrepresentation of a culture that provided the foundation of the monotheistic religions which have “borrowed” heavily from Egyptian tradition but neglected to mention the source as they claimed these well-known rituals as their own.

Azzat has labored at this task for several years on his Pyramidion website <>, but now has taken a big step forward with the publication of “Egypt Knew No Pharaohs Nor Israelites”. The book is available in a Kindle edition for a mere $5 and contains lots of very valuable live links, including Breasted’s famous “Dawn of Conscience” essay and instructive background material from the Roman writer Plutarch, Egyptologist Donald Redford and contemporary reporter Juan Cole using archivist Peter Myers’ encyclopedic background data.

The book is a real treasure trove of objective Biblical history, an essential counterweight to the overabundance of unreliable religious proselytization material that handicaps objective historical scholars everywhere with self-absorbed misinformation.

Defending Egypt’s honorable tradition.

Many factors set Ezzat on this detective trail of the Biblical deception that castigates Ancient Egypt as an immoral, slave-keeping society.

The first clue was that the Old Testament never mentioned the pyramids, making the writers of that document the first and probably the only visitors to Egypt who never mentioned these awe-inspiring structures. Ezzat’s contention, backed by solid empirical scholarship, is that the events of the Old Testament occurred in southwestern Arabia, in a province called Mizraim, or Misr, a location now near modern day Yemen, which is where he says the tribe of Israel was really born.

The second tipoff was the terrain, which in the OT more resembles hilly Arabia rather than flat Egypt. Also, the Bible recounts droughts, which Egypt never had, only fluctuations in the flooding of the Nile. Many of the events ascribed to the area of present day Palestine actually occurred much further south down the coast of the Red Sea, Azzat insists. Furthermore an even more telling detail in the Joseph story was the camel caravan carrying “gum, balm and myrrh”, which were products of Arabian trade, not Egypt’s.

The third and most revealing clue was the notion of slavery, which Azzat claims was never practiced in Egypt until the Greeks and Persians brought the practice with them a thousand years later than the supposed time of Moses and Joseph. Some stories state the pyramids were built by slaves, but history shows us the pyramid builders were willing volunteers, as the village of the pyramid builders attests. <>

And the fourth aspect of this millennia-old Old Testament fraud was the label of pharaoh, which no Egyptian document ever uses. But the leader of the Mizraim tribe was called Faraon, which made the switch from Hebrew to Greek and the creation of a villainous pharaoh many centuries later an easy trick to pull off. Egypt, one of the best documented of all ancient civilizations, never once used the term pharaoh.

This is truly a tale of two Egypts: Egypt was mentioned in the Bible around 700 times; the Israelites were not mentioned once in the Egyptian records.

The 5th century BC historian Herodotus, commonly known as “the father of history”, never mentioned pharaohs, only kings. Herodotus also never mentioned Israel, repeatedly mentioned Palestine, Syria and the Phoenicians, never mentioned Jews or Canaanites, and never mentioned any Jewish holy temple.

But more than anything else, it was the insult to Ancient Egypt’s extremely enlightened religious philosophy — moral practices that have never been equalled by the civilizations that came later — that compelled Azzat to defend the honor of a remarkable culture that survived for the better part of three millennia, longer – you make take note — than any other culture in world history.

“Deceitfully linking the story of Moses and his Pharaoh has tarnished the image of one of humanity’s greatest civilizations,” Ezzat writes. “Ancient Egypt has been stabbed in the heart by this two-thousand year duplicity. And this deception is likely to continue if we don’t expose the truth about the Israelite stories and their Arabic origin and the Septuagint fraud.”

Corrupt Jewish translators.

In the 2nd century BC, the Hebrew bible was translated from Aramaic to Greek at the legendary Library of Alexandria. Seventy Jewish scribes, hence the designation of the Septuagint Bible, were assigned this task by the Ptolemies in which they cunningly replaced this obscure tribal leader Faraon with the mighty Egypt and its king. The Greek version, with this malicious distortion of ancient history, has been the source for all translations of the Bible worldwide ever since.

The Septaguint deception had been the result of a Greek-Jewish bond very similar to nowadays’ American-Israeli one. (Controlling and manipulating world superpowers — ancient and modern — is obviously an old Jewish proficiency also demonstrable in the old Jewish/Persian arrangement that led to the release from Babylonian Captivity and the complicity with the Roman Empire to control and contain Christianity.)

Replacing the Arabic town of Mizraim/Misr with pharaonic Egypt in the stories of the Patriarchs has not only distorted the Israelite stories but the historiography of the whole ancient Near East.

The dangers this misrepresentation presents to modern times are numerous.

Number one, modern Egyptians have been detached from their own culture.

Number two, the lies presented in the Bible that have filtered into other religions present a violent danger based on mistaken information.

For instance, the Salafis, hardened Islamists and jihadists, want to demolish all of ancient Egypt’s monument and temples, including the Pyramids and the Sphinx, because they believe these are the idols Pharaoh worshipped while rejecting the true word of God delivered by Moses.

So here is a closed-minded mass murder plot based on the fairy tale of Jewish slaves building the Pyramids

The Exodus tale is about slaves, toiling in 400 years of continuous bondage. The failure of his brothers to murder Joseph is told both in the Qu’ran and the Bible. The brothers sold him to the Ishmaelites, not the Egyptians, for 20 shekels of silver (Genesis 37:26-28).

The Septaguint deception repeated through contemporary filmmaking was evident in the recent Ridley Scott film (which flopped at the box office!) Exodus: Gods and Kings.

Egypt banned this movie for its “Zionist view of history”. The same scam perpetrated by the Jews for 3000 years — changing history to dupe the public — is still being run today in Hollywood.

Although Exodus: Gods and Kings is set in Egypt, you won’t actually be able to see it there. According to Deadline magazine (and reported by Azzat), Scott’s adaptation of the biblical story of Moses has run afoul of Egyptian censors. Abdul Sattar Fathi, the head of the Egyptian state censorship board, harshly criticized the film, citing “historical mistakes” such as claiming the Jews built the pyramids and portraying Moses as a general, not a prophet.

“Furthermore,” Fathi said, “it shows ancient Egyptians as a mob group persecuting peaceful Jews. Our board has refused this out of respect for Egyptians’ feelings.”

(Peaceful Jews, I like that. Could be the only example in history of peaceful Jews. No surprise that only Hollywood could come with a concept like peaceful Jews, which is surely a type of human being that has never before been seen in history. Go tell the Palestinians about peaceful Jews.)

Says Ezzat, who remains scrupulously impartial when it comes to contemporary politics, Egypt is simply not where this story took place.

At the time, Israel wasn’t there.

Jews lie. How many modern examples do you need? Six million dead in a Holocaust that never happened? People all over the world paying reparations for crimes they didn’t commit and being thrown in jail when they ask for proof of these crimes. A Jewish company producing poison food and a Jewish government forcing people to eat it. Jews murdering thousands of unarmed peasants and calling it self defense, triggering wars all over the world through covert manipulation of governments it has bought.

Current Israeli rabble rouser Binyamin Netanyahu said recently in a speech that the Jewish people were building Jerusalem 3000 years ago. Yet another Jewish lie.

Ezzat says no. “The Jewish people were not building Jerusalem 3000 years ago, i.e. 1000 BC . . . There was no invasion of geographical Palestine from Egypt by former slaves in the 2200s BCE . . . The chronicle of events of the reign of Ramses II on the wall in Luxor does not know about any major slave results or flights by same into the Sinai peninsula. Egyptian sources never heard of Moses or the 12 plagues etc.”

Jerusalem not only was not being built by the likely then non-existent “Jewish people” in 1000 BCE, but Jerusalem probably was not even inhabited at that point in history. Jerusalem appears to have been abandoned between 1000 BCE and 900 BCE, the traditional dates for the united kingdom under David and Solomon.

So Jerusalem was not ‘the city of David,’ since there was no city there when he is said to have lived there. No sign of magnificent palaces or great states has been found in the archeology of this period, and the Assyrian tablets, which recorded even minor events throughout the Middle East, such as the actions of Arab queens, don’t know anything about any great kingdom of David and Solomon in geographical Palestine.

Not a thing.

Palestine was not the homeland for the kingdom of Israel and the stories of its early patriarchs. The inception of Judaism and the stories of Abraham, Isaac, Joseph and Moses happened in Arabia and Yemen, Ezzat writes. The blatant failure of Biblical archeology in the land of Palestine is primarily due to a premise completely flawed and a Bible (Septaguint) cunningly tampered with (by the same evil creeps who manipulate our news and educational materials today).

Egypt’s written records date back to 1870 BC. No trace of the Israelites.

Slavery was a common tradition in Arabia but not in Egypt. Slavery didn’t come to Egypt unit 7th to 4th century BC, influence of the Persian/Greek invasions.

This tradition of slavery lingers on in Yemen, where foreigners aren’t allowed to get a job without the sponsorship of a native called a kafeel who control all aspects of their lives.

In his breakthrough theory “Bible Came from Arabia” Dr. Kamal Salibi has discovered more than one hundred place names in Arabia and North Yemen that amazingly matched the ones mentioned in the Torah, Azzat writes.

“Placing the Israelites back in their native Arabic land will no longer make the pervasive future of slavery in the stories of Joseph and Moses alien or inexplicable, or the walls and fortifications of mountainous villages tumbled by Joshua unreal and unverifiable.

“The land Joshua conquered was a small territory in North Yemen. The Egypt of the Bible is not the Egypt of the NIle Valley but an obscure little town in the southwestern desert of ancient Arabia called Mizraim, or Misr in Hebrew and Arabic.

“The Exodus took place in a much humbler way and on a much narrower scale in an obscure little village in ancient South Arabia,” Azzat writes.

“If Egypt knew no Pharaohs, then it goes without saying that Egypt never knew Moses, either. And if Moses never set foot in Egypt, then the Exodus’ road map into the Promised Land has to be redrawn.”

A conception of world harmony

The lies began a long time ago. According to the Old Testament, written by Jews, ancient Egypt is the land of idolatry, tyranny and slavery.

It is this slander at which Ezzat bristles, because the precepts of the ancient Egyptian religion were plagiarized by its Christian and Muslim successors lock, stock and barrel.

“Maat is the Egyptian concept of world harmony based on justice, balance and truth. Maat, or the lady of truth, as personified by ancient Egyptians in the shape of a lady wearing the feather of truth on her head and holding the balance of justice, is the code of ethics by which all Egyptians, including monarchs, should follow,” Ezzat writes.

The late Prof. Breasted, in a beautiful introduction to his 1933 classic “Dawn of Conscience”, writes in a live link from the book <>:

The Egyptians possessed a standard of morals far superior to that of the Decalogue (the Ten Commandments) over a thousand years before the Decalogue was written.
So Ezzat is not making this stuff up. Breasted is one of the most respected historians ever. And Ezzat’s insistence that much of the material in the Old Testament is fabricated, distorted and plagiarized is true.

For instance, the wisdom of Amenemope, preserved in an Egyptian papyrus in the British Museum, was translated into Hebrew in ancient times and, circulating in Palestine, was the source for a whole section of the Old Testament Book of Proverbs.
“Our moral heritage derives from a wider human past enormously older than the Hebrews, and it has come to us rather through the Hebrews than from them. Man arose to high moral vision two thousand years before the Hebrew nation was born,” Ezzat writes.

Just like in modern times, when in World War II Germany was presented as the bad guy while the Jewish countries the U.S., Britain and Soviet Union were presented as the good guys, the Hebrews presented Israelite interlopers as the brave heroes and innocent Egyptians as the villains, which like the juxtaposition of Israeli murderers and Palestinian victims into Jew freedom fighters and Islamic terrorists is a historical injustice and unforgivable lie of the type that so debilitates our existence today.

Jews lie. They always have, and they always will.