Jun 15, 2015

The High Costs of the Racism Misdiagnosis

via Theden

The Left constantly misdiagnoses the source of the problems blacks face. The Left insists that the root of all these problems—from high incarceration rates to low academic achievement—is white racism. But the reality is that black behavior and attitudes cause a great deal of the obstacles and challenges that they face.

The costs of misdiagnosing the source of troubles for blacks, however, are often quite high for everyone involved. Theden has reported on an example of this phenomenon previously. Powerful voices in American media and politics insist that the problem in inner cities like Baltimore is white racism in the form of hyper-policing. And thus they prescribe a treatment based on that misdiagnosis: police less aggressively. But the real threat facing black inner cities is the violence and criminality within them, not the tactics that law enforcement officers use in an attempt to curb that violence and criminality. Any treatment predicated on the former etiology of inner city turmoil rather than the latter, though, will inevitably fail. Because it seeks to cure a disease that doesn’t exist and leaves the actual disease to spread uninhibited. And the kindler-gentler-police treatment certainly is failing, as the crime spikes in Baltimore and elsewhere attest.

But law enforcement is not the only arena in which the Left’s misdiagnosis is made, nor the only one in which their misdiagnosis comes with a hefty price tag.

As conservative bloggers such as Steve Sailer have been pointing out for years, institutions such as the New York Times and the Department of Justice have gone to war against school systems all over the nation. These paragons of liberal anti-racism correctly note that, across the board and at every level of education, blacks students receive more disciplinary actions than their counterparts of other races. The reason for this, of course, is that black students commit more infractions—from the trivial to the serious—of school rules and policies than their counterparts of other races. But progressive elites reject such realities out of hand. Instead, they push the same, tired old misdiagnosis that, once again, that dastardly white racism is punishing black students simply because of the color of their skin.

The St. Paul Public Schools system in Minnesota has been ground zero for one such misguided reform effort. In those schools, as in practically any multiracial school system in the country, administrators noted that black students were punished at disproportionately high rates. And there, as is so often the case, they took the problem to be “racism” rather than an inability of black students to conduct themselves appropriately.

Under the Strong Schools, Strong Communities program, then, the SPPS decided to combat the “problem” of disciplining so many black students simply by refusing to discipline them so often. Students in specialized behavioral classes were mainlined into normal classrooms. Offenses that previously would have gotten a slap on the wrist were overlooked. Offenses that previously would have been punished with suspension now got a slap on the wrist.

The results, of course, are chaos and disorder:

At John A. Johnson Elementary on the East Side, several teachers, who asked to remain anonymous, describe anything but a learning environment. Students run up and down the hallways, slamming lockers and tearing posters off the walls. They hit and swear at each other, upend garbage cans under teachers’ noses.

“We have students who will spend an hour in the hallway just running and hiding from people, like it’s a game for them,” says one despondent teacher. “A lot of them know no one is going to stop them, so they just continue.”

Nine teachers at Ramsey Middle School have quit since the beginning of this school year. Some left for other districts. Others couldn’t withstand the escalating anarchy.

For a full report of the carnage, read here.

Just as in Baltimore, the problem in St. Paul is not white racism. The problem is black attitudes and behaviors. And so, just as in Baltimore, a solution that attacked this phantom of “white racism” did absolutely nothing to solve black dysfunction. In fact it only intensified it. As long as the Left is allowed to keep propagating this misdiagnosis, sadly, the real disorder will remain untreated—worsening, metastasizing, and threatening the very fabric of schools and cities nationwide.

Jews & the Dark Age

via Counter-Currents

Editor’s Note: The following is an excerpt from chapter 16 of Savitri Devi’s The Lightning and the Sun. The title is editorial.

The advanced Dark Age of this present Time-cycle is the reign of the Jew—of the negative element; of the reverser of eternal values for the sake of “human” ones, and, finally, for that of his own, selfish interests; the reign of the “destroyer of culture,” as Adolf Hitler so rightly pointed out; of the age-old “ferment of disintegration.” It is natural that “ferments of disintegration” should become more and more active—more and more alive—as a Time-cycle nears its end.

It is—or was, for a very long time—a widespread belief among Christians that, when the Jews become once more the masters of Palestine, their “promised Land,” the “end of the world”—i.e., the end of the present Time-cycle—will not be far away. The Mohammedans behold, they too, in that same event, one of the tokens announcing the advent of the long-awaited “Mahdi.”[1] Thanks to England’s steadily pro-Jewish policy, the Jews have, in Palestine, since 1948, a State of their own. If the collective belief of many generations of men, both in the West and in the Near East, corresponds to any reality (and collective beliefs of that nature generally do, to some extent), then the great end must be drawing nigh. The existence of that strange—at the same time ultra-modern and unbelievably archaic—Israelitish State is an extra “sign of the times” or, rather, the symbol of a by far mightier and more dangerous reality, which is the actual “sign.” And that reality is none other than the ever-tightening grip of the Jew upon the whole world.

The truth about the Jewish State in Palestine remains that which Adolf Hitler had already understood—half through his knowledge of the Zionist Movement, half through his intuition of the natural enemy of Aryan mankind as such—and expressed, fourteen years before its foundation, namely that the Jews never intended to live in their independent country (which is, anyhow, far too small to contain them all) but that they just wanted “protected Headquarters—Headquarters with sovereign rights, free from the interference of other States—for their worldwide international organisation of deceit; a place of refuge for rogues who have been detected, and a high-school for rogues in the making . . .”[2] In other words Palestine may well be the mystical—and practical—centre of world-Jewry, but the Jewish danger has no “centre.” It is everywhere, and all the more difficult to fight that most people either refuse to see it or reject as “inhuman” the only methods through which it could be neutralised.

One need not read the famous Protocols of the Elders of Zion or the more modern speech which Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovitch delivered in Budapest, on the 12th of January, 1952 before the “Emergency Council of European Rabbis,”[3] in order to be convinced of the double, world-wide effort of the Jews, on one hand, to lower the biological level of all non-Jewish races, especially of the Aryan, and, on the other, to work themselves into all key positions in the economic, political, cultural, and spiritual life of all leading nations. It is, on the contrary, the obvious reality of that double effort—the presence of the international Jew (or of organisations entirely under his control) behind all “spiritual,” “cultural,” or political movements or thought-currents that allow, encourage, or logically lead to the mixture of races; behind all or practically all “literary,” “artistic,” commercial, or “medical” concerns, the aim of which is to encourage sexual perversity and any manner of vice, to provide silly amusements or to forward the love of empty speculation, in one word, to lower the physical, intellectual, and moral level of the individual; and, along with that, the ever-increasing number (and influence) of Jews (or of men completely under Jewish control) in world finance, world industry, and world politics—it is the fact that, whoever shows that he or she is fully aware of that effort and fully prepared to fight against it, “gets nowhere”; the glaring fact that nothing indeed happens in this ugly post-1945 world without the Jews’ order or permission, which strengthens, at least in us, the conviction that both the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the recent Rabinovitch speech, and the like of them, are genuine documents. As genuine as the much older Bible and Talmud that also proclaim the Jews “God’s Chosen people.”

There resides, perhaps, the whole meaning of the rise and temporary victory and world-wide rule of the Jews as a “sign of the times”; it is based upon a lie; it is lasting through a lie; it is the most logical feature of the advanced Dark Age, which is, more and more, the Age of Lies.

The truth is that there is no other “God” but the immanent, impersonal divinity of Nature—of Life; the universal Self. No tribal god is “God.” Tribal gods are more or less divine, to the extent they embody and express a more or less divine collective soul. Yahweh, the tribal god of the Jews, is as little divine, as negative as they themselves—they, the typically negative human element of our Time-cycle. Through a series of lies, the Jews have been for the last 3,000 and especially for the last 2,400 years, leading an increasingly intensified campaign for the reversal of the eternal, natural values—i.e., an anti-truth campaign—in view of their own exaltation. They have, through the mouth of their prophets and “philosophers” proclaimed Yahweh “God of all men”; they have, then, concealed as many as they could of his nasty characteristics through a clever exploitation of the Christ myth by Paul of Tarsus and other Jews, half-Jews.[4] and judaised Greeks; they have, through the same, stressed anew the old, very old denial of the unity of the Realm of Life and proclaimed “all men” different in nature from the rest of creatures—and therefore above the general laws of Life—in order to buttress the false teaching that “one blood”[5] flows in the veins of “all nations,” and to kill the idea (and the instinct) of a natural, God-ordained racial hierarchy. They have preached meekness and forgiveness and pacifism (to all, save to their own people) in order to rob the young, warlike Aryan race of its stamina; in order to kill its healthy pride. They are, now more feverishly than ever, encouraging its adolescents to make fun of “Nazi prejudices,” to despise purity of blood, and to marry outside their race (if thus be the impulse of “individual love”)—so that the race may disappear; encouraging them into perdition, both through the old superstition of “man” under its various modern forms, and through the whole atmosphere of subtle corruption in which the post-1945 world is literally soaking.

They must win—and they shall win—for the time being. Otherwise, it would not yet be the End. They must—and shall—see their dream—their immemorial dream of easy domination over a peaceable, “happy” hotchpotch of bastardised millions and ever more millions, that their long-drawn disintegrating action has rendered even more contemptible than they—at a hair’s breadth from its complete materialisation. Otherwise, the measure of iniquity—the measure of untruth—would not be full. And it would not yet be time for “Kalki”—the Avenger—to come.


1. See the beginning of chapter 16.
2. Mein Kampf, p. 356.
3. Published through the care of Einar Åberg, Norrviken, Sweden. [This speech is apparently a hoax.–Ed.]
4. Timothy, the faithful follower of Paul of Tarsus, was a half-Jew.
5. See the “Acts of the Apostles,” chapter 17, verse 26.

Jews, Communists, and Genocidal Hate in 'Whiteness Studies'

via The Occidental Observer

“Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed—not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed -- Race Traitor

As a general rule, you can be fairly certain that any academic discipline that contains the word ‘studies’ within its title can be immediately dismissed on an intellectual level as involving very little studying and a great deal of leftist indoctrination. The relatively new discipline of ‘Whiteness Studies,’ however, is vastly more toxic than the average contemporary effusions of the bloated academic corpus. Indeed, its productions should be seen as nothing less than incitement to the genocide of our people. While many great thinkers in our ranks have explored and exposed the more subversive attempts to shape the ‘ways of seeing’ that continue to lead our people to extinction, I think some light should also be shed on the open, explicit, and unashamed hatred that seethes within this academic discipline. The hateful creed that motivates the new discipline’s leading ‘thinkers’ is shocking and yet somehow predictable in equal measure. Behind its ideological foundations we find phrases, traits, patterns and strategies that are sadly all-too-familiar to us. We are forced to acknowledge once more the pitiless ethnic warfare that is being waged upon us, and the enlistment of our own people in a suicidal crusade.

My own odyssey into this hateful miasma began recently when a friend sent me a link to the online ‘Whiteness Studies’ journal Race Traitor. The journal, formerly boasting the tag-line “Treason to Whiteness is Loyalty to Humanity,” was founded in print form back in 1992 by the Jewish academic Noel Ignatiev.  Both Ignatiev and Race Traitor have been mentioned previously at TOO by Kevin MacDonald. As MacDonald noted back in 2008, Ignatiev only very thinly disguised the unrestrained hatred that his ‘discipline’ incites against Whites and their culture:
Ignatiev et al. have developed a story that goes as follows: A bunch of very bad people got together and created a category called “white” to which they belong but people with different colored skin can’t belong. Then they made laws that favored people in the white category, they colluded with other whites to dominate the economic and political process, and they invented baseless scientific theories in which whiteness had its roots in real biological differences. All Ignatiev’s written material that we’ve seen carries the same odd message with the same extreme wording…Ignative writes darkly and dramatically of “abolishing the white race,” “genocide of whites,” etc. When pressed, he emphasizes that that he doesn’t really mean killing people who call themselves white. He only wants to destroy the concept of whiteness. So he’s off the hook, right?
Not quite. Ignatiev is really just playing a game of bait and switch. While fully tuned-in to his own Jewish racial identity, he ostensibly follows the PC line that “races” are only “social constructs.” When pressed, he claims to be little more than an extreme egalitarian, against all social hierarchies but especially those in which he imagines Whites to be at the top. The true nature of the anti-White crusade thus concealed, Ignatiev and his protégés have been able to grow their disciple, and incite hatred against Whites without being accused of doing so. Their hatred assumes a surface legitimacy because the hated “whites” are just a “social construct.” So they are aiming to ‘kill’ a construct, not a people. The party line, therefore, is that it’s all about getting White people to stop thinking that they are White – for their own good of course. So while Black studies, women’s studies, Chicano studies etc. all aim to develop and nurture their relative identities and social agendas, ‘Whiteness Studies’ aims to utterly extinguish any sense of identity and awareness of group interests.

Seen in the context of ethnic competition, and education and culture as weapons in this struggle, it’s clear that there’s nothing remotely benign about stripping Whites of their ethnic awareness and identity. As Kevin MacDonald commented:
Notice that if Ignatiev were sincerely opposed to ethnic competition, he would have criticized all sorts of peoples and individuals around the world for thinking of themselves as belonging to a racial/ethnic category. After all, what’s left when there is no more category of whiteness? There will still be people with white skin who can trace their genetic ancestry to Europe but who have lost all sense of belonging to a racial category. And there will still be people who categorize themselves as Jews and Blacks and Asians and various subdivisions of Asians. These people will continue to have a sense of racial/ethnic identity and they will continue to act on the basis of this identity. Only Whites will be left without an identity and hence without weapons in the racial/ethnic struggle. … When only Whites are left without an identity and hence without weapons in the racial/ethnic struggle, it doesn’t take much imagination to suppose that actual genocide of Whites is the next step.
While Ignatiev and Race Traitor are important and highly visible cornerstones of the contemporary efforts to destroy White identity, and with it our genetic viability, in this article I want to further contextualize these efforts as well as explore some of the broader implications and ramifications of key individuals and their works.

One of the seminal texts of the ‘Whiteness Studies’ clique is Ted Allen’s two-volume The Invention of the White Race (1994 & 1997). Allen (1919–2005) strikes me as a profoundly strange character who circulated in a heavily Jewish milieu throughout his life. Allen was born into a middle-class family in Indianapolis, Indiana. In 1929 the family moved to Huntington, West Virginia, where he later claimed to have been “proletarianized by the Great Depression.” He had joined the thickly-Jewish Communist Party in the 1930s and, after moving to New York in 1948, he taught classes in economics at the Party’s Jefferson School at Union Square in Manhattan (1949–56). In the late 1950s the Communist Party came under government scrutiny and descended into internal struggle, prompting Allen to leave the Party in order to help establish a new organization, the Provisional Organizing Committee to Reconstitute the Communist Party (POC).  After sojourns in England and Ireland following the death of his wife, Allen returned to Brooklyn in the 1960s.

Ted Allen
Ted Allen
Drawing on the theories of W. E .B. Du Bois in Black Reconstruction (1935) on America’s alleged ‘racial blindspot,’ and heavily influenced by close Jewish friends like Noel Ignatin (later Ignatiev), Allen began work on a historical study of three crises in United States history in which he perceived there to be general confrontations between the forces of capital and those from below — the crises of The Civil War and Reconstruction, the Populist Revolt of the 1890s, and the Great Depression of the 1930s. His work focused on the role of the theory and practice of what he perceived as “white supremacy” in shaping those outcomes. Together, Ignatiev and Allen provided the copy for an influential 70s pamphlet containing both “White Blindspot,” under Ignatiev’s name, and Allen’s article “Can White Radicals Be Radicalized.”
I think it speaks volumes about Allen’s own confused sense of racial identity that he published his own contribution to the pamphlet under the decidedly Jewish-sounding pseudonym J. H. Kagin. The Jewish pseudonym was fitting for an individual who throughout his life apparently strove for Jewishness, both in his annihilation and hatred for his own White identity, and in his perpetual association with Jews and their interests. When he finally published The Invention of the White Race in the early 90s, Allen contributed significantly to Ignatiev’s cause by challenging phenotypical definitions of race, challenging arguments that racism is an innate feature of human nature, and in denying the idea that the White working class benefits from a sense of racial awareness and identity. Allen died in poverty in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, where he lived for over forty years. His last job, it might be added, was rather fitting. He taught math at the ultra-Orthodox Crown Heights Yeshiva.

Another major figure in the development of whiteness studies was Alexander Saxton (1919–2012). Saxton, like Allen, came from a middle class family but cherished pipe-dreams of a life as a class warrior. His father was editor in chief of Harper & Brothers, the company that first published Edna St. Vincent Millay, Aldous and Julian Huxley, J.B. Priestley, and Thornton Wilder. His mother taught literature at a private girls’ school in Manhattan. Also like Allen, he later claimed to have been “radicalized by the Great Depression.” Saxton entered Harvard in 1936, but dropped out in his junior year to become a laborer in Chicago. The six-day-a-week job paid 25 cents an hour, leading Harvard’s dean to suggest that his parents get him psychiatric help. Saxton soon joined the Communist Party, eventually getting his bachelor’s degree at the University of Chicago. His membership in the Communist Party, as well as his production of a number of dubious novels beginning in the late 40s, led to an appearance before the House Un-American Activities Committee in the mid-1950s. After decades of writing articles about ‘white supremacy’ a decrepit Saxton published The Rise and Fall of the White Republic in 2003, where he made the argument that ‘white racism’ was central to American politics and culture. It later become a key ‘Whiteness Studies’ text. Saxton shot himself at his home in 2012.

A younger figure in the development of ‘Whiteness Studies’ was Ruth Frankenberg (1958–2007). Frankenberg was born in England to a Jewish father and an English mother, both ardent leftists. After her parents divorced, Frankenberg was raised mainly by her father before moving to California at the end of the 70s, aged 21. Throughout the 70s she had devoted herself as a ‘socialist feminist’ (never as Jewish!) to opposing the National Front, an anti-immigration movement that had been gaining strength in England since the mid-1960s. After arriving in California, and declaring herself a lesbian, Frankenberg began working closely with Erica ‘Ricky’ Sherover-Marcuse and Terry Berman. In A Promise and a Way of Life: White Antiracist Activism, author Becky Thompson writes that “From Ricky Marcuse and Terry Berman, both white antiracist consultants and teachers, Ruth learned that antiracist work for white people requires ‘doing the work from a place of self-love.’”[1] There are a number of problems with Thompson’s naive statement. Firstly, both Marcuse and Berman were not White, but were instead strongly identified Jewesses. In fact, Marcuse was the widow of Herbert Marcuse of Frankfurt School notoriety. Secondly, like the work against Whites pioneered by her husband, Ricky’s work may well have been motivated by self-love to the extent that she loved, and identified with, her Jewishness, but there was no love for whites.

Ricky Marcuse
Ricky Marcuse
Marcuse was sufficiently in tune with her own Jewish identity to work on a kibbutz from 1959–1960/61, where she learned Hebrew. She worked with Herbert Marcuse at UC San Diego in the 1970s, and after Herbert’s second wife, Inge Neumann, died in 1972, Ricky and Herbert married on June 21, 1976. After Herbert died, Marcuse continued producing a large number of writings which simultaneously acting against White identity while boosting Jewish interests. These writings would go on to form the seedbed for the development of ‘Whiteness Studies.’ For example, in her article ‘Working Assumptions For White Activists On Eliminating Racism: Guidelines For Recruiting Other Whites As Allies,’ Marcuse wrote that activists should:
Assume that all white people have undergone some variety of systematic conditioning or ‘training’ to take on the ‘oppressor role’ in relation to people of color. Sometimes this training has been to participate in acts of violence, or to join in racial slurs or jokes; sometimes this training has been to keep silent in the face of injustice. Sometimes this training has been to be ‘extra nice’ towards people of color.
While all Whites are to be seen as ‘trained’ oppressors, Jews were always represented by Marcuse as the quintessential victim. Jews were to have all the rights to identify as Jews that ‘white oppressors’ were to be denied as Whites. In ‘A Working Perspective on Jewish Liberation,’ Marcuse wrote:
Jewish oppression is real; it affects the life of every Jew. As a people and as individuals Jews have been the targets of systematic mistreatment and of anti-Jewish attitudes. … Every Jew has and is entitled to have a unique (self-defined) relationship to Jewish traditions, Jewish cultures, Jewish religious practices, Jewish history, and to the state of Israel.
Before dying in 1988, Marcuse devoted much of her time to pushing her ideology through her ‘Unlearning Racism’ workshops, and indoctrinating White teenagers into supporting multiculturalism through her Oakland-based ‘New Bridges’ group. She also invested a lot of time in ‘Whiteness Studies’ protégés like Ruth Frankenberg, before dying of cancer aged 50 in 1988.

Taking her cue from Ignatiev, Marcuse, Berman, and the White Communists, Frankenberg published White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness in 1993. Frankenberg based her ‘study’ on the dogma of the discipline, which orbits around the belief that race is nothing more than a fluid social, political and historical construct. She argued that while Whites may deny that they are ‘racist,’ they cannot deny that they are White. Frankenberg proceeded to argue that Whites are implicitly racist by virtue of their ‘dominant’ position in western society, and contended that we should ‘critically reflect’ on this social position of dominance that White people occupy in our society. ‘Whiteness Studies’ to Frankenberg, like her predecessors, was therefore nothing more than an exercise in convincing Whites that they are oppressors, whether they wished to be or not, and whether they had actually personally taken part in any oppression or not.

It was this collection of cranks and activists that produced and disseminated the ‘white privilege’ cultural meme.

Frankenberg, like Allen, Saxton, and Marcuse, met a less than pleasant end when she died of lung cancer in 2007 aged 49. But by then enough momentum had been generated for the intellectual movement to survive without its chief architects. ‘Whiteness Studies’ began booming around 2002 when many Jewish and self-hating Leftist academics previously involved in vicariously attacking Whites via scurrilous histories of slavery started noticing new opportunities and drifted into the new field. One was Jewish slavery ‘expert’ Peter Kolchin, who wrote in a 2002 Journal of American History article that:
Suddenly whiteness studies are everywhere. The rapid proliferation of a genre that appears to have come out of nowhere is little short of astonishing: a recent keyword search on my university library’s electronic catalog yielded fifty-one books containing the word “whiteness” in their titles, almost all published in the past decade, and most published in the past five years. … Although the term “whiteness studies” might at first glance suggest works that promote  white identity or constitute part of a racist backlash against multiculturalism and ‘political correctness’ virtually all whiteness studies authors seek to confront white privilege – that is, racism,  and virtually all identify at some level with the political Left. Most of them see a close link between their scholarly efforts and the goal of creating a more humane social order.
Of course, the new genre hadn’t “come out of nowhere,” as Kolchin suggested. Both the genre itself, and several of its major architects and authors, had verifiable organic links to both Communism and the Frankfurt School — Marcuse being the very personification of such a lineage. And like the Frankfurt School, the ideology of the group is built more or less explicitly on the idea that a more ‘humane social order’ can be achieved only through the total annihilation of Whiteness.

The open pursuance of ‘Whiteness Studies’ must be perceived as nothing less than an act of extreme, even violent, aggression against the White race. I am reminded of a particularly pertinent section from Savitri Devi’s The Lightning and the Sun. Devi wrote that the materialistic world’s view of violence enabled tremendous acts of aggression to slip by unchallenged. She pointed to:
Inconspicuous, slow, yet implacable persecution, both economic and cultural: the systematic suppression of all possibilities for the vanquished, without it ‘showing,’ the merciless ‘conditioning’ of children, all the more horrible that it is more impersonal, more indirect, more outwardly ‘gentle,’ the clever diffusion of soul-killing lies; violence under the cover of non-violence.
The ‘educational’ programs of the ADL, the obliteration of our national borders, the assassination of our racial identity, and the slow genocide of our people are being accomplished without the bullet, bomb or blades. But it is, and will be, tremendously violent in its implications. Whiteness studies are not part of an academic discipline in any true sense of that term. The genre is an act of inter-ethnic aggression.


Today, a quick search on amazon.com reveals more than six hundred hits for books with “whiteness” in the title. Jews are strongly represented both in numerical terms, and in the sense that their contributions appear even more venomous than the average. Take for example, George Lipsitz’s The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit from Identity Politics (2006), in which the author offers “an unflinching look at white supremacy…whiteness is a structured advantage that produced unfair gains and unearned rewards for whites while imposing impediments to asset accumulation, employment, housing, and health care for members of aggrieved racial groups.” Although Jews continue to be prominent, it remains a painful reality that young White academics continue to flock to a movement geared towards the destruction of their own people.

One major factor facilitating this ethnically suicidal behavior is the ongoing Jewish domination of academia and the constant mutation of what may loosely be termed ‘Frankfurt School’ ideologies into superficially novel intellectual movements. There is really nothing novel at all about ‘Whiteness studies.’ It is simply the latest guise for the radical critique of White culture and, all Talmudic logic about ‘race as a construct’ aside, the active promotion of White genocide. The hypocrisy of the Jewish architects of ‘Whiteness studies’ is self-evident — made clear in their total lack of identification with Whites, and in their very strong identification with Jewish culture and group interests. It is tragic, criminal in fact, that this corrupt cabal of ethnic activists and dysfunctional Communist wannabe-Jews has hijacked positions on faculty, has obtained access to elite publishing outlets, and with it, significant power and influence over culture.

The second factor at play in the success of ‘Whiteness studies’ is the ongoing problem of White pathology. One side of white pathology is altruism towards other races. The even more insidious side is the tendency towards self-hate. In my last article on that subject I wrote that:

This self-hatred can be relatively dormant, to the extent that it is often sub-conscious, but will spike when the media or other cultural influences discover a suitable issue and build a false narrative around it. When the false narrative goes mainstream, replete with emotive moral triggers, White self-hate translates into activism which then takes on a life and momentum of its own. The moral crusade quickly becomes fashionable, spreading on trend-facilitators like social media, gaining more and more blind followers. The true facts behind the original issue are by this point buried under layers of socially constructed debate, stunts, and protests of the ‘body-bag-on-a-beach’ variety. Counterarguments are at this stage designated as subversive, and as an extension of the folk devil of Europe’s ‘racist’ past. Even ‘indifference’ and any mention of the costs of immigration are treated with contempt. Those individuals who are alert to the ruse and actively organize behind a counterargument, such as PEGIDA or nationalist political parties, are designated as folk devils incarnate. Confronted with these folk devils, White moralism reaches its zenith.

The White Leftists currently conspiring with their Jewish academic gurus for the untergang of whiteness are dangerous and morally deluded zealots, and thus race traitors of the highest order. They fully believe that “Treason to Whiteness is Loyalty to Humanity.” They have wilfully opted out of the struggle for life.

Surveying the turgid productions of this rabble, I was moved towards my own reflections on whiteness. It goes without saying, as a writer for TOO, that I reject outright any suggestion that race is merely a construct. Race, to me, is as concrete a natural reality as the rising of the sun and the blowing of the wind. I could wax lyrical for pages on the accomplishments of the White race and its place at the pinnacle of human progress, but would I reject any reduction of Whiteness to the merely material. More important than the inventions, discoveries, voyages, and battles that distinguish our race is the energy and spirit underlying all of them. I prefer to reflect on whiteness as being distilled in the Faustian spirit, and I believe it would therefore be no more possible to capture ‘Whiteness’ on paper, or an academic discipline for that matter, than to capture lightning in a bottle.

CIA Attempting to Foment Civil War in Iran

via TradYouth

Originally published at Voice of Reason on June 26th, 2009.

After two decades of attacks on Iran, the US government holds that the recent Iranian elections were illegitimate. How is this surprising. The CIA has been involved in attempting to manipulate the Iranian government since they sponsored the Shah’s coup against Mossadegh in 1953. But today, a Mossad connected opponent of Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad, Hossein Mousavi, is struggling to be installed as President by Israel and the United States.

In this recent election, the current president, Ahmadinejad, won just over 63% of the vote. In a predictable fashion, the opposition claims fraud. But this is an old tactic: the US backed parties have tried it in Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Belarus, Serbia and many other places. It is a common tactic. But why should the current president have won the election? It seems if his rule has been just and economically prosperous, then how could he not be reelected? The very fact that Iran has elections is enough to upset the America/Israeli propaganda against the Persian people. But what are the facts?

Ahmadinejad was elected in 2005 without a peep from the west. Since 2005, according tot he CIA itself, Iran has grown economically an average of 6% yearly, very respectable when one considers the US sponsored sanctions which has driven up unemployment to an American level of 12%, though this is currently falling quickly as relations with China continue to grow. In the process, Iran has become the 18th most powerful economy in the world, and importantly, has diversified its economy substantially away from the oil sector, with a 4.5% industrial (non-oil) growth rate per year average since 2005.

Even more, Iran has successfully stood up to Israeli and American threats, including threats of nuclear war courtesy of John McCain. In terms of foreign trade, Iran has developed a foreign trade surplus of over 25 billion US dollars, and also has $100 billion of foreign currency in its banks, much of that is American. Iran has rebuilt its military into a first world fighting force. Like Iraq under Hussein, Iran under Ahmadinejad and his immediate predecessors has taken a third world country and turned it into a first world one, complete with universal schooling and a near 100% literacy rate.

It will only be a few years until Iran becomes a thriving industrial economy where the oil profits, according to the government, will be plowed into major industrial and trading enterprises, creating a diverse and powerful economy.

But apparently, none of this is enough to warrant any reelection.

The Los Angeles Times wrote the following in late 2007: “In praising the Iranian president, Arabs quickly navigate around historical religious animosities and present-day fears that Iran is undermining Sunnis in Iraq and elsewhere. They prefer to speak of how Ahmadinejad is a rallying voice for Islam at a time the region is bewildered by its powerlessness to fix Iraq, Lebanon and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

And the highly prestigious international news agency, Stratfor, wrote in May of this year, “Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s popularity has risen among Iranian voters, Iran’s Press TV reported May 13. A poll conducted revealed that 58.6 percent would vote for Ahmadinejad in the June 12 presidential elections.” The identical numbers were reported by the neo-con organization, “Stand for Israel,” no doubt with a shudder. Why does this man need to rig elections?

Certainly, food prices have gone up, but Ahmadinejad has also increased spending to assist the poor, and revamped old programs with the same end. It is hard to believe that the average Iranian holds the president responsible for American sanctions or the fallout from the American-created economic crisis that has enveloped the world.

Mir Hossein Mousavi, the man who the west says won the elections, espouses policies that are consonant with his western backers and slick, New York oligarchs, but unpopular with the Iranian people. Mousavi advocates the western line for Iran: free western television and the elimination of Islamic law in the country. Most of all, Mousavi has condemned all forms of “Holocaust revisionism,” as if that is an issue with the Persian population. Such a program was developed in Washington and Tel Aviv, and had no resonance with Iran as a country, especially in the countryside. Mousavi has received millions from the west in recent months to mount an attack on Ahmadinejad. The very fact that the Mousavi campaign is running with English language websites and Facebook pages strongly suggests the work of western operators, since the identical modus operandi was present in the west’s manipulation of both the Serbian and Ukrainian elections in recent years.

Persian journalist Reza Fiyouzat writes that Mousavi has close ties with one Manuchehr Ghorbanifar, former Mossad double agent and leading figure in the arms deals in the Iran/Contra scandals. In Chapter 1 of the Walsh Report on the Contra scandal, we read this paragraph:
On or about November 25, 1985, Michael Ledeen received a frantic phone call from Ghorbanifar, asking him to relay a message from [Mir-Hossein Mousavi] the prime minister of Iran to President Reagan regarding the shipment of the wrong type of HAWKs. Ledeen said the message essentially was “we’ve been holding up our part of the bargain, and here you people are now cheating us and tricking us and deceiving us and you had better correct this situation right away.”
There can be no doubt that Mousavi is CIA and has been created as a shill to fight the Anti-Washington president of Iran, using cliched tactics and fashionable slogans not to win elections, but the next best thing, to receive money and approbation from the west. Mousavi is a part of the globalist plan for Iran and close to the CIA. The very fact that the west is spending this much money trying to manipulate these elections proves just how frightened the American government actually is.

The Fortunes of Africa: A History of Africa before Independence

via American Renaissance

It is not easy to fit 5,000 years of the history of anything between two covers, much less the history of an entire continent. Journalist and historian Martin Meredith has not only done it, he has done it very well. The Fortunes of Africa is a first-rate introduction to a part of the world about which most Americans know next to nothing, and is an excellent companion to Mr. Meredith’s masterful account of black Africa since independence, The Fate of Africa.


Like the previous volume, this one is marvelously unsentimental. Mr. Meredith has no use for fantasies about mythical black sages and empires, nor does he make a fetish of the sins of the white man. He just tells the story–and it is a fantastic tale of colorful characters and useful lessons.

Recurring patterns

Although the author does not always call attention to them, there are clear patterns that emerge from this history, one of which is the importance and persistence of slavery. Except among people such as the Pygmies and Hottentots who were so poor that they were all struggling to survive, slavery was practiced all across the continent for as long as we have records.

Foreign peoples who came into contact with black Africans appear to have found them deeply alien and fit candidates for slavery. Place names that persist to this day reflect what must have been the first reaction of all outsiders on first meeting blacks. “Sudan” by which was meant the entire south Saharan region, comes from the Arabic Bilad as-Sudan, meaning “land of the blacks.” “Guinea,” which is in the names of three African countries as well as the gulf of that name, comes from a Moroccan word meaning “black.” “Ethiopia” comes from the Greek, meaning “burnt faced.” Zanj, which is the Arab name for the east coast of Africa and for its inhabitants, means “black.” Likewise, “Zanzibar” is from the Persian, and means “black coast.”

Toposa villagers in present-day South Sudan.
Toposa villagers in present-day South Sudan.

For centuries, black Africa had only three major exports: gold, ivory, and slaves. When trade caravans began crossing the Sahara in the 8th century, they brought slaves north. Mr. Meredith notes that the service life of early trans-Saharan slaves was about seven years, so there was steady demand. A good horse could be traded for 10 to 30 slaves, and eunuchs brought the highest prices. From 600 to 1500 AD, before the trans-Atlantic trade began, there were probably some 4 million slaves taken across the Sahara to markets in North Africa and the Middle East. Enslavement of blacks was so common that the Arab word abd, which means “slave,” (the name Abdullah means “slave of Allah”) also meant any black person.

Muslim Arabs tried to conquer the black Christian kingdoms in the highlands of what is now Ethiopia (missionaries from Alexandria had converted them in the fourth century). The Christians fought the Muslims to a standstill and established a truce, under which there was to be an annual exchange. The Arabs would supply horses, wheat, etc., in return for 360 of “the finest slaves of your country,” both male and female. Mr. Meredith writes that this deal, known as the Baqt, was honored for six centuries.

For about 800 years, Muslims shipped slaves from the east coast of Africa. Zanzibar is only 20 miles off the coast of Africa, but sea-faring Arabs controlled the island, and Islam was firmly established by the 11th century. From bases in Zanzibar, Arabs controlled a vast, East African slave and ivory trade, with destinations throughout the Middle East. During the 1860s, after the trans-Atlantic trade had been essentially abolished, Zanzibar was still shipping out some 20,000 slaves and 250 tons of ivory every year.


Stone Town, on Zanzibar, was the world’s last public slave market. The British shut it down in 1873, but could not root out the system, and Arab traders continued to hunt slaves in the interior to work on plantations on the coast. In 1875, the British Navy had to put down several local rebellions by slave traders on the coast who were furious that outsiders were meddling in their business. Mr. Meredith notes that British interference resulted in a sharp rise in the price of slaves.

It was the Portuguese who began the Atlantic slave trade in 1441, initially supplying markets in Portugal and Spain. Henry the Navigator initially promoted exploration of the African coast in the hope of finding a sea route to the gold mines in what is now Ghana, but slaves turned out to be a more accessible commodity. Since slavery was widely practiced in West Africa, the Portuguese had no trouble finding suppliers, and rarely had to go on slaving expeditions themselves. The Spanish church sent missionaries to the Congo delta, where profits were so high that even priests traded slaves.

In many African kingdoms, the punishment for crimes such as murder or theft was enslavement, and chiefs were happy to sell off their criminals to Europeans. A horse could be had for 9 to 14 slaves, but guns were also very popular. Africans who got their hands on them first attacked neighboring tribes in order to capture and sell yet more slaves. Chiefs policed their turf just as drug gangs do today, executing rivals.

The first shipments to Spanish territory in the New World came directly from Spain in 1510, and the first cargo directly from Africa arrived in 1518. Thus, slavery had been practiced in Latin America for a century before the first blacks arrived in Jamestown in 1619.


Most North American slaves came from West Africa, but Mr. Meredith notes that the port that shipped the largest number of slaves was Luanda in what is now Angola. The Portuguese controlled the area, and most of the 2.8 million slaves shipped from Luanda were bound for the Portuguese colony of Brazil, and for sugar plantations in the Caribbean. The next largest source of slaves was the coast of what is now Togo, Benin, and Nigeria–known then as the Slave Coast.

The mouths of rivers were the best trading posts. African chiefs sent their men up river in huge canoes with 50 paddlers and filled them with captives to sell to Europeans.
Part of the Atlantic trade stayed in Africa. The Akan people managed to keep control of the gold mines until the British seized them in the late 19th century. Slaves worked the mines, and the Akan bought slaves from the Luanda area when local supplies were low.

The end of the 18th century was the high water mark of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, with shipments reaching 80,000 a year. The British carried more than half of the trade, but Parliament, bowing to abolitionist pressure, passed a law in 1807 banning the slave trade in British ships. The British West Africa Squadron patrolled the area, and beginning in the 1840s, the navy began breaking up land-based slave operations as well. Africans were dumbfounded by this incomprehensible interference in age-old business practices.

An engraving used by anti-slavery campaigners in the 1700s. It reads "Am I Not A Man And A Brother?"
An engraving produced by English anti-slavery campaigners in the 1700s. It reads “Am I Not A Man And A Brother?”

The British founded the colony of Sierra Leone initially as a place to send blacks who were not wanted in England, but later they used it as a haven for slaves freed by the navy. Between 1810 and 1864, some 150,000 blacks were settled there.

In the interior of Africa, however, the trade went on undisturbed. Tippu Tip was a Zanzibar trader who stripped a vast part of the Eastern Congo of ivory and slaves. A missionary who was appalled by the sight of one of his caravans in 1882 wrote that Tippu Tip’s men made slaves carry the ivory. Anyone who complained that the ivory was too heavy was speared to death and left in the jungle. This discouraged slackers.

Tippu Tip knew David Livingstone and Henry Morton Stanley, but could not understand what motivated explorers:
If you Wazungu [white men] are desirous of throwing away your life, there is no reason we Arabs should. We travel little by little to get ivory and slaves . . . . but you white men only look for rivers and lakes and mountains and you spend your lives for no reason, and to no purpose.
Of Livingstone he said, “He bought no ivory or slaves; yet he traveled further than any of us, and for what?”

David Livingstone
David Livingstone

Mr. Meredith reports that the best estimates for the total number of slaves shipped from Africa in the long-haul trade between 800 to 1900 come to about 24 million. They took the following routes:

Trans-Sahara: 7.2 million.
Across the Red Sea: 2.4 million.
From the East African coast: 2.9 million.
Trans-Atlantic: 11.3 million.

These numbers do not include the countless millions trafficked within Africa. Some 800,000 are estimated to have been brought to British North America.

Slavery, of course, continues in Africa. In 1981, Mauritania was the last country officially to abolish it, but did not provide for criminal penalties. Today Arabs there own an estimated 150,000 to 600,000 blacks, which means that as much as 20 percent of the population could be slaves. Slave status is hereditary, and slaves can be bought, sold, rented out, or given as gifts.

Historically, Arabs enslaved whites as well as blacks. Mr. Meredith describes the Janissary and Mamluk systems in which Christian boys were captured and trained as soldiers. He also describes the Barbary Pirate raids, estimating that at least one million Europeans were enslaved between 1530 and 1780. Christians were worked to death as galley slaves, and white slaves helped build 18th-century Algiers into one of the most beautiful cities in the world.

Religion and superstition

It is clear from The Fortunes of Africa that the continent has seen a great deal of religious frenzy, with as much jihad as in the Middle East. Islam’s sweep through all of North Africa in the 7th century is one of history’s prime examples of conversion by the sword.

Similar tactics spread Islam south of the Sahara. In the 18th century in what is now northern Nigeria, Usuman dan Fodio established the Sokoto caliphate, which forcibly extended Islam over an area of 180,000 square miles. In the 19th century a jihad movement of Tukolor tribesmen also spread Islam into great swathes of West Africa.

One of the most famous Muslim warriors was Muhammad Ahmad ibn Abdallah, better known as “the Mahdi.” He was a Sudanese hermit with a reputation for great piety. In 1881, he saw visions in which he learned that he had been sent to prepare for the judgment day. “We shall destroy this and create a new world,” was his motto, which he said came straight from Allah. It was his armies that attacked Khartoum in 1885, killing General Charles George “Chinese” Gordon.

The Mahdi died shortly after this victory, but his successor, Abdullahi, expanded his territory to the equivalent of half the size of Europe, and wrote a letter to Queen Victoria inviting her to come to his capital at Omdurman, submit to him, and accept Islam. Abdullahi ran his empire for another 13 years until Lord Kitchener led a heavily armed force into the Sudan from Egypt and destroyed the Mahdist army of “Fuzzy-Wuzzies” at the Battle of Omdurman in 1898.

In Somalia, the British had to fend off another Muslim fanatic they called the “Mad Mullah.” Muhammad Abdullah Hassan waged guerrilla war from 1900 to 1920, and eluded five military expeditions sent to kill him. “I wish to rule my own country and protect my own religion,” he explained. His poetry about the death of a British commander became a staple of Somali national literature.

Statue of the "Mad Mullah" in Mogadishu.
Statue of the “Mad Mullah” in Mogadishu.

The toughest native resistance to French colonization of Algeria was in the name of Islam.

A fanatical Muslim movement, known as the Sanusiyya, was started by Muhammad ibn Ali al-Sanusi in the 1880s and rampaged through Libya until 1931, when the Italians finally put it down using bombers and concentration camps. Mr. Meredith reminds us that Osama bin Laden spent six years building up Al Qaeda in Islamist Sudan. There has been nearly perpetual low-grade war between Christians and Muslims in northern Nigeria. Boko Haram is only the latest version of high-octane Islam.

Further south there have been even weirder enthusiasms. From 1856 to ’57 a cult grew up around the prophecies of a 16-year-old Xhosa girl named Nongqawuse, who persuaded her people that their ancestors would rise from the dead and drive the whites into the sea if the Xhosa slaughtered their cattle and destroyed their grain stocks. Forty thousand people died in the famine.

In German Tanganyika (today’s Tanzania), Kinjikitile Ngwale had visions that led him to believe that if his tribesmen used his holy water (maji) it would turn German bullets into water. In 1905 he started the Maji Maji Rebellion, in which some 26,000 men were cut down by German machine guns.

In the 1980s, a Ugandan spirit medium named Alice Lakwena started something called the Holy Spirit Movement to oppose the Ugandan government. She mixed up holy oil to smear on followers who believed it would stop bullets. She also blessed stones that were supposed explode like grenades. Her units went into battle singing hymns and marching in cross-shaped formations. This sort of thing worked better against Ugandans than against the Germans, so Miss Lakawena held out against the national army for several years.

Her relative, Joseph Kony, proclaimed himself a prophet in 1987, and press-ganged thousands of children to fight in his Lord’s Resistance Army. He told them his holy water made them immune to bullets. Mr. Kony got the support of neighboring Sudan against the Ugandan government, and his campaign of rape, mutilation, and murder displaced some two million people. He claimed that all he wanted was to start a new government based on the Ten Commandments, but in 2005, the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest. Mr. Kony is now thought to be holed up in eastern Congo.

Joseph Kony
Joseph Kony

The various civil wars in Liberia also produced colorful characters, such as General Butt Naked, who would sacrifice a child and then lead his men into battle naked. General Die and Captain Kill Easy also made lurid names for themselves in battles in which no one seemed to know what he was fighting for and everyone was high on drugs.

It is clear from The Fortunes of Africa that human life has not counted for very much on the continent. The colonial powers certainly did a great deal of killing, but they did it methodically and scientifically in the interests of empire. No one seems to rival black Africans for killing their own people. The 19th century Zulu king, Shaka, is notorious for arbitrary mass executions of entire villages, but there are less well known monsters.

The rulers of the kingdom of Buganda, in what is now Uganda, had unlimited power of life and death. In hard times, they practiced what was known as kiwendo, or mass killing of subjects to propitiate the gods.

When Mutesa took the throne, he had to kill about 30 half brothers to consolidate his position because he was the son of his father’s 10th wife. The British explorer John Speke recorded a meeting with Mutesa, in which Speke gave the king a gift of firearms, and demonstrated their usefulness by shooting a few cows. Mutesa immediately had the weapons tried out on some of his subjects, of whom he made a practice of killing several every day. In old age, Mutesa suffered from advanced venereal disease and resorted to extravagant kiwendo cures, sometimes sacrificing as many as 2,000 people in a single day.

A later Buganda ruler named Mwanga had a predilection for young boys. In 1886, when several pages refused his advances, he decided that Christians were the problem. He had 45 of them castrated, and then hacked or burned to death.

This sort of thing survived into the post-colonial era. Nowhere has shooting political rivals been more popular, and many “big men” have been mass murders. The number of victims of Idi Amin, who ruled Uganda from 1971 to 1979 is said to be half a million, and Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe is still adding to his death toll. Mengistu Haile Mariam, who was president of Ethiopia from 1987 to 1991, had thousands of enemies killed, and kept famine relief out of restive areas, causing an estimated 1.5 million deaths.

There have been plenty of autocrats who were not mass murderers. Hastings Banda, who led Malawi to independence used to say, “Anything I say is law. Literally law.” Habib Bourguiba, the first leader of independent Tunisia, was once asked about the political system of his country. “System?” he asked. “What system? I am the system.”

Equatorial Guinea is a small country with lots of oil, and a per capita GNP of $35,000, which makes it easily the richest in Africa. However, all the oil wealth goes into the pockets of the ruling clique, so three quarters of the population live on about one dollar a day.

Many African countries do not bother with elections, and those that do are usually just putting on a show. Mr. Meredith notes that between 1960 and 1989, over the course of the 150 elections held in 29 countries, opposition parties were not allowed to win a single seat. Recently, opposition parties have actually won power in a few cases, but Mr. Meredith notes this usually means only that a different gang gets to loot the country.

At least this is government of some kind. Eastern Congo and most of Somalia have been a lawless mess for decades.

Botswana, just north of South Africa, seems to be a shining exception to the African rule of mismanagement and kleptocracy. It has a genuine democracy, a middle class, and enjoys economic growth–but it has advantages: Almost the entire population is Tswana, meaning there is no ethnic conflict, tribal governance was traditionally based on discussion rather than murder, and it has a thriving diamond industry. It does, however, have one of the highest AIDS rates in the world.

Mr. Meredith does not predict a happy ending. He writes that world food production rose by about 150 percent from 1970 to 2000, but in Africa it fell by 10 percent. From 1950 to 2010, the continent’s population more than quadrupled, from 225 million to 1 billion. Young people are swarming into reeking, pollution-choked cities surrounded by endless slums. The last words of the book warn that “the urban crisis . . . posed a threat not only to the stability of Africa’s cities but to entire nations.”

Martin Meredith
Martin Meredith

Africa poses threats beyond its borders. Africans who have wrecked their own countries are streaming into Europe, whose leaders do not have the backbone to keep them out. An exploding African population just to the south of a shrinking Europe is one of history’s great dysgenic menaces.

Population pressures and migration alone will keep Africa in the headlines. Along with The Fate of Africa, The Fortunes of Africa is an excellent history of what led to the current crisis.

Rachel Dolezal and the Blackification of Superfluousness

via Alternative Right

Has the NAACP come full circle?
Liberals and Leftists claim that race is a social construct, but what they really mean is (a) race is not important and (b) it does not exist. The recent case of Rachel Dolezal, a White woman who has been pretending to be Black for years, gives the lie to this.

Race was certainly important to her, and more fundamentally it was her actual race – White – that no doubt gave her the relative intelligence vis-a-vis more authentic Black NAACP members to rise up in the organization to the point where her identity has now become an issue.

In a similar way, Race has always been important to the NAACP both as an affective condition and a determinant of executive ability. The name of the organization is telling, literally the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People. Wasn't this exactly what Dolezal was doing – colouring herself? In the same way, it is pertinent to point out that the NAACP has always been a lot less Black than it has pretended to be – especially in its anti-lynching, Jim-Crow-defying golden age.

Because it was created in the era of the White Man’s Burden, most of its early leaders were out-and-out Whites or Jews, but even after it became important for an organization predicated on the cheery notion racial equality to colour itself Black by having Black front men, most of these have been remarkably White:

Brainteaser: Can you guess which one of these Black guys has not occupied the chief position at the NAACP?
And remember, this is without going into all the Whites and Jews who continued to pull the strings from the shadows of the organization.

In recent years the NAACP has become a Blacker organization, with Blacks and Mulattoes now dominating most of the leadership and board positions. How can this be explained?

The history of the NAACP can be divided into two periods, the period in which it played an important role in securing full Civil Rights for Blacks/Mulattoes (in my view a mistake because Segregation was actually an optimum solution for Blacks/Mullattoes and Whites in America, in the same way that Apartheid was in South Africa), and its post-Civil-Rights period, in which the organization has no real function beyond “raising awareness” (WTF?) and hobnobbing with Hollywood.

The best proof that the organization has simply become a loose, spinning wheel is its promotion of something called “climate justice”:
"Global climate change has a disproportionate impact on communities of color in the United States and around the world. The NAACP Climate Justice Initiative was created to educate and mobilize communities to address this human and civil rights issue."
That'll keep the funds rolling in with absolutely no accountability for results!

As it has become an increasingly superfluous and parasitical organization, the involvement of Whites, Jews, and even "too White" mulattoes at the top level has noticeably tapered off – although they still keep a rabbi on board to make sure things don’t take an anti-Semitic turn at the fried chicken and watermelon parties.

Indeed the Blackification of the NAACP correlates rather well with just how redundant the organization is in a country that bends over backwards 24-7 to be nice to Blacks and Mulattoes.

Proud Black woman, Rachel Dolezal.
This is the real story behind the Rachel Dolezal case. In the past the NAACP had a mountain to climb – in my view the wrong mountain but a mountain nonetheless – so it needed talented, intelligent , and committed people, instead of just freeloaders. This naturally meant a disproportionate number of Whites and Jews with a few pale-skinned mulattoes to tick the Black identity box. As the organization became increasingly pointless, it became safe to allow it to transform into a social organization and gravy train with sinecure positions for mid-tier Blacks and Mulattoes.

Rachel Dolezal’s mistake was coming along sixty years too late. Back in the 1950s and 60s, when the NAACP had some of its mountain still to climb, Whites were needed, especially behind the scenes. They could join the organization and rise with their talents. No kinking of the hair or darkening of the skin was necessary. But now, with its pernicious historical mission complete, the NAACP merely exists as a kind of role playing game for Blacks and Mulattoes. Rachel Dolezal’s own little role playing game reveals this.

A Day in Utopia

via Radix

I. Morning

I hopped out of bed right at 7:00 am. My life partner, Pat, was still curled up under the covers, with a cute little smile on zher face. Pat’s arm was wrapped around our adopted African child, Kanye--named for the the 51st President of the United States, Kanye West. I had had myself sterilized, of course, and Pat was trans, so adopting was a no- brainer. I smiled, loving the way that Kanye’s dark skin contrasted with Pat’s cream colored, slightly hairy forearm. But ah, no time for sentiments. I had to get ready for work!

I took a quick shower and got dressed, carefully feeding my legs through the adult diapers I now had to wear. Ever since Pat’s surgery, zhe preferred to be the dominant one, and I was cool with it, especially since I had read that catching helped men like myself expose their more vulnerable side. Besides, penetrating had always felt a bit uncomfortable to me. It felt sexist somehow.

So, as much as we were enjoying ourselves, I was stretched just a tad too much. Believe it or not, this was actually a good thing. It showed me that continence privileged people operated along invisible power structures that denied opportunity to those who were continence challenged. I was glad to no longer benefit from that hierarchy, and diapers were actually far more comfortable than briefs.

After I finished dressing, I got the Mx. Coffee fired up and brewed two cups of gluten-free joe. Pat had just woken up, and zhe was stumbling sleepily towards me, grasping for the cup of coffee. Zhe took the cup in one hand, while running the other one through zher tousled, neon pink hair in a way that just melted my heart.

“Hey, John,” Pat smiled at me.

“Hey, Life Partner. Do you consent to a kiss?” I asked. Zhe nodded.

“I give formal consent.” Pat said.

I grinned and leaned over to give zher a peck on the cheek. Pat’s raspy stubble gave me a little thrill. Unfortunately, I had been born with heterosexual tendencies, so naturally I was pretty excited when Pat decided to begin zher FTM surgery while continuing to identify as the female gender. Pat’s shoulders were really getting broad with the HRT, and zhe was growing hairier by the day! Zhe had also gotten very chubby, so it was really a humbling opportunity for me.

It wasn’t until Pat’s body started to radically change that I realized how badly white supremacist ideals of beauty had shaped me. I felt terrible when zher rolls of fat had hurt our most intimate moments. I mean, who was I to impose exclusionary standards on the love of my life? But honestly, zher sex change and weight gain was the best thing to happen to us. I was finally at the point where zher body was a turn-on, and it felt good—almost holy—to overcome my innately bigoted biology.

“Is Kanye up yet?” I asked.

“No,” zhe said, “I couldn’t bear to wake hen. Hen looked so cute there sleeping on the bed. Kanye will get up when hen’s ready. It wouldn’t be right to impose Western time standards on hen, especially when hen’s only been in this country for five years.”

I nodded. In some ways it was hard having an adopted child. Kanye was more impulsive than I had been, and hen definitely had a lower time preference and little tolerance for school. We encouraged it, though, because it was important to both of us that Kanye grew up free from the institutional violence and racism that had blighted this country for so long.

“Well, I gotta get to work,” I said, checking the time on my iPhone 37. “Permission to kiss you goodbye?”

“Consent not granted. Sorry, John, but you know how too much physical contact with a binary male can trigger me.” Pat said.

“No problem. I respect your boundaries.” It was already getting on near seven thirty. I had to get going or I’d be late.

II. On the Way to Work

Upon adopting Kanye, Pat and I had decided that it would be best to move into a more diverse part of town. It was important to us that Kanye be able to grow up and see people who looked like hen.

So, despite the higher levels of crime and general state of disrepair, I still preferred to walk to work. Owning a car had gotten too expensive, and it was a carbon tax write-off not to have one. Besides, it was good exercise.

I saw an urban teen walking toward me. Normally, I said “hello” to everyone, but part of me wanted to cross the street. It wasn’t a good thought to have, but he definitely looked a little angry, or suspicious, or something. Still, I suppressed the thought and kept walking. After all, prejudging was just short step away from prejudice.

“Sup nigga?” the youth asked, while reaching into his baggy pants and pulling out what must have been an assault weapon. He pointed the gun at me, and I felt a little feces slip into my diaper.

After former President Chelsea Clinton had overturned the Second Amendment, only the protected classes were allowed to own firearms--at least up until historic racism and privilege had been overcome. Unfortunately, we still had a long way to go.

“H-h-hello,” I stammered. “Is there a-anything I could h-h-help you with?”

“Gimme yo money!” he said, gesturing with the gun. I felt bad for him. Underneath the baggy clothing and reek of weed, this poor youth was only a child.

“Here,” I said, and handed him my wallet. He started rifling through it with one hand while keeping the gun trained on me with the other.

“I can’t use dis, where da greens at? Iz all creds. Wut yo numbaz?”

“Numbers?” I asked, drawing a blank. Was he asking me out on a date? “I fully support polyamory and polysexuality, but you have to understand that I’m in a civil union contingent upon there being only two actors present. It’s renegotiable, but I’ll have to consult with my SO first.”

“Wut da fuck chu talkin about? Yo pin, nigga! Fo’ yo akown!”

“Oh, right! I am so sorry.” I said. “It’s one-four-eight-eight.”

“One-fo-eigh’-eigh’! Now don’t yo go kanslin yo akown! I know whe’ yo lif, nigga!” he shouted at me, and waved the gun in my face. I squeezed my eyes shut, feeling awful that circumstances had forced this poor youth to act like this.

When I finally opened my eyes, he was gone. I stood there, shaking a little. It was terrible that he had had to act that way, but my real fear was that my use of verbal privilege when referring to my civil union would only further contribute to this youth’s oppression. On the other hand, he had called me the “N” word. Did that mean that he saw me as one of his own? One could only hope.

Oh, and I was definitely going to need to change my diaper when I got to work. Good thing there were spares in my fanny pack.

III. At the Office

I heard a knock on my door. It was 2:30 in the afternoon, and I’d been looking forward to this meeting all day.

“Come in,” I said.

A tall, biologically male, cisgender white person stepped into the office. He sat down in front of my desk, and had to squeeze his large frame into the chair. Underneath his dress shirt, it looked like he lifted weights. Didn’t he know that physical strength was privilege? I hated to admit it, but I felt a little intimidated. This guy was a walking microagression.

“So, Pete,” I drawled, trying to inject some confidence into my voice, “do you know why you are here?”

“No,” he said. Monosyllabic, like some sort of dumb, blond beast.

“We’ve been monitoring your interactions with your coworkers. Tell me, Do you know the racial and gender distribution of this company?” I asked, steepling my fingers. This was going to be good.

“No,” Pete sighed.

“We’re operating very close to demographic standards. Our workers are 51% female, 49% male. Of those, 14.5% are African American, 1.3% Amerindian, 33.1% Asian, 20% white, 28% Hispanic, and 3.1% Transracial. Diversity is our strength.” Now he was really going to get it.

“Okay, so? What’s wrong? Listen, I’m committed to diversity too, but there’ some work I need to get done.”

“Well, that’s the problem. Your work record is fine, but your interaction with coworkers is not. Are you aware of how you allocate your break time? Give me percents.”

“I don’t know. Mike and I take our breaks together, usually.”

“It’s good you’re telling the truth. Do you know what Mike is?”

“Yeah, he’s also a programmer,” Pete said, looking genuinely puzzled at my line of questioning. Did this piece of shit not even know what he had done? Could we have made so little progress?

“Yes, he’s a programmer, but he’s also a WHITE MAN!” I shouted, and a little spittle came out of my mouth. “You’ve been exclusively spending over 95% of your allocated break time in the presence of another white male. Do you realize how far off that is from our demographics standards?”

This time Pete didn’t have any laconic cowboy bullshit for me. His face went pale. He knew I had him.

“L-listen,” he stammered, “we just have the same job. I’m n-n-not hanging out with him because he’s white, it wouldn’t matter.”

“Our programming department is even closer to demographic ideal than the rest of our company. That’s no excuse.” I said, and grinned like the Cheshire Cat. I had him, and he knew it.

Pete stood up so fast that the chair fell to the ground behind him with a clashing bang. For a second he looked very tall and very angry. His face was a beet red and his shoulders were so broad they filled the room. It felt like the office itself darkened, and he loomed over me like some sort of demented troll.

I felt an ugly shiv of fear in my gut (and my diaper) but nothing came of it. Pete’s reason got the best of him, and he deflated. His shoulders sagged, and the color left his face.

He realized that there was no point fighting. Everything was documented, and we both knew he’d be dead in the next day or two. Racism was a capita l offense.
Sometimes, I loved my job.

IV. Ready for Bed

Pat, Kanye, and myself were all laying in bed together, going over the day. My head was resting on Pat’s broad, post-mastectomy chest. Pat had wrapped zher strong, muscular arms around me, and Kanye was sitting at the foot of the bed, playing on hen’s iPhone.

It felt good. It felt safe. Just a typical family decompressing after a hard day.

“So, I called this guy, Pete, into my office. You wouldn’t believe how scared he was. He tried calling me, ‘sir,’ and everything, but he was just a closeted bigot. Spent all his break time in the presence of other whites,” I said, spitting out ‘white’ like a curse word. For all the bigotry and hate still in the world today, it practically was.

“That’s terrible,” Pat murmured in my ear. “I can’t believe we’ve made so little progress in all this time.

“Yeah, how white people live with themselves, I have no idea.”

“So what did you do next?” Zhe asked.

“I told him we had documentation. The color drained right out of his face. He begged and bribed me not to take any action. But he doesn’t know who he’s dealing with!” I said, chuckling. That wasn’t exactly how it went, but I had learned a long time ago that perception was reality. What else could I say? I wanted Pat to think I was cool.

“No. You stood by your principles, that’s what matters. Is the State going to Release him?”

“Yeah, should be only a couple days. We have all the right documentation and forms filled out, and these charges are really serious,” I said.

Pat laughed, “That’s great!” Pat nudged Kanye, with zher foot. “Your zaza’s a hero!” Kanye looked up briefly from hen’s iPhone and smiled at me.

“That good, Zaza,” Kanye said, and returned to whatever hen had been doing on the phone.

“I think you’ve earned a little reward, John,” Pat said, and I could hear the mischievous smile in zher voice.

“Did it come in the mail?” I asked, and squirmed with anticipation.

“It did,” Pat said, and opened the night stand drawer. Zhe pulled out a massive dildo that was at least the size (and color) of a large eggplant. “We’re going to have fun tonight.”

“Kanye, do you want to join in or are you going to sit in the Watching Chair?” I asked.
“I wan’ watch!” Kanye said, putting his phone down. Hen climbed his tiny frame into the Watching Chair. It stood over the bed like a diving board, giving the person sitting there a full view of things.

The social workers had impressed upon Pat and me the importance of Kanye being exposed to alternative forms of sex at an early age. It would help prevent hen from developing any bigoted notions of “normal” human relations. We both had felt a little uncomfortable about it at first, but Kanye seemed to enjoy it, and in the end, that was all that really mattered.

Pat ripped off my diaper with aggressive abandon, while I began the breathing exercises that would help loosen me up, and, boy, was I going to need them for tonight. We’d never played with something this big before, and it was definitely going to broaden my horizons. For better or for worse.

It was in that brief period of lucidity before lust completely overtook me, I realized that this was what I loved so much about Pat. Zhe helped push me past old boundaries, and preconceived notions of what was possible, both in bed and in life. Together, we were always moving forward, constantly progressing.

This was going to be the perfect ending to a near-perfect day. I just hoped that I’d be able to walk tomorrow.

Homeless Jack Says it’s Like We’re in Biblical Times again

via Western Spring

“I’m tellin’ you man, we’re in times like they had in the Bible,” said Homeless Jack.

“Do you think those people in Sodom and Gomorrah thought they were bad people, man? Of course they didn’t. They thought they were good people. They thought they were doing the right things by humans. Problem was, the Big Guy in the Sky thought otherwise and wiped ‘em all out. You know why, man? It’s because the things they were doing violated the Big Guy’s first rule: “Go forth and multiply in your image.”

“See, those sexual things they were doing didn’t lead to having more children. Even when children were produced, many of them were all mixed up genetically. That’s what got the people in those two cities in trouble. God wants each to his own. Like with like. And, He wants certain people to produce more of themselves and others not to produce as many and to naturally be replaced by newer models.

“How about the flood and Noah? Same thing, man. The whole Earth had become wicked so the Big Guy drowned ‘em all and started over again. Do you think all those people who were drowned thought they were evil? Nope. They thought they were good. God disagreed.

“You see, God steps in and wipes out the evildoers, and then things are fine for a time, but humans soon forget and they get arrogant and they start changing things again to suit human trends and wishes. And, in doing so, they forget about God and they become evil in God’s eyes and once again God steps in and wipes out everybody. We’re in the pre-wipe out period right now, man.

“I figure that’s why Arman has come in this day and not in an earlier or later day. He was sent by God to tell us the truth so we can choose to follow the true path or the false paths. There are many of the latter and only one of the former for us, man. And, it ain’t an easy path. Just imagine a few people in Sodom and Gomorrah saying that everyone else in the cities was evil. They’d be called names and they’d be ostracized and be persecuted and they would be lawbreakers, because the evil people made the laws.

“Or, imagine you lived in the time of Noah. Just a very few people out of millions of people believed Noah. Who perished, man? Right. It wasn’t Noah and his family.

“Sound too remote and you can’t relate? Can you imagine going to, say, San Francisco and standing on a street corner and speaking out against gay marriage and miscegenation? You’d probably be physically attacked and you’d probably also go to jail. And, the local church leaders would condemn you from their pulpits. The media would also attack you as some sort of nut case.

“That’s just like what happened in the Bible, man.”

“I thought you didn’t believe in the Bible, Jack,” I said.

“I don’t. Not as a sacred religious book. But, like all books, it’s worth reading and studying for insights. And, whether the stories about Sodom and Gomorrah and Noah are real or just parables, it doesn’t matter. The point is the same. Give up your evil ways and do what God wants–and especially go forth and multiply in your image–or you’ll perish. Nature tells us the same thing.

“The problem today, as in Biblical times, is that humans get all confused about right and wrong and evil and good and today many are picking and choosing various things from the Bible to justify anything they want to do. Most religions today are religions of man, not of God. They won’t say this directly, but they worship man and call it religion.

Homeless Jack 1“Arman brings a message from God that is harsh, hard and uncompromising when compared to the way many people think today. He brings a message that we can’t just all get along and that we can’t just think ourselves better. He brings a message that only those with the Code that we carry will get through the bottleneck and even then, it won’t be all of us. Yup,we have to struggle to get through. We have to compete even with our own people to be the ones to survive and to become a new species on the other side after the extinction that is coming. Arman brings a message that genes matter and that only our genes will get us past the great extinction to the other side of the bottleneck where we will be a new species incapable of producing children with homo sapiens. That’s not a message that humans want to hear, man.

“Look, man, I figure God ain’t a bluenose. He’s not against homosexuality just because he’s against it, but because it doesn’t lead to the production of children.

“And, what about miscegenation? God’s against it because it screws up our Code and stops our evolution. It blends us all back together into a lumpen mass with all other humans–the ones from whom we evolved. It reverses our evolution. It’s devolution for us. And, lumpen masses ain’t the way to evolve. That’s why God is against this. We are the distillate of mankind for the next jump.

“Look man, Arman says we gotta separate out from the rest of mankind and not have any gene flow with them. We gotta have geographic and reproductive isolation in order to get through the bottleneck. And, we also have to have vast numbers of us in our image to make sure the Code survives.


“Lots of people talk about what’s wrong with the U.S. and what we need to do to fix it, man. Some others say it might just be best to have the country break up into parts where people truly can pursue happiness and live their lives as the founding fathers had intended, and, in our case, to pursue our religious and evolutionary destiny separated from all who are unlike us.

“Arman doesn’t directly address this, but says we must separate with our own people to stop the gene flow and blending.

“Does this sound radical? Actually, it’s not. The present Constitution and the Bill of Rights if properly interpreted as originally intended are probably just fine for most of us who listen to Arman. Remember, when they were written there was no thought of a mixed society as we see today. Those documents were written for indigenous Europeans on these shores and for no one else.

“The U.S. today is artificial and inauthentic. It is now based on some ideas that are flawed and which ignore the laws of nature. We are told that race is a social construct and not a reality. This is nonsense and is anti-nature. The reason we are told this is to break down our resistance to blending in with the rest of mankind. We are told that homosexuality is the equivalent of heterosexuality. This is nonsense and is anti-nature.

“Will we survive? According to Arman’s teachings we will, but our numbers will be greatly reduced as we approach the bottleneck and as we emerge on the other side as a new species. We are the replacements for the present humans.

“We are the new model aborning. God willing, we are the ones who will have the general adaptations and the mutations that allow us to survive and prosper in many different environments and niches. Why us? Because God chose us. But, if you want a fuller answer, Arman says it has to do with the fact that most mutations build upon earlier mutations. We, alone of all humans, have those earlier mutations upon which the new ones will build. Arman says that our white skin is no trifle. It is a necessary part of the complex of mutations we need.

“Will we be the final model? Not in a long shot. But we believe that, God willing, we are the ones who will evolve as God wants and that we will continue to branch off into ever newer models as we carry the Code forward. We are the carriers of the Code, man. We are born with it, and that’s the only way to get it.

“Arman says those who have awakened to the truth need to share their new understanding with others of our people so they will understand something about what God really wants and about the Code that they carry. Only with right belief and right action will the Code be activated in the way it should be activated. This is as God wants it, man. Don’t get on God’s wrong side.”