Oct 28, 2015

Hate and Defamation: The Full Story of the ADL, Part 1

via Kevin Alfred Strom

Listen Now

Meet the new Jew, same as the old Jew
October is the anniversary month of the creation of the ADL, a Jewish organization with close ties to organized crime, the purpose of which is to monitor and control non-Jews so these criminal activities — and other operations deemed vital to the Jewish establishment — can continue without exposure, legal hindrance, or abatement.

Over this and the next two weeks, we are going to present one of the finest exposés ever produced on this subject, written by Valdis Bell for the American Mercury, and read for American Dissident Voices by National Vanguard editor Vanessa Neubauer. I give you “Hate and Defamation: The Full Story of the ADL, part 1”:

* * *

2013 MARKED THE 100th anniversary of the largest and most-well funded hate and defamation group in the history of mankind: the Anti-Defamation League, or “ADL.” The organization was originally called the “Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith” after its parent group, the Jewish fraternal order B’nai B’rith (meaning “Sons of the Covenant,” or, literally, “Sons of the Cut” — referring to circumcision).

The ADL was founded in the immediate aftermath of the conviction of Atlanta B’nai B’rith President Leo Frank for the strangulation and sex murder of a 13-year-old factory girl, Mary Phagan. The international Jewish community did not believe that Frank should have been convicted. They had mounted a huge press, publicity, legal, and lobbying campaign to convince officials and the public that a Black man, James Conley, was the real killer. But the evidence against Frank was so strong — and the evidence against Conley so thin — that the Southern, all White, and doubtless philo-Semitic (like most of the Christian South) jury unanimously convicted Leo Frank and sentenced him to hang. Two months after Frank’s conviction, on October 20, 1913, the ADL was formed. To this day, the ADL and its allies promote the fiction that Frank’s conviction was a result of “anti-Semitism” and use the case a rallying cry to garner support and funding.

The ADL operates as a private intelligence agency, sending spies, infiltrators, disruptors, and agents provocateurs into the camps — both Jewish and non-Jewish — of those who disagree with its radically pro-Israel and Jewish supremacist agenda. Also like an intelligence agency, it maintains a huge database containing personal information on politicians, writers, dissidents, activists, publishers, bloggers, and even unaffiliated private citizens so that — should any of these people “get out of line,” in the opinion of the ADL — they can be threatened, “exposed,” blackmailed, and thus silenced with maximum effectiveness.

ADL operative Roy Bullock
ADL operative Roy Bullock
In 1993, an ADL operative, Roy Bullock, was caught corrupting police officials and illegally obtaining police files to add to the ADL’s dossiers on “thought criminals” Left and Right. Despite this, the ADL audaciously uses its money and influence to “educate” law enforcement officials through a subsidiary called the “Law Enforcement Agency Resource Network” (LEARN), which uses persuasive techniques to convince police authorities that individuals and groups that the ADL dislikes are dangerous criminals — and that the ADL and its allies are public-spirited, beneficial groups.

Ironically, considering its name, one of the main techniques used by the ADL, and for which its massive intelligence archive is most useful, is public defamation of those who the ADL has declared are its enemies.

The ADL is headquartered in New York City and has 29 offices in major cities in the United States, one in Israel, and two known offices in other countries. Abraham Foxman has been “national director” of the group since 1987. It has an admitted annual U.S. budget of $55 million, with listed assets in 2011 of $171 million.

The Bullock Case

In 1993, an ADL agent named Roy Bullock, a San Francisco art dealer and fairly well-known in the homosexual community there, whose specialty was the infiltration of patriotic, Arab-American, and other organizations on behalf of the League, was found to have in his possession illegally obtained and highly private and personal data on his targets — data which could only have been obtained from police and other confidential government files; data that was also discovered in the files of the ADL itself when police raided ADL headquarters in San Francisco and Los Angeles as a result of Bullock’s exposure.

According to the Los Angeles Times of 9th April, 1993, “Police on Thursday served search warrants on the Anti-Defamation League here and in Los Angeles, seizing evidence of a nationwide intelligence network accused of keeping files on more than 950 political groups, newspapers, and labor unions and as many as 12,000 people.

“Describing the spy operations in great detail, San Francisco authorities simultaneously released voluminous documents telling how operatives of the Anti-Defamation League searched through trash and infiltrated organizations to gather intelligence an Arab-American, right-wing, and what they called “pinko” organizations….

“…Police allege that the organization maintains undercover operatives to gather political intelligence in at least seven cities, including Los Angeles and San Francisco.

“Groups that were the focus of the spy operation span the political spectrum, including such groups as the Ku Klux Klan, the White Aryan Resistance, Greenpeace, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the United Farm Workers, and the Jewish Defense League. Also on the list were Mills College, the board of directors of San Francisco public television station KQED, and the San Francisco Bay Guardian newspaper.

“People who were subjects of the spy operation included former Republican Representative Pete McCloskey, jailed political extremist Lyndon LaRouche and Los Angeles Times correspondent Scott Kraft, who is based in South Africa….

“…In addition to allegations of obtaining confidential information from police, the Anti-Defamation League could face a total of 48 felony counts for not properly reporting the employment of its chief West Coast spy, Roy Bullock, according to the affidavit filed to justify the search warrant.”

I’ll interrupt the article to inform you that those 48 felony counts were somehow suppressed and the ADL was never prosecuted. A sweetheart deal was worked out in the year 2000 under which the ADL admitted no wrongdoing, paid an out-of-court settlement — of under $200,000 — part of it for legal fees and the rest to “charitable groups” which “fight hate” (in other words, the kind of groups the ADL would support anyway — one such group was the “Hate Crimes Reward Fund”), issued a weak apology for dealing with “fact finders” who had violated the law, supposedly without the knowledge of the ADL, and then had the unbelievable audacity to reaffirm their “right” to spy on any group and anyone just as they always have!


“The Anti-Defamation League disguised payments to Bullock for more than 25 years by funneling $550 a week to Beverly Hills attorney Bruce I. Hochman, who then paid Bullock, according to the documents released in San Francisco. Hochman, a former president of the Jewish Federation Council of Greater Los Angeles and one of the state’s leading tax attorneys, will be out of the city until late next week and could not be reached for comment, his office said.

“Until 1990, Hochman, a former U.S. prosecutor, also was a member of a panel appointed by then-Senator Pete Wilson to secretly make initial recommendations on new federal judges in California. Hochman is a former regional president of the Anti-Defamation League….

“David Lehrer, executive director of the Los Angeles ADL office, said the organization has not violated the law….

“…But in an affidavit filed to obtain warrants for Thursday’s searches, San Francisco police allege that ‘ADL employees were apparently less than truthful’ in providing information in an earlier search conducted without a warrant’….

“…The police affidavit contends that Lehrer had sole control of a secret fund used to pay for ‘fact-finding operations.’ Lehrer, according to the documents, signed checks from the account under the name ‘L. Patterson.’…

“…League officials will not confirm or deny whether Bullock was an employee and have said they simply traded information with police departments about people who might be involved in hate crimes.”

I’ll add here that the category of crime called “hate crimes” was virtually invented by the ADL. The purpose of such laws is to add extra penalties for acts which are already crimes under existing statutes — like murder, assault, etc. — if the perpetrator can be shown to have held prejudiced or “hateful” views which might have motivated his actions. Under “hate crime” laws, American citizens would receive different sentences for the same crime, depending on whether or not their thoughts are “Politically Correct” on issues relating to homosexuality, race, nationality, and politics. That such laws might have a chilling effect on free speech — for a thoughtful person would now realize that his every utterance on “sensitive” topics might someday be used against him in a court of law, should he be required to defend himself with force someday or even have an argument with a member of a “protected class” — was probably the ADL’s intention all along.

Enter Tom Gerard

From the Los Angeles Times, 13th April, 1993:

” To the outside world, Roy Bullock was a small-time art dealer who operated from his house in the Castro District. In reality, he was an undercover spy who picked through garbage and amassed secret files for the Anti-Defamation League for nearly 40 years.
“His code name at the prominent Jewish organization was Cal, and he was so successful at infiltrating political groups that he was once chosen to head an Arab-American delegation that visited Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) in her Washington, D.C. office.

“For a time, ‘Cal’ tapped into the phone message system of White Aryan Resistance… …From police sources, he obtained privileged, personal information on at least 1,394 people. And he met surreptitiously with agents of the South African government to trade his knowledge for crisp, new $100 bills.

“These are among the secrets that Bullock and David Gurvitz, a former Los Angeles-based [ADL] operative, divulged in extensive interviews with police and the FBI in a growing scandal over the nationwide intelligence network operated by the Anti-Defamation League….

“Transcripts of the interviews — among nearly 700 pages of documents released by San Francisco prosecutors last week — offer new details of the private spy operation that authorities allege crossed the line into illegal territory.

“At times, the intelligence activities took on a cloak-and-dagger air with laundered payments, shredded documents, hotel rendezvous with foreign agents and code names….

“On one occasion, Gurvitz recounts, he received a tip that a pro-Palestinian activist was about to board a plane bound for Haifa, Israel. Although the Anti-Defamation League publicly denies any ties to Israel, Gurvitz phoned an Israeli consular official to warn them. Shortly thereafter, another [Israeli government] official called Gurvitz back and debriefed him.

“The court papers also added to the mystery of Tom Gerard, a former CIA agent and San Francisco police officer accused of providing confidential material from police files to the Anti-Defamation League… …Bullock said it was Gerard who sold official police intelligence. Bullock said he split about $16,000… evenly with Gerard, telling him at one point, ‘I may be gay, but I’m a straight arrow.’…

“Gerard fled to the Philippines last fall after he was interviewed by the FBI, but left behind a briefcase in his police locker. Its contents included passports, driver’s licenses, and identification cards in 10 different names; identification cards in his own name for four different embassies in Central America; and a collection of blank birth certificates, Army discharge papers, and official stationery from various agencies.

“Also in the briefcase were extensive information on death squads, a black hood, apparently for use in interrogations, and photos of blindfolded and chained men.

“Investigators suspect that Gerard and other police sources gave the ADL confidential driver’s license or vehicle registration information on a vast number of people, including as many as 4,500 members of one target group, the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee.”

(republished with the permission of The American Mercury)
* * *
What a lurid and disgusting story — what an outrage that such corrupt and criminal men hold offices of trust and respect in the United States and are praised as advocates for justice and “human rights.” And even more outrageous is the fact that these criminals were not punished for their crimes — for their thousands upon thousands of undeniable felonies revealed to us in this one case alone.

On our next American Dissident Voices broadcast, we’ll tell you how the FBI’s illegal COINTELPRO files — which were required by law to be destroyed — somehow found their way into the files of the ADL; how the ADL wined and dined — and compromised — high American intelligence, military, and other officials, sent them on all-expenses-paid trips to Israel, and created a conduit for secret information to find its way to the Mossad and Shin Bet, Israel’s intelligence, dirty tricks, and political assassination agencies; and how the ADL sent an agent provocateur into radical groups to purposely try to incite anti-Jewish violence.

The British Isles and Atland

via Aryan Myth and Metahistory

Over recent years I have written extensively on this and my Celto-Germanic Culture, Myth and History blogs about the ancient presence of the Germanic peoples in the British Isles and how English is now increasingly being considered as an ancient Germanic language deserving of its own classification as a distinct sub-group within the family of Germanic languages. See http://The Ancient Presence of the Germanic Peoples in England 

I have also made a case for the Germanic origins of the megalithic culture. http://celto-germanic.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/the-aesir-and-vanir-reflection-of.html

In the light of this I have also widely discussed the Indo-European or Aryan origins of Phases II and III of Stonehenge. http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-aryan-origins-of-stonehenge.html

Wulf Ingessunu, the founder and Folk Warder of Woden's Folk has also followed similar but independent lines of enquiry in his writings. I wish to add further light to these researchers by informing my readers that my research and conclusions have been strengthened in my own mind following my recent reading of Tony Steele's The Rites and Rituals of Traditional Witchcraft, published by Capall Bann in 2001. Mr Steele is the founder of  the Ordo Anno Mundi, a magical order which uses the Oera Linda Book as a foundational text. The Rites and Rituals of Traditional Witchcraft quotes frequently from the Oera Linda Book.

Tony Steele's book contains a lot of useful information regarding the lost Frisian and Aryan civilisation and land mass known as Atland which he derives from Oat-land and Aldland-Old-land. This land mass and its civilisation was destroyed by the Great Flood of 2194 BCE. He considers the cause of this cataclysm to be the appearance of the Hale-Bopp comet. Interestingly the reappearance of this comet heralded the formation of Woden's Folk by Wulf, to prepare the way for the final Avatar. There is a deep mystical truth and connection here that we need to meditate on.

Mr Steele comes to the conclusion (far earlier than many others) that Old English, which is closely related to Old Frisian is far more archaic than many scholars up until now have been willing to admit.  Stephen Oppenheimer in his Origins of the British: The New Pre-History of Britain: A Genetic Detective Story (2007) analyses the structure and lexicon of Old English and comes to the conclusion that it is not merely an offshoot of the West Germanic or Ingaevonic language group. Its genesis is more complicated than that. It does indeed share a close similarity in structure with Old Frisian but its lexicon is greatly affected by North Germanic-Old Norse. Now my readers must not jump to the conclusion that this is the result of the Viking invasions as these took place centuries after the advent of the Anglo-Saxons. So any Scandinavian influence on Old English would have had to have taken place before the Saxon invasions but this does not make sense as before these invasions there was no English presence in Britain-or so it would seem. Thus Oppenheimer theorises that there was indeed a Germanic language and thus a Germanic presence already here in England by the time of the Anglo-Saxon invasions.

The truth of the matter is that the ancestors of the English were present in Britain thousands of years before the accepted date of the Anglo-Saxon invasion of 449 CE referred to in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles. Like myself Mr Steele attributes the Megalithic Culture to the Germanic peoples but he refers to the English as part of a Frisian confederation which covered most of northern and western Europe. It is no coincidence that Haplotype R1b is dominant in western Europe including the British Isles and is particularly common amongst the so-called Celts of Ireland, Scotland and Wales as well as the Western Germanic peoples (English, Frisians, Dutch, Germans). Indeed Wulf makes a similar point in his recent blog article http://inglinga.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/cu-chulainn-one-eyed-hero.html
"These similarities may not be 'borrowings' since I would suggest they have a common source in the ancient land of At-al-land which was the northern continent much of which sank under the North Sea some 7,000 years ago in a catastrophe. This being so these myths are Ario-Germanic Myths (Northern European) originally. As we have gone some way to proving, these islands were not 'Celtic' at all but were made up mainly of Germanic Folk with a mixture of Gallic peoples from Southern Europe and migrations from the South."

To further prove this point 'The Destruction of Da Derga's Hostel' is based around the Winter Sunstead period of the year, and the four main points of the 'Celtic' (Gallic) calender are the X-points and not the points that include the Winter Sunstead, this being a Germanic Festival. We can find Germanic Myth throughout these islands since the peoples are a mixture, and the idea that Wales, Scotland and Ireland are somewhat 'different' and 'Celtic' is a modern invention - one suited to our oppressors who work through the 'divide and conquer' method. In very ancient times we can see that Ingwe-Inguz is a figure found throughout these islands (except Wales, but even there we find Woden as Gwydio/Wydion).
There is a particularly close connection between Germanic and Celtic mythology in the British Isles which goes beyond cultural 'borrowing' or exchange or indeed from their shared Indo-European distant past. It is indicative that the shared mythology and DNA of the so-called Celts and Teutons demonstrates that at one point they were a unifield folk and that the British Isles has always been Ario-Germanic.

For many years so-called scholars have been unwilling to admit to the possibility that Stonehenge, the greatest of our ancient monuments was of Indo-European origin despite research and writings on this subject going back to the 1950s. It is only now with the recent discoveries at Stonehenge that it is accepted as fact even though the likes of Peter Crampton and Leon Stover have been writing about this since the 1960s and 1970s respectively that Stonehenge was built by Indo-Europeans (the Wessex Culture).

What I find also of interest in Mr Steele's book is that the Picts, thought to be aboriginal to Britain may indeed have a Germanic origin. For many years they were considered to be either non-Indo-European or simply a subset of the Celts. It is argued that the language of the Picts was "a very archaic and somewhat degenerate form of Germanic." Mr Steele mentions that the original name of Britain was Albion meaning either White Island or more interestingly Elf Island. He points out that J.R.R. Tolkien demonstrated that cognates of the word 'Elf' are only to be found in Germanic languages! The Scots who colonised Scotland from Ulster renamed the Picts' Alba as Scotland.

The Frisian confederation was apparently divided into ten 'kindreds' which included the Angelarar (the Angles) along with the Juttar (Jutes) and Saxmannar (Saxons)which constituted the Anglo-Saxon tribes which returned to Britain from the mid 5th century CE onwards. The English therefore were an important part of this confederation.

Whistling Right While Wriggling Left: Against Civic Nationalism

via TradYouth

The struggle for nationalism is one that is in the hearts of all peoples and nations. From the dusty streets of Palestine and Lebanon to the lush fields of Europe to all of the Americas and beyond; nationalism is a biological and spiritual drive for all people to care for their children, their families and their extended family of kindred folk. Nationalism lies at the intersection of blood and soil, of culture, and of Faith. The central tenets of one’s Identity are found in the flame of Tradition that has been passed throughout the centuries.

By maintaining one’s folkish traditions, you keep alive the spirit of your ancestors and pass along the flame to future generations. Austrian composer Gustav Mahler famously said, “Tradition is not to preserve the ashes, but to pass on the flame.” It is with this spirit of passing along the flame to our children and grandchildren that nationalists work to preserve, cherish, and advance our goals of keeping our unique extended family vibrant and thriving.

The concept of what makes a nation can be found even in the language that we use. The very word “nations” in Greek as used in the Biblical New Testament is “ἔθνος” or “ethnos” which is where we derive the word “ethnicity” from. Nations have historically always been understood as organic expressions of a united folk where both blood and soil are what makes up a nation.

Corneliu Codreanu, the founder of the Romanian nationalist movement The Legion of Saint Michael the Archangel said to his supporters that to him nationalism was,
“When we speak of the Romanian nation, we refer not only to the Romanians currently living on the same territory, with the same past and same future, the same habits, the same language, the same interests. When we speak of the Romanian nation we refer to all Romanians, dead or alive, who have lived on this land of ours from the beginnings of history and will live on it also in the future.”
There is a symphony of elements that makes up a people, and nationalists battle to ensure that all of these elements survive against all attacks both internally and externally by malicious forces.

If you attempt to remove the pieces of what makes nationalism, either the element of shared kinship by blood or of culture and Faith, it is like knocking out one of the legs of a stool. Only nationalism that protects all elements of the nation can be called true nationalism. It is with this knowledge that we march forward, manifesting and fomenting a societal revolution against the combined forces of globalism, capitalism, and Cultural Marxism which infect the European peoples both in the homeland and abroad.

A phenomenon has arisen in the Occident known as “civic nationalism” which is a false nationalism, one based on abstract concepts of a nation being based only in a shared belief in government, economics, or simple residence. This can be traced back to the forces behind the American Revolution, the first proposition nation in human history. Up until that point every nation had been secure in the knowledge that to be a true part of a nation is to share in the blood, culture, and soil of an extended family.

Civic nationalism is a modern phenomenon, one that poisons all that it touches. The ties between men and their wives, parents and their children, and families with their communities, …all are torn apart. They’re replaced with a mild form of globalism. Globalism is the belief in a one world market and an eventual one world government and it is opposed to all forms of ethnic Identity and religious expression. Globalism has been the chief opponent of nationalism for hundreds of years.

But in order to defeat our foe, we must first understand our foe.

Our most insidious opponents appear as allies, “conservatives” master the disposition and optics of the nationalist, while pursuing an incompatible, hostile agenda. Everyone should be reminded that many of the so called “moderates” in Spain during the Spanish Civil War sided not with the Christians, Traditionalists and nationalists but instead with the communists and anarchists. Moderates always end up backing the Left, because to back true nationalism would require them to be courageous, willing to sacrifice for something greater than themselves.

Chief of Staff and chaplain to famous Confederate General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, Robert Lewis Dabney famously noted,
“Conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom.“
Moderate Conservatism has always been weak because while the Left pushes forward with revolutionary fervor, the conservatives trail behind defending the Leftist positions of a generation ago all in the name of “conserving” their lifestyles and habits, instead of fighting for a Nation that is healthy in mind, body and soul.

The betrayal of true nationalists is found in the recent case of Jack Sen, a nationalist candidate who was running for the United Kingdom Independence Party who was running for the party in West Lancashire. UKIP and its leader Nigel Farage have publicly called themselves “true nationalists,” representing the interests of the English people. With the issue of getting Britain out of the European Union as their rallying cry, UKIP has worked to undermine other nationalist parties such as the British National Party and the National Front, two groups with a far better track record of fighting for the best interests of English people, and positioned themselves to be the choice for voters who want to vote to the right of Marxist-lite Conservative Party led by David Cameron.

As with all moderates or “civic nationalists,” UKIP’s propaganda is slick. But they have quickly shown themselves to the the devil in disguise. Jack Sen was removed from being a candidate for UKIP not because of anything radical, but because he spoke out for lives of those who are having an active genocide committed against them. If Mr. Sen had denounced the Chinese treatment of Tibetans he would have likely been applauded for being a maverick for human rights. If he had championed the cause of indigenous groups in Latin America, he would have been put on all the major media outlets as a hero, but Mr. Sen spoke up for a people who have no voice, White South Africans.

In the modern West, you can speak up and advocate for any group of people; just not Europeans. If you work for the best interests of Europeans, both the civic nationalists and the Left will attempt to crucify you. Just as the untouchables of pre-colonial Indian society were viewed as the absolute lowest on the totem pole, so now the global elites have put Europeans on the bottom of the entire global political hierarchy. European nations are to be undermined and destroyed and the sellout conservatives clap along to this genocidal plan.

Jack Sen was brave enough to stand up, knowing full well that the elites and their lapdogs would come for his scalp, but Jack stood strong in his beliefs that Whites deserve rights too. Mr. Sen spoke out against a genocide occurring in South Africa and was thus politically crucified for it by members of a government which had once supported White South Africa. England had positive relations with South Africa for decades, until it became politically expedient to betray White South Africa and send her people into a Third World hellstorm of bankruptcy, dysfunction, rape, and savagery.

Following the end of Apartheid, the White South African population has undergone what can only be called a systematic plot to exterminate their culture, language and race from South Africa by the ruling African National Congress government. ANC leaders have publicly called to “Kill the Boer” to thousands of cheering Black Marxist revolutionaries, but not one Western leader has stood against this agenda. The White South Africans were allies of the West in the fight against communism during the Cold War, but as soon as the Cold War ended, the former allies of White South Africans threw them to the dogs without a second thought.

White South Africans deserve respect–not condemnation–for the years of selfless sacrifice they gave to the world. White South Africans helped feed the starving citizens of West Berlin in the Berlin airlift, battling in the air alongside Rhodesian pilots to stop the communist takeover of South Korea and are the only nation on earth to choose to disarm all of its stockpiles of nuclear weapons to help promote world peace and disarmament.

As Europeans, we should have a special connection with White South Africans due to shared culture, religion, values, and blood. While separated from Europe, White South Africans just like Europeans in the United States, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, we are all still part of the greater European extended family.

Strong Christian values were the bedrock of White South African society. The Afrikaners banned abortion while they were in power (only to be repealed by the black majority in 1994), did not allow the sale of pornography, and even closed businesses on the Sabbath Day in accordance with Christian law. Moves against rampant gambling and homosexuality stopped the spread of moral decay within White South African society while initiatives aimed at promoting the family and traditional values helped strengthen the culture and community.

Men like former South African President Nelson Mandela are idolized by a global Leftist media. They’re politely ignoring the fact that Mandela has the blood of countless people–Black and White alike–on his hands. Mandela is the man who was serving time in prison for terrorist activities, who signed off on the bombing which killed nearly two dozen and wounded over two hundred. Mandela was a terrorist in both ideology and action. This was not the first time that the armed wing of the ANC Umkhonto we Sizwe (Spear of the Nation) had attacked and killed civilians nor would it be the last.

From 1961 onward, Umkhonto we Sizwe, the African National Congress, and the South African Communist Party were united and dedicated to overthrowing the Afrikaners by any means possible, and brutal means were preferred. From Johannesburg to Roodepoort, the organization that Nelson Mandela supported regularly abducted, tortured, abused, and murdered innocents to advance political goals.

After apartheid, the ANC government has restricted White South Africans from job opportunities, spots at places of higher education, government assistance, and government contracts all because of their race. The farm murders that have been perpetrated over the past two decades have cost the lives of thousands of White farmers and their families, all without a peep from the global media or Western politicians.

The Whites of former Rhodesia have been destroyed by the genocidal maniac leader of “Zimbabwe,” Robert Mugabe. White South Africans are looking at a similar fate if they do not get international support for their human rights crisis. The cries of hundreds of thousands of White South Africans forced to live in decaying squatter camps or on isolated farms where they daily face violence and the threat of land seizures and even murder forced Jack Sen into action, and that is when the opportunistic vultures swooped in.

When the Left cried about the supposed “racism” of Jack Sen for standing up for a people who are facing real persecution and eventual genocide, UKIP couldn’t throw him under the bus fast enough. When the money changers ordered Jack’s head, the leaders of UKIP decided they would rather lose the election than stand by true nationalist principles. Even though Mr. Sen was publicly suspended as a UKIP candidate, he outperformed the Deputy Leader of Ukip, Paul Nuttall, who was running for a nearby election. The people of England were stripped of being able to vote for a real political fighter not because of his policies, but because of the cowardice of UKIP and its leaders.

To look at false nationalism in England it is clear to see the role of big business, Marxist elites, and globalists propping up false nationalists. As the British National Party under Nick Griffin was gaining momentum after decades of hard work, a huge amount of money came out of nowhere to promote civic nationalist groups like the EDL.

The EDL of course made one of its first goals to burn National Socialist flags to condemn “radical nationalism,” start homosexual and Jewish divisions of their organization, and claim that being British has nothing to do with race or culture, only living in England and being against “Radical Islam.”

If these forces were truly for the British people, they would spend their time fighting for the voiceless. This is what Jack Sen has done, instead of simply blaming immigrants for the problems. Our opponents would like to imagine a simple continuum of ignorance and “hate,” one with ourselves as the most hateful and the more “civic nationalist” groups as watered down versions of our positions. But what’s more ignorant and hateful than inviting Muslims by the million, knowing fully well what Islamic customs are, only to turn around and vilify them for being who they are?

We don’t want to rip their burkas off, deny them their ancient customs, insult their beliefs, or tease them about their dietary habits. What we want to do is respectfully and humanely send them back home so that their customs and our own are no longer in conflict. The world’s an incredibly big place. The Islamic World spans unbroken from Gibraltar to Borneo, and our foggy island in the North Atlantic’s not big enough for both our culture and theirs.

Insisting that England be for the English is neither ignorant nor hateful. What’s ignorant and hateful is what the “moderate” civic nationalists make a sport of: inviting all the world’s exotic and incompatible cultures with one hand while poking them in the eye with the other. What’s ignorant and hateful is turning our ancient island nation into a powder keg of ethnic and religious infighting. What’s ignorant and hateful is rejecting the simple and natural notion that English communities have a right to exist, too.

When the English Defence League looked as if it would break the Systems containment, its leader Tommy Robinson was sent to prison and the money mysteriously disappeared, only to have a huge sum of money and professional equipment land in the lap of Britain First, another civic nationalist group that says that ethnicity and culture have nothing to do with being British or keeping England for the English. Instead, they believe in a lie of civic nationalism which means absolutely nothing save for being against Islam.

To counter these civic nationalists, we must look at who is pulling the strings. UKIP refuses to acknowledge the forces behind the European Union and other globalist endeavors. Richard Coudenhove Kalergi, a wealthy Jew, founded the “Pan-European” movement in Vienna in 1922 which aimed to create a New World Order that would use immigration to break up homogeneous nations and make Europe easy to control from a central point of governance.

World War II stopped Kalergi’s original plan, but afterwards he, other high ranking Jewish financiers and complicit European leaders worked together to create this reality of a new European government, what became known as the European Union. Kalergi publicly spoke about using immigration to destroy the European people and culture by saying in his book Praktischer Idealismus that “The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear.” Kalergi and his followers have worked to undermine Western civilization and have pushed through the genocidal immigration policies that are now plaguing Europe and all European nations.

Of course though, civic nationalist Parties like UKIP only have interest in being a safety valve and discussing “cutting” immigration and having a “referendum” on EU membership, all while they do nothing to attack those who publicly and privately are working for the extinction of the European people and our diverse and beautiful cultures.

Jack Sen was also punished by UKIP for Tweeting a news headline about Luciana Berger, a Jewish member of  Labour MP who chaired the Labour Friends of Israel group, that she might have “divided loyalties” between her ethnic Homeland of Israel and the nation where she was an elected politician, England. Pointing out a politician’s potential conflict of interests isn’t hate speech in any sane world, but UKIP decided that asking a legitimate question about whether an ethnic Jew might harbor favoritism for Israel over the best interests of the British people is grounds for punishment.

Voltaire is often quoted as saying “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.” That is doubly clear in British politics. As long as British political and social movements neurotically fixate on Asian immigrants’ religious customs, but don’t question who is sending millions of them to Britain, they are left alone. But if you look for the man behind the curtain, both the conservatives and the Left will have your head, ruin your political career, and incite the public against you.

After reading all of UKIP’s official policies, it is clear that UKIP has no interest in the true nationalist goal of having a healthy nation in body and spirit. UKIP has no policies to bring back the moral foundations of England. It has no policies for abolishing abortion and protecting the unborn. Nigel Farage worked to change UKIP policy to not support the Traditional definition of marriage and UKIP also supports the globalist endeavor of NATO and continued British involvement in the military pact that has worked to advance both Zionist and global capitalist interests for decades.

While UKIP promotes itself as a nationalist Party, it is anything but. The treatment of Jack Sen is just one example of how when the cards are on the table, UKIP will side with globalist interests every time. To get England out of the European Union but keep it in NATO would still make the British pay pay for and bleed for a New World Order. The globalists don’t care whether they get your euros or your pounds, or which side of the chunnel their stooges are on. We certainly must get the UK out of the EU, but the national question is much greater than that.

The civic nationalism of UKIP and Cameron’s Conservatives did not start in England. In fact, their movement can be traced back to the founding of one of England’s prodigal son, the United States of America. The American Revolution, full of Judeo-Masonic Enlightenment concepts that would soon wrack Europe in the French Revolution, the communist uprisings throughout Europe in 1848 and up until this day in modern politics would challenge tradition in an attempt to redefine what a nation actually is.

To understand the rise of civic nationalism, we must look at how civic nationalism has fought against organic nationalism over the past several centuries in North America. The battle we as nationalists fight today is not a new one, it has been raging for far longer than many of us realize. The Founders of the United States were not evil men, but many were misguided in their attempts to create a new form of civilization, a civilization free from hierarchy, shared Faith, and shared blood. Historically this battle between civic nationalism and organic nationalism has been fought between the American Northeast and the American South.

The American South had the lowest amount of support for the rebellion against the English King in the American Revolution and fielded a large number of Loyalist volunteers in the war. The South has historically believed in a natural and organic society, based in hierarchy for government and in loyalty to tradition. After the war, this can be found in the establishment of the North becoming led by big business owners, bankers and ties to the globalist economic market while the South maintained a society where landed families maintained their Anglo-Celtic society.

A difference in vision for the new American society was even found between Northern and Southern delegates to the Constitutional Convention in which the laws of the new nation would be established. Southerners overwhelmingly supported the anti-Federalist position that States should have more power than a Federal government in order to maintain local control over matters that impacted the people of that State. The Federalists, spearheaded by Northern radicals believed in a powerful Federal government that would make the States subservient to the Federal government in nearly all affairs.

The difference between the two positions is found in how the States were viewed. When Great Britain made peace with the colonies, they made thirteen separate peace treaties, viewing each State as a sovereign power. The Federalists wished to combine power under the bootheel of a new Federal government while the anti-Federalists desired to maintain the view that each State had unique culture, customs and Identity and should remain sovereign.

As nationalists it is clear to see how the anti-Federalist position would better protect a people from foreign influence controlling their lives and allowing local culture and principles to remain dominant in that region. The planter-run society of the Deep South was economically, socially, and religiously distinct from the business- and mercantile-dominated Northeast.

Religion was a major difference between the two regions. The Northeast was dominated by the Quaker and Puritan movements and its various offshoots, a movement that originally stemmed out of rebellion against the Anglican Church and the hierarchical and traditional form of worship found within High Church Protestantism. The South was dominated by Catholics in Maryland and Anglicans throughout the rest of the South, maintaining a religious tie to England and also reaffirming tradition and hierarchy as building blocks for a society. This religious divide was not one merely of religious persuasion, the divide between High Church Christianity and Low Church Christianity represented a societal and cultural divide between organic and traditional organic nationalism and Enlightenment civic nationalism.

The North and South also took separate views on the racial components of what makes up a nation. Like most White liberals of today, the North were hypocrites in openly promoting a nationalism where all ethnicities can be a part of the nation while not wanting those diverse populations in their own backyards. Following American Revolution, Northern states began abolishing slavery, beginning with the 1777 constitution of Vermont and by 1804, all the Northern states had abolished it. A large number of these Northern States fell back on the Enlightenment and Jacobin ideas of Liberté, égalité, fraternité or “liberty, equality, fraternity” to justify their decisions. The Enlightenment era ideas of civic nationalism, a rebellion against hierarchy and religion pervaded the Northeast following the American Revolution.

Many Northern States while condemning for the South for our “peculiar institution” as it became to be known then followed up emancipation by enacting laws that stopped Blacks from living in their Leftist utopia. New Jersey in 1786 prohibited Blacks from entering the state to settle, Massachusetts in 1788 prescribed flogging for non-resident blacks who stayed more than two months and Indiana there was up to a five hundred dollar fine for bringing a Black person into the State. Liberals have founded their entire ideology on hypocrisy and in the North this principle on race relations was common practice.

While the “peculiar institution” belongs in the past, the Utopian multicultural social experiment where mutually suspicious tribes with conflicting group interests all get crammed together under a common government also belongs in the past. The South tried to plug along for several decades under a Jim Crow arrangement of White Supremacy, but that was a half-measure, along with Apartheid and anti-Islamism, which only delayed the inevitable conflict between the different identities competing for political dominance.

The lesson from history could not be more clear. The English have no excuse for error here, as England’s colonial history confirms that that sun will set on not only the British Empire, but on the British themselves if you keep settling for these half-hearted half-measures. How many historical case studies do you need? The English people aren’t some fixed historical entity to be taken for granted. They’re a living and breathing extended family who must fight with everything they have to secure their stake in the future. With eyes wide open, arm-in-arm, we must rally to defend our inheritance from both the foreign invaders and homegrown traitors who would deny our families a safe, sovereign, and prosperous future.

Back in the United States, false nationalist groups are known under the loose banner of the “Tea Party” groups that were said to be from the grassroots but were actually seeded with tens of millions of dollars from business interests and globalist forces. The Tea Party is no more organic than a plastic Christmas tree, but it was promoted as such as a way to redirect American anger at the Republican Party selling out voters on issues such as immigration, abortion and traditional marriage.

When millions of White Americans had thrown in with the Tea Party movement, it pivoted from its radical origins and became an arm of the very System it was supposed to challenge. These voters were tricked and misdirected into voting for Establishment conservative candidates and over the span of 2010 to 2015 the anger and drive behind these nationalist sentiments waned, people grew tired and things in Washington went back to business as usual. This is the nature of the civic nationalist “conservative” in every land the world over, always whistling to the Right while wriggling to the Left.

The false conservatives and civic nationalists work to court pro-Identity White voters, but they do everything in their power to subvert true nationalism. It was the Republicans, not the Democrats, who pushed through bills to take down Confederate flags around the South in order to appear “not racist” to the Leftist mainstream media. The symbols of millions of men who fought and sacrificed for the Southland were taken down and thrown into the garbage in order to appease political opponents, all while the majority of the Republican Party maintains a positive view of the Confederate flag.

Republican Establishment candidates promote mass immigration in order to get financial support from big business interests, but over 90% of Republican voters want a secure border and enforcement of Federal immigration laws, including deportation of illegal immigrants. While the Republicans controlled the Presidency, the House of Representatives, the Senate and the Supreme Court the border remained unsecured, abortion clinics went on killing over three thousand unborn children a day, the radical homosexual agenda made advances against the traditional view of marriage and our men kept losing life and limb overseas to fight wars for Zionist and business interests.
The controlled civic nationalists tell us that the definition of being an American has nothing to do with history, blood, honor, or Identity. It’s all about paperwork patriots and economic opportunists. America is on the path to total social and demographic destruction because to be an American no longer means anything except greed. Immigrants are not required to speak our language, respect our Faith or Traditions, or assimilate in any way…aside from assimilating into the consumer economy.

Just like UKIP and other false nationalist political parties in Europe, the Republicans are a reflection of the failed ideology of moderate conservatism and compromise with the enemies of Faith, family and folk. They aim to replace their base with foreign peoples and cultures and are only a false safety valve for the Establishment to waste the time, effort, and money of nationalists. These false parties must be exposed and destroyed so that true nationalism can take its place.

In order for Europeans to survive into the 22nd century, it is up to us to stop supporting false nationalists and instead throw off the shackles of international finance and foreign control of our countries and once again reassert that we are the ones who run our nations. It is we who control our destiny.

If we fail in this task, our nations will become assimilated into the globalist New World Order. Europeans however never stop fighting, and I have faith that this next generation of nationalists will continue to organize, to fight and we will free our lands and our people from this vile beast of globalism. The future belongs to us if we are willing to fight for it, and we will. Tomorrow belongs to us comrades. Hail Victory!

Ethno-Christology, Part 1: The Caucasian Christ -- Law, Order, and Valor

via Faith & Heritage

Communicating the Gospel According to Each kind

The truth of Christianity is universal and objective, yet the Gospel of Christ is best understood through one’s subjective experience and relative cultural mores. Culture consists of the norms and folkways which develop amongst peoples of common ancestry as a means to define and understand their existence. However, culture itself is not a completely thorough means to understanding the interactive nature of the supernatural, metaphysical, and physical. Through the light of Christ, one can comprehend order out of chaos, clarity out of confusion. Since the Fall, mankind’s understanding of the world has become warped, which is why there is a plethora of religions and cults, yet many of them have common truths and narratives that are echoes of the Christian Truth.

Yet in light of that, how one understands, interprets, and expresses Christianity is quite subjective. God diversified mankind into various races and tongues, and with that comes different cultural narratives which will absorb other Christian emphases and express the faith in different ways according to various ethnic narratives.

So long as the core, universal doctrines of Christianity are not violated, which leads to heresy or apostasy, how different cultures decide to approach Jesus is by and large not a major concern. Therefore if we are to fulfill the Great Commission to spread the good news and baptize the nations in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, then Christians will be forced to specify the Gospel message to the unique understandings of the consumer. Hence, the message and person of Jesus Christ must be tailored to meet the primitive understandings of various cultures.

Caucasians, Africans, and Orientals, the three racial branches descending from Noah’s sons, Japheth, Ham, and Shem respectively, have all come to develop their own approach to understanding “the Origin,” i.e. the Divine, the Holy Trinity, or the Truth. God created the plethora of biological diversity we see in the world, and He communicates to each group in the language and the mores they will understand. The narrative of each ethnos is different, and therefore the ways and means of communicating the Gospel message will be tailored to meet the mores of each racial group and each sub-racial (ethnic) group. Furthermore, it is also not limited to how God will work to receive each nation, but also how man will come to receive God. The historical and evolutionary narratives of each ethnos have brought us to the point of viewing the world though ethnocentric lenses. The folkish narratives of the various ethne of the world give a glimpse into the heart of creation and source of this diversity in the Creator.

The Greek Jesus

The fist type of “Jesus” that we encounter in Christianity is the “Greek Jesus.” Jesus Christ interpreted and applied to the Greek peoples is the first type one encounters when reading the Gospels; the other is the “Hebrew Jesus.” The Gospel according to Saint Mark is where the mission of Jesus is first interpreted into specifically Greek terms. The Gospel of Mark is written unlike the other three, for St. Mark was writing exclusively to a Greek/Gentile audience. Hence his Gospel message does not contain long genealogies which would make little sense to a European audience, but is very matter-of-fact, establishing the primacy of Christ’s ministry to the fallen world. Jesus to the Greeks is not a God of law-fulfillment, as He would be to the Hebrews; rather, the Gospel displays central theological messages, especially his Divine power.

It is important to note here that once Christ is accepted by the Greeks, He is no longer envisioned as a fulfillment of the Hebrew law. He is of course accepted as such, but in order to meet with Greek culture and Greek understanding, Jesus is presented as a completion of the Greek philosophical question of the Agnostos Theos, the “unknown God.”

The Greek people are infamous for their many gods and mythologies, but for centuries before the advent of Christ, much of Greek philosophy had been in contention with Greek polytheism over the question of monotheism, polytheism, and atheism. Aristotle had articulated the concept of the “unmoved mover,” and other notable Greek philosophers had challenged the existence and legitimacy of the gods. In addition to swearing allegiance to the known gods, the Greeks also had an altar to the Agnostos Theos as a placeholder for whatever unknown deities could be in existence but had not yet been revealed.

According to the accounts in Acts 17:22-31, St. Paul had opened up this debate, maintaining that the Christ-God became the fulfillment of Agnostos Theos, giving the Greeks the completion and fulfillment of their years of unanswered philosophical and deistic questions. For with the Christ-God, what was once unknown is now known, and therefore the traits and behaviors of the unknown, of ignorance, have come to be replaced with traits and behaviors of the known.

From this point forward, as the Greek people began to abandon their ancient pagan practices of ignorance and accept the revealed Truth, the Christ-God became the fulfillment of the philosophical mission of the Greek people. This is why is was so easy for St. Thomas Aquinas to synthesize Greek philosophy with the Catholic faith, because it was a process that already began in the first generation of Greek evangelism, when the Greeks began to seek Christ as the fulfillment to their philosophical tradition.

The Roman Jesus

Once Christianity had begun to take root inside the Roman Empire, Christianity and the structure and nature of the church also began to adapt to the Roman view of the Christ-God. Unlike the Greeks, who looked at the Christ in a similar manner as the Hebrews would have, both groups being conquered peoples, the Romans were able to look upon the Christ in His capacity as King and Ruler.

After Constantine’s famous Edict of Milan (313 AD), Christianity became not only a tolerated faith, but the establishment faith of the Roman Empire as paganism began to recede both socially and politically. Hence, with the new establishment of the church and its hierarchy in political symphony with the Roman government, Jesus Christ then became elevated, an exalted figure. Hence from this point, Jesus Christ was no longer viewed as the co-laborer of the poor, the wisest of philosophers, or even the greatest lawgiver. Rather, Christ was then exalted into royalty, where his attributes qualifying Him as “King of kings” were so established that even Caesar had to bow before His sovereignty as “Lord of lords.”

From a supernatural perspective, the Romans began to interpret the Christ as superior to the old gods, as He had broken their power after His death and resurrection. The social, political, and military plagues under which the Roman Empire suffered during the fourth and fifth centuries were evidence of the weak and failing power of the gods.

In Roman society, the state was viewed as a divine manifestation. The gods no longer capable of maintaining this power, therefore a new supernatural protector was needed, one that could justify the legitimacy of the Caesars. No longer were Jupiter and Mars protecting the empire or upholding its majesty and divine grandeur as had happened in the past. Rather Jesus Christ, Saint Peter, and Saint Paul spoke for Christians to remain loyal to the legitimacy of Roman rulers; it was then natural for the Caesars to justify their legitimacy via the religion of the Christ-God.

An additional change which occurred within Christianity as a result of this social shift, however, was the glorification of the church. No longer were Christians forced to worship in the sludge of the catacombs; they instead now enjoyed an exalted position as the saviors of the Roman Empire. Therefore church buildings, clergy, and ecclesial symbols transition from a humble nature to the glorious majesty of the Roman Empire, which was now Christendom. The artistic depictions of Christ transition away from the humble shepherd to the royal robes of the Caesars while wielding swords of power and ruling over the greatest of emperors. This leads, in the long term, into a political shift, where the Roman merging of religion and statecraft erodes, exchanged for the political partnership of the church in symphony with the civil state. In the West, this would manifest itself in the Roman Catholic and Protestant churches, where secular monarchs would share power with the ecclesiastical establishment. Yet in the East, this did not take as strong of root, as the Byzantine emperor more or less continued the tradition of God-emperor.

With the state now working with the Christian Church instead of against it and the Christ-God now acting as the “Imperator of Imperators,” the state had the legal right to enforce and protect the Holy Faith and true doctrine. With Caesar sitting on the throne by God’s grace, the Caesar became the agent of God. Therefore the eras of the ecumenical councils began to occur where the emperor could call the meeting, order and chair it, and oversee the enforcement of correct doctrine.

This may seem to many Christians, especially Protestants, as somewhat disconcerting, a distasteful political intrusion into theological affairs. Yet there should be little concern to true believers. It has been well documented that despite this “Constantinian shift” in understanding the nature and role of Jesus Christ and His church, the ancient and orthodox doctrines of the Faith have been upheld in their original format. Moreover, it was though the power and might of the Caesars in convening the ecumenical councils that blasphemous heresies such as Gnosticism and Arianism were finally squashed.

This very Roman interpretation of Jesus Christ as the overlord and protector of the imperium continued on in Europe after the collapse of the Roman Empire. Successive monarchs in great empires such as France, Spain, Britain, and Germany have all recycled this image of the Christ-God sanctifying the forward march of the empire and the respective ethnic group. Given this context in Europe, along with the Genesis 9:27 prophecy that the sons of Japheth would spread wide throughout the world, it would be correct to acknowledge that the European peoples have fallen in accordance with God’s providential plan. Perhaps we did not always apply His message correctly, but we nonetheless did receive the full blessing proper to God’s people for a time to accomplish a specific mission, namely to bring the “blessings of Japheth” (i.e. the Gospel of Jesus Christ) to the farthest ends of the world.

North America, South America, black Africa and much of the Orient are now either Christian or becoming Christianized, thanks to the world of European missionaries fulfilling their ancient calling and recognizing that it was God leading the Niña, Pinta, and Santa Maria across the Atlantic to the new world for God, King, and Country.

The Saxon Jesus

Despite the key differences between the Greek and Roman Jesus, there was still great unity in both cultures, seeing the Christ-God not only as a deity of universal majesty who transcended the old gods, but also as a God of reason. His message flowed in a consistent pattern that represented a right ordering in the universe which the old gods could not match. But once the Gospel message came to the Germanic lands of central and northern Europe along with the British Isles, this message no longer held the same weight.

One of the first key facts to understand when deciphering “Saxon Christianity” is environmental. The Latin lands of Roman Rite Christianity were lush and fertile, with vast amounts of wealth and trade. It was as if the Christ-God had deemed that He should conquer Rome first to gain their economic vibrancy and then turn to the hard, cold woodlands of Northern Europe. In one letter that Saint Boniface (the patron saint of Germany) wrote to the pope:
. . . whilst the Christians are allowed to possess the countries that are rich in oil and wine and other commodities [God] has left to the heathens only the frozen lands of the North . . . frequently to be reminded of the supremacy of the Christian world.1
The harsh reality of Nordic life, mixed with a strong folklore of magic, fatalism, and harsh, uncompromising gods who allowed only proven warriors into paradise, was a sharp contrast with the more environmentally comfortable and philosophically oriented Mediterranean world.

Christianity’s story in Rome was one of endurance. One previously had to suffer for Christ, renounce the world, and pray for the salvation of the emperor. Yet now with the conquest of the Empire by the message of the Christ-God, the power and might of Rome’s legacy could be used to liberate the heathen north. To put it in context, contrary to many secularist and pagan reinterpretations, the heathen north was anything but benign, hardly victims of an evil, imperial Christianity. For centuries, Germanic tribes had harassed the Roman Empire, specifically in Gaul. As well, the Roman Empire had just been torn a part by a dozen different Germanic tribes, all fighting in the names of their heathen gods, many of whom still possessed a strategic threat to Christian kingdoms in the south. Angles, Saxons, and Jutes colonized Britain, Franks occupied Gaul, and later on the Northmen were on the march pillaging Christian England, France, and Germania.

Since the partitioning of the western Roman Empire in 476 AD until the end of the Viking Age around 1066, Europe was embroiled in a hot civil war between Christian and pagan for nearly 600 years. Hence, when Christianity started making its way north, the Gospel message of the Roman Christ-God needed to be adapted to Norse concepts and mores. In order to reach the Saxon peoples, the more Greco-Hebrew/Mediterranean attributes of Jesus, such as wisdom, mercy, love, and philosophy had to be tempered and the more “masculine” attributes and sides of His mission and Passion had to compensate. To the Germanic peoples, Jesus was not here to bring justice to an unjust world or to reconcile difficult philosophical problems, as St. Paul had done in Athens. Rather the Germanic peoples needed a more powerful chieftain. For the Greeks, it was enough to inform them that the Christ-God was a fairer and more just deity than their old gods or various philosophies. But for the Scandinavians and Germanic tribes, they needed to be shown that this new God was more powerful, stronger, more courageous than the old gods.

In Scandinavian and similar forms of paganism, it was sufficient enough to often syncretize various cults and pagan beliefs. Many began to practice a pagan-Christianity in worshiping the Christ-God alongside Odin and Thor, but in order to squash this heresy, the Christ-God had to be absolutely stronger. Thus we receive the picture of Jesus Christ as a conquering Hero who fights for His tribe – the saints and church – the glorious Chieftain anointed from heaven. To be part of His warband is to be one of his warrior-companions, fighting gloriously with Him until the Last Judgment, a Christian Ragnarök.

Germanic Christianity here, then, is extremely hierarchical. God the Father’s supremacy is asserted over Jesus Christ, the “God-child” who has authority over us, His loyal band of warrior companions. This hierarchy is built by the God-King out of love for mankind to give us the strength and unity in the Church needed to triumph against Satan and his band of evil warriors who seek to slaughter our souls.

Many pagans will claim that this version of Germanic Christianity is proof that European Christianity – the Christianity we all practice – is nothing more than a syncretized hybrid of Norse paganism and biblical Christianity. They’ll point to things such as relics, Christmas trees, and food to the dead as evidence of this syncretism, yet it is all still folly on their part. The church may have adopted dates, locations, and even cultic practices with sacred objects, but the goal was to make the faith more palatable to these pagans who had a difficult time understanding the nature of an east-Mediterranean religion.

Given the universal nature of Christianity, it is inevitable that local customs will be adopted into the faith, yet the question is: Do these local customs destroy the integrity of the original faith? And the answer here in European Christianity is no. The orthodox theology that has been routinely and consistently upheld – the foundational truths of monotheism, trinitarianism, and the necessity of repentance and belief in Christ – is still purely upheld, and that is key. That is the core message of Jesus Christ, not the language in which we worship, nor the practice of honoring Christ’s birth with a tree on December 25th.

The conversion of Scandinavia and northern Germany was an orthodox conquest. Unlike in the previous centuries in which the Germanic Goths converted to Arianism or many Germanic peoples began to worship Thor, Odin, and Jesus simultaneously, which the church suppressed, here the orthodox faith was upheld. Inside Germanic Christianity, the orthodox Faith was presented, convincing the ancient Germanic peoples to convert to Christianity, and the truth was protected and upheld. Even though the cultural expression of Northern Christianity would be different from that of the Greco-Slavic east or the Latin South, the ancient Faith was still upheld, established, and bound together through the universal jurisdiction of the universal church. Even after the Reformation had taken off, Nordic Reformers still made sure to emphasize that their interpretations of the Faith were in keeping with the ancient church fathers and the Bible. No longer was paganism a point of social contention or influence that could corrupt or remove the Faith from its ancient foundations.

Despite the charges of many pagans, pre-Christian Scandinavian mythological teaching shares many commonalities with Christianity. Such Scandinavian virtues as courage, fidelity, honor, strength, and warriorhood are also common principles found in Scripture. The difference, however, is that with Christianity’s encounter with Scandinavian virtues, Christianity tempers and reconveys these values into a more honorable and dignified form.

The American Jesus

At the risk of sounding facetious, it is necessary to understand the Americanized version of the Christ. Given the civic foundations and nature of America, Jesus is generally detached from any organic, cultural identity. Nonetheless, over the years, portraits of Jesus Christ have remained depicting Him as a white man, and the power of the Christian God is still generally accepted among Christians in America as having a key hand in founding America.

Regardless of the various cultural expressions of European Christianity to which the Gospel had to be adapted, the various forms of European Christianity that have emerged – whether they be Catholic, Orthodox, Reformed, Lutheran, or Anglican – have all subscribed to the same universal doctrines and tenets of the ancient faith, most specifically the seven ecumenical councils. American Christianity takes a notable and significant departure from this consistent historical trend. Unlike European Christianity that is bound through a common European culture, history, and customs, American Christianity was uniquely synthesized with the Enlightenment and even the specific goal of repudiating ancient European traditions, customs, and behaviors that were viewed as archaic, repressive, and backwards. The American Founders set sail with the specific mission in mind to start a new civilization in the New World; and with Christianity being the central religion of the New World, yet severed from the Old, it was inevitable that in the long term, American Christianity would wind up manifesting itself differently than its European counterparts.

Yet despite this syncretism between Jesus Christ as the traditional Americana is a new theology that is emerging that has radically overturned the nature and character of Jesus. Perhaps it is a consequence of egalitarianism or a consequence of simple modernity and commercialism, but Jesus Christ in modern America is a “homeboy,” nowhere approaching a genuine authority figure. Unlike ancient Anglo-Saxons who regarded Jesus Christ as the warrior-chief, or ancient Romans who regarded Him as the Lord of divine glory and power, or even many Hebrews who accepted Him as the Messiah of the Old Testament, modern Americans perhaps have the most irreverent approach to Jesus Christ. To them, Jesus is both subconsciously and culturally treated and marketed more as a buddy, friend, companion, and all around “good guy” that American Christianity hardly treats Him as the King of kings and Lord of lords. The natural outflow of American egalitarianism requires this: it cannot accept a God-King. Americans do not understand the nature and beauty of hierarchy, even as it applies to religion. Their soft and tolerant culture emphasizes the tender sides of Christianity, while utterly neglecting the violence, hierarchies, hard justices, and even justified hatred that exist throughout the Bible and the history of Christianity.

Therefore it is easy to see why Jesus can be commercialized on t-shirts, shoes, and memes with no reverence as in the society of equality, reverence need not be paid, there being no hierarchy. Jesus may have done great deeds, but considering he is subconsciously understood as a friend here to give you a boost, rather than a physical manifestation of the God-King of the universe, it is no wonder modern that American Christians do not sally forth as their Anglo-Saxon predecessors did to fight for the Holy Faith.


If Christianity is to revive itself in the West, it is only going to come though a rediscovery of the valor of Christ. The contemporary American Jesus does not call the Christian to marshal his inner strength and take back lost lands and souls. The American Christ in his buddy-buddy nature affects the souls of men to be complacent and simply absorb the peace of Jesus while sacrificing very little. It is actually a very narcissistic and extremely limited view of Christ’s message. It is no wonder that thousands of American Christians become Mormon, Muslim, or pagan in an attempt to discover and live out a life of fulfillment and meaning.

The European Christ that we encounter in the Heliand and in the histories of the ancient Church is the Christ we need to come to know. Only a vigorous, masculine Christianity can move the souls of Western men and women to utterly reject modernity and fight back for the salvation of their nations. It is the white man’s addiction to materialism which inhibits a revival of masculine, virtuous Christianity, and only the anti-materialist message of Jesus Christ can liberate the white man from this world. A Christianity like the modern one practiced by America will easily fall to the rugged vigor of Islam and the die-hard commitment of secular atheists to destroy Christianity.

It is time for the white man to rediscover the Christ of His ancestors, the one who took Western Civilization from the grasp of the heathen and saved it from the invasions of the Saracens, Moors, and Turks. It he can rediscover the Christ of his ancestors, then we can stop the demographic time-bomb, defeat the secular atheists, and prevent the Islamicization of the West.

  1. Boniface, Letter 15

Displacement from Within

via Radix

It’s an oft-repeated cliché among the so-called alternative Right to say that while Britain once ruled a third of the globe, today it barely controls the streets of London. Those hit the hardest by Britain’s transformation (or, more accurately, deformation) is the working class—once the backbone of British industry and patriotism. Today, fed on the twin somas of sports and what little popular culture has to offer, the working class languishes in a post-industrial dystopia.

Derek Turner’s novella Displacement is a portrait of this Britain—a Britain of displaced workers, alienated elites, and a growing non-native population. It takes place alongside other social novels in the history of the British isles from Disraeli and Dickens to Orwell. But what separates Displacement from many works in this tradition is its non-didactic and honest portrayal of those whom it depicts.

Displacement’s protagonist, Martin Hacklitt, is the forgotten man of today’s Britain—an intelligent youth of poetic disposition, who finds his release from the drudgery and baseness of everyday life through practicing parkour in the streets of London. Parkour, or free running, is a sport that attempts to replicate natural obstacles. Using tall buildings, walls, and other bits of today’s urban jungle, its participants seek to bend their bodies to the world around them and find a sense of liberation from their banal lives below. At least this is how those ‘French books’ Martin reads on the subject describe it.

Martin, a quintessential Englishman, balks at the heady prose and philosophizing of the French parkour books he reads, and sees in it a way to keep fit. Outside parkour along with his poetry, Martin’s other main concern is his love for his on-and-off-again girlfriend Kate. They began dating in high school, where Martin stood up for himself to a gang of bullies. However, by the time of the events described in the novella, the two had grown apart.

Martin is eventually given celebrity status by a chance photograph depicting him performing parkour acts, with the tabloids referring to him as the ‘London leaper’. Who he is quickly takes on an ideological dimension, with left-wing presses seeing in him some exotic, rogue outsider, whereas the conservative media describe him as an enemy to public order.

Kate, recognizing Martin from pictures in the tabloids, contacts him and hopes to set up an interview with a posh, that is, upper class, journalist. Kate’s swift return to Martin—learning of his his celebrity status—will have most Radix readers instantly reminded of hypergamy and the work of F. Roger Devlin, as it should. One of the strengths of Displacement is its chilly realism. Indeed, nowhere is that more apparent than here. For instance, Martin’s inner monologue upon meeting Kate again after a long lull is reminiscent of many one would find in the sort of true-life ‘beta’ stories in the so-called ‘manoshphere’:

“Martin tries to take her hand and she withdraws it, but not abruptly. He will try again soon. It feels weird not touching her when she is so close. They always touched, held. But if she feels the same she is disguising it well. She looks so poised, he marvels, yet the speed with which she has rattled out her news shows she’s nervous. As so often over the intervening three-and-a-quarter years, he wonders how many boyfriends she’s had, and hates them all. But he cannot ask her that yet.”

Many readers, especially young men, will recognize some of the same thoughts that have gone through their minds in the context of today's feminized and deracinated society. But Kate is no villain—merely misguided and far too drawn by the pull of our age. Turner holds his vitriol for the real antagonist of the story—the liberal journalist Seb.

Seb seeks to write a story on the London leaper. For him, journeying to working-class Deptford is akin to traveling to an exotic Caribbean island. He is constantly taken aback by the boorish behavior of Martin’s football-hooligan brother and his staunch old-Labour, old-Britain father, who is constantly trying to hijack Seb’s interview. In addition, he is attracted to Kate and hopes to use this project to get closer to her.

However, when the story is published, it is more or less a hatchet job. Martin’s working-class background is viewed through the gaze of contempt by Britain’s 'Guardianista' cultural class. To Seb, the final version of the article was not meant to be this stereotyped, and, exasperated, he tries to excuse his less-than-positive story on Martin’s roots to Kate:

“I knew it! I knew it didn’t do you justice – I mean that it didn’t do Martin justice. But I only had very limited space. You know how it works!”

Indeed, this language should sound quite familiar. One only has to look at Jared Taylor’s recent run-in with the New Yorker to find another journalist, who hoped that he captured his ‘complex subject'.

Seb eventually attempts to buy off Martin’s loyalty by inviting him to edit a volume of Postmodernist poetry, the theme of which is outsider work edited by outsiders. In doing this, Martin is unwittingly making a deal with the devil, compromising who he is to be taken in by the cultural establishment that rules Britain and, indeed, the entire West. His football-hooligan brother says it best:

“Funny, ain’t it really – by having these published all you poetry plonkers become insiders, don’t you?”

Martin’s brother hits the nail on the head for many bright, poor whites, who go on to be educated at Oxford and Cambridge in the U.K., or the Ivy League schools in the U.S., or who achieve some status of cultural distinction by the current ‘Apes of God’, as Wyndham Lewis called the modern cultural classes.

What Turner documents is not just a ‘displacement’ of Britain’s indigenous population by foreigners, but, more important, its debasement of those, who have inherited the land and cultural institutions of their ancestors. Martin walks like a man on a tightrope between the void of today's West and the transcendence of participating in true art.

In the end, we see him compromised, but through his portrait, we also note an all-too-familiar tale of what happens to bright young boys from traditional working class today. Displacement gives those of us, who self-describe as Identitarian and thus find ourselves in the political fringes, a moving literary look into the heart of our forgotten people.

Panelists Slam "Civil Rights" Industry and the Myth That "Racism" Is Responsible for Black Dysfunction

via Michael Savage

Bill O'Reilly has talked a lot about race this week, talking about issues in the black community he doesn't think others are willing to talk about. Tonight he continued looking at the issues of black-on-black crime and babies born out of wedlock, agreeing with his two panelists that the "civil rights industry" does a huge disservice" by attempting to blame the problems of the black community on "white racism."

O'Reilly asserted that many white Americans are "enabling the chaos" in places like Chicago and are just trying to "make excuses for bad behavior." He tore into the idea that the real issue with drugs in the black community is that blacks are getting harsher sentences than whites for the same drug crimes.

Wall Street Journal editorial board member Jason Riley agreed with O'Reilly, arguing that it's partly due to "black behavior" because it's not about committing the same crimes but about a pattern of continually committing them. He also slammed the "myth" that incarceration rates are driven by drug crimes, telling O'Reilly, "If you threw out all the people incarcerated because of drugs, the black incarceration rate would still be right around 37 percent."

Heather MacDonald added that people understand the outdoor drug trade is "destroying their neighborhoods," and noted how even though liberals are crying out that no one cares about dealing with inner city crime, stop and frisk does that and liberals disagree with that policy." O'Reilly found it remarkable how no one is willing to honestly report this story, not even civil rights leaders.

Riley and MacDonald agreed that civil rights leaders are more interested in promoting the "myth" of "blam[ing] the problems of blacks on... white racism," with MacDonald describing it as a "desire of victimology."

Reframing the Jewish Question

via Counter-Currents

When I first became interested in White Nationalism, I noticed that the basic principle of ethnonationalism was always framed as distinct from the Jewish question. Ethnonationalism is the idea that racial and ethnic diversity within the same political system are sources of strife, and that peace and harmony are best served by establishing homogeneous sovereign homelands for all peoples.

The Jewish question, however, is supposedly something separate from basic ethnonationalism. It includes such topics as the role of Jews in promoting Communism, Zionism, and white decline, and even questions about the holocaust. Some nationalists pursue these questions, but others choose to abstain, merely advocating ethnonationalism but not touching the “J.Q.”

I wish to suggest that this framing of the Jewish question is entirely wrong. The Jewish question is not something distinct from ethnonationalism. It is not a separate, higher-order, entirely optional set of questions from which ethnonationalists can recuse themselves. On the contrary, the Jewish question is a simple, straightforward application of the basic principle of ethnonationalism.

If ethnonationalism calls for the replacement of multicultural societies with monocultural ones, then Jews, as a distinct people, belong in their own homeland and not scattered among other nations. Thus if England is to be English, Sweden to be Swedish, Ireland to be Irish, alien populations need to be repatriated to their own homelands, Jews included. That is the ethnonationalist answer to the Jewish question.

This completely accords with the original historical sense of the Jewish question, which is the question of how Jews, being a distinct nation, can be given legal equality and citizenship within other nations. Our answer is: they shouldn’t. They belong in their own nation-state. The Jewish question is entirely a question about the relationship of ethnicity and nation-states.

The Jewish question long predates such phenomena as Communism, Zionism, and the holocaust, so it certainly has no necessary connection to them. Nor is the Jewish question necessarily connected to  the Jewish role in promoting white cultural and demographic decline. Jews could be as venomous as snakes or as innocent as lambs, but there would still be a Jewish question simply because they are a distinct people scattered among other nations.

As far as White ethnonationalists are concerned, the Jewish question is exactly analogous to the black question or the Mexican question or the Gypsy question. Thus the Jewish question is Ethnonationalism 101, not an arcane higher-level elective.

This approach to the Jewish question shifts the burden of proof. It is no longer incumbent on the “anti-Semite” to argue that ethnonationalists need to pay attention to the Jewish question. One does not need to argue that Jews are a “special” people once one observes that they are simply a different people, and, therefore, they belong in their own homeland, not among us.

Instead, it is incumbent on those ethnonationalists who would abstain from the “J.Q.” to explain why Jews, unlike other alien peoples, should have the right to live among us with full rights of citizenship — for this is, in effect, what nationalists who wish to avoid the Jewish question are arguing. When Jared Taylor says Jews “look huwyte to me,” he is saying that they are “us,” not a distinct nation. Of course, claiming Jews are “us” is inconsistent with American Renaissance’s policy of praising Israel as a nation that protects its borders and takes its own side in ethnic conflicts. For if Jews are just generic white people, then what possible justification do they have for creating an ethnostate on Palestinian land? And if Jews are a distinct people, then they belong in their own homeland, not among other nations.

Of course, it is easier for Taylor to imply that Jews are “us” in the American melting pot. It would be harder to say that Jews “look French” or “look Swedish,” because they don’t, and because French or Swedish ethnicity is not a matter of  generic whiteness. Furthermore, despite high rates of intermarriage, the core of the American Jewish community has remained aloof from the melting pot and strongly identifies with the state of Israel. And finally, Jews aren’t generically white to begin with. The racial core of their population is non-European, although some Jews have picked up a lot of European genes in their wanderings.

The Jewish question is not distinct from ethnonationalism. It is ethnonationalism applied to Jews. Thus no ethnonationalist is entitled to abstain from it. Once one recognizes that Jews are a distinct people, the ethnonationalist solution to the Jewish question is Jewish nationalism, i.e., Zionism.

Of course many White Nationalists have a whole lot more to say about Jews than merely observing that they are a different people. I have argued that the fate of White Nationalism does not depend one way or another on the outcome of historical debates about the holocaust. But I do believe that Jews are not just different from whites, but powerful and malevolent enemies who bear significant responsibility for causing white decline and opposing white renewal.

Some White Nationalists don’t want to hear it. But even so, as I have argued here, they still have to face up to the Jewish question. Because if Jews are nothing more than a distinct people, then ethnonationalists must conclude that Jews belong in their own homeland, not in ours. It is as simple as that.

The Logic of Civil Rights

via Social Matter

The grand idea of Civil Rights for everyone enjoys almost universal uncritical adulation in the United States. Part of the reason for this is that people who oppose the law – either explicitly or implicitly through their behavior – will quickly discover that their property rights have been severely restricted. The term ‘civil rights’ is really a program of the restriction of rights which creates certain conditions under which the state can seize or redistribute property, whether it happens to be corporate or personal. A corporate, government, or nonprofit leader must terminate an employee who can be shown to be discriminatory against protected classes of people.

The racist is a boogeyman that’s popular to hate. Anyone who can proclaim that they don’t discriminate immediately enjoys a warm feeling of being on the good side of society.

‘Racism’ tends to be portrayed as a universal evil that has been overcome by the march of rational philosophy, much like how the development of sewer systems and indoor plumbing made it so that people no longer dump feces on the streets (except in contemporary, high-tech San Francisco).

The triumph of theory over reality

There’s a logic to the way that these ideas progressed in America. For one, it was only natural that a republic which formed itself around the repudiation of the rights of kings eventually repudiated the rights of the people who formed that republic. The republic formed around an outburst of rage motivated by abstract Lockean philosophy rather than some Venice-like aristocratic council. That the state first coalesced around the colonial quasi-aristocracy didn’t matter nearly as much in our contemporary understanding of America as does the fulminating of the patriots in favor of the God-given rights of man and against the rights of kings.

The early America began in an egalitarian revolt in theory, even if the practice involved the rule of landed semi-gentry. Part of what made it digestible to Americans was the fact that there was so much land to go around: people who would be bums in the old world could secure a plot on credit. Sometimes hucksters sold the same plot to tons of people without any of the people involved actually seeing it – and that helps to explain how the franchise began to expand.

No one gives a lick about your property rights

Property requirements to gain the vote quickly lost salience as the pioneers blazed their trails into new territories. Properties that would be the envy of any European nobleman could be had by anyone with the grit to settle it.

The American project made revolt profitable for an extended period of time. To see permanent classes of leaders forming and solidifying makes Americans feel uncomfortable – particularly intellectuals, who need to agitate people towards action to stay busy.

To say that some people are naturally subjects – and others, their rulers – seems to be a repudiation of the freedom which is supposed to be the birthright of all Americans. If you have to tear up some property rights along the way, who cares? Keeping the rebellion alive has always been more exciting than anything else.

Civil Rights is sort of a replay of the Reconstruction period, which was both supposed to raise the South back up after its destruction while providing for African-Americans to exercise their votes and participate in the broader republic as full citizens. As the decades went on, it became the leading opinion to view Reconstruction as a failure and segregation as a compromise policy that prevented conflict from boiling over in what was the only racially diverse region in the country.

The ‘Negro problem’ was a strictly regional issue until technological change and government policy encouraged African-American migration throughout the country – suddenly creating diversity-related conflicts in cities that had never known them before in addition to the typical social problems generated by the transition of rural populations to industrial life.

Expropriation as a means to the end of equality

Equality begins as a spiritual proposition – that all men are morally equal in their capacities. This tends to bleed over into other realms also. If people are morally equal, shouldn’t they be materially equal, also? Why shouldn’t we downplay the other differences between them? If the law treats all men and women in the same way, with no special privileges for anyone (in theory), then really we must all put ourselves in servitude to the egalitarian ideal.

Woodrow Wilson wrote about the condition of Blacks in the south after Reconstruction in volume five of his history of the American people:

“Their masterless, homeless freedom made them the more pitiable, the more dependent, because under slavery they had been shielded, the weak and incompetent with the strong and capable; had never learned independence or the rough buffets of freedom.”

We could say the same about Americans as a people today – and of all people touched by modern ways which insulate people against the cruelty of nature.

It’s popular among figures like Glenn Beck to cherry-pick quotes from Wilson to portray him as a ‘racist,’ and to then call him bad for that reason, but he was a man of his time. Historians across the political spectrum tend to heap abuse on him for other reasons also, but this fact of shifting opinion in and of itself is worth noting. The head of Princeton and the first internationally significant American president could articulate an opinion at length in the early 20th century that would result in the expulsion of a Princeton undergraduate today.

This is, again, one of the obligations which we shoulder to keep the civil rights of ‘racial minorities’ (soon-to-be-majorities) aloft. There’s an accounting to rights in the same way that there are credits and debits in regular accounting – they are never provided for freely, despite all the speechifying to the contrary.

What prevented America from ‘progressing’ faster

 For a long time, American leaders were rightfully frightened for their skins – all the way up through the world wars and the mutual destruction of the old world. Before this, the balance of power put a brake on how far the egalitarian revolution could progress domestically. The country needed to remain at least somewhat unified to avoid a rapid destruction by the economically and technically superior nations across the Atlantic.

Rights, in the classical way of thinking, always come with reciprocal obligations to the institution which grants those rights. Contemporary democratic thinking, in contrast, tends to view the expansions of rights as a sort of zero point energy device which magically generates new goods without any costs. The Civil Rights regime does have real costs – namely, that it forces the host population to give up their freedom to associate freely and dispose of their property in the way that they might otherwise wish to.

This must make the country weaker and incapable of protecting itself from entropy, as the network of allied institutions within that country can no longer freely adapt to changing conditions. They must instead adapt themselves to the ever-more-demanding requirements of the permanent revolution.

It also obligates the state to continually raise funds to attempt to shield the weak and incompetent, who tend to multiply from that protection. The people who pay for that shielding receive some secular beatification as compensation, but ultimately, the policy must prove to be unsustainable.

The unsustainable lasts until it doesn’t

The most likely way that this ongoing Civil Rights revolution will fail will be a repetition of the last time it failed – the attempt to equalize civil conditions resulted in a spread of mass vagrancy and banditry in the Reconstruction South.

Eventually, the remnants of the Confederacy and others re-asserted order. Something precisely similar is unlikely to happen because of the general democratization of the American character. In some ways, the rise of the Drug Warriors resembled the old rise of the KKK in that it both furtively fought against the consequences of the revolution while also gaining temporary support among American elites from around the country.

The contemporary backlash against the drug war also resembles the backlash against the KKK and its institutional descendants as the political situation changed. The confusion around this is also explained by the avoidant pop history around Reconstruction. The enormous human suffering and mass death by the hundreds of thousands among freedmen in particular tends to be mostly ignored by curriculum-forming standardized tests like the AP US History exam.

Lynching tends to be taught as a phenomenon of racist evil rather than of an understandably broader phenomenon of the breakdown of state authority amidst an economic collapse that caused central governments to lose legitimacy and effective authority. Whereas early progressives encouraged their followers to understand and respect the ante-and-post-bellum South in order to shore up support for their national ambitions, the New Left inheritors of the progressives decided to return to older Republican traditions while repudiating the conciliatory attitude of their predecessors.

There’s also often something profoundly dishonest about advocates for civil equality as opposed to advocates for Black separatism like Marcus Garvey or Malcolm X. Advocates for equality tend to be happy to agitate distant populations against their distant enemies, regardless of what the negative consequences are for the people that they’ve used as their tools or the targets of their cowardly way of making civil war.

New York liberals are never going to visit modern Ferguson in the same way that Reconstruction-era Republicans were never going to head down to Charleston except as carpetbaggers accepting plush government jobs. The destruction of flyover cities using proxy mobs bought and paid for by established foundations is just plausibly deniable terrorism of a distinct and recognizable pattern in American history.

Discrimination fights entropy; non-discrimination embraces it

What’s also possible is that the decay of Western nations will just be corrected by some combination of economic failure and military invasion. Although military invasions of advanced nations are supposed to be impossible in the age of mutually assured destruction, it’s entirely possible that effective defenses against such weapons will be developed by America’s competitors and deployed by surprise.

That Americans tend to discount such a thing as impossible (owing to a hoary international relations theory) – whereas it was considered a distinct possibility through the Reagan, Clinton, and Bush I, and Bush II years – and developing a first strike capability was a priority – just makes it more likely to happen.

That this seems to be entirely outside of public awareness when people are happy to rattle the saber at China and Russia is both understandable and dismaying. That people consider how well Android devices render advanced Javascript frameworks to be more important ‘technology’ than, say, missile defense, just goes to show how much more seriously people take their fantasies over unpleasant realities.

This also has to do with the way that the American government staffs itself and operates – equality is a useful argument against hiring based on merit or returning many large bureaucracies to the private sector. The moral patina of goodness that comes from what has come to be the progressive mode of hiring – ironically similar to the machine-based political systems that the early movement agitated against – helps to make it all go down more smoothly.

Because contemporary elites (in contrast to past generations of American leaders) tend to view their government as invulnerable, it makes them reckless, stupid, and willing to provoke domestic conflicts – often out of boredom and decadence rather than any readily identifiable pecuniary interest. The slow wing of the progressive movement, embodied by the GOP, similarly excuses these radical outbursts. And what you excuse and permit, you get more of.